America's Living Room

2011-12-14T21:12:00.000-08:00

The Obama/Democrat prism

Remember Bush v Gore? Imagine an election result (2012) that the Democrats, especially Obamas’ turning up negatively through a shift rightward rejecting their failed policies. Imagine an Obama war chest of close to a billion dollars and an army of election law attorney’s fanning across the country after a defeat to “contest” the results ala Bus v Gore.

Conspiracy theory? Preposterous?

If individual States cannot certify results then what is the result -- Obama remaining in the White House? Can you say “Occupy White House”!

Do you think this is such a radical idea for a man and his party that cut their teeth utilizing radical tactics? ACORN, Bill Ayers, OWS, Rev. Jeremiah Wright are just a few examples of Obama friends and advisors seeking radical, violent if necessary, change.

On December 5, 2011 Ed Pilkington (thegardian in NY) ran an article titled “NAACP warns black and Hispanic Americans could lose right to vote”. In this article it was reported that “the NAACP has petitioned the UN high commissioner on human rights of what it contends is a conscious attempt to “block the vote” on the part of state legislatures across the US.”

It must be reminded that the US has, in the recent past (Bush Administration), withdrawn/boycotted this Council until the decision by Obama to rejoin in 2009.

We know, for example, Jesse Jackson, Jr., stated his belief that Obama “suspend the Constitution” and pass the Jobs bill. We also know that Democrat Governor Bev Purdue (NC) called for suspending Congressional elections until the economy recovers only to recant with “I was joking”.

We also know that the people Obama is affiliated with look to Saul Alinsky and his “Rules for Radicals” as a roadmap to bring the American system down from within. The Cloward-Piven strategy to overwhelm the system by making the government live up to its promises/laws was the catalyst for the New York bankruptcy.

It was people like Bill Ayers and the Rathke brothers who began their activism in “Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)” and the “Weather Underground” offshoot to go on to found ACORN and SEIU.

Obama and his “Motor voter” efforts with ACORN saw the rise of rampant voter fraud charges and convictions after the 2008 elections. It was many of these abuses and electioneering that caused many States to adopt more stringent voter registration laws to combat them.

The NAACP’s petition of the UN HRC, goes to the heart of this effort and have gone to the international body for what, relief? According to the December 5 article the NAACP contend that - “voting rights are being whittled down at every stage of the electoral process. First of all, the registration of new voters is being impeded in several states by moves to block voter registration drives that have historically proved to be an important way of bringing black and Hispanic people to the poll.”

The article goes on to say - “more than 5 million Americans are denied the right to vote on grounds that they were convicted of a felony, 4 million of whom have fully completed their sentence and almost half of whom are black or Hispanic.”

Again, the article goes on to say – “Other measures have reduced the ease of early voting, a convenience that is disproportionately heavily used by African-Americans. Even more importantly, 34 states have introduced a requirement that voters carry photo ID cards on the day of the election itself.”

Finally, the NAACP points to Texas where the law passed disallowing college ID as a form of ID but a concealed carry permit (handgun) is. This argument is frivolous as stringent background checks are required to get a handgun permit whereas the college campus admission policies are not so stringent, wouldn’t you think?

The suppression of voter turnout is a red herring issue as the very States that the NAACP cite as conspiratorially racist in its aims were themselves victims of ACORN and their tactics. For instance, they cite Florida, but in 2008 election officials in Brevard County prosecutors were investigating more than 23 suspected registrations from ACORN while the states Division of Elections were also investigating complaints in Orange county.

In 2009 11 ACORN workers were accused of forging applications in Miami-Dade county. Law enforcement found 197 of 260 ACORN applications did not match living people.

In North Carolina in 2008 many applications had similar or identical names, but with different addresses or dates of birth.

In New Mexico in 2008 Prosecutors investigated more than 1,100 registrations deemed fraudulent. Many were also duplicated names and slightly altered personal information.

In Missouri in 2008 registrations were rejected due to duplicated and false information.

In Michigan in 2008, a large amount of fraudulent applications were turned over the US Attorney for investigation.

In Indiana in 2008 Election officials threw out registrations after they were found identical (handwriting) and from dead voters not to mention a “fast food restaurant” as a name.

In Ohio in 2008 ACORN gave residents cigarettes and cash for registration. Many voters admitted to registering more than a dozen times with one individual admitting to registering 72 times.

In Pennsylvania in 2008 Election officials threw out over 57,000 registrations for fraudulent signatures with vacant lots listed as their address. That same year an ACORN worker was sentenced to 23 months in prison identity theft and tampering records while a second ACORN workers posted a $10,000 bond to await trial.

In Pennsylvania in 2009 7 ACORN workers were indicted for falsifying voter registration with 6 of the 7 also indicted for registering under a “quota” system.

In Texas in 2008 over 10,000 registrations were thrown out as invalid including fraudulent address and personal information.

In Washington in 2007 3 ACORN workers pleaded guilty (and 4 more charged) for the worst case of voter fraud in the States history.

In Wisconsin in 2008, ACORN used “felons” to register voters in violation of State rules and 2 have been charged with voter fraud felonies.

http://www.rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html

The incredible divisiveness of Obama and the Democrats only make this scenario more plausible than not. Obama needs not to win the election, he only needs to occupy the White House after all “possession is 9/10ths of the law”!

With the election looming and Obama’s incredible credibility gap with the voting public due to failed promises, distortions and outright falsehoods it is easy to see the path he is embarking upon. He desperately wants to distance himself from his record and deeds and has literally blamed everything and everyone else for his and his party’s failures.

Shortly on the heels of the NAACP petition to the UN HRC we now learn through Eric Holder the reality of the supposition above. Holder, in a speech given at the LBJ Library, solidified the aims of Democrats and Obama to change the Voters Rights Act, specifically Section 5 to bring the US “into the 21st century.

No longer is Holder content with arming violent Mexican cartels, he aims to give them the right to vote through automation. The issue is certainly going to divide the American public who see this attempt for what it is – giving an edge to Democrats and Obama just in time for the election, if successful.

We do not have to look any further as this is blatant, illegal and unconstitutional from every angle. If we chose to examine motivations then we must also examine credibility too. As the “top cop” for the nation Holder has proven to be the liberal lap dog who doesn’t look to the law for guidance especially along “voter suppression or voter intimidation” lines. He has proven to be anything other than applying the law equitably as the “Black Panther” dismissal has shown.

The arrogance of Holder as he tries to appear the champion by channeling LBJ in his speech is, well, speechless. For instance, in the text of his speech he states –“Today, as Attorney General, I have the privilege – and solemn duty – of enforcing this law, and the other civil rights reforms that President Johnson championed. This work is among the Justice Department’s most important priorities. And our efforts honor the generations of Americans who have taken extraordinary risks, and willingly confronted hatred, bias, and ignorance – as well as billy clubs and fire hoses, bullets and bombs – to ensure their children, and all American citizens, would have the chance to participate in the work of their government. The right to vote is not only the cornerstone of our system of government – it is the lifeblood of our democracy. An no force has proved more powerful – or more integral to the success of the great American experiment – than efforts to expand the franchise.”

Again, referencing the Black Panther 2008 voter intimidation case that Holder dismissed (after it was won) shows the arrogance of the hypocrisy. Though his speech referenced the dangers that African-Americans faced in the turbulent times prior to the passage of the Voters Rights Act – his reference to “confronting billy clubs” is especially poignant as the Black Panthers blocked a Philadelphia Polling Station while armed with billy clubs. I assume that Holder meant that “to ensure their children, and all American Citizens” does not apply to African Americans who blatantly violate the very laws designed to ensure their childrens rights.

Is Holder lying or is his “frame of mind” just so that he actually believes what he is saying?

Black em"power"

2011-10-15T20:50:00.000-07:00

Let us look into a crystal ball for a moment and imagine the GOP field is whittled down to their nominee --- Herman Cain.....

We have been hearing from those on the left who love to inject racism into anything conservative -- Tea Party; House Jobs bill; Deficit reduction bills; any GOP member.
Jesse Jackson, Sr; Jesse Jackson, Jr.; Al Sharpton; Rev. Jeremiah Wright; Harry Belafonte; Morgan Freeman to name a few have interjected and suggested that even those who are white and had voted for Obama but now are having "buyers remorse" and vow to not vote for him this time around are doing so because Obama is black.
I can give a longer list of black leaders in addition to the one's mentioned above who have, for many decades, been telling black Americans that the Government is their only hope for equality through affirmative action (or the phrase I like best, affirmative racism), welfare, abortion rights and wealth redistribution.
Couple this with the same message, and record, that Obama has that mirrors this "big government", big brother equalizer system.
If Cain is ascended into the man to go head to head with Obama for the next term in the White house what will the liberal socialist do who have controlled that message for so long.
Of course, they have already begun to label Cain as backed by white money in conspiracy like theories. They have already begun to label him "no friend of the black man". But, when the rubber hits the road and both men stand against each other with their backgrounds, policies and words hanging in front of everyone to see what do you think will happen? What will the American public see -- Obama as representing the big government dole out to survive and Cain as a shining example for young (and old) black Americans to see a self-made, successful, family oriented, conservative black man who made it on hard work and persperation.
I see that when this occurs it will also vindicate white voters who switch their votes from Obama to Cain with the confidence that they do not fear a black man in the White House, just a Black Socialist in the White House.

Decontructing & Re-constructing of America

2011-10-15T09:54:00.000-07:00

The political establishment has been exposed! The 2 party system has had a long and damaging run that has brought America to the brink of extinction. For instance, the view of most American's share is that there is virtually indistinguishable actions between Democrats and Republicans. A good example of this is the "amnesty" talk for the 20+ million illegal aliens (lets not call them immigrants) already here. It is arguable that the polical ideologies from both sides of the isle appear to be polar opposites but both have worked hard to make it (amnesty) a reality. The Democrats see a 20+ million voting block to exploit while the Republicans see a new glut of chep labor for big business. The only thing that has prevented illegals from becoming legal through means other than "legal immigration mechanisms" is the American publics outcry. George Bush (Jr) tried to implement the amnesty and was beaten back down by an overwhelming negative public response opposing it. John McCain was for it (amnesty) until he was against it in the 2008 Presidential elections. Why do you think he "flopped" on the issue? He knew that voters would punish him for it.

In the 2000 GOP primaries it was Bush vs. McCain -- Bush got the GOP nod. Then in 2008, the GOP force fed "Republicans" us McCain (the preselected heir apparent for the GOP). The GOP has groomed their center-left candidates for a conservative country for quite some time. The 2 party political system has been rigged for quite some time and the result, at least since 1901 has created political and political familial dynasties that have done nothing be erode our American Civil Liberties and the Constitution ever since. The slow and steady, methodical and deliberate shift leftward has continued -- until recently.

Starting with Theodore Roosevelt (Progressive Party), Uncle to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, had 8 years (1901-1909) in the White House. Franklin Delano Roosevelt had 12+ years (1933-1945) in the White House where a major shift left really solidified. Franklin Roosevelt had political support from the father of another familial dynasty in the making with Joseph Kennedy. John F. Kennedy as you know was assassinated and we can speculate that if that event did not occur, he would have gone on to a second term in office with his brother Bobby waiting in the wings. As such, the assassination occurred and Bobby had to step up sooner but before he could be annointed, he too was gunned down. This left the Kennedy clan with Ted and we know now why he did not rise to be annointed -- Chappaquiddick! His chances died along with Mary Jo Kopechne!

In the 1990's we were introduced to another dynasty in the Clintons who's history is still being written as long as Hillary is in politics and a strong contender for the White House.

Finally -- The Bush family. Both Bush (Sr) and Bush (Jr) have had 12 years in the White House with Jeb Bush possibly in the wings.

The people know, they feel that something almost out of their control is happening and are now rising to stop it. Thus, the "Tea Party" movement was born.

I would like to share a passage that I read from the novel penned by Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, where the storyline arrived at a place when those who seized power and systematically plundered America's wealth from it's businesses, eerily similar to what is happening today in real life from those in power -- bringing about anarchy through attrition when there is nothing left to plunder. One of the early proponents in the novel responsible for ushering in the dogma "from each according to his ability to each according to his needs" was arguing that the resulting imminent collapse wasn't his fault, he said --
"What's reason to them? you don't know how deadly they are! You don't understand them! They don't think! They're mindless animals moved by irrational feelings -- by their greedy, grasping, blind, unaccountable feelings! They seize whatever they want, thats all they know: That they want it, regardless of cause, effect or logic -- they want it, the bloody grubbing pigs! Our weapons are so helplessly, laughably childish: Truth, knowledge, reason, values, rights! Force is all they know, force, fraud and plunder!""

That passage wasn't describing "evil business" -- it was describing exacly what the Progressives, and yes Republicans who are attempting to usher in "wealth redistribution" through theft, power and erosion of our rights. Who would have imagined that the Supreme Court would have allowed the "KELO" decision to become law of the land whereas, at the end of a gun barrel (the force of our laws) a corporation could seize an individuals private property for the gain of the State and this corporation?

This election cycle is no different that the 2000 Bush/McCain annointment. In 2008 when McCain was foisted upon us his rival in the primaries was Romney and the GOP again, mistakenly, is doing the most within their arsenal to ensure they heir apparent is foisted on us -- problem is, we don't want Romney.

The GOP reaped the windfall of the 2010 mid-terms through the tea party anger. The GOP ridiculed and ignored this grassroots, yet they benefitted from it. The GOP continued to try to miminize or marginalize the incoming tea party freshmen by first ordering them to get in "the Party line" then by threats. The freshmen stood their ground and as such have stopped some further damaging legislation from moving forward.

Make no mistake about it, the tea party is not through as I believe the 2012 elctions (House, Senate & White House) will throw these interlopers of overthrow into the dust bin of history. The "Deconstructing" began with the tea party, with the proof of the election results since their inception and will begin "Re-Constructing" after the political houses have been cleaned and sanitized from those who do not believe as Ronald Reagan did when he saw America as that "shining city on the hill".

God Bless America -- the world is about to see how she will throw the yokes of oppression of her in spite of the overwhelming odds against her.

Can you handle the truth?

2011-10-12T20:56:00.000-07:00

Is the Obama Jobs plan credible, or is it just another stimulus plan disguised as one? Before we can begin to assess this plan that Obama instisted Congress pass, we need to ask another question first -- "Is Obama credible?"
The President has insisted, emphatically, his "Jobs plan" is the only plan that will be acceptable enough to bear his signature and that the Senate and House need not send a "stripped down" version or a completely different package to him. He will not sign it! Period...
Obama has gone on the record, ad nauseum, telling us that "he will not rest until every American who is in need of a job, gets one!" What we see though is a different reality. Golf, White House Parties and Global junkets/vacations fill the headlines instead.
In his opinion he believes that his Jobs plan is right and everyone else (including Senate Democrats) is wrong.
As human experience has proven throught time, those who are untruthful to us in our personal lives tend to lose their credibility in our eyes. The old axiom "burn me once shame on you but burn me twice shame on me" goes to the heart of this experience I speak. To get to Obama's credibility with the American public we need to be honest and objective in our assessment lest we be labeled racist, knuckle-dragging tea baggers that do not care or have compassion to those who believe he is above reproach.
To start this object process we must clear our minds of all clutter, news bites, rants by the Right Wing and Left Wing to arrive at a "Zen-like" state of mind that is free of bias. We need to disregard things Obama has told us in the past like, lets say, "Even though I sat in Rev. Jeremiah Wright's church for over 20 years I never heard him preach those things" -- or, "Bill Ayers is just a guy who lives in my neighborhood". Clear your mind....
So, now that we are there the first question to contemplate is -- "Has Obama lied to us or did he harmlessly embellish his estimation of his abilities when he told us we needed to pass Stimulus and if we did unemployment would stay below 8%?" "Has Obama mislead us by believing in the advice of those around him or is it just plan and simple incompetence?"
There is a difference between a lie and embellishing abilities. For example, if someone is caught lying vs. "embellishing" the human reaction is apt to be harsh towards the former and more nuanced towards the latter.
In a court of law a witness is impeached when found inconsistent or outright deceptive in their testimony. Kind of like when Bill Clinton went on the record to say "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"! The blue dress, Bill! Again, human nature has seen that the American legal system is based upon our necessity for the truth -- thus the oath each and every witness takes before testimony pledging to "tell the truth and nothing but the truth". We have had enough of Obama's testimony, so to speak, in the public forum for many of us to conclude that we have personally inpugned him along these lines.

Past vs. Present

Obama began his Presidency, in all fairness, in a weak economic condition. His campaign said as much. Unemployment was increasing, though below 8% at the time. One can argue Obama had known there was a looming economic storm coming, but the question of how large was unknown. The American public also knew that soon after his election, in the first 100 days, Vice President Biden admitted that "Obama would probably get things wrong 30% of the time" when making economic decisions. The expectation bar was lowered.
The first priority of any incoming Administrations is to set in place, as quickly as possible, their Cabinet. In spite of Obama's prior knowledge of the approaching financial storm clouds he filled his cabinet with men and women with literally zero "real world" business experience. His Cabinet, collectively, had 8% that did which is the lowest percentage in any American President Cabinet. His Cabinet's business experience was even lower than that of the Carter Administration.
Another prime example of the ignorance that Cabinet members appointed can be highlighted in the Solyndra scandal. Steven Chu, Department of Energy Secretary pushed through the Solyndra loan in spite of the warnings and prediction that the Office of Management and Budget advised about the company during their "financial due diligence" of the loan documents. The company was so heavily indebted that the OMB actually predicted the month and year the company would go broke. This Nobel Prize winning Cabinet member may know how to split an atom, but he surely didn't know anything about business. Obama's $38 billion loan guarantee program (part of Stimulus) promised to "save or create" 65,000 jobs and the centerpiece and first loan recipient went bust. The reality was Solyndra added 1,100 people to the unemployment roles instead.
While it is true that his Cabinet is feckless in all things economical it could have been worse as Obama's original choice for Deputy Treasure Secretary, Annette Nazareth withdrew after it was discovered she had a problem with her personal tax filings. Additionally, Tom Daschle withdrew his nomination to the Department of Health and Human Services for tax evasions as did Nancy Killefer.
Despite all of these individuals and their tax issues one did manage to survive to become the Secretary of the Treasury -- Timothy Geithner! He is having trouble shaking his nickname though -- "tax cheat geithner"!

Obama's Job Council

By now everyone is aware of the much heralded "Jobs Council" that Obama put together in addressing the increasing unemployment issue. This "Dream Team" of real world, free market titans that were hand picked reads like a "who's who" of the business and finance world. The Council is Chaired by Jeffrey Immelt, Chairman, CEO -- General Electric (GE). The other prominent names and companies are Kenneth Chenault, Chairman, CEO -- American Express; Ursula Burns, Chairman, CEO -- Xerox; Jim McNerney, Chairman, President, CEO -- Boeing; Paul Otillini, President, CEO -- Intel; Gary Kelly, Chairman, CEO - SW Airlines; Ellen Killman, Chairman, CEO -- DuPont; Antonio M. Perez, Chairman, CEO -- Kodak; AG Lafley, Chairman -- Proctor & Gamble; Brian Roberts, Chairman, CEO -- COMCAST; Mathew Rose, Chairman -- Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway; Sheryl Sandberg, CEO -- Facebook.

You would think that the collective experience of these individuals can be trusted to usher in the "silver bullet" of job creation, right?

Again, we must clear the clutter of our minds that have been boggled by the shear array of companies and people listed above so that we can again reach an objective state of mind to assess whether or not Obama finally did something right financially.

Again, before we can begin to answer this question of trust and confidence of this Dream Team of idea "movers and shakers" we must consider some others who also sit on this Council with the Titans listed above. The first name I want to mention is a man named John Doer (great name for a businessman). His bio on the White House "Jobs Council" website lists his current background as -- Partner -- Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. This firm is the firm that originally financed Solyndra. If that connection doesn't raise any alarm bells then perhaps another partner in this firm where Mr. Doer works is another Nobel Prize winner -- Al Gore!

Moving along now. Another name on the council is Lewis Hay, Chairman, CEO of Nextera. Again, not a big name company like GE but important enough to be picked by Obama. What Mr. Hay's bio on the Council website does not mention is that Nextera just purchased another Project that just recived Department of Energy Loans totaling $1.46 billion dollars (about 3 times more than Solyndra). The project purchased by Nextera is named "Desert Sunlight Solar Project". When you look at the strength of Nextera you will see similar "debt-to-capital" ration problems as did Solyndra. The debt-to-capital ration of Nextera is 59%. If you or I were to walk into a bank to seek a loan with that ratio, what do you think we would be told? With Solyndra still fresh on everyone's mind and in the early stages of a Congressional investigation chaired by Darrel Issa why would the DOE take another chance on a heavily indebted company? Because a much bigger corporate fish swam into the pool and partnered with Nextera to purchase the Desert Sunlight Solar Project -- Jeffrey Immelts, General Electric and Chair of the Jobs Council.

Perhaps GE used all that money they saved not paying any Corporate taxes last year, you think?

So, can you handle the truth?

The great Socialist election victory of 2010

2010-11-05T10:45:00.000-07:00

The “purging of moderates” within the Democrat party

We have seen all of the reports that the American people spoke loud and clear. We have been told that this election was historic on so many fronts. We were told that the people demand smaller government, less taxes and, well, Conservative constitutional adherence. In all of the jubilance that the American people exhibited and the purported work to reverse the far left socialist agenda gets underway there is a side story that has not been reported – the story that the far left, radical wing of the Democrat party also won this year in historic proportions. What, you say?

We have learned well in advance of Obama’s election of his extreme radical ties and his “Marxist” roots. Since taking office we have also come to learn that the far left fringe elements of the Democrat party have taken over, or “high jacked” if you will, the party. As a result of the two dynamics just mentioned that startled and concerned the American populace resulting in a line in the being drawn in the sand forcing us to use the most powerful weapon in our arsenal to implement a reversal of change – that weapon was our votes.

The word that the Democrats have fought a public fight over in order to distance themselves from was “Socialists”. The MSM has painted those who attempted to label Democrats and the Obama agenda as a whole as Socialist have been met with resistance and scorn. Paranoia.

Then something happened, not once, but from different Elitist Democrats who boldly stepped forward to declare that yes it is Socialism at work.

The infamous Fox News interview with Al Sharpton:

REV. AL SHARPTON, CIVIL RIGHTS LEADER: I think that this is — began to transform the country the way the president had promised. This is what he ran on.

GERALDO RIVERA, FOX NEWS ANCHOR: Some argue to socialism.

SHARPTON: Well, first of all, then we'd have to say that the American public overwhelmingly voted for socialism when they elected President Obama.

I wrote an article recently that outlined that 70 members of Congress have been openly identified as members of the DSA (Democrat Socialists of America).

I did not pull these names out of a hat, out of thin air but from the DSA’s own documents that boasts of this tie. Not only is the Government full of Socialists but one must read the “charter” or philosophy of this group to understand its goals and then compare these goals to what has actually transpired through the forced legislation that angered and awoken the masses to begin to reverse it course.

Once the dust started to settle on the mid-term elections and the MSM decrying the loss of the Democrats by historic proportions there was one aspect of the elections that have gone unreported -- The re-election of these 65 of these 70 hard core, anti-American congressmen and women.

As I wrote in my last article, I identified these individuals by name (taken directly from the DSA documents) in order for Americans to target with their votes. I also point out that these Anti-American politicians, who took an oath of office to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States are in breach of their promise and therefore should be impeached, if not voted out of office for this serious dereliction to their promise.

I will again, below, show these Socialists infiltrators and will highlight that not only have they been re-elected despite the “conservative” wave of voters against the socialist agenda, but have done so by huge vote margins. I provided each name with an imbedded link that will show their voting records, affiliations, speeches and most importantly – their endorsements. These endorsements are from the usual “leftist” organizations (i.e., AFL-CIO, Planned Parenthood, NEA, Brady anti-gun lobby, Sierra Club, etc) that span the entire group of 70 almost uniformly. The ones that lost re-election (4 – Alan Grayson, John Hall, Phil Hare & Carolyn Kilpatrick) curiously did not have a single endorsement from the usual organizations list above, not one.

When you take into consideration the lopsided margin of victory that these socialist enjoyed on Election Day and the fact that as a whole Conservatives routed the Democrats it makes one wonder how the hardcore socialists seemed to be the only Democrats to survive?

The answer, in my humble opinion can only be one of two reasons (or both):

1) There are pockets, or enclaves so to speak, around the country that have communists and socialists in big numbers that concentrated in populated urban areas, and or

2) The Hard Left has completed their “high-jacking” of the Democrat party and allowed those they consider to not “socialist enough”, or “too moderate” to be purged from power leaving a core socialist contingency in place.

When you consider that the House of Representatives is now down to 187 remaining Democrats (with 9 seats still undecided) it is abundantly clear that nearly 50% of those who survived have openly declared to be Socialists.

One of the hardest hit caucuses that lost in big numbers were the “moderate” Blue Dog Democrats.

The Blue Dogs proved to be troublesome early on with the Obama agenda in various stages of putting his policies in place.

It appears that the heavy lifting that has yet to happen needs to inclusive of exposure of this insidious Marxist organization that has it roots firmly in place in our political system and elsewhere. We need to keep the pressure on and inform the American public that they are there, in direct contradiction to the Constitution of the United States in which they (65 Socialist Democrats) took an oath to uphold and defend.

One last “honorable mention” for those who consider themselves “birthers” – Neil Ambercrombie (D-HI) who is one of the names mentioned in the DSA document resigned his House position in March 2010 to run for and win the Hawaii Governorship. Any hope that the birthers had in any form of cooperation with obtaining the Birth records of Barack Hussein Obama just go a little thinner.

You decide after researching each member list below through the provided link. One further mention about the “endorsements” that are not listed on these links is that AARP has endorsed virtually every one of them:

http://www.votesmart.org/election_congress.php

DCA Member -%age of votes

Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04), 65.5

Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31), 84.1

Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17), 66.3

Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51), 59.7

Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15), 66.5

Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09), 83.4

Hon. George Miller (CA-07), 67.3

Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37) , 69.1

Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34), 77.4

Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47), 51

Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13), 71.5

Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35), 79.4

Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30), 64.4

Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03), 64.9

Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)

Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03), 62.7

Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08) Lost

Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19) Resigned Jan 2010

Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04), 74.6

Hon. John Lewis (GA-05), 73.7

Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)

Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01) Resigned Mar 10

Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02), 51

Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07), 81.4

Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04), 77.3

Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17) Lost

Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02), 80.5

Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01), 80.2

Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09), 66.2

Hon. André Carson (IN-07), 58.9

Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08) Uncontested

Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04), 53.9

Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07), 65.9

Hon. James McGovern (MA-03), 56.5

Hon. John Olver (MA-01), 60.1

Hon. John Tierney (MA-06), 56.9

Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07), 75

Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04), 83.6

Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01), 56.8

Hon. John Conyers (MI-14), 76.7

Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13) Lost

Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05), 67.8

Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01), 73.5

Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05), 53.1

Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02), 61.8

Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12), 63.8

Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10), 85.4

Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3), 56.8

Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11), 90.3

Hon. John Hall (NY-19) Lost

Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22), 52.4

Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14), 74.9

Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08), 75

Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15), 79.9

Hon. José Serrano (NY-16), 95.4

Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28), 65.2

Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12), 92.9

Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11), 82.5

Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), 59

Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04), 53.6

Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01) uncontested

Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02), 89.3

Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09), 74

Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30), 75.8

Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)

Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL), 64.5

Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07), 81.5

Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02), 66.7

Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04), 69.1

http://www.votesmart.org/election_congress.php

Now HEAR this, or risk your political career!

2010-10-31T08:11:00.000-07:00

For the last 18 months the Main Stream Media and the ruling political elites on both sides of the isle have ignored you, slandered you and looked down their noses at you to tell you that you are just stupid and ignorant. While they were forcing their will upon you they too were trying, to the best of their ability, to silence those few news agencies that lent a voice to those feelings of despair.

In two short days those who have behaved in the manner described above are about to be replaced (hopefully) with new and fresh faces that have heard our voices, listened to our concerns and have declared to be our allies in sweeping aside the politics as usual. They have pledged to start the hard work to dismantle those policies and force fed legislative deeds that you have been screaming about.

The GOP leadership appears to be riding the benefits of this grassroots tidal wave but early indicators are that they do not fully grasp the gift being handed to them. This is borne out by the fact that they are trying to staff “newbies” with their own people in order to keep out those that the “newbies” intend to bring with them (i.e., tea party supporters).

Before any election results are tabulated, the MSM and the alternative media as well as members of both parties have predicted that the House will change hands and there is a chance of the Senate majority changing as well. Some are predicting a landslide while others are more conservative in their estimates. But one thing is assured – Nanci Pelosi will be handing over her gavel to a Republican majority come January.

The other consensus is this “change” of leadership will probably be historic on many fronts in the sheer number of seats being lost by incumbents on both sides. Throughout the last 18 months I have been anything but conservative in my estimates about this tidal wave of change. I have always had faith in Americans to resist this socialism and soft despotism that has gripped our nation’s capital. We are, after all, Americans first and a political party second.

The narrative from the White House has been that when this change occurs, Americans will see that the Republicans will not be able to deliver on their promises. Obama made this prediction because he still holds the powerful pen of veto. Shortly after this proclamation some powerful Republicans have made statements that Republicans are going to have to find a way to work with Obama to get things done. This is political suicide.

Obviously, these RINO’s either don’t understand the earthquake that has caused the tidal wave that is about to deluge Washington DC, or they are ignoring it. This misunderstanding or ignorance is exactly what caused the Democrats to lose their power and the GOP had better get with the program quick or risk peril to their own political futures.

Finally, here is my prediction to what will occur after a massive change of deck chairs in both the House and Senate.

1) Those who survive the initial onslaught will be startled by the sheer power of the American public’s demands for the first time as they will be reminded of “our” agenda everyday they come to work to do our business because they will be staring at new faces everywhere.

2) Taking the lead from prediction number one, those who remain seated will privately think twice about anything that resembles support for any of the unpopular programs and will most likely lead to an unprecedented era of bi-partisan support led by the newbies.

3) The newfound bi-partisan support will extend to actual over-riding of Presidential vetoes. The people will demand it, and if our elected leaders falter for just a moment they will be swept aside in the next election cycle.

While all of this historic, ground up change of power shines its light on the benefits of a true democracy and the world will take notice. Sure we will hear from the leftist tabloids in England, Germany and France of how stupid we are as a nation but there is one thing that they don’t understand either (as elites) – Tea Parties are springing up all over the globe as more and more see that people do have a say about their own lives and don’t have to be led like sheep anymore. Once again America will take her place as the leader of the free world.

The Lying, the Witch and the Wardrobe

2010-10-06T11:08:00.000-07:00

The Delaware Senate candidates are now set to square off against each other. On the side of the Democrats you have Chris Coons (the Liar) and on the Conservative side (notice I didn’t say Republican) is Christine O’Donnell (the Witch). Then, on the sidelines doing their very best to amplify O’Donnell’s witchy side while downplaying the Marxist side of Coons is CNN (the Wardrobe).

There is a lot to be gleaned from the Tea Party and more importantly the Glenn Beck march on the National Mall. From the start, with the rise of the Tea Party and the Americans that come from everyday life that comprise it, there has been an underlying fear that Socialism has come into America through the back door and is now an imminent threat to the fabric of what has made our country the shining beacon of freedom throughout the world.

CNN has taken the front position on the Coons story when Sean Hannity divulged that Coons was considered “the bearded Marxist” while in college. They stepped in to give Coons political cover to downplay his Marxist roots and beliefs as “a college prank” or “joking nickname” given to him by his fellow dorm buddies.

CNN has a president in providing Marxist cover when they did so with Obama throughout his career and culminating with his Presidency. The right wing talk show circuit warned us about Obama’s true roots, all of which have rung true to form. Well, the American people who love the Constitution, America and her long history have decided that it is time for a witch hunt of our own. No longer are regular Americans sitting on the side lines. They are rising up, getting active politically and connecting with the “main stream” to throw the Socialists, Communists and hippy throwbacks out on their collective asses.

This resurgence of McCarthyism is taking shape in our time, not by a single individual such as it was with Eugene McCarthy, but by millions of individuals armed with their voices and more importantly, with their votes. Where a single man tread in the 50’s to uproot this scourge from America, Americans are now foisting this banner and taking to the streets in peaceful yet powerful protest of the creeping incrementalism of socialist infiltration of our political landscape.

No longer can the liberal socialist elites and so called moderate RINO Republican ignore “flyover” country as isolated voting blocks taking a back seat to coastal liberal bastions because it is “flyover” and “coastal” silent majorities coming to life rejecting this anti-American dogma that has festered within the halls of the political power houses.

The spirit of America has allowed socialists, communists and anti-Americanism to flourish mainly because we are a free society to worship and think individually. It has allowed Socialists to even gain political office when in fact the oath of office they take to uphold and defend the Constitution is abridged by their very beliefs thereby making their oaths nothing more than lip service. This fact alone is enough to impeach them as unfit for office for failing to uphold this sacred oath. It is this sacred Constitution and its meaning that is behind this Tea Party movement.

The march on Washington by those who answered the clarion call to freedom can no longer be ignored as they were when the last time they held court in Washington, DC when Obama was flying out the back door of the White House while simultaneously saying “what, nothing going on here” mentality. The socialists and RINO’s have tried everything in the book to diminish the power of the people by ignoring, deriding, labeling and then finally, ostracizing us radical and dangerous.

Failing to achieve any measure of success in squashing this movement of grass root Americanism they changed their tactics to hold their own march on Washington called “One Nation” rally. They meant to show us that they too can have a powerful and large rally. There were two things that happened as a result.

First, we found that their event was sponsored by over 400 different labor unions, community organizing groups as well as socialists, communists and anti-American groups. They trotted out their “old bones” as their dignitary speakers such as “Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson” to spew the same ol same ol about racism of the other side (us). The contrast here is the Glenn Beck rally was attended by Americans who drove themselves to the rally in their own vehicles, on their own dime and time to attend. They did not rely on special interests to pay for their transportation, lodging, meals and freebie t-shirts to attend. We did so because WE demand to be heard over the din of astro-turf voices and collective MSM covering for socialist agenda’s.

Second, the socialists that put this rally together think that they can sway the majority of Americans that we are wrong and backward thinking. That we are not progressive enough to understand that we need to be told how to think, act and submit to another radically different form of governing that is alien and contrary to our beloved Constitution. The socialists still to get it, we are all Eugene McCarthy now and we want this socialist and communist scourge uprooted from our leadership and replaced with likeminded Americans who want smaller government, less taxes and individual freedom that includes morals and family values. If this is radical, then call us that if you wish but do so at your political peril.

Finally, the Delaware Senate race has a Marxist (Coons) that will not enjoy a voter celebrations come November because the daughter of Bozo the Clown and one time dabbler of Wicca will be put into office by We The People endorsed by Sarah Palin and the Tea Party.

This is only the beginning because there are also self avowed socialists who currently hold office (their names below as release by the American Socialist Party (DSA) recently) that will be removed from office as unfit to uphold American Constitutional values as required by their oaths of office:

Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)
Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)
Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)
Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)
Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)
Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)
Hon. André Carson (IN-07)
Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)
Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)
Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)
Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)
Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)
Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)
Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)
Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)
Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)
Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)
Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)
Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)
Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)
Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Hon. John Hall (NY-19)
Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)
Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)
Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)
Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)
Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)
Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)
Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)
Hon. George Miller (CA-07)
Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)
Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)
Hon. John Olver (MA-01)
Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)
Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)
Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)
Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)
Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)
Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)
Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)
Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)
Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)
Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)

These are the collective faces of the enemy of America’s Constitution who by the very nature of their socialist beliefs and ideology make them incapable of upholding and defending the Constitution as it runs contrary to them.

Of the politicians noted above who are “DSA” members – eleven of the seventy sit on the Judiciary Committee.

It's not just New Yorks decision anymore -- 9/11 saw to that!

2010-08-15T20:21:00.000-07:00

The overty PC New York Leadership from the lowly mayor to the highest Senator have decided for the rest of America in sending the most egregious appeasement message of all. In approving the Mosque in NY City within shouting distance of those who jumped to their deaths from the highest floors of those two buildings, the elites have defiled the memory of the innocents. It's not just a matter of religious freedom because there are numerous Mosques in the city. The proof lies in the pudding because almost 10 years after the most horrific terror attack on US soil there is still no building or memorial standing where the towers once stood. Yet, the Islamic world can get past all the red tape of NY City Government and erect a building in record time, if given the chance.

When you view the video below, it is meant to shock you back into reality and hopefully you will find your voice to object in the strongest terms, this travesty.

God Bless those who died that day:

Pencil neck geeks - now its cool!

2010-08-07T11:13:00.000-07:00

From Odd Stuff Magazine

Gay Judge, Gay Town and Gay results!

2010-08-04T16:15:00.000-07:00

Californians must really be getting pissed off by now that once again the electorate has voted down gay marriage only to have elected bureaucrats and activist judges overturn the will of the people.

When the case wound it’s way to this particular judge (notice I use a small “j”) it was noted that he was himself “gay” and his courtroom in San Francisco. I know, I know I am using a lot of generalities here, but come-on now I think I can recognize conflict of interest when I see it. Those on the left bleated that his being gay had nothing to do with it.

So a single gay judge who presides over legal cases held in San Francisco is not biased – “poppy-cock”!

Either way this case was decided it is destined to be heard by the US Supreme Court anyway, but the more that these elites defy the will of the land the angrier we get. I can only assume that NAMBLA, Code Pink and Barney Frank are celebrating tonight over at Gavin Newsome’s digs.

Here’s to hoping it is a short celebration because in the end it will be a massive group of "one man-one woman" getting their wishes in the end -- saving traditional marraige.

Kegan a Supreme mistake - according to Jeff Sessions

2010-08-04T11:13:00.001-07:00

Texas anti-Obama billboard - Gotta love the Lonestar State!

2010-08-04T10:15:00.000-07:00

Judicial Sanctioned Anarchy

2010-08-03T14:14:00.000-07:00

Democrat judges find ways to break precedent settled law!

We have heard the arguments and have seen first hand many instances that this Administration has sidestepped, flaunted or wholly ignored the law in so many areas that it is getting harder and harder to remember them all.

Some of these examples are, at least troubling and at worst dangerous. Taking a stroll down memory lane I am compelled to remind the readers that the single item on Obama’s resume for President that he touted gave him the requisite experience to hold his lofty office was his “community organizing”. I have written ad nauseam about this experience with ACORN and motor voting laws. I have delved into the organization and their tactics of intimidation with banks where they have stormed offices and private homes of these institutions executives in order to “hold hostage” the policies that eventually led to the financial meltdown of the mortgage industry.

We are now seeing these tactics being employed across the entire spectrum of the free market, states rights and this time with the full force and resources of the Federal Government.

For instance – The Obama Administration defrauded the bond holders of GM when he took over the auto maker instead of allowing them to go through re-organization in Bankruptcy court to save Union pensions and possibly some jobs. Was this Quid pro quo for the massive campaign support and finance of the Unions? In the process, those who invested in Bonds for their retirement plans got the shaft that they would have been protected from if the company would have sought protection under Bankruptcy laws. It wasn’t greedy executives that lost their money in the nationalization, it was mom and pops and individuals who invested in these bonds. To be fair, the GM bailout did start under the Bush Administration but it was Obama that took it to the extreme.

Then we have another example when Democrats in Congress brought the executives from AIG to explain those pesky bonuses (that the Democrats placed into the bailout bill themselves). They wanted these executives to name those who were receiving these legally protected bonuses so their ACORN buddies could go into full guerilla warfare mode against (which they actually did when they bussed in activists to the personal homes of the executives). To make matters worse, Congress enacted legislation that targeted individuals who received bonuses with draconian taxes to take away the money. Using the IRS to target individuals is unfair as well as illegal.

Now we have the mother of all judicial anarchy where the DOJ has targeted the legislation of Arizona to put an end to their self defense of illegal immigrant overrunning their state and killing their citizens. While Eric Holder and the DOJ dismiss the New Black Panther case (that was won) they target Arizona to stop enforcement of Federal and State laws.

In addition, we now find that there is a “secret memo” that has been uncovered where the Federal Government is intending to direct all Federal agencies that are involved in the identification, apprehension and deportation of illegal immigrants to “stand down”, let slide and look the other way in enforcing these laws. The Administrations answer to Congressional failure to enact amnesty in the manner in which Democrats want is for the 20 million illegal immigrants to aid them in the upcoming elections.

What is distressing is the DOJ and Eric Holder. In an article recently penned by Rich Lowry titled “The hilarious Arizona ruling” points out the length in which the Judiciary is trying to force the ruling in such a way as to support the Governments position.

For instance:

“Judge Bolton piles speculation atop implausible readings of the law. Say a legal alien is arrested and his release is delayed by a check on his status. Let’s put aside (as Judge Bolton does) that on average it takes the staff manning the federal database set up for such checks 70 minutes to get to an inquiry and a mere 11 minutes to answer it. Judge Bolton declares that any delay amounts to exposing legal aliens to “the possibility of inquisitorial practices and police surveillance.”

”This is a tautology dressed up with scare words. It’s impossible as a matter of definition to get arrested without experiencing “police surveillance.” As for “inquisitorial practices,” blogger William A. Jacobson notes that “states already routinely run searches for a variety of statuses, including outstanding warrants, child support orders and non-immigration identity checks. Each of these checks potentially could delay release of an innocent person.”

“If the state finds too many suspected illegal immigrants, it might overburden the system. Let’s put aside (as Judge Bolton does) that the system already gets 1 million inquiries a year, that it has a theoretical capacity to process 1.5 million and that, as of now, Arizona only makes 80,000 inquiries annually, meaning even a drastic increase could be accommodated. If the federal government fears a surge from Arizona, couldn’t it add some positions to the 153 staffers currently assigned to the database? Think of it as stimulus.”

The Federal Government has now gone after individuals (targeted tax penalties) and now the States for attempting to stem the flow of dangerous individuals who are running amok in the “wild west” of Arizona. So much so that “boot hill” is in the appropriate geographical location. When Arizona stands against tyranny it emboldens other border states to follow suit. Texas is already considering a law similar to Arizona’s and we find out yesterday that Virginia’s Attorney General has ruled that police in that state can start checking the immigration status of suspected illegal aliens. Once this “spigot” is opened then the Federal Government will have to expand their targeted attacks on a wider spectrum of States. I say, bring it on……

Blue Man Group stand aside, her comes the "Pink Glove" group!

2010-07-24T17:48:00.000-07:00

Sit Down, and prepair to enjoy battling cancer! In the infamous words of Lynyrd Skynard "TURN IT UP"!

Rangle asks for "more time"!

2010-07-24T07:29:00.000-07:00

Now that the investigation portion of this dispicable character has finally wormed its way to a conclusion after years of footdragging and delay tactics by those on the left who claimed to have opened a new chapter in political ethics in Washington Rangle is set to go to trial. We must not forget those who have repeatedly come forward to protect his political backside and have given him a pass in order for him to remain the "Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee" -- namely Nanci Pelosi.

Now that all the delay is over and he stands naked in front of a "softcore" media establishment, Rangle is asking for more time. I say that we should give him more time -- more time behind bars.

Will Arizona become the “new Alamo?”

2010-07-20T07:56:00.000-07:00

Governor Jan Brewer the new Commander in Chief!

In an interesting argument, Arizona is on firm “war footing” if the State wishes to engage in War with Mexico. What? Wait just a minute – hear me out.

U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 10 (Read Clause 3)

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

In March 2010 a prominent Arizona rancher was murdered on his property. At the time of his killing authorities found (the day before) 290 pounds of marijuana on his property and tracked footprints back to 8 illegal immigrants and arrested them. According to Fox News – “Giffords said if Krentz's killing is connected to drug cartels or smugglers, the federal government must respond appropriately.

"All options should be on the table, including sending more Border Patrol agents to the area and deploying the National Guard," Giffords said.

Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard said government has a clear responsibility to aid law enforcement resources at all levels along the border.

"I call on our federal and state governments to work together to bolster the law enforcement resources needed to better protect Arizonans living on the border," Goddard said.

Meanwhile, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer joined U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in calling for federal officials to send more National Guard troops to the Mexican border.”

That was in March and this week Obama sent a token order to send 1,200 National Guard to the border and only half of which will go to Arizona.

In April 2010 a Pinal County Deputy Sheriff was shot and wounded by fire from an illegal drug smuggler with an AK-47. According to AZ Family news – “According to Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, Puroll had been following a group of five men who were transporting drugs. One of the suspects allegedly hid while the others moved on, and Puroll continued to follow the group. Around 4:00 p.m. the suspect ambushed Puroll and shot at him, grazing his left side above his abdomen.

"They've become more aggressive," Babeu said, referring to the ambush. "They're always armed, but we've never had this happen."

US Federal Government authorities have failed to address the problem on every level and in most cases refuse to do so. It is even more distressing that the Mexican Government is aiding and abetting the invasion of their nationals into our sovereign (I use this term loosely) nation. In June 2010, Mexico opened a satellite “Consular” office on the Island of Catalina to specifically issue illegal invaders “matricular ID Cards”. According to the Washington Examiner – “The Mexican government is opening a satellite consular office on Catalina Island -- a small resort off the California coast with a history of drug smuggling and human trafficking -- to provide the island's illegal Mexican immigrants with identification cards, The Washington Examiner has learned.

The Mexican consular office in Los Angeles issued a flier, a copy of which was obtained by The Examiner, listing the Catalina Island Country Club as the location of its satellite office. It invites Mexicans to visit the office to obtain the identification, called matricular cards, by appointment.”

"Handing out matricular cards to Mexicans who are not in this country legally is wrong no matter where it's done," he said. "But on Catalina it will do more damage. It's a small island but there's evidence it's being used as a portal for illegals to access mainland California."

So, as Eric Holder and the US Dept. of Justice sue the State of Arizona to scrap the new law they should take into consideration that Arizona is on sound Constitutional footing in declaring war on Mexico (as a State) and deploying troops to combat the armed and dangerous invaders to our southern border.

Compulsory Education & Compulsory Gun Control

2010-07-19T12:56:00.000-07:00

What keeps Liberals up at night?

Public Schooling is not about education and Gun Control is not about curtailing crime –

It is about controlling the message and the masses. I found that a more apt description of Public Schools is the moniker “Public Hatcheries” as progressives seek to take and mold young minds in the ways of “Saul Alinsky” and “Homosexuality”.

On many fronts in the area of education there is a focused and concerted attack by progressives. These attacks are focused on home-schooling, sex-ed, vouchers and charter schools and come from powerful Unions, Main Stream Media outlets, professors from the ivory halls of collegiate education as well as non-profits and NGO’s.

The venom that these individuals and the organizations they come from are very explicit in making their beliefs more mainstream as the former “veil” is lowered now that they are more emboldened. For instance:

“The husbands and wives in these families feel themselves to be under a religious compulsion to have large families, a homebound and submissive wife and mother who is responsible for the schooling of the children, and only one breadwinner. These families are not living in romantic, rural, self-sufficient farmhouses; they are in trailer parks, 1,000-square-foot homes, houses owned by relatives, and some, on tarps in fields or parking lots. Their lack of job skills, passed from one generation to the next, depresses the community’s overall economic health and their state’s tax base.” – Robin West, Professor – Georgetown University

It gets better (or worse if you are a parent):

“Parents in many states have full authority, free of all state oversight, to determine the content of their children’s education,” a situation almost as unendurable as life in a 1,000-square-foot house. Professor West writes longingly of the golden age when practically all education was conducted under the tutelage of the state and opting out of the system was forbidden — and “parents who did so were criminals.”

This attitude that the State should be the sole practitioner in what your own children are taught is typical of the venom and statist dogma the liberals have, for so long now, gone unchecked.

Likewise, the gun control advocates who have been so busy trying to wrest our guns from our hands have their minions in full force ridiculing the recent Supreme Court Decisions (Heller & McDonald) that the right to bear arms extends to us, well, little people who don’t know any better.

For instance, The Washington Post headline that screamed “The Supreme Court Gun Decision Moves Us toward Anarchy” by David Ignatius. Mr. Ignatius had this to say:

“My biggest worry with Monday’s Supreme Court decision is that by ruling, in effect, that every American can apply for a gun license, the justices will make gun ownership much more pervasive in a society that already has too many guns. After all, if I know that my neighbor is armed and preparing for Armageddon situations where law and order break down (as so many are — just read the right-wing blogs) then I have to think about protecting my family, too. That’s the state-of-nature, everyone for himself logic that prevails in places such as Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Here the writer is overtly concerned about those who possess guns “legally”, who go through the proper procedures in applying for a license as pervasive and dangerous. He couldn’t help himself in bashing the “right-wing” blogs either but again there is truth hidden between his lines of vitriol. If the “right wing” blogs are so overtly concerned about the break down of law and order, or in his words Armageddon situations then he must be concerned enough to think about arming himself too. If he is so concerned about protecting himself and his family against law abiding citizens, then why not against criminals who would do harm to his family?

It is all about control and power. Rush Limbaugh said it eloquently when he said that conservatives (those who favor education alternatives to state run indoctrination and adherence to the US Constitution) are the “Party of NO as well as the Party of KNOW”!

If you have knowledge (other than that the State feeds you) and you are also adequately armed then the grassroots are a danger to their quest for total domination.

Another example of this power grab against the grassroots was the speech Michele Obama gave just prior to the Obama’s vacation in Maine about childhood obesity and her comment that dessert is not a right, yet the first image we saw of Obama in Maine was of him gobbling down an ice cream cone. I guess he didn’t get the message or maybe it was just that he is better than the rest of us. It started with Trans fat and the outlawing of fast food restaurants in certain cities to the attempt to ban salt and now sugar. To even consider that the State in essence is criminalizing eating of food the most oppressive power grab yet. It only gets worse unless of course you are on you way home from a home schooling session and decided to stop at McDonalds packing your 357, then you have a fighting chance.

A DemoKKKrat history lesson!

2010-07-17T08:54:00.000-07:00

When the racists call others racist!

Here is a brief history lesson about racism in the United States and its progression through time thanks to Michael Zak:

1) the Ku Klux Klan was established by the Democratic Party

a. the Republican Party and a Republican President, Ulysses Grant, destroyed the KKK with their Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

2) The Ku Klux Klan was reborn in the early 20th century by Democrat President Woodrow Wilson with the movie premier (held in the White House) of “The Birth of a Nation”.

3) The KKK so dominated the 1924 Democratic Convention that Republicans, speaking truth to power, called it the Klanbake!

4) In the 1930s, a Democrat President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, appointed a Klansman, Senator Hugo Black (D-AL), to the U.S. Supreme Court.

5) The notorious police commissioner Bull Conner, who attacked African-Americans with dogs and clubs and fire hoses, was both a Klansman and the Democratic Party’s National Committeeman for Alabama.

6) Starting in the 1980s, the Democratic Party elevated a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), to third-in-line for the presidency.

The former Grand Dragon of the KKK, Byrd was rewarded by becoming the longest serving US Senator in US history. His death also ushered another record in the history books when his body was placed in the Senate Chambers to lie in state. This has never before occurred with any Senator.

So, when the NAACP, Democrats and socialists say that Republicans and the Tea Party movement, who align themselves with American principles – racist, they are trying to rewrite history to elude their guilt for standing with those who are – racist…..

2010 - Year of the "Pro-Life" women

2010-07-15T18:23:00.000-07:00

We have been treated to the recent polling data that has a remarkable amount of women candidates who are running for office in 2010 at every level of politics. The most famous of which is Carly Fiorina who is taking on the Abortion queen herself, Barbara Boxer in the California Senate race. Another Pro-Life woman is leading another abortion friendly Senator in the State of Nevada in which candidate Sharon Angle is ahead of Obama's favorite lap dog, Harry Reid.

The resurgence in life respecting women are a welcomed trend, but more so when they directly take out a pro-abortion incumbent. All of this redefining "feminism" to include the choice of life is ultimately leading to the most famous of Pro-life women of late -- Sarah Palin who has yet to decide if she will run for President in 2012......

Justice partially served, but justice all the same!

2010-07-15T18:11:00.000-07:00

Today, in a New York Courtroom a Judge has increased the jail time for the traitorous, jihad loving leftist lawyer Lynne Stewart to a term of 10 years (the prosecution sought 15) which was an increase to the paultry 28 month sentence she received in her 2005 trial. Now, maybe she will die behind bars instead of the comfort of her American bed in her American home which she sold to the blind Islamic Terror leader who was convicted of the bombing of the twin towers during the Clinton years.

She bears a striking resemblance to Elena Kagan, dost she not?

Obama and the Titanic!

2010-07-14T09:52:00.000-07:00

The ship of State is taking on water!

I posted an article the other day marveling at the recent news conference held by the White House Spokesman (Baghdad Bob Gibbs) when he, for the first time, told the truth.

The truth he told was that the House of Representatives were in trouble and that the Democrats would lose their majority. Of course it did not take long for Obama to scold him (for truth telling) and to counter his message with the “he misspoke” one.

Today, when perusing the headlines my attention focused on a Financial Times article titled “Obama facing growing credibility crisis”. I have learned long ago to pay attention to “key words” in article titles and in the body of the text of them as the MSM has a way of using certain verbiage to diminish (or amplify) twist bad news (or good) to lend their political hand to this Administration.

For instance, when the MSM has to report “bad” employment figures it does so preceding the bad news with a word like “unexpected” or “unforeseen” to make it appear to be an anomaly versus real world reality, like those who are actually standing in the unemployment line experience.

The title of the article is another example of this helping hand lent by the MSM. Though the title is actually factual as it is supported by polling data, but the article makes it appear to be a recent development when in fact Obama (and the public) has seen his polling data continue to fall since his inauguration. It is as though the magic number (40% approve) is the start of the credibility crisis. When 60% of Americans disprove of the job, or credibility of his Presidency then I think the magic number that should have triggered this article is (49%) approve.

The article is replete with the distaste for the truth. For instance, a snipet taken from it says:

“Add to that the continuing woes of Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic majority leader, in Nevada, where the Republican party’s recent nomination of Sharron Angle, a far-right and highly eccentric Tea Party supporter, appear to have had no positive effect on Mr Reid’s prospects, and the Grand Old party has a good shot at taking control of both houses of Congress. Worse for Mr Obama, political scientists say that at this stage in the calendar, there is almost nothing he can do about it.”

Here the author paints Sharron Angle as “a far right and eccentric Tea Party supporter” and the Republicans as the “Grand Old Party” and the use of these labels in describing the candidate and the party as “out of the mainstream (eccentric) and outdated (Grand “Old” party) are far too obvious.

Another example in this article is the following:

“Astonishingly, 55 per cent of citizens think Mr Obama is a “socialist” against only 39 per cent who do not share that diagnosis. The same poll shows 48 per cent support for Republicans against just 42 per cent for Democrats. The numbers are eerily similar to 2006, except that it was George W. Bush’s Republicans who were on the receiving end four years ago.”

The use of the word “Astonishingly” is laughable. When did the media stop doing their jobs? Any third grade student recognizes “socialism” when they see it and Obama fits that bill perfectly in spite of the MSM’s non reporting of it.

Since taking off, Mr. Obama has socialized Medicine, Banks and Financial Institutions, Education and other aspects of the “free market system” in the name of crisis. To say it is “astonishing” is journalist malpractice at its core.

The reason why this administration has failed the economic, jobs and quite frankly public opinion is because he IS a socialist and more accurate is the fact his administration is filled with like minded un-American, anti free-market and anti-business people who hail from Unions, Universities and Community Organizer groups who have historically opposed the American Way.

Townhall erupts in disgust over Congressman feigning ignorance on Black Panther dismissal!

2010-07-13T21:34:00.000-07:00

I guess that since the Tea Party crowd is again being labelled as racist by the NAACP and Michelle Obama calling for blacks to "bring it up a notch" against the tea party this Congressman from California should have felt his answer would just slide on by without recrimination. The woman at the microphone had the issue framed correctly, which again shows that the constituents are on top of issues that the MSM is failing to report. It is a pleasure to see this idiot get blasted, he should have......

Where is Osama Bin Laden?

2010-07-10T08:41:00.000-07:00

This is a question that the Democrats (in time for the elections) have been pumelling the Republicans (and of course GW Bush). I think it time we ask the very same question this time directed at the Democrats (before and in time for the November mid term elections).

So Democrats - you have had control of the House and Senate since 2006 (for those Democrats who are math challeged it is 4+ years) and the White House since 2008 (again for the math challenged 1+ years) and what, no Bin Laden?

You have offered everything to the extreme Muslim Community up to and including NASA and the carrots aren't working? Maybe you can offer him a primetime MSMBC slot alongside Oberman & Mathews so he can get his message across easier than the cave system he has occupied for the last 9+ years. Hopefully, once you have signed an executive order allowing amnesty for illegals, it will finally allow him to enter this country free and unfettered to get his message of peace and love out to an adoring, albeit minority of Americans like the New Black Panthers who have applauded him.

New Black Panther Party press conference

2010-07-10T05:56:00.000-07:00

It was the racist George Bush and John McCain that prompted their call to intimidate voters and end up on the butt end of a Federal Civil Rights lawsuit, but it was the Black Eric Holder (their words not mine) that came to their rescue. When will the jihaidst radical warrior wannabe's of the left ever learn that their words of celebration and in your face rhetoric will come back to bite you.....

The legal case is nowhere near being filed away in the dusty drawers of some Federal Courthouse basement. The political fallout of a racial politicized dismissal and a two tiered Justice Department that will only uphold Federal Civil Rights laws when the offenders are White against Black is only beginning. When the Justice Department dropped the case the Justice Department made erroneous and factually incorrect statements, on the record, about how high this decision went because we now now Holder and Obama were briefed.

The uproar is only beginning to gain momentum in spite of the MSM non-reporting the issue.

Update: If you need to see the true nature of this "terrorist organization" called the New Black Panther Party that the Holder, Obama Administration is attempting to roam free to intimidate and wage their own jihad, just look at the same individual (Shabazz) in 2002. Remember that 9/11 occurred less than 1 year prior to this video clip:

Happy Fourth of July - relfection after the article!

2010-07-05T07:17:00.000-07:00

Ooh, socialist donuts!

Yesterday, I posted this article found in the Canadian on-line news site “The Globe”. I was so profoundly disgusted by this “revered and highly awarded” individual’s venomous take on America that I wanted everyone to read it for what it was – delusional.

The old axiom “chew on for a day before you decide” applies here because that is exactly what I did. Over breakfast, my wife and I discussed the article and as Americans the “bread and butter” issues we discuss over our mealtimes together should be a microcosm of what other patriotic, conservative Americans (who are the majority) discuss over meals, around water coolers at work and anywhere we congregate.

We are fiercely patriotic, Christian and ascribe to the embedded notion that America’s Constitution is to be revered, respected and followed. We believe in “legal immigration”, freedom, liberty and the vision that we are to leave America to our children in such a way that they will have more than we, when we depart.

We listen to Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin and the host of other conservative talk radio personalities who have stepped up to fill the void of information (truth) that our Main Stream Media refused to give us and most of all we consider ourselves active “tea party members”. That said, we have discussed the path that America has traveled and the trajectory it course has taken since the middle of Bush’s second term. That’s right, we believe that our discourse with the so-called conservatives began under Bush (we blame him). Though we applaud his handling of national security issues, we deride him for his blatant out of control fiscal policies and his misguided attempt to give amnesty for illegal immigrants.

The discourse discussions had quickly changed in tone and content with the election of Barrack Obama and the elevation of the Democrats in both the House and Senate. The tone of our talk was now of fear of transformation and the complete disintegration of America as we have come to love in our lifetime. The one thing that I have consistently told my wife in the discussion was that in the end “America will persevere”! I have told her that America (the men & women across the country) will never let it happen. I have told her that what we have taken for granted (freedom, liberty and the bedrock fundamental principles of our founding fathers) will reassert itself as the pressure from the socialist transformation tries to take hold. I liken the socialist dream of this transformation to that of a “splinter” in America’s body. It is foreign and festering and the body is in the process of rejecting it naturally as our body would reject a splinter. The body America simply does not accept these principles that have been forced into us because it goes against everything we have set into place in this experiment called America. The wound that began with corrupt and weak Republicans is now a fully blown infection that the Democrats have furthered with their lies, distortions and forceful thuggery. We Americans reject this and thus we are the anti-bodies fighting to reject this internal invader called “socialism”.

Now that a day has passed since I posted this article from Jeffrey Simpson I will address the content in the context of what I have just articulated:

"We can only hope that our American friends enjoy their national holiday weekend. Let them wave their flags, enjoy their picnics and show their love of country, because they need a holiday.

It is disturbing these days for the country’s friends to watch the Great Republic’s politics, to wonder about its economy, to tremble at its deficits, and to shake their heads at its Supreme Court that has struck down corporate contribution limits in politics and reaffirmed the right to bear arms, to the intense joy of the gun lobby.

This opening statement exposes the author quite profoundly as he is openly disdainful of the America in which my wife and I (as well as the majority of other American’s) ascribe. Mr. Simpson exposes his hatred for those who show national pride by his comment of flag waiving, picnics and love of country diatribe. He can only hope WE take a holiday from our beliefs because this is the underlying sentiment he talks of.

It is furthered by his next paragraph – his hostility towards our court for reaffirming two of our bedrock principles freedom of speech (corporate contributions in politics) and our right to bear arms. This is evident by the false and deceptive attack on business. The thing he does not understand or refuses to understand is that corporations are made up of people (individuals) and as such the freedoms of our constitution extend to them also. The other misunderstanding is the deflection of the intense joy to a “lobby group” when in fact it is the American public who is breathing a collective sigh of relief that the Supreme Court has finally placed our right to bear arms back into our arms as individuals. The left have tried to bastardize the legal system through legalese and legislative fiat to take away this right for many years now.

The United States gave itself the most gifted President in several generations, handed his party a majority in both houses of Congress, only to watch his presidency be swamped by the doleful legacy of the Bush years, a worldwide recession and its parlous aftermath, and a ferocious Republican opposition bent on a search-and-destroy mission of his presidency.

Once again Obama is the tip of the “splinter”. To call him the “most gifted President” in several generations is misguided. The over the top vocabulary he uses (Doleful and Parlous) underscore the continued hatred of Bush and the blame they continue to throw at his feet given the fact that he admits the majority status of his beloved Obama and his socialist brethren in both houses of Congress (since 2006). You can say Bush contributed to the out of control spending but the economy and its “parlous aftermath” are a direct result of the control of the Democrats since 2006 (remember its mid 2010) and the 4+ years of their legislation and largess. Finally, the ferocious opposition of the Republicans is not an apt description either. They have stood in a complete and unified voice of opposition to the Healthcare bill, cap and trade further bail out measures being forced upon America but to say we are “bent on a search and destroy mission” is melodramatic because the author equates “ferocious opposition” to personal destruction of the President.

To make matters worse, the war in Afghanistan, into which President Barrack Obama has poured thousands of additional soldiers and billions of borrowed dollars, is going poorly. As The Economist belatedly recognized this week, “America and its allies are losing in Afghanistan.”

The U.S. commander there, Stanley McChrystal, was sacked for impolitic remarks about various high officials in the Obama administration, a dismissal even the choleric Republicans did not criticize.

His replacement, David Petraeus, somehow has to salvage something from the Afghan mess, at a time when Americans are growing increasingly weary of that war, now into its ninth year.

The very best that Americans (and allies) might hope for is to inflict sufficient damage on the Taliban in the next year that some insurgents might be inclined to negotiate inclusion in an Afghan government. To say that this is a long shot understates the odds.

The Pakistanis are already assuming an American departure and defeat, and are therefore looking to strengthen ties with the insurgents and the Afghan government of Hamid Karzai, so that they, and not the Indians, will have a more important influence on the government in Kabul.

The “America is losing the war” rhetoric is a tired one. The fierce opposition the author describes in the section above this one disappears to show that McChrystal’s firing was a just one but he still couldn’t help but call the Republican “Choleric”. I especially liked the “Obama has poured thousands of additional soldiers” into the war when the truth is he was feckless, indecisive and had to be dragged into that decision against the wishes of his far left constituency.

The U.S., far away, burdened with debt, its public having turned against the war has already imposed a deadline for beginning some kind of withdrawal next year. Time is therefore running against the Americans, as are its allies, some of whom want out next year, including Canada, the Netherlands and Poland.

It is this Obama deadline that has emboldened the Taliban. The coalition of the unwilling “Canada, Netherlands and Poland” is the only ones he could cite for those who want out next year vs. finishing what we went their do.

What to do about Afghanistan will be the subject of intensive debate at year’s end, after the mid-term elections, the prospects for which colour everything in political Washington.

The mid-term elections do colour everything in political Washington, this much is true. It is the only thing keeping those Democrats who believe they have a modicum of a chance of re-election from doing anything stupid. But, once the elections are over and the Democrats (and left leaning Republicans) lose their majority then the lame ducks will be even more dangerous to America as they will have nothing else to lose and will not be bound to their constituents any longer.

It had been hoped, for example, by those who want action on climate change that the U.S. Senate might produce an energy and environment bill that the President could sign. Nothing seems likely now, given the stout opposition of the Republicans to any serious measures, including a cap-and-trade system. Democrats, too, are divided, with legislators from the coal- and oil-producing states protecting their industries. One of these Democrats just died, Senator Robert Byrd, a pork-barreler par excellence from West Virginia, who used to oppose action against acid rain.

Here the author is lamenting at the “global warming” failure to convince us argument. Again, the descriptor “stout opposition by Republicans” is humorous. At least he says that some Democrats also are divided, but he describes the opposition minded Democrats as “big oil and energy” lap dogs. The true description of those Democrats in opposition are “cowards” because they know their political lives are at stake because the majority of the opposition Democrats (Blue Dogs) are from and were elected by conservative constituents.

In this, as in much else, what happens or does not in the U.S. directly affects Canada. The Harper government has said it will follow any U.S. measures against greenhouse gas emissions. But if the U.S. Congress is unable to decide anything, what does the Canadian government do? Given the Harper government’s lassitude toward climate change action, this result might suit the Conservatives, if not the country.

The immense borrowing requirements of the U.S. – requirements that stretch over the horizon – are the single most destabilizing, or at least worrisome, of all the factors at play in the world’s economy. And no country is more exposed to the ups and downs of the U.S. economy than Canada.

Those U.S. borrowing requirements are daily sapping the influence of the U.S. worldwide, and heightening all the international uncertainties about deflation/inflation, high unemployment, sluggish growth, the volatility of the U.S. dollar.

Last weekend, Mr. Obama lent his name to a G20 declaration calling for halving deficits by 2013-14, a statement easy for him to make, but impossible for him to fulfill without congressional approval.

In the House and Senate, no appetite exists for doing more than nibbling at the edges of the deficit/debt problem, certainly not before the mid-term elections and very likely not thereafter. Without taking aim at the defense budget and considering higher taxes, all debate about the deficit/debt is an illusion wrapped in rhetoric.

As stated above, the economy is owned lock, stock and barrel by the Democrats who have been the majority in power since 2006 regardless of the blame Bush argument. The author again, is lamenting that he believes we Americans will not cut our defense budgets (a favorite of Democrats who want to decimate our military strength) and will not impose higher taxes (again a favorite of Democrats and socialists who are anti-business and pro government).

At the state level, governments constitutionally required to balance budgets are slashing everywhere: welfare, universities, health, children’s programs.

Corporate profits and industrial production are recovering in the U.S. That’s the good news. The discouraging news is that consumers remain hesitant, unemployment is high, the housing market remains awful, and the country’s fiscal situation is appalling.

This last section takes the cake! Again, the author has the disdain of our Constitution requirements. Notice the “slashing” everywhere comment is focused on the socialists four favorites (Welfare, Universities, Health and of course the oft mentioned “children’s” programs).

Finally, his information of corporate and industrial production recovery is another dishonest bone being thrown for the benefit of the “most gifted President of the last several generations” but the truth is what he ends with – “consumers remain hesitant, unemployment is high, the housing market remains awful, and the country’s fiscal situation is appalling.”

Happy Fourth of July to them. They need it."

What this article really transmits is the desperation before the death of the Democrat Socialist party of America just prior to the Mid-term elections. The Democrats and those aligned with them in the MSM (as is the author of the Globe article) are seriously depressed about their utopian dream unraveling before their eyes. It goes to show that America’s spirit cannot be lied, cheated or beaten into submitting to false and foreign behavior in the most cherished “Golden City of the Hill”! Lastly my wife has a suggestion for this particular author as well as the Democrats in General – “quit your daytime job!”

Jeffrey Simpson books (need I say more):

• 1980 - Discipline of Power, winner of the 1980 Governor General's Award for Non-Fiction.
• 1988 - Spoils of Power
• 1993 - Faultines, Struggling for a Canadian Vision
• 1996 - The Anxious Years
• 2000 - Star-Spangled Canadians
• 2001 - The Friendly Dictatorship
• 2007 - Hot Air: Meeting Canada's Climate Change Challenge (co-authored with Mark Jaccard and Nic Rivers)

Notice the progression of his writing:
Discipline of Power, Spoils of Power, Faultlines, Struggling for Canadian Vision, The Anxious Years, Star Spangled Canadians, The Friendly Dictatorship and finally Canada's Climate Change!

This lays out the socialist agenda in its timelines that mirror exactly what has transpired up to and including its failure to allure the masses.

If you have the stomach, you need to read this garbage!

2010-07-04T19:28:00.000-07:00

Article posted on The Globe newsite titled "Happy Fourth of July - America Needs it! by Jeffrey Simpson

Warning, the content will make your head explode like a mortar fired firework display. I hope your gag reflex is not a weak one because you will need all the strength you can possible muster to keep from projectile vomiting. I would suggest once you read the article which I have linked to their site, feel free to leave a comment -- I did.

"We can only hope that our American friends enjoy their national holiday weekend. Let them wave their flags, enjoy their picnics and show their love of country, because they need a holiday.

It is disturbing these days for the country’s friends to watch the Great Republic’s politics, to wonder about its economy, to tremble at its deficits, and to shake their heads at its Supreme Court that has struck down corporate contribution limits in politics and reaffirmed the right to bear arms, to the intense joy of the gun lobby.

The United States gave itself the most gifted President in several generations, handed his party a majority in both houses of Congress, only to watch his presidency be swamped by the doleful legacy of the Bush years, a worldwide recession and its parlous aftermath, and a ferocious Republican opposition bent on a search-and-destroy mission of his presidency.

To make matters worse, the war in Afghanistan, into which President Barack Obama has poured thousands of additional soldiers and billions of borrowed dollars, is going poorly. As The Economist belatedly recognized this week, “America and its allies are losing in Afghanistan.”

The U.S. commander there, Stanley McChrystal, was sacked for impolitic remarks about various high officials in the Obama administration, a dismissal even the choleric Republicans did not criticize.

His replacement, David Petraeus, somehow has to salvage something from the Afghan mess, at a time when Americans are growing increasingly weary of that war, now into its ninth year.

The very best that Americans (and allies) might hope for is to inflict sufficient damage on the Taliban in the next year that some insurgents might be inclined to negotiate inclusion in an Afghan government. To say that this is a long shot understates the odds.

The Pakistanis are already assuming an American departure and defeat, and are therefore looking to strengthen ties with the insurgents and the Afghan government of Hamid Karzai, so that they, and not the Indians, will have a more important influence on the government in Kabul.

The U.S., far away, burdened with debt, its public having turned against the war, has already imposed a deadline for beginning some kind of withdrawal next year. Time is therefore running against the Americans, as are its allies, some of whom want out next year, including Canada, the Netherlands and Poland.

What to do about Afghanistan will be the subject of intensive debate at year’s end, after the mid-term elections, the prospects for which colour everything in political Washington.

It had been hoped, for example, by those who want action on climate change that the U.S. Senate might produce an energy and environment bill that the President could sign. Nothing seems likely now, given the stout opposition of the Republicans to any serious measures, including a cap-and-trade system. Democrats, too, are divided, with legislators from the coal- and oil-producing states protecting their industries. One of these Democrats just died, Senator Robert Byrd, a pork-barreler par excellence from West Virginia, who used to oppose action against acid rain.

In this, as in much else, what happens or does not in the U.S. directly affects Canada. The Harper government has said it will follow any U.S. measures against greenhouse gas emissions. But if the U.S. Congress is unable to decide anything, what does the Canadian government do? Given the Harper government’s lassitude toward climate change action, this result might suit the Conservatives, if not the country.

The immense borrowing requirements of the U.S. – requirements that stretch over the horizon – are the single most destabilizing, or at least worrisome, of all the factors at play in the world’s economy. And no country is more exposed to the ups and downs of the U.S. economy than Canada.

Those U.S. borrowing requirements are daily sapping the influence of the U.S. worldwide, and heightening all the international uncertainties about deflation/inflation, high unemployment, sluggish growth, the volatility of the U.S. dollar.

Last weekend, Mr. Obama lent his name to a G20 declaration calling for halving deficits by 2013-14, a statement easy for him to make, but impossible for him to fulfill without congressional approval.

In the House and Senate, no appetite exists for doing more than nibbling at the edges of the deficit/debt problem, certainly not before the mid-term elections and very likely not thereafter. Without taking aim at the defence budget and considering higher taxes, all debate about the deficit/debt is an illusion wrapped in rhetoric.

At the state level, governments constitutionally required to balance budgets are slashing everywhere: welfare, universities, health, children’s programs.

Corporate profits and industrial production are recovering in the U.S. That’s the good news. The discouraging news is that consumers remain hesitant, unemployment is high, the housing market remains awful, and the country’s fiscal situation is appalling.

Happy Fourth of July to them. They need it."

Ancient Egyptians, Masons, and Revelations!

2010-07-03T15:23:00.000-07:00

Are humans capable of “singularity”?

Let me begin by saying that “I believe in God”! My Religion is Christian. I also believe that Extraterrestrial beings exist. I also believe that they, like me, are all children of God. I believe that these extraterrestrial beings are technologically advanced to a point that they either mastered “time travel” or the ability to bend time to travel quickly so as to make long distance travel, from their home to ours without dying en-route. To clarify this belief I do so to explain that though they are far more advanced than we, they were still created as we were by a higher power than they (i.e., God).

For me my belief in God was not always so. I was one of many who “needed to see” and quantify His being real, by scientific proof though I have always kept an open mind of His existence.

I looked for archeological empirical evidence, or something tying Jesus to something scientific. Scientists have been trying to prove and disprove Gods existence for many millennia. Religion and science have always been antagonistic towards each other yet there have been scientific breakthroughs that work hand and hand with each other (i.e., Science & Religion). One that comes to mind is the current research taking place at the Super Collider on the “God Particle”.

Another lesser known experiment that will gain more traction with the recent book by Dan Brown “The Lost Symbol” is in the field of Noetics. Scientists claimed that they have actually weighed a human beings’ soul. The “soul weighing” experiment was followed very closely by the Vatican and the Pope and commented on its findings as being pleased that the “soul” has been quantified. This experiment was not conducted by anyone religious but by famous communists.

The Experiment:

In 1988 German scientists weighed 200 terminally ill patients directly before and after their deaths. In each and every instance the weight of these people reduced 1/3,000th of an ounce. Thus is the science of Noetics.

According to the scientists – “The inescapable conclusion is that we have now confirmed the existence of the human soul and determined its weight,” Dr. Becker Mertens of Dresden said in a letter printed in the German science journal Horizon.

“The challenge before us now is to figure out exactly what the soul is composed of”, he continued. “We are inclined to believe that it is a form of energy. “But our attempts to identify this energy have been unsuccessful to date.”

The expert’s report, co-authored by physicist Elke Fisher, got mixed review from top scientists around the world. Gerard Voisart, the leading French pathologist, was especially critical, saying that the weight difference between the living and the dead could be accounted for by air leaving the lungs. But Drs. Fisher and Mertens said they took that into account in making their calculations. They further stated that the device they used to weigh the soul has a margin of error of less than 1/100,000th of an ounce.

“It occurred to us that the weight loss could be the result of an instantaneous physical deterioration,” said Dr. Fisher. “But after exhaustive study we agreed that was not the case. The only possible explanation is that we were measuring the loss of the human soul or some kind of life force.”

Is the soul a singularity? There are many who say, yes. Once the soul breaks free from its “prison” (human body) and is released it is no longer bound to this plane of existence. It, in essence, becomes “god like”. The bible describes that “we all have God in us” and that “God created man in his image.” The “resurrection of Christ” describes the souls’ release from its earthy prison.

Furthermore – “In the Roman Catholic Church, Saint Michael has four main roles or offices. He is the Christian angel of death, carrying the souls of all the deceased to heaven, where they are weighed in his perfectly balanced scales (hence Michael is often depicted holding scales). At the hour of death, Michael descends and gives each soul the chance to redeem itself before passing, thus consternating the devil and his minions. St Michael is the special patron of the Chosen People in the Old Testament and is guardian of the Church; it was thus not unusual for the angel to be revered by the military orders of knights during the middle Ages. Last, he is the supreme enemy of Satan and the fallen angels.”

I found this evidence (of Gods existence) the moment I opened and begun to read “The Bible Code” and the “Bible Code II - The Countdown”. In the opening chapters, in laymen terms, I was given the scientific proof that was peer reviewed by the worlds leading mathematicians (Eliyahu Rips) who set out not to prove that the a code was imbedded in the 3,000 year text of the bible -- but disprove it as a hoax because they believed that it flew in the face of scientific probability. In doing so and to the contrary, they not only validated the findings, but added their own personal scientific mathematical expertise that expanded the work and the findings.

The code that was found in the Bible, Torah’s and other religious texts show it was imbedded (hidden) over 3000 years ago. Similarly, Ancient Egypt pre-dated Christ by 3000 years. The code that was found has allowed scientists (mathematicians) to pull events that have transpired historically directly from the biblical texts proving that these events have been foretold. Events like Hitler, Al-Qaeda 9/11 strike, etc. The scientists surmise from the code that there is a “key” here on earth that will be divulged when the time is right to avert Armageddon.

The intensity of the research was now focused on breaking the code to allow the scientists to see into the future events instead of verifying the past. On page 31 of the book, Michael Drosnin (author and founder of the Bible Code) explained the following discovery:

“They key. It played on my mind the whole time I was in Israel, and then one night I opened my laptop and looked into the Bible Code for “Code Key (mentioned in the opening paragraph).” It was there four times.

Twice as an obscure Hebrew word I didn’t recognize crossed “Code Key.” It wasn’t even in my dictionary. But in the definitive Hebrew dictionary it was translated as “obelisks.”

It was also found that the “Code Key” that was engraved onto an obelisk contained the “language of the Chaldeans.” According to the bible code “in the opening verses, the “plain text tells the story of a siege on Jerusalem by a king of Babylon, who brought back to his palace some of the children of Israel. They were taught all that was known in the ancient world, “all wisdom, and knowledge, and science,” including the language of the first known civilization, the “language of the Chaldeans.” In the hidden text of Daniel it spoke of the children “standing in the palace” the same words in Hebrew could be translated “pillar in the palace (Obelisk).”

An Obelisk is the one object (real world) that ties Ancient Egypt (which is where they first appeared) with the Vatican, Washington DC, Ancient Rome, Modern Rome and the Masons for the mere fact they all possess one (or many).

Obelisks – Date back to early 3,000 b.c.e. and the Ancient Egyptian Culture.

1) Washington Monument was designed by Freemason Robert Mills and is the tallest Obelisk in the world.

2) Vatican Obelisk originally erected in Rome around 30-28 BC and moved to the Vatican in 27.

The word “Revelations” as is described in the bible, torah and other religions come from the “root” “Reveal” (To make known, To bring to view – show). We know that in many religions, Revelations describes the “end times, or end of days” or the final battle between good and evil.

There have long been comparisons between certain aspects of the Christian religion and Ancient Egyptian beliefs. For clarification, the Preface of the book written by Moustafa Gadalla titled “The Ancient Egyptian roots of Christianity” indicates – “The very thing that is now called the Christian religion was already in existence in Ancient Egypt, long before the adoption of the New Testament. The British Egyptologist, Sir E.A. Wallis Budge, wrote in his book, "The Gods of the Egyptians"[1969], "The new religion which was preached there by St. Mark and his immediate followers, in all essentials so closely resembled that which was the outcome of the worship of Osiris, Isis, and Horus."

The similarities, noted by Budge and everyone who has compared the Egyptian Osiris - Isis - Horus allegory to the Gospel story, are striking. Both accounts are practically the same, e.g. the supernatural conception, the divine birth, the struggles against the enemy in the wilderness, and the resurrection from the dead to eternal life. The main difference between the "two versions," is that the Gospel tale is considered historical and the Osiris - Isis - Horus cycle is an allegory. The spiritual message of the Ancient Egyptian allegory and the Christian revelation is exactly the same

For me, I know that God created the universe. The scientific claptrap that it just was and not created is ludicrous. It had to be created - it just didn’t magically appear long ago out of thin air. Likewise, the argument of Darwin that man climbed out of some primordial ooze and evolved into the complex life form now known as man is equally ludicrous. I believe that there was evolution going on because life is nothing but evolving. To age is to evolve. But that single cell that supposedly climbed out the soup had to come from somewhere just as the universe itself.

The special nature of man is his soul. Now that the soul has been weighed it has mass at the subatomic level in the form of energy?

When the soul departs its prison and becomes one with the universe the realm of possibilities are endless. It means we do not die (in the conventional sense), we evolve. Do we then have our conscience intact? This “singularity” of our soul removes us from our current plane of existence and if we are truly one with the universe at this point then we simple would only have to think about a place and we would be there. This pure form of teleportation could explain how extraterrestrials travel such great distances without dying along the way.

This is what I believe is to be discovered (Code Key) - the answers that saves mankind from its destiny of Armageddon. We already know that our minds are yet to be unraveled and understanding how it works. For instance, take the following excerpt from the book “Law of Success” written by Napolian Hill:

“It happened on Armistice Day in Chicago in 1918. That day, he woke at 3 a.m., feeling as someone had tried to awake him using physical force. As he sat up in bed, he knew immediately that something out of the ordinary had happened. He felt so strange that it had driven him to get up get dressed and leave for the streets in Chicago in the middle of the night. Outside, he found that there had already been thousands of others who had felt the touch of the same influence, yet everybody was wondering what happened, why everyone was on the streets?

They didn’t know at that time that what happened was that millions of men had received instructions to cease fighting and there combined joy set in to motion a thought wave that swept the entire world and made itself felt in every normal mind. Never before had so many people though of the same thing, in the same manner at the same time. Everybody felt something in common, effectively creating a mastermind.”

Napoleon Hill was also a “Freemason”.

This is exactly the dynamic, or group mastermind would have if the obelisk described in the bible code is found, uncovered and divulged to everyone one the planet. It would be a powerful uniter in a time when religions divide the world over whose God is the true God.

Gore believes his Nobel “Piece Prize” has benefits!

2010-07-01T11:09:00.000-07:00

The reason behind the Gore divorce is coming into clarity!

When Al Gore received the Nobel “Peace Prize” he obviously believed it said “Piece Prize” because he felt obliged to get a “little somethin, somethin” from a Portland, Oregon masseuse in 2007.

As it is typical for the Portland Police (from little Moscow on the Willamette) they did not have the political will to warrant a formal investigation into the serious sexual allegations against the liberal icon. Just as Lewinski had her “blue dress” with semen stains from the “liar in chief” bodily fluids on her garment, so does this young lady (except it’s jeans and not a dress) that purportedly captured gores spores.

It should also be noted that Gore’s definition of “Global Warming” should now include a new dynamic (warming up to her globes) that is of course up to interpretation of what the word “is”, is!

Once again, the “National Inquirer” has scooped the Main Stream Media on the story and has now identified the 54 year old victim with the revelation that it no long a “he said, she said” case because according to the Inquirer the victim stated “"I want justice served," Hagerty said as she reveals the key witness who could blow the case wide open, the secret hotel video surveillance and the DNA evidence!

As the Portland Police Department was caught “flat footed” (no pun intended) in their egregious non-handling of this sex crime they have since “re-opened their investigation” into the matter. It kinda sounds like the recent mass murder suspect in the University of Alabama, Huntsville police case in the suspects 1980’s death of her brother.

While Gore has now come out and “unequivocally and categorically denies” any wrongdoing we will have to wait and see if a warrant for DNA is served on the future “sex offender” registry candidate.

I can only wonder if he ever thought that when he was stripping for his "piece prize" that he would actually be stripped of the other "Peace Prize" if convicted?

Petreaus Confirmed 99-0 in Senate exposes Democrats alliance with netroots!

2010-07-01T07:08:00.000-07:00

Remember the infamous 2007 MoveOn.org full page ad in the NY Times titled "General Peteaus or General Betray Us". The ad generated much controversy and forced the democrats who, up until that point, overwhelmingly criticized the surge as a failure and the war -- well, lost -- to openly condemn the ad as over the top. The vote condemning MoveOn was taken and two of the Democratic Presidential hopefuls chose not to vote. Who were the two Democrats that chose not to condemn? Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama!

In addition to Clinton and Barrack siding with MoveOn over Petraeus and our war effort we saw Harry Reid on CNN before the Congressional testimony on the surge in Iraq by Patraeus answering the CNN reporters question "will you believe Petreaus if he testifies the surge is working?" -- His answer - NO.

If you go to the MoveOn site to see the infamous ad today you will find that they have removed (scrubbed) it from their site because the narrative of the 99-0 confirmation of Petreaus does not fit with the Obama narrative. They are attempting to rewrite history, again.

If anyone recalls the NY Times controversy on MoveOn did not end with the mere ad itself. It was also learned that they (NYT) charged MoveOn 2/3rds less for this political ad over all others.

The confimation of Petreaus affirms that the Iraq war surge was a success and that the Democrats were on the wrong side of history. This history is one that they and their MSM allies are busy scrubbing in search of a better narrative to support "Obama's stunning success in firing McCrystal in Afghanistan."

This also means that the success of the surge is a vindication of George Bush though you won't hear that being uttered anywhere on the left side of the isle.......

Testimony contradicts WH Council Internal Report on Blago!

2010-06-29T14:59:00.000-07:00

We go from knowledge of Blago intentions to cover-up crime.

On 12/23/09, while on vacation in Hawaii and unable to field questions from reporters, Obama’s White House Council (Greg Craig) released his internal report that exonerates the President elect and his Cabinet from the growing Senate Seat sale.

Excerpts from the report:

The President-Elect

"the President-Elect had no contact or communication with Governor Blagojevich or members of his staff about the Senate seat. In various conversations with transition staff and others, the President-Elect expressed his preference that Valerie Jarrett work with him in the White House.

He also stated that he would neither stand in her way if she wanted to pursue the Senate seat nor actively seek to have her or any other particular candidate appointed to the vacancy.

After Ms. Jarrett decided on November 9, 2008 to withdraw her name from consideration as a possible replacement for him in the Senate and to accept the White House job, the President-Elect discussed other qualified candidates with David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel. Those candidates included Representatives Jan Schakowsky and Jesse Jackson, Jr., Dan Hynes and Tammy Duckworth. The President-Elect understood that Rahm Emanuel would relay these names to the Governor's office as additions to the pool of qualified candidates who might already be under consideration. Mr. Emanuel subsequently confirmed to the President that he had in fact relayed these names. At no time in the discussion of the Senate seat or of possible replacements did the President-Elect hear of a suggestion that the Governor expected a personal benefit in return for making this appointment to the Senate."

Testimony today in the blago trial:

"On (the day before the Presidential elections) -Top union leader Thomas Balanoff (SEIU) said he was at dinner the night before (November 4) the November Presidential election when he got a call that was blocked.

So he didn't take it.

Later he listened to his messages: "I walked outside, listened to it and it was from President Obama," Balanoff said.

"Tom, this is Barrack, give me a call," the soon-to-be President-Elect said on the message.

After Balanoff sent word through an Obama aide to call him back, Obama returned his call later that night.

"Tom, I want to talk to you with regard to the Senate seat," Obama told him.

Balanoff said Obama said he had two criteria: someone who was good for the citizens of Illinois and could be elected in 2010. Obama said he wasn't publicly coming out in support of anyone but he believed Valerie Jarrett would fit the bill. "I would much prefer she (remain in the White House) but she does want to be Senator and she does meet those two criteria," Balanoff said Obama told him. "I said: 'thank you, I'm going to reach out to Gov. Blagojevich."

Assessment: According to the internal report “The President-Elect had no contact or communication with Governor Blagojevich or members of his staff about the Senate seat”

According to Tom Balanoff (SEIU President) testimony today, Obama personally called him and said “Tom, I want to talk to you with regard to the Senate seat” and Balanoff ended the call on 11/4/08 with”thank you, I'm going to reach out to Gov. Blagojevich."

Obama personally had contact with Blagojevich staff, through a Union intermediary, specifically to relay Valerie Jarrett’s name for the seat.

Balanoff testified that on 11/6/08 he met with Blagojevich -- "Balanoff then described a Nov. 6, 2008 meeting he had with Rod Blagojevich to recommend Valerie Jarrett for Barrack Obama's Senate seat.

Blagojevich responded that he was in "active discussions" with the Madigan’s about appointing Lisa Madigan and was holding out for a legislative package with the House speaker.

"I said that could be months. He said, 'Yeah'. I said Valerie Jarrett, I don't believe she has that kind of time," Balanoff testified.

Blago then turned the conversation to a cabinet position, Balanoff said.

"He said, 'You know, I love being governor, but my real passion is health care,'" and then he asked about the Health and Human Services cabinet post.

"I told him that's not going to happen," Balanoff said. "He said, "Is that because of all the investigations around me?"

This exchange infers two things:

1) That by 11/6/08 Obama would have known that Blagojevich was seeking a “quid pro quo” for Jarrett and did not report it as a crime. And

2) When Blagojevich turned the conversation to a cabinet position and suggested his “passion” for the HHS post, Balanoff cut him off with the comment that “That’s not going to happen. This gives anyone with a brain that Balanoff has the authority to negotiate. Balanoff did not say he “believes that would never happen” but said directly that “that’s not going to happen”!

It is also important to note that Balanoff’s testimony was not given in exchange for a “lighter sentence” because he was not indicted for a crime. He is simply giving “witness testimony”. So Obama supporters will have a hard time explaining how Balanoff has a credibility problem like, let’s say John Harris or Tony Rezko.

I would say that Balanoff is very credible and that the proven relationship between Obama (pre-election and after) and SEIU is very cozy indeed. It explains why he would use one of their senior members to act as intermediary discretely.

In fact, after Balanoff received that message on November 4th from Obama, the first call Balanoff made was to Andy Stern. That fact has yet to come out at trial. Stern was Head of SEIU at the time and the most frequent visitor to the White House since Obama was elected.

Finally the White House Council report stated the following about Balanoff and Valerie Jarrett –

“On November 7, 2008 -- at a time when she was still a potential candidate for the Senate seat -- Ms. Jarrett spoke with Mr. Tom Balanoff, the head of the Illinois chapter of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Mr. Balanoff is not a member of the Governor's staff and did not purport to speak for the Governor on that occasion. But because the subject of the Governor's interest in a cabinet appointment came up in that conversation, I am including a description of that meeting.

Mr. Balanoff told Ms. Jarrett that he had spoken to the Governor about the possibility of selecting Valerie Jarrett to replace the President-Elect. He told her that Lisa Madigan's name also came up. Ms. Jarrett recalls that Mr. Balanoff also told her that the Governor had raised with him the question of whether the Governor might be considered as a possible candidate to head up the Department of Health and Human Services in the new administration. Mr. Balanoff told Ms. Jarrett that he told the Governor that it would never happen. Jarrett concurred. Mr. Balanoff did not suggest that the Governor, in talking about HHS, was linking a position for himself in the Obama cabinet to the selection of the President-Elect's successor in the Senate, and Ms. Jarrett did not understand the conversation to suggest that the Governor wanted the cabinet seat as a quid pro quo for selecting any specific candidate to be the President-Elect's replacement. At no time did Balanoff say anything to her about offering Blagojevich a union position."

Assessment: At the time of the interim investigation report, the White House council report deflects and tries to imply that Mr. Balanoff did not speak for the Governor when the report stated -- “Mr. Balanoff is not a member of the Governor's staff and did not purport to speak for the Governor on that occasion.”

We know from Balanoff testimony that this is disingenuous because Obama called Balanoff to speak to the Governor as his intermediary, not the Governors. In fact, Obama’s call to Balanoff was the prior evening to this accounting by White House Council.

This can be born out by the fact that Blagojevich turned the conversation with Balanoff to a HHS position within the Obama cabinet in which he shot Blagojevich down. That is not an indication that Balanoff worked or represented the Governor, it is indicative of Balanoff representing Obama.

of Democrats and Dying, and interesting analogy!

2010-06-29T06:50:00.000-07:00

An interesting article over at "American Thinker" by Alex Stevenson titled "The Democrats' Five Stages". The author applies the 5 stages of grief outlined in the Elisabeth Kubler-Ross 1969 book (on Death and Dying) and compares it to the Democrats of today. I found it a compelling assessment:

"The five stages are:

Denial, a temporary defense for the individual

Anger, when denial fails, resistance and rage against the truth replace it.

Bargaining, the third stage involves the hope that the inevitable can be delayed

Depression, the beginning of understanding the inevitable

Acceptance, honestly dealing with the reality of the situation.

The Democrats are going through this process.

Consider the Democrats' response to the Tea Party Movement in terms of this analysis. The Democrats and media offer a classic instance of Denial. The unified response by the party and the media was to characterize the movement as "Astroturf." MSM reports on the Tea Party demonstration in Washington minimized the large number of participants and labeled them as poorly organized and unlikely to have any influence on the debate of the role of the Federal Government in our current crisis.

The second stage, Anger, is well underway and may have peaked. The House Democrats called the Tea Party "racist," claiming imaginary swastikas at rallies, and marched to the Capitol in force, bearing the Imperial Gavel in order to provoke an incident. The only incident was a phony spitting accusation and a non-existent racial epithet by an entrenched incumbent race baiter.

Looking forward in the political process, Americans should anticipate the third stage, Bargaining. The Democrats will offer up candidates under the false flag third party "Tea Party." In Florida, Democrat Congressman Alan Grayson has conspired with corrupt local operatives to register the Tea Party as a political party. The intention is to put candidates on the ballot in November in order to confuse the electorate and draw votes away from the newly invigorated Republicans. We can anticipate more of this nationally, depending on its success in Florida and Nevada.

Depression will be the overwhelming emotion in the Democrat leadership after the elections in November. They will be inconsolable and difficult to deal with in the depths of their despair, and not just a little dangerous. The few months between the November election and new members taking their seats in House and Senate will be a lame duck session we all should fear.

The final stage is Acceptance. Will the Democrats ever abandon the tactics that delegitimize a Republican majority? Accusations of election fraud and lawsuits will be in the news in the period following any significant Democrat loss. It is doubtful that the Democrats will ever accept the new situation and start the cycle of grief over from the first stage, denial. The rage will be renewed through the rent-a-mob and bargaining will begin anew as committee seats are renegotiated.

Depression will bring the retirement of the previous powerful committee chairmen and other figures unable to deal with their loss., thus setting the stage for a new generation of Democrats, who will adjust to the new power structure. Acceptance will be required to advance any legislation favored by the Democrats, so in the long run, the new generation will come to terms.

Obama and his Union allies make significant gains!

2010-06-28T08:50:00.000-07:00

What we know and don’t know!

What we don’t know:

What is the true cause of the BP oil rig explosion? Was it sabotage? The Obama administration made one of its only real decisions in this ecological disaster when it placed a moratorium on any “deep water” drilling in the gulf and elsewhere in the United States. Ken Salazar, of the EPA, did so by citing experts (who have all come forward to say he lied about what they said in their reports) and now a Federal Court judge has overturned the moratorium. The battle continues with the Justice Department ready to appeal the decision to lift the ban and the EPA stating it will just re-impose another ban to circumvent the court ordered lifting.

Did you know that 100% of the “deep water oil rig” workers are non-union. Did you also know that unions have tried, in vain, for decades to organize a union shop on these oil platforms and failed? It begs the question of how much of the EPA and Obama’s decision to ban further drilling has to do with this fact? The 6 month moratorium is to give the government enough time to complete studies and investigations and come up with recommendations for renewed operations. What is to stop the government from concluding that part of the reason for the “accident” (I use this term loosely, though the government uses it exclusively before any meaningful investigations are even begun) is because of non-union labor? I think that the Union/Obama relationship is well established in the eyes of the voting public and is not a stretch to see the oil industry nationalized to accomplish Union transformation.

We already see the Unions pointing to this when the President of the Seafarers International Union penned a recent Op-Ed:

“The offshore exploration, production and service industry in the Gulf of Mexico, to the best of our knowledge, is 100 percent nonunion and increasingly foreign. Past attempts to organize these workers have been met with bitter opposition — not from employees but from employers. These largely anti-union employers struggle in a volatile, hyper-competitive environment that has resulted in unsafe working conditions and unstable employment. Lack of union representation has denied oil-field workers a voice in the workplace, which in turn has created an out-of-control industry with little oversight or accountability. It is painful to see oil-soaked birds receive more media attention than injured, deceased or displaced workers. It is also painful to see the lack of an organized workers' voice in the legislative and regulatory processes contribute to 11 deaths and the worst spill in U.S. history. This clearly did not have to happen.”

What we know:

GM and Chrystler were in deep financial trouble and seeking relief through the US Federal Bankruptcy courts. If they were allowed to enter into bankruptcy, the company would have had the opportunity to “renegotiate” (through the courts) the UAW pensions that were the direct reason for the company’s financial woes.

May 2009 - "General Motors (GM) has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, triggering the next stage in the ongoing fight to see who will bear the costs of making the company financially viable again. The bankruptcy process allows debts and other claims to be reduced, sometimes dramatically, in an attempt to create a reorganized firm that can actually earn enough to meet its downsized obligations. One large claim that could theoretically be cut back is the unfunded portion of GM’s pension liabilities."

In the end, the Government just took GM (70%) and gave the secondary share of ownership to the UAW (17.5%) and effectively killed the bankruptcy and in the end the shareholders were left holding the bag (along with taxpayers) for the UAW pension insolvency.

Obamacare has also ensured a “SEIU unionized” windfall of union membership.

The most recent jobs report show that while the private sector has lost over 2MM jobs the union government workforce has added roughly half a million net new jobs.

I would say this Administration is accomplishing much for unions who made it possible for Obama to accomplish his Oval Office victory.

Obama's talk is cheap!, Israel's tough talk worked!

2010-06-27T10:16:00.001-07:00

Maybe the Obama administration can have a "teachable moment" over the tough talk of Israel to Iran when they communicated their response to Iran's assembling a "Gaza flotilla blockade busting" event of their own (using warships). Here is what happened next according to Michael Ledeen:

"Iran has cancelled sending an aid ship to the Gaza Strip which had been scheduled to set sail for the Palestinian territory on Sunday, state news agency IRNA reported.

"The trip is not going to happen," Hossein Sheikholeslam, secretary general of the International Conference for the Support of the "Palestinian" Intifada, an Iranian body set up by parliament, told reporters on Thursday, IRNA said.

He said the ship had originally been due to depart on Thursday, but "due to restrictions from the occupying Zionist regime, it was decided that this ship would leave on Sunday. But now the trip is not going to happen." ...

"The Zionist regime has made the blockade a political issue and we do not wish to politicise this kind of humanitarian aid because the most important thing for us is to break the blockade of Gaza," he said.

He said the voyage was cancelled as Israel "had sent a letter to the United Nations saying that the presence of Iranian and Lebanese ships in the Gaza area will be considered a declaration of war on that regime and it will confront it," IRNA quoted him as saying.

That’s clear enough, isn’t it? Israel said that if any Iranian ship tries to enter Israeli waters, it will be treated as an act of war. So the Iranians bagged it."

Maybe Obama could at least talk tough but it would ring hollow as everyone knows he would never back it with force, Israel on the other hand -- you betcha!

The other "teachable moment" would be for the Media and the UN who have claimed Israeli blockade to be a violation of Internation law is really an act of war against against a legitimate legal operation of Israel.

Last thought, Bill Ayres & Bernardine Dohrn along with Jodie Evans of Code Pink should be imprisoned for their direct involvement with the "flotilla" incident -- don't you thinK? They were guilty of this personal activity which led Israel to forcefully speak of war to an aggressive Islamic regime bent on destroying her.

"Custards last stand"

2010-06-27T09:52:00.000-07:00

More aptly put, Biden slaughtered at Custard stand.

America needs another Ronald Reagan and

2010-06-27T09:47:00.000-07:00

She needs another Joseph McCarthy!

June 25th marks the opening salvo of the Korean War and I sat down to watch a great Hollywood film (The Longest Day) that won 2 Oscars in 1962.

The iconic film was an example of the support that Hollywood (Institution) of the time and the actors that actively supported America troops and her allies. Names like John Wayne, Sean Connery, Robert Mitchum, Henry Fonda (who would have guessed his daughter Jane would lead the traitorous left later), Eddie Albert, Stuart Whitman, Rod Steiger, Peter Lawford and many more (five directors and a cast of thousands).

While I sat and watch with pride that influenced so many at such a critical time in our history (the outset of the Vietnam War and the counter-culture movement) it was apparent that so many in Hollywood and the US Government are so openly hostile of our country and equally as open about their socialist and communist fervor.

In 1962 the communist culture that was brimming just below the surface and closeted in the late 1940’s through the 1950’s was exposed by Joseph McCarthy and Ronald Reagan. In fact the term McCarthyism is a negative connotation used by leftists in the Main Stream media who today still claim he was on a witch-hunt and his assertions, baseless.

History has a way of vindication

The 1995 release of the Venona papers and corroboration from documents gleaned from the Soviet Archives largely vindicate McCarthy as correct in his assertions of widespread Soviet infiltration of the United States Government (at all levels including the White House) as well as Hollywood California.

Sean Penn, the Hugo Chavez loving actor’s family has a long history of communism starting with his father (Leo Penn) who was “blacklisted” from Hollywood acting until much later in life and only then, on television.

Rosey O’Donnel - "I say seize their assets. Right now. Seize their assets today. Take over the [company]. I don't care [how]. Issue an executive order...Call it socialism, call it communism, call it anything you want. Let's watch Rush Limbaugh explode on TV...Seize the assets. Take over BP."

Oliver Stone - U.S. filmmaker Oliver Stone said he sees Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez as an energetic, principled champion of change in Latin America and hopes to capture the spirit of his drive to roll back U.S. influence in an upcoming documentary.

Ed Asner – Interview with Progressive.org:

Q: Has it become easier for progressives in Hollywood now?

Asner: [Sighs.] I don’t think anything ever becomes easier for progressives. Far too much of our country is being misguided by rightwing radio, which dominates the airwaves. Far too many people are intrigued by the news space the tea baggers occupy. They talk about “socialism” while they’re busy collecting their Social Security, unemployment, and Medicare checks, and busily decrying any other new innovation as being “socialistic.”

Q: What do you think of socialism?

Asner: I think we need more of it.

Al Sharpton - "First of all, then we have to say the American public overwhelmingly voted for socialism when they elected President Obama," Sharpton said. "Let's not act as though the president didn't tell the American people - the president offered the American people health reform when he ran. He was overwhelmingly elected running on that and he has delivered what he promised."

It is no secret that now Obama has taken the Oval Office, Progressive Socialists and Communists are so emboldened that they no longer hide in the shadows. They openly discuss to any microphone in their face that they want America destroyed and replaced with their utopian madness. I believe that the results of the November elections will be our collective rejection of their ideals and kick their sorry asses to the curb and new fresh faces will emerge in the American conservative model in order to turn this tide back to our exceptionalism that the Democrats do not think we have…..

The promising outcome of "Kelo" - 5 years later

2010-06-26T06:20:00.000-07:00

I believe that what happened when the US Supreme Court gave government the right to seize private property and give it to another private group (for monitary gain) energized individuals to act. It was the proverbial last straw for Americans who have seen the Constitution go down the tubes and government power grow to the state it has found itself in Obama. I also believe it was one of the main impetus' for the modern tea party movements phenom in "grass roots". Watch, and you decide.....

One good thing leads to another!

2010-06-25T12:12:00.000-07:00

Or in this case, one bad thing leads to another!

An interesting piece of information hit the newswires yesterday concerning a fundraising letter Nanci Pelosi put forth regarding financial contributions for the upcoming November elections. I find it amusing that the very “tea party” she and her Democrat cohorts decried as “astro-turf” and insignificant are now keeping them awake at night with images of jail cells and the exposure of truth (truth that we already know but they think we are too stupid to know).

This letter of “campaign money desperately needed” is another “fear tactic” but this time it is their own personal fear of the coming inquisitions of their own behavior. You see, she and her fellow travelers are fearful of the myriad of investigations of this administration, particularly Obama himself that is driving this fear.

Darrel Issa (R-CA) has already held congressional investigations of ACORN and found them to be a “criminal enterprise” (surprise, surprise) and forwarded the Congressional findings to the Dept of Justice (Eric Holder) to open their own investigation, to no avail. Darrel Issa had this to say about the letter –

“Pelosi was effectively seeking "immunity" for the Obama administration. Obviously, Speaker Pelosi believes that a Democratic Congress should give this administration immunity from legitimate questions and appropriate accountability," Issa said. "Her statements are indicative of the desperate state her Majority is in and if the best case she can make is to caution the American people against the dangers of conducting legitimate and vigorous oversight, she is welcome to make that case."

The fear that Pelosi and her fellow travelers feel as it relates to her rhetoric of a “Ken Starr-like” witch hunt is a real and palpable one. If you recall, Ken Starr was initially appointed to look into the death of Vince Foster and the real estate investments of Bill Clinton (Whitewater). The thing about democrats is their dealings, or more aptly put, their Gordian knot of dealings are intricately woven and encompass many different illegalities that tie one subject to another and so on and so on. This dynamic was proven with Ken Starr because while the democrats were decrying witch hunt the investigators were led to each door as it related to the last. They simply followed the trail and it ultimately led to “Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones and others”. The fact that Clinton lied under oath is a testament to the facts of the investigation. This led to the door that ultimately led to the impeachment of Clinton. This is what Pelosi and her ilk fears.

In her plea for contributions to hold back the initial door that will be opened by Issa it will lead to another door with Pelosi’s name on it. How so you ask? Let’s look at some of the facts. We know that the letter Pelosi sent out was in direct reference to the open admission of Issa’s that meaningful congressional investigations WILL be opened, at least in the following areas:

“At a recent speech to Pennsylvania Republicans here, he boasted about what would happen if the GOP wins 39 seats, and he gets the power to subpoena.

“That will make all the difference in the world,” he told 400 applauding party members during a dinner at the chocolate-themed Hershey Lodge. “I won’t use it to have corporate America live in fear that we’re going to subpoena everything. I will use it to get the very information that today the White House is either shredding or not producing.”

In other words, Issa wants to be to the Obama administration what Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) was to the Clinton administration — a subpoena machine in search of White House scandals.

Even if Republicans don’t take the House, Issa has other ambitions. Those close to him say he is eyeing a potential run for a leadership post, even though he’s a two-time loser for Republican policy chairman.

Issa also is trying to build his national brand, traveling to Pennsylvania for a summer Republican meeting. He basked in praise for his role in creating “job-gate,” a mini scandal that forced the White House to admit that former President Bill Clinton tried to coax Rep. Joe Sestak out of the Democratic Senate primary in Pennsylvania by offering him an unpaid job.

After calling the White House “corrupt” and Obama’s presidency “failed,” Issa reiterated his claims that — despite a contrary assessment from most experts — the administration violated federal law with the Sestak imbroglio.

He also mentioned e-mail from White House deputy chief of staff Jim Messina to Colorado U.S. Senate candidate Andrew Romanoff about three possible administration jobs as the administration apparently tried to steer him away from a primary challenge against Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet.”

Once the door to “jobgate” is opened and the Obama Administration is left exposed to their gerrymandering of two “Senate seats” the facts will closely mirror what is currently unfolding in a Chicago, Illinois courtroom involving Rod Blagojevich which already has mentioned Obama, Emmanuel and Jarrett as well as Andy Stern and SEIU.

The doors that Issa will have to choose from are many and go in different directions. We know that he has already opened the ACORN door and his committee has already declared them to be a “criminal enterprise” that the Justice Department refused to investigate. The doors will ultimately lead to Obama’s door and inevitably his birth records. Once this door is opened it will lead to Pelosi as she was the one person on behalf of the Democrat party that signed two different forms that put forth Obama as “eligible” for his candidacy.

The Blagojevich trial has already proven that this Administration has engaged in deceit and cover-up when confronted with the realization that Blago was caught on FBI tape recordings dealing with this administration for the Senate seat. If you remember, the first response by Obama was “at no time did I or anyone in my administration” have any conversations with Blagojevich about the seat he vacated. It took less than a day for conflicting proof that David Axelrod had said a “list” was given directly to Blagojevich’s staff and the White House immediately said Axelrod misspoke. Then Axelrod came out and said as much. Then Obama said an internal investigation would occur shortly to see if anyone had direct communication over the seat with the Governors staff. The White House counsel report on that investigation exonerated the actions of the White House.

Now we know that John Harris said Obama knew that Blago was shopping the seat and that the staff of the President elect had direct contact through Rahm and members of SEIU.

If Watergate has shown us anything it is that the actual crime itself is less than a cover up. The reality that the Democrats, who have had Obama’s back covered, are facing their loss of power know that their day of judgment is on the horizon. It will not come from their God (because the have no God) but from the “little people” who they have insulted and derided since they took absolute power. Pelosi knows this and is pleading for your money to stop it. But, the problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money……

Obama -- someone to laugh at!

2010-06-24T17:59:00.000-07:00

Blago, Obama and the Chicago way!

2010-06-24T06:42:00.000-07:00

To understand Obama of today you need to look at his past.

They say to emulate someone is the sincerest form of flattery – unless you are Rod Blagojevich emulating Barrack Obama.

The trial underway in Chicago against Blago has many tales to tell in how politicians in the State of Illinois succeed at their craft. The trial of public opinion against Obama has also been waging since Obama has taken office and surrounded himself in the White House with those who hail from that very cesspool of corruption, thuggery and dirty tricks.

The public is aware, now, of Obama and his ties to ACORN and their voter fraud baggage. His community organizing experience is the only “real world” experience that he could claim on his resume during his candidacy for President and we know it was at ACORN and the “motor vote” drive.

There are many who say that the Joe Sestak job offer as well as the Andrew Romanoff job offer is no different than what Blago is on trial for – selling (or bribing) of a Senate Seat. We know that Obama and his crack White House staff is neck deep in the Blago trial because, after all, it was Obama’s vacated seat at the center of the trial.

That said, it is apparent that the Democrats will do just about anything to subvert the American electorate to place whom they deem fit for the job in a seat.

Before I get into any of the details about Obama’s meteoric rise to the White House I just need to point out that Blago vacated his Senate seat to become Governor (first win) and guess who was appointed to fill that vacated seat? Rahm Emmanuel!

To show the lengths that Obama’s employed from his Chicago dirty bag of tricks to get elected in 1996 to his first ever political office you may not have learned.

We know that one of Obama’s self proclaimed experience was with his efforts to get voter registration increased -- first in his home State before his first election, then, nationwide for his Presidential victory.

This is how CNN described it – “In his first race for office, seeking a state Senate seat on Chicago's gritty South Side in 1996, Obama effectively used election rules to eliminate his Democratic competition.

As a community organizer, he had helped register thousands of voters. But when it came time to run for office, he employed Chicago rules to invalidate the voting petition signatures of three of his challengers.

The move denied each of them, including incumbent Alice Palmer, a longtime Chicago activist, a place on the ballot. It cleared the way for Obama to run unopposed on the Democratic ticket in a heavily Democrat district.”

Could it be that the Obama team employed their ACORN army that registered non-existent voters and then challenged those very registrations?

The Islamic Republic of Dearbornistan!

2010-06-23T14:40:00.000-07:00

You may think that this behavior is not happening here in the US because after all we have freedom of speech laws that protect us from a tyranical oppressive government -- wrong! Look at the peaceful christians handing out literature and the overwhelming police response for "unlawful" behavior? you decide......

Democrats aligned with radical Islam!

2010-06-21T09:49:00.000-07:00

It won’t be long before we hear “Allahu Akbar” at a “Joint Session of Congress”!

I wrote a couple of articles that outlined the current activities of Bill Ayres and Bernardine Dohrn along with Jody Evans (founder of Code Pink) in agitating the unrest in the Middle East between Israel and all those who wish to see her destroyed, as Iran has promised to do.

I also pointed out that this alliance between the “Free Gaza Movement” which the unrepentant terrorist actively attended the early Cairo protests with their Islamic brothers and sisters to breach the blockade of the Gaza Strip by the Israeli Navy. In doing so, they are not only breaking international law but also a host of other laws here in the US by doing so laws that include aiding and abetting terror organizations under US anti-terror laws. I feel the need to remind who are actively aligned with those on the left side of the isle -- Labor Unions – of all stripes (i.e., SIEU, UAW, ILWU etc).

It is only a logical step for unions to support their national leaders who are tied to the hip with the policies of the White House. These national leaders of the union of which I speak are the same ones that, during the 1960’s created the SDS and the Weather Underground and went on to found the SEIU and ACORN.

Now the Longshore union in Oakland is holding their own blockage against Israel here in the US. There solidarity with their Islamic terror brothers is in full swing.....
Israel has release a video of the peace activists preparing for their bloody voyage. Here are the leaders, in their own words preparing for martyrdom vs. peace.

Now, as a result of Bill Ayres and the Democrats Union thugs, American naval warships have exited the Suez Canal to rendevous with the Israeli navy to confront the Iranian navy which is enroute to the blockade in a show of force to thwart Israels right to defend herself. The community organizer has taken his "revolution" to the international stage that has been set for a dangerous end game that has the potential to engulf the entire world in war......

Chris Christie for President 2012

2010-06-18T08:48:00.000-07:00

The anti-Corzine must first prove his mettle and keep his promises. Somthing tells me he will do just that and as he does his stock will continue to rise, perhaps to Presidential level.

23 days after elected – a preview of things to come

Honest & Direct and does not genuflect to anyone but the citizens who elected him

Unlike Democrat cowardice, Christie holds multiple town halls in libland to answer brunt questions with honest and brunt answers like he did here with a teacher.

Taking on the judicial activism that Americans are tired of, like the recent California Constitutional Amendment on Gay Marriage passed by the will of the voters now rests in the hands of a few “black robes”.

Christie rejecting his legislature tax hikes on the rich then at the same time over-riding their veto. Can you say “man on a mission”….

The day of reckening…..

Weatherman Bill Ayres latest revolution - II

2010-06-17T01:30:00.000-07:00

From the Streets to the schools and back again!

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” – Edmund Burke

To set the stage and show that the Obama Administration officials are on the same page as Hamas, Iran, Hezbolla and not with our long time ally (Israel) -- here we have John O. Brennen (White House Homeland Security Chief) calling “Jerusalem” – “Al Quds” (Arab meaning). This is the same guy who is tasked with the investigations of the Ft. Hood & Christmas Day terror incidents. The speech he gave was on May 19, 2010 just 12 days before the “flotilla” incident.

Keep in mind that the flotilla, according to the White House, MSM and those who hate Israel nothing more than “unarmed peace activists” bringing humanitarian aid to the Gaza strip which is under the control of the terror organization Hamas.

What the White House, MSM and those who hate Israel did not tell you was that 3 days prior to the flotilla, Hamas TV (not to be confused with CNN) featured a Yemeni professor (perhaps a colleague of Professors Ayres & Dohrn) boasting that “"as much as the heroes on the flotilla want to reach Gaza, the option of martyrdom is more desirable to them." while the same day news (Al Jazeera) coverage reported -- "Before Its Departure for Gaza: Activists on Board Chant Intifada Songs and Praise Martyrdom."

So, here in the West the “flotilla” was filled with “peace activists” and all through the Muslim world these activists sang “intifada songs praising martyrdom” and the desired outcome isn’t landing with humanitarian supplies, but becoming martyrs.

While the MSM was “under-reporting” Bill Ayres during the 2008 Presidential campaign of Barrack Obama by focusing the brunt of their articles of the “weatherman underground” bombings across American in the late 60’s and early 70’s they did not dig into his current radical involvement in 2007 and 2008 (with the exception that he is a respected college professor). If the media would have even just scratched the surface (this includes Fox News as well as the bloggers) then we would have learned that Ayres and his wife as well as Jodie Evans of Code Pink were already in the Middle East with the first attempts to “break Israel’s blockade of Gaza” with the “Free Gaza Movement” and in direct collaboration with Hamas. In November 2007 the “Free Gaza Movement” organizers received the following letter from “Palestinian National Authority in Gaza for the Hamas led government”.

In August 2008 just two months after Obama won the Democratic nomination for President, Ayres, Dohrn, Evans (Code Pink founder) and the Free Gaza Movement staged violent protests in Cairo with the intentions of boarding the first successful boat flotilla aimed at breaching the Israeli blockade . Ayres, Dohrn and Evans were not permitted (by Egyptian authorities) to board the ships as they only allowed 100 of the 1,100 “Free Gaza” peace activists agitating the violence. Instead, Dr. Larudee (friend and colleague of Ayres and Dohrn) was allowed to board that day and was given a “hero’s welcome” by Hamas upon landing in Gaza replete with medals and media fanfare (except US media was silent probably due to the Ayres/Obama ties).

As you can see from the photos below, Larudee (second from left) is in full solidarity with Hamas and is wearing not one, but two medals.

Never mind the anti-terror laws for aiding and abetting known terror organizations which Ayres, Dohrn, Evans and the entire American contingent of “Free Gaza Members” who attended this action in August 2008 -- The US Neutrality Act was also violated big time when they set upon the confrontation with the Israeli Navy enforcing the blockade.

The U.S. Neutrality Act provides that:

"Whoever, within the United States, knowingly begins or sets on foot or provides or prepares a means for or furnishes the money for, or takes part in, any military or naval expedition or enterprise to be carried on from thence against the territory or dominion of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States is at peace, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

Furthermore – “the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip is lawful under international law and recognized as such by the U.S. government. In addition, pursuant to the Oslo Accords signed by both Israel and the PLO, the Gaza coastline is under strict control of Israel until a Palestinian state is created.”

“The Free Gaza Movement (FGM)”, which had organized the earlier Gaza flotilla in 2008, raises funds in the U.S. via its website: www.freegaza.org although it remains formally unorganized there. The website explains that the FGM does not have tax-free status in the U.S. and therefore relies upon another anti-Israel organization, the American Educational Alliance, which issues tax receipts on its behalf.

Israel sent a formal letter to Attorney General Holder requesting his office “take all necessary and appropriate actions to uphold the laws of the United States, to investigate those that are organizing the flotilla, money laundering and funding this illegal effort and to enjoin any unlawful activity on the part of the FGM and the American Educational Trust.

The entire letter reads:

June 7, 2010

Attorney General Eric Holder
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001

Sent Via Fax: (202) 307-6777

Re: Violation of the U.S. Neutrality Act, 18 U.S.C. § 960, by Free Gaza Movement

Dear Attorney General Holder,

As you are no doubt aware, this past week a boat flotilla organized by anti-Israeli NGOs and Islamic terrorists set out to provoke the Israel Defense Forces and to violate Israel's military blockade of the Hamas controlled Gaza Strip. The flotilla's efforts resulted in the deaths of 9 armed militants and the serious injuring of numerous Israeli soldiers.

I am writing to bring to your attention to a serious matter regarding the flotilla and what might have been a violation of the U.S. Neutrality Act, 18 U.S.C. § 960, regulations of the Internal Revenue Service and an attempt to aid & abet the Hamas terrorist organization, which has occurred within the United States.

The radical pro-Hamas organization, the Free Gaza Movement ("FGM"), has been raising funds for its extremist activities within the United States. The FGM was one of the driving forces behind past efforts to organize a flotilla to Gaza in 2008, and its members raised funds in the U.S. and directed the current Gaza flotilla campaign from Cyprus. These activities would appear to be a violation of the U.S. Neutrality Act, which provides:

"Whoever, within the United States, knowingly begins or sets on foot or provides or prepares a means for or furnishes the money for, or takes part in, any military or naval expedition or enterprise to be carried on from any thence against the territory or dominion of any foreign prince or state, or of any colony, district, or people with whom the United States is at peace, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

This past week U.S. Vice- President Joseph Biden declared that the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip is lawful and pursuant to international law. The blockade was established in June 2007, after terrorist from the Hamas organization violently took control of the territory and ousted the members of the Palestinian Authority security services. Since that time, Hamas has engaged in a relentless campaign to obtain weapons and explosives and to terrorize Israel's civilian population. In an effort to prevent Hamas from obtaining any additional military equipment and to impose economic pressure on the Hamas leadership in Gaza, the Israeli Security Cabinet imposed a series of sanctions on the Gaza Strip including a coastal blockade that is being implemented by the Israeli navy. The naval blockade is particularly important in light of previous attempts by the Iranian government to transfer weapons to Palestinian militants at sea such as occurred in January 2002 when the Israeli navy seized the "Karine A" ship that was loaded with 50 tons of Iranian supplied weaponry.

Moreover, there are several provisions within the agreements signed by Israel and the Palestinian Authority that grant Israel the right to implement a naval blockade on the Gaza Strip. Specifically, the September 28, 1995 Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip which was signed in Washington D.C., which provides that Israel has "the responsibility for defense against external threats, including for defense against external threats from the sea and from the air." In addition, it was agreed that that foreign vessels would "not approach closer than 12 nautical miles from the coast" unless specifically authorized by Israel. As such, the Israeli blockade on Gaza is lawful and the waters outside of Gaza are legally controlled by Israel.

The FGM has a website at: www.freegaza.org. Those who wish to support the FGM'ts activities, including the organizing and outfitting of the boat flotilla which attempted to engage the Israeli navy and run the Gaza blockade, are asked to donate to the FGM. As the FGM website plainly explains ( http://www.freegaza.org/en/usa-donations ), however, that since the FGM does not "currently have 501(c)3 status" donations to the group will be channeled through the American Educational Trust, the publishers of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, who "have generously agreed to serve as our fiscal sponsor in the United States. Through the American Educational Trust you can make U.S. tax-deductible donations to us either with PayPal or by check." Potential donors are informed that if they "would like to make a U.S. tax-deductible donation to the Free Gaza Movement by check, please make out the check to: "American Educational Trust LE" and write "Free Gaza" in the memo section . . ."

In addition to organizing boat flotilla's that contain weapons and supplies the Israeli government has deemed harmful to its security and which it seeks to smuggle into Gaza which would constitute a violation of the Neutrality Act, it is hard to believe that the IRS would authorize an outlaw organization like the FGM, which does not appear to be incorporated nor have tax-free status in the United States to have another organization like the American Educational Trust issue tax receipt to donors on its behalf. This is a clear case of money laundering by the FGM and the American Educational Trust and an effort to defraud the regulations of the IRS. It is both the FGM and the American Educational Trust, as well as its donors, who are knowingly engaging in this fraud on the IRS.

Nevertheless, despite the clear unequivocal policy of the United States to support Israel's right to control the security of the territorial waters around Gaza and to isolate Hamas from external support, the FGM and the American Educational Trust are attempting to undermine the foreign policy of both the United States and Israel, and attempting to aid and abet the Hamas terrorist organization, by raising money to smuggle in weapons and supplies in direct violation of the Interim Agreement regarding foreign vessels and to undermine Israel's sovereign authority.

The FGM and the American Educational Trust has openly soliciting financial support in the United States for its hostile expedition against a friendly nation in violation of the U.S. Neutrality Act. As such, the actions of the FGM and the American Educational Trust are nothing short of an attempt to violate the laws of State of Israel and to engage in conduct that has the effect of undermining the national security of a U.S. ally.

Consequently, I respectfully request that your office take all necessary and appropriate actions to uphold the laws of the United States, to investigate those that are organizing the flotilla, money laundering and funding this illegal effort and to enjoin any unlawful activity on the part of the FGM and the American Educational Trust.

Thank you,

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, Esq.

===============================================

As you can see the “Free Gaza Movement” is working hand in hand with Hamas to break the blockade to allow the free importation of weapons which Hamas fully intends to use against Israel. Bill Ayres is no long content with his scholarly and respectable teaching position any longer because he is engaging in “jihad” against Israel and by extension the United States which he has long desired to overthrow. The involvement of Obama’s long time friends and radicals begs a bigger question – Is Obama aware? Of course he is!

Coming (oil cleanup gear) and Going (evacuation of New Orleans)

2010-06-16T19:46:00.000-07:00

Democrat failures on both ends of a catastrophe

When hurricane Katrina hit New Orleans the Democrats and the MSM severely criticized the Bush Administration for the Governments failure to act or respond to the disaster. The State of Louisiana at the time was in complete Democrat control at the State level with Governor Blanco and at the City of New Orleans level with Mayor Ray Nagin. The blaming of the Federal response, though warranted does not diminish the lives lost because of the local government failure to implement evacuations of their own people and 1,100 deaths occurred as a result. Those deaths are on Blanco and Nagin. In the case of Katrina the Democrats failed to get people out.

Per congress investigation of Katrina:

The failure of local, state, and federal governments to respond more effectively to Katrina — which had been predicted in theory for many years, and forecast with startling accuracy for five days — demonstrates that whatever improvements have been made to our capacity to respond to natural or man-made disasters, four and half years after 9/11, we are still not fully prepared.

Despite adequate warning 56 hours before landfall, Governor Blanco and Mayor Nagin delayed ordering a mandatory evacuation in New Orleans until 19 hours before landfall.

The failure to order timely mandatory evacuations, Mayor Nagin’s decision to shelter but not evacuate the remaining population, and decisions of individuals led to an incomplete evacuation. The ncomplete pre-landfall evacuation led to deaths, thousands of dangerous rescues, and horrible conditions for those who remained.

Now, the Gulf oil rig disaster the same thing is happening but differently. Now we have the local governments controlled by Republicans who are hamstrung by Democrats controlling Washington to get responders into the area (vs. evacuating). Coming and going the Democrats have been consistent in their inaction and negligence to handle a catastrophe from the local to the federal levels…….

Weatherman Bill Ayres latest revolution -- Part I

2010-06-16T09:23:00.000-07:00

“The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” – Edmund Burke

From the Streets to the schools and back again - a radicals journey!

Try to guess the location of these photo’s. I will give you a hint – It is the best kept secret of the Main Street Media. The implanted population are huddled into “concentration-like camps” (according to the MSM) under military oppression by Western back governments, they are also starving with little or no medical supplies and are dying by the droves of malnutrition and preventable medical diseases. The UN is their greatest champion for liberation from the terrible conditions they have to endure (see photo’s above) at the hands of their oppressors.

If you guessed gaza, you guessed right. This is the oppression that Barrack Obama’s buddy and unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayres is currently (since at least 2007) and personally made his life goal of ending, in the name of social justice. It isn’t bad enough he literally got away with murder during his “fugitive days” days and go onto become, in Obama’s words, “a respected professor”, he now is actively working with overseas Islamic terrorists to ignite a powder keg in the Palestinian territories. The flotilla that Israeli commando’s stormed was the next step in their plan which Iran has now seized with the next waive of “humanitarians” with Iranian Navy escorts. Thanks Bill for your concern, but you should be in a jail cell. You were not successful in bringing down the United States government in the 1960’s through you “weathermen” terror cell. You were not successful in transforming the minds of today’s youth through your socialist educational efforts so you had to go and export your “revolution” to the world stage and ignite a possible WWIII instead.

The mean streets of violent radicalism

There is a man who is the embodiment of evil and is enjoying the freedoms of America while he plots and acts to bring her down. He is as cunning as the devil as he has a slippery nature about him as he has eluded law enforcements grasp since the early 1960’s for terrorism crimes that includes the murder of a police officer in the 1970’s in which he is still the prime suspect and remains unsolved.

His name is William Ayres and we know him best as the “unrepentant terrorist”.

We first heard about him during the 2008 Presidential campaign as a friend of Barrack Obama and it was in Ayres home that Obama kicked off his first political campaign in the State of Illinois. When the ties to Ayres became too hot politically, Obama explained to the public that “he was only 8 years old when Ayres committed acts of terror” and then also glossed over Ayres (the adult friend) when Obama said “Ayers is a tenured professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago and a ‘respected advisor' to Mayor Daley on School Reform".

Of course, the unrepentant Ayres didn’t help Obama much when he boasted “Guilty as hell, free as a bird -- America is a great country" when describing his terror activities that went unpunished due to technicalities in the law.

There has been much criticism of the MSM for their lack of investigative reporting surrounding this terrorist and his close affiliation to Obama and what has been reported during the election and quite frankly since has been about his days on the lam in the 60’s and 70’s. We of course have also been treated to just how respectable he is now, being a Professor and all. What we have not heard though is his current terror related activities that brings us to the “flotilla” incident and the escalation of tension between Iran and Israel. Ayres, no longer satisfied with the mundane task of indoctrinating our youth into little brown shirts he has returned to his taste for blood and revolution that he likes most and is working alongside Hamas with the “Free Gaza Movement”.

The birth of a radical progressive educator

Ed Lasky of The American Thinker put it best in an article about Ayres when he wrote – “Ayers was a subversive when he was with the Weatehr Undergound. He is still a subversive, but does his work behind the scenes and with a broader canvass to draw upon. He no longer may lead small gang of bombers but is reaching and shaping a much larger number of people that capitalism is not only bad, but should be fought.”

Ed Lasky of course is speaking of the influence of Ayres over young adults in the college system of indoctrination.

Returning to the streets again

He is no longer patient about the re-education of our youth in the mold of his early revolutionary dreams of violence, Ayres and his wife are back on the front lines of their personal war against freedom with their personal involvement with the “Free Gaza Movement” and the recent “flotilla” incident.

In a letter to the President that was sent by Senators’ Reid and McConnell they urged him to support a broader form of investigation than what the UN is proposing with the incident with Israel and the “flotilla”. The gist of the letter states --

Israel is our strongest ally in the Middle East and a vibrant democracy. Israel is also a partner to the United States on military and intelligence issues in this critical region. That is why it is our national interest to support Israel at a moment when Israel faces multiple threats from Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the current regime in Iran. Israel’s opponents have developed clever diplomatic and tactical ploys to challenge its international standing, whether the effort to isolate Israel at the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty review conference or the recent effort to breach the naval blockade around Gaza.

We fully support Israel’s right to self-defense. In response to thousands of rocket attacks on Israel from Hamas terrorists in Gaza, Israel took steps to prevent items which could be used to support these attacks from reaching Gaza. Israel’s naval blockade, which is legal under international law, allows Israel to keep dangerous goods from entering Gaza by sea. The intent of the measures is to protect Israel, while allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza.

Late last month when Israel learned that groups operating in Turkey wanted to challenge its blockade of Gaza, Israel made every effort to ensure that all humanitarian aid reached Gaza without needlessly precipitating a confrontation. Israeli forces were able to safely divert five of the six ships challenging the blockage. However, video footage shows that the Israeli commandos who arrived on the sixth ship, which was owned by the Turkish Humanitarian Relief Foundation (the IHH), were brutally attacked with iron rods, knives, and broken glass. They were forced to respond to that attack and we regret the loss of life that resulted.

We are deeply concerned about the IHH’s role in this incident and have additional questions about Turkey and any connections to Hamas. The IHH is a member of a group of Muslim charities, the Union of Good, which was designated by the US Treasury Department as a terrorist organization. The Union of Good was created by and strongly supports Hamas, which has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the US State Department. We recommend that your administration consider whether the IHH should be put on the list of foreign terrorist organizations, after an examination by the intelligence community, the State Department, and the Treasury Department.

We commend the action you took to prevent the adoption of an unfair United Nations Security Council resolution, which would have represented a rush to judgment by the international community. We also deplore the actions of the United Nations Human Rights Council which, once again, singled out Israel. Israel has announced its intention to promptly carry out a thorough investigation of this incident and has the right to determine how its investigation is conducted. In the meantime, we ask you to stand firm in the future at the United Nations Security Council and to use your veto power, if necessary, to prevent any similar biased or one-sided resolutions from passing.

This letter urging the President to “hold the line” at the UN while a meaningful investigation is conducted is absolutely warranted and we should use our “veto power” to prevent the UN from further adverse action once again against Israel. This is a welcomed development coming from our elected leaders in Washington. More important though is the credible statement that is now on the record that the backers of the “flotilla” are and have been found to be collaborating with terrorist organizations (IHH & Hamas).

Furthermore, the conflict of interest that the UN has with the IHH is typical as many of their organizations are tied to the hip with terror and it is no different with the IHH because they are a member of ECOSOC in a “consultative status”. In other words they have the ear of the UN as an NGO.

Israel has announced it is holding its own investigation into the matter while the UN conducts their Kangaroo court. The immediate MSM response was overwhelmingly in support of the “flotilla was manned by unarmed peace activist” angle in which the Israeli commando’s opened fired on the kumbaya peaceniks. Of course, Israel was smart and had a complete and comprehensive video log of the mission because they knew what the World of public opinion would predictably do, which they did. In fact the media bias against Israel once again had a prominent news organization (Reuters) doctoring their photo’s to give the impression that 1) the Israeli commando’s were not bloody and 2) the armed peace activists were “unarmed”. The Israeli video contradicts the MSM version.

There is a lot of disinformation being spoon fed by the MSM to the world over this incident. They would have us believe that it was a humanitarian mission and Israel was a brutish aggressor that murdered, in cold blood, nine unarmed activists. Take for instance the information on “freegaza.org” (organizer and participant in the incident):

“We partners in the Freedom Flotilla would like to offer our deepest sympathy to the people of Turkey and particularly to the nine families who have lost their brothers, sons and fathers. We have been proud and honored to work with the Foundation for Human Rights & Freedoms & Humanitarian Relief (IHH) and respect its track record of humanitarian missions worldwide.

IHH was one of the first charitable organizations to send in teams of doctors to Haiti after the earthquake. Their outreach and aid to impoverished and traumatized people is based on doing the right thing and not on religion, ethnicity or nationality. www.ihh.org.tr

They are a member of ECOSOC, one of only 3000 organizations granted consultative status to the UN. http://www.un.org/esa/coordination/ngo/

To be eligible for consultative status, an NGO must have:

• A democratically adopted constitution
• The authority to speak for its members
• A representative structure
• Appropriate mechanisms of accountability and democratic and transparent decision-making processes.

The basic resources of the organization must be derived in the main part from contributions of the national affiliates or other components or from individual members.

In the past few days, Israel and its apologists around the world have demonized this charity. Instead of facing the fact that the Israeli navy committed crimes of murder, maiming, hijacking and theft, they are blaming the victim. It is time for all of us who believe to stand up and shout …………………….

WE ARE ALL IHH”

Contrary to “freegaza” we (informed public) are not “all IHH” nor are we “apologists” for Israel.

They claim that the Israeli Navy committed crimes of murder, maiming, hijacking and theft – let’s consider this charge with facts!

Vice President Joe Biden asserts that the Israeli blockade of the Gaza Strip is lawful and pursuant to international law!

The blockade was a result of Hamas’ attempts to obtain Iranian weapons at sea after the 2002 seizing of the “Karine A” that was loaded with 50 tons of Iranian weapons.

On September 28, 1995 an agreement was signed regarding Israels rights to protection against terror when the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip was signed in Washington D.C., which provides that Israel has "the responsibility for defense against external threats, including for defense against external threats from the sea and from the air." In addition, it was agreed that that foreign vessels would "not approach closer than 12 nautical miles from the coast" unless specifically authorized by Israel. As such, the Israeli blockade on Gaza is lawful and the waters outside of Gaza are legally controlled by Israel.

This agreement was signed during the Clinton Administration! The position of the United States that gives Israel the rights, to ensure their national security, to control their territorial waters around Gaza, specifically containing Hamas and their ability for external military and weapons support, is unequivocal. Just in case anyone needs to be reminded, Hamas is deemed a “terrorist organization” by the United States and abroad.

In August 2008, the “freegaza” organization was successful in breaking through Israel’s blockade. When they landed in Gaza they were met by the leaders of Hamas and given medals. Yet, this information about their Hamas meeting and celebration was never intended for public consumption.

Now that Bill Ayres the unrepentant terrorist has exported his "community organizing" and social justice brand of violent "pacifism" to the Middle East, Iran has picked up the cause and will now provide Naval support for the next blocade action. The ships have already departed their ports and the big question is -- what is Israels next step?

Part II - Free Gaza players and their Hamas connections

Billboard of the Year - Compliments of "Feed your ADHD" website

2010-06-15T10:35:00.000-07:00

Political violence Democrat style

2010-06-15T07:00:00.000-07:00

Remember when Nanci Pelosi got teary eyed and said "we have take responsibility for our actions and our words"? She of course was talking about "right wing" tea partiers and their dangerous ways.

Here is the clip of her teary-eyed lament:

Now, since that time and actually even before that speech on hate and how it is reminiscent of the 1970's violence she personally witnessed the only recorded violence has come from the left. Isn't it ironic that the clip below that caught the NC Congressman assaulting a young man for asking the simple hate filled question of "do you fully support the Obama agenda" when he was exiting a fundraiser for, um, er, Nanci Pelosi?

Now, compare how a Republican is ambushed, surrounded by the opposition and how he reacts to the situation -- you decide where the violence rhetoric and intimidation comes.....

America - Gather your armies!

2010-06-14T18:06:00.000-07:00

Here is one guy that has the passion to upset an incumbent in Alambama! Say hello to Rick Barber ladies and gentlemen.....

Ayres, Dohrn & Jodie Evans are still active with terrorism!

2010-06-12T09:47:00.000-07:00

Jodie Evans with Obama

In an article written by William Kristol (Weekly Standard) it was learned that the Obama Administration has given the green light for the US to push the UN to hold an official investigation of Israel and their “excessive use of force”.

The article points out that once again, Obama has placed his hatred of Israel above the facts and once again sides with our enemies over our long term ally.

The precedent it will set will damage our own “war on terror” efforts because the incident was minute in comparison to anything Israel has done in the past in protecting their citizens thus our troops will undoubtedly be held to the same “low standard” of conflict and deemed criminal.

The UN investigation will be solely focused on Israel and will not scrutinize Turkey or the IHH for their involvement or behavior.

Since the article was published and the facts surrounding the IHH and Turkey were amplified the White House felt the need to respond directly to William Kristols criticism. The response said this:

“The White House has suggested in the past that it supported international participation in an Israeli investigation, but a shift to the kind of international inquiry supported by many of Israel's critics would be a dramatic one, and a White House official brushed off Kristol's flotation.

The White House pushed, immediately after the incident, to downgrade a planned resolution condemning Israel to a vague presidential statement that didn't directly target the Jewish State.

The White House official said the administration continues to support "an Israeli-led investigation into the flotilla incident that is prompt, credible, impartial, and transparent."

"We are open to different ways of ensuring the credibility of this Israeli-led investigation, including international participation, and have been in intensive talks with our Israeli partners in the past few days on how to move forward," said the official. "We know of no resolution that will be debated at the UN on the flotilla investigation next week." – politico (Ben Smith)

powerlineblog.com has now reported the following:

Senators Reid and McConnell have in addition circulated a joint letter to Obama for signature by their colleagues. The letter raises the role of the IHH in the incident and recommends investigation of the IHH for inclusion among the designated state sponsors of terror. The letter further states: "[W]e ask you to stand firm in the future at the United Nations Security Council and to use your veto power, if necessary, to prevent any similar biased or one-sided resolutions [such as the UN Human Rights Council's] from passing.”

What does Obama fear from a full fledged international investigation and why does this administration, in a knee jerk reaction to William Kristol’s article call the Israeli Investigation un-credit worthy? Here is why – Long time friend and unrepentant American leftist terrorist Bill Ayers and his Wife Bernadine Dohrn along with Code Pink founder Jodie Evans are directly involved with the IHH (not from afar in America but on the ground in Egypt). Here is there involvement:

“The group behind the Gaza flotilla that engaged in deadly clashes with Israeli commandos today counts among its top supporters the friends and associates of President Barack Obama, namely the founders of the Weather Underground terrorist organization, William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, as well as Jodie Evans, the leader of the radical activist organization Code Pink.

Earlier today, Israeli navy commandos raided the six-ship flotilla, encountering heavy resistance and live fire from the activists. Several activists were killed and dozens of others were reportedly injured, as were several of the Israeli commandos.

The flotilla was organized by the Free Gaza Movement, a coalition of leftist human rights activists and pro-Palestinian groups engaged in attempts to break a blockade imposed by Israel on the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.

Ayers, Dohrn and Evans' Code Pink have led several recent Free Gaza Movement initiatives, including attempted marches into the Gaza Strip. Dorhn was in the Middle East just last month on behalf of the movement.

Ayers and Dohrn were close associates for years with President Obama, while Evans was a fundraiser and financial bundler for Obama's presidential campaign.

The hot new best-seller, "The Manchurian President," by Aaron Klein reveals inside story on Team Obama and its members. Now available autographed at WND's Superstore!

In January, wnd.com reported Ayers, Dohrn and Evans were involved in provoking chaos on the streets of Egypt in an attempt to enter Gaza with the Free Gaza Movement to join in solidarity with the territory's population and leadership.

The three helped to stir riots after the Egyptian government refused to allow a large number of protesters to enter neighboring Gaza. Eventually, the protesters accepted an Egyptian offer of allowing about 100 marchers into Gaza. Once in the territory, those marchers were reportedly met on the Gaza side by Hamas' former Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh.

At the time of the march, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., wrote a letter in support of a "humanitarian delegation from Massachusetts" to Gaza. Members of Ayers', Dohrn and Evans' group documented on their blogs how Kerry's letter was used at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo while attempting to pressure Egypt to let their group into Gaza.

Images of the letter were also posted on the Electronic Intifada website run by Ali Abunimah, who was with Evans' group in Egypt and who, WND previously reported, spoke at pro-Palestinian events in the 1990s alongside Obama. In one such event, a 1999 fundraiser for Palestinian "refugees," Abunimah recalled introducing Obama on stage.

Kerry's office previously met with Code Pink members, WND has learned. Sarah Roche-Mahdi of Code Pink also is a member of the United for Peace and Justice Palestine Task Force, which met with Kerry's staffers.

Kerry last year became the most senior U.S. politician to visit the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip, although at the time he did not meet with Hamas leaders.

Dohrn later wrote on a blog that she was briefly detained at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo following the January protests there by her group: "Bill and I went to the American Embassy at 10 a.m. and asked to see the ambassador. We were ushered into a holding pen a block away from the embassy building where we joined 35 people already there, surrounded by Egyptian soldiers," she wrote.

Deadly clashes

Israeli Naval Forces intercepted the flotilla today attempting to break the maritime closure of the Gaza Strip.

An Israel Defense Forces spokesperson told WND commandos boarded the ships after numerous warnings from Israel requesting the ships redirect toward the Israeli port of Ashdod, where they would be able to unload their aid supplies, which could then be transferred to the Gaza Strip after undergoing security inspections.

During the boarding of one of the ships, the Marmara, activists onboard attacked IDF naval personnel with live fire and light weaponry including knives and clubs, the IDF spokesperson said.

"The demonstrators had clearly prepared their weapons in advance for this specific purpose," said the spokesperson. "As a result of this life-threatening and violent activity, naval forces first employed riot dispersal means, followed by live fire.

"IDF naval personnel encountered severe violence, including use of weaponry prepared in advance in order to attack them," said the spokesperson.

The IDF released a YouTube video clearly showing activists attacking Israeli commandos, including attacks with live fire.

Close Obama associates

Evans formed Code Pink, a far-left activist organization, in 2002 to protest America's war in Iraq. The group previously met with Hamas and with leaders of the Taliban. Evans was a fundraiser and financial bundler for Obama's presidential campaign.

Abunimah traveled in some of the same political circles as Obama in the 1990s. Abunimah previously described meeting with Obama at a fundraiser at the home of Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi, reportedly a former PLO activist. Khalidi was also a close associate of Obama.

"[Obama] came with his wife. That's where I had a chance to really talk to him," Abunimah recalled. "It was an intimate setting. He convinced me he was very aware of the issues [and] critical of U.S. bias toward Israel and lack of sensitivity to Arabs. ... He was very supportive of U.S. pressure on Israel."

According to quotes obtained by Gulf News, Abunimah recalled a 2004 meeting in a Chicago neighborhood while Obama was running for his Senate seat. Abunimah quoted Obama telling him "warmly" he was sorry that "I haven't said more about Palestine right now, but we are in a tough primary race."

"I'm hoping when things calm down, I can be more up front," Abunimah reportedly quoted the senator as saying.

Abunimah said Obama urged him to "keep up the good work" at the Chicago Tribune, where Abunimah contributed guest columns that were highly critical of Israel.

Ayers, meanwhile, became a name in last year's presidential campaign when it was disclosed the radical worked closely with Obama for years.

Ayers helped launch Obama's political career with a fundraiser in his home. Obama served on the board of a Chicago nonprofit alongside Ayers. The terrorist later hired Obama to serve as chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a job Obama later cited as experience that helped qualify him to run for public office.

While at the CAC, Obama and Ayers both granted funds to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN.

WND columnist Jack Cashill has produced a series of persuasive arguments that it was Ayers who ghostwrote Obama's award-winning autobiography, "Dreams from My Father."

Ayers and Dohrn were two of the main founders of the Weather Underground, which bombed the New York City Police headquarters in 1970, the Capitol in 1971 and the Pentagon in 1972. The group was responsible for some 30 bombings aimed at destroying the defense and security infrastructures of the U.S.

Characterizing the Weather Underground as "an American Red Army," Ayers summed up the organization's ideology: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents."

"Everything was absolutely ideal on the day I bombed the Pentagon," Ayers recalled in his 2001 memoir, "Fugitive Days." "The sky was blue. The birds were singing. And the bastards were finally going to get what was coming to them."

Ayers brandished his unrepentant radicalism for years later, as evidenced by his now notorious 2001 interview with the New York Times, published one day after the 9/11 attacks, in which he stated, "I don't regret setting bombs. I feel we didn't do enough."

Ayers posed for a photograph accompanying the New York Times piece that showed him stepping on an American flag. He said of the U.S.: "What a country. It makes me want to puke."

So the President will be embarrassed when the truth of who was behind the flotilla eventually comes out and traced back to his door. I find it chilling that the letter that Reid and McConnell sent to the President (from above: “Senators Reid and McConnell have in addition circulated a joint letter to Obama for signature by their colleagues. The letter raises the role of the IHH in the incident and recommends investigation of the IHH for inclusion among the designated state sponsors of terror”) wishes to designate the IHH amongst terrorist organizations. This puts Obama in a pickle situation as his three friends (Ayers, Dohrn and Evans) have all been personally active with that organization directly. This will mean they were complicit in terror activities, again!

The Secret of America by Carol Negro (American Thinker)

2010-06-12T09:08:00.000-07:00

America is not a plot of land. It is not a culture. It is not a nationality. It is not a set of traditions or customs. It is not a government. It is not a people. It is not a book of laws. And it certainly isn't a race.

America is an idea.

That's why anyone can become an American. Embrace the idea (and fill out a few forms) and you're an American.

You're one of us.

Most other nations are nationalities. Their heritage depends on blood and territory. America is portable. We carry it around in our hearts and minds.

If you bomb our cities, you can't destroy America. If you ruin our economy, you can't destroy America. If most of the continent falls into the ocean, you can't destroy America. Even if you kill most of us, you can't destroy America.

Because wherever two or more of us are gathered in her name...America is there.

Here is the secret: We don't live in America. America lives in us.

America is an idea.

The greatest, purest, sweetest, most sublime idea in the history of the world. It lifts man up, it blesses him, it encourage him, it enlightens him, it civilizes him, it opens his heart, it makes him kind and generous and honest and brave and free. It makes him smart and successful and industrious. It makes him innovative and cheerful. It makes him happy, honorable, and honest.

America is an idea.

And it is that idea that is under constant assault in the halls of power, the press room, the classroom, and the screening room.

Who seeks to murder the idea seeks the destruction of America.

What specifically is this idea? It is that man is created with certain inalienable rights, including Life, Liberty, and Property. It is that man has the right to self-government, the right to be left alone, the right to the fruit of his labors, the right to dispose of his property as he sees fit. It is that all men are created equal under God and the law, and that no man can take away these rights, and that the sole duty of government is to protect them. It is that government must be accountable to The People, not the people to the government. It is that ours is to be a nation of laws, not of men, and that no one is above the law. It is that justice is blind. It is that man must be virtuous if he is to be free. It is that human rights come from the creator and cannot be abrogated by men.

The entire goal of the Left is to murder the idea of the goodness and righteousness of freedom, of self-reliance, of independence, of merit, of virtue, of hard work, of honor, of courage, of sacrifice, of loyalty, of morality, of faith, of the inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property.

The Left, in politics, media, education and entertainment, despise the idea that is America. And they are doing everything in their power to promote a replacement "idea" -- one that distorts the language of freedom to promote the serfdom of dependence, twists the meaning of truth to tell lies, seeks to limit freedom, mocks faith, virtue and morality, undermines self-reliance and the independent spirit; one that disdains (or punishes) hard work, laughs at frugality, and sneers at sacrifice; one that approves of murdering new life, regulating liberty, confiscating property, and seizing the fruit of our labors. One that denies the Creator and those annoying and inconvenient inalienable rights.

They seek to replace a divinity with a corpse.

Since America is the idea, plotting the overthrow of the idea is plotting the overthrow of America.

They may love their jobs, their plot of land, their privileges, their personal wealth, their property, their family, their friends, their clubs, and their cars. They may love California wine and Maine lobster and Southern Fried Chicken, Texas barbeque, and Boston baked beans. They may love museums, and lighthouses, and beaches and palm trees and big salty lakes, and waterfalls and huge canyons, and redwoods and geysers and cowboys and Indians. They may love football, and Santa Claus, and Martin Luther King Day. They may love fireworks, and Hollywood, and Harvard. But they don't love America.

They have already killed her in their own hearts. And they are trying to kill her in ours and our children's with their unconstitutional laws, their biased reporting, their false history, their immoral and undermining "art."

They seek nothing less than the death of the American idea, which is far worse than the conquest of territory. They mercilessly and tirelessly work toward the destruction of the American soul.

Sessession, no ejection - by Joseph Somsel (American Thinker)

2010-06-11T22:31:00.000-07:00

Here is the complete article cut and pasted from "The American Thinker". By jobe I think he's got it!

"The issue of whether or not a state can secede from the Union seemed well-settled following the Civil War. The answer was not "no," but "hell no!"

But the issue has arisen again, what with the rise of an expansionist, domineering, invasive, and spendthrift federal government. Elected officials in some of the same states that gave secession a whirl back in 1861 have subtly hinted that maybe we should reopen the issue.

Personally, I think rethinking the right to secede from the Union is a dead end. However, maybe there is another route to a similar result. Maybe most of the states in the Union can kick a few others out! After all, a handful of states and/or localities seem to be causing most of our troubles with their consistently liberal voting patterns. Drilling down, we could also do some internal rearranging within a state so as to separate the wheat from the chaff, so to speak.

For example, California tends to vote very liberal overall. But that aggregate vote is dominated by a few coastal, urban counties. Let's just split off the urban counties around San Francisco Bay and let them form their own microstate. Since many in these counties crave some sort of aristocracy of liberalism, the new citizens could make it a principality like Monaco. One quandary they would have is to reconcile is their self-proclaimed "inclusiveness" with the heredity nature of the rulers in such political organizations. One could see the exclusion of the large gay populations from such a structure, or at least the possibility of instability as one ruling house after another dies off barren.

Los Angeles could be another split-off mini-state. Hollywood could provide some good-looking royals, able to match IQs with the best Eurotrash and with the same entertainment value. Without these two hotbeds of liberalism, the state would vote much more conservatively and with more respect for the U.S. Constitution.

Back east, Vermont would be a good candidate for ejection. They would take their Socialist senator with them. We'd want to guarantee free trade in maple syrup and the right of access to their ski slopes as a condition of ejection. In spite of Scott Brown, Massachusetts could find a Kennedy to lead them -- somewhere else. If somewhere in Joe Kennedy's family tree there's an Earl Kennedy, he would be a natural for the throne. Harvard would supply the court jesters in perpetuity and be granted an exclusive royal charter for the same. Maine might feel left out in the cold, but hey, it is cold in Maine! Rhode Island could formalize their status as a kleptocracy rather than just pretending like they do now.

Back in the center of the country, more than a few down-state Illinois citizens would be quite happy to see Cook County become its own independent political entity -- so long as it took its state legislators with it. Michigan without Detroit (Wayne County) might start to look like a viable business again. Detroit could someday be self-sufficient in food production with the way they are tearing down houses within the city limits for reversion to farmland -- if they can find the hardworking farmers needed.

So such a few simple boundary rearrangements could clarify our political debates and make America strong and good again. As with the Quebec independence movement and the rest of Canada, the matter of how to equably divide the national debt would be contentious. The remaining U.S. citizens would argue that the liberals in the ejected areas should assume more than a simple per capita division since liberal policies have been disproportionally responsible for the accumulation. But like many a party to a difficult divorce, I'm sure we'd all settle for even-Steven just to get it over with.

If the question of secession was answered with a "hell no!" then maybe the answer to the question of ejection will be "Why didn't we think of that sooner?"

When you’ve got nothing, you’ve got nothing to lose!

2010-06-11T19:36:00.000-07:00

Incumbents getting the boot will strike before going down!

Has anyone watching the political scene wondered why many of the spending bills have been put on hold until after the November elections? Most will say it is because they are so toxic that no politician is willing to give the electorate the added incentive, in this anti-incumbent climate, to give them the boot from the voting booth.

What about politicians like Harry Reid or Barbara boxer who are surely likely (and they know it) to lose their seats anyway regardless of how much money or times Obama and his friends hold fundraisers? There are many on the Democrat side of the aisle (and Republican too) that have already thrown in the towel and have decided to retire instead of facing the oncoming wrath of the angry electorate. These are politicians that have nothing to lose because they do not have to face the music anymore. These are the ones as well as those who are about to lose their seats that are dangerous to the rest of us.

Once the dust settles after the election and they find themselves out of a job in two months (January 2011) time they will be emboldened to pass anything they wish and I believe pass they will, with frenzied socialistic orgiastic pleasure.

Chairman David Obey (D-Wis) is just one of those I speak of. Has anyone noticed that Congress has delayed their 2011 spending budget resolution yet? This is the first time since 1974 this has occurred. The chance that after the election has put the final nails into the political coffins of 32 to 57 seats (depending on which poll you look at) that will ensure absolutely zero political restraint of those outgoing members pass a massive omnibus spending bill. We are talking a bill that is all rolled into one huge pig of pork with things like “Card Check”, “Cap and Trade” or other riders to the appropriation bill that has been kicked down the road until now.

It will give a whole new meaning to “lame ducks”.

The man who wants to be California Governor - a Socialist!

2010-06-11T06:34:00.000-07:00

In 1995, during the Clinton Administration Jerry Brown laid out his vision of America (sounds alot like Obama today) on a radio show, here is the transcript:

The conventional viewpoint says we need a jobs program and we need to cut welfare. Just the opposite! We need more welfare and fewer jobs. Jobs for every American is doomed to failure because of modern automation and production. We ought to recognize it and create an income-maintenance system so every single American has the dignity and the wherewithal for shelter, basic food, and medical care. I’m talking about welfare for all. Without it, you’re going to have warfare for all. Without a universal health care like every other civilized country, without a minimum level of income, this country will explode. You can’t blame the guy at the bottom forever. At some point there’s a reaction and we’ll see that the real criminals are those calling the tune, making the rules, and walking to the bank. We have the money, we have the brain power. The United States now has the highest measured wealth of any nation ever in the history of the world. We could rebuild our cities, we could create the kind of buying power and community well-being that will provide for peace. The guaranteed income is one way. Another way is to have always the availability of work in a nonprofit, in community service. A third is to start giving people training to develop skills where they can be self-supporting. You could come up with a cash supplement. Even conservatives have suggested a negative income tax to cut out the bureaucracy. If we were smart, we’d get rid of welfare and give people a family assistance like they do in Europe…

The problem isn’t even a problem. Automation and technology would be a great boon if it were creative, if there were more leisure, more opportunity to engage in raising a family, providing guidance to the young, all the stuff we say we need. America will work if we’re all in it together. It’ll work when there’s a shared sense of destiny. It can be done! It’s all there! What isn’t there is the leadership to create the kind of social network, the safety net, the distribution that would truly create a just and equal society…

We have to restore power to the family, to the neighborhood, and the community with a non-market principle, a principle of equality, of charity, of let’s-take-care-of-one-another. That’s the creative challenge. First, expose relentlessly the big lie that comes over the tube every night-that if you just go out and find that job, and work harder, it’ll all be fine. It won’t! There’s not enough work to go around and a lot of the pay is not fair. Unless you totally yank up that system and create a better one, unless the spirit changes, unless the heart opens, unless we confront power with the truth of our own unarmed but absolute fearless truth, we’re not going to overcome it. Evil is too embedded to be overcome by anything other than a spiritual challenge.

This is the same man who calls his conservative apponent Meg Whitman "a Nazi propagandist"!

We all win when “nobody” wins

2010-06-10T06:10:00.000-07:00

SC Democrats just don’t get it, but they will!

One of the most intriguing Senate race primaries occurred on Tuesday in South Carolina where, as the press puts it -- a “nobody” won the Democrat nomination over the hand picked Democrat backed candidate (Vic Rawl) to face off with Senator Jim DeMint come November.

The State and Federal levels of the Democrat party have floated two possibilities:

1) Alvin Green won because his name appeared first on the ballot alphabetically, and
2) The GOP planted him in the Democrat race

What the Democrats don’t understand is that it is probably because anti-incumbency is so great on their side that their own voters would pick someone with no experience over an established one with over 40 years of public service.

Never mind the Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts victories in holding up the example of voters distrust, anger and disenfranchisement with Democrats (and yes Republicans too) because South Carolina is the best example yet of the mountain of voter angst established candidates are to face come November.

Think about it for a moment…..

Vic Rawl, the Democrat establishment backed candidate lost to a “nobody” within their own ranks. It tells us a lot that if either of the two excuses they have floated as their reasons for the loss of their candidate is true then what does it say about their strategies and the research of their constituents -- Dismal failure is what.

Vic Rawl (taken from his website) ran on a pro –

“The health care reform bill passed by Congress is a huge step forward in improving our national system. Jim DeMint made opposing this bill the cornerstone of his last two years in the Senate, promising to give President Obama his “Waterloo” and to “break” him over it.” (Rawl is pro Universal Health Care)

“Health Care” (DeMint coined Obama’s Waterloo) – "The health care reform bill passed by Congress is a huge step forward in improving our national system. Jim DeMint made opposing this bill the cornerstone of his last two years in the Senate, promising to give President Obama his “Waterloo” and to “break” him over it." (Rawl is an ardent supporter of Obamacare, but wanted a more robust bill that included the public option)

“Jobs” – “My opponent, Jim DeMint, is dismissive of the needs of working South Carolinians. He supports “free trade,” which opens our borders to cheap foreign goods. He’s opposed to regulating safety in the workplace. He works actively to keep wages low by opposing the right of workers to organize (Rawl is PRO Union). He’s opposed to the minimum wage (Rawl supports JOB killing). He sees no role for government in saving our major industries, like automotive manufacturing (Rawl is PRO GM – Government Motors). He’s opposed to government support for new jobs in renewable energy.” (Rawl is PRO Global Warming).

“Education” – “Dissolving the public primary and higher education systems and substituting unregulated “free market competition” will guarantee permanent, second-rate status for our country. DeMint’s solution is to cut funding, to throw vouchers at the problem, and to let parents take their chances.” (Rawl is anti competition and instead of saying “let parents take their chances” should read “take away parents choices”).

“Environment” – “In fact, Jim DeMint remains the servant of unregulated exploitation. He supports widespread deployment within our state of coal-fired power plants, which pollute our rivers and land with mercury, and unproven nuclear options. These projects will send electrical power to other states, leaving huge amounts of coal ash and nuclear waste here forever. DeMint voted to block approval of a rule that would have limited mercury emissions from oil and gas smokestacks.

He’s dismissive of the wind, biomass and solar energy options that could free our children from the power of foreign energy sources. He continues to support off-shore drilling in South Carolina, even after the disaster in the Gulf has proven that “drill, baby, drill” has massive risks.” (Rawl is anti coal, nuclear and indigenous oil exploration and pro wind and biofuels as the answer to wean ourselves off foreign oil dependency.)

“Military” - America has also become ensnared in a system in which war is profitable to far too many people.” (Rawl is a 20+ year National Guard veteran and this writer thanks him for his personal service).

“Net Neutrality” – “Superficially, DeMint’s plan for an unregulated Internet sounds like freedom, but it’s really handing a dangerous near-monopoly to a few large companies, AT&T, Verizon and Comcast being among the largest. These companies are already immensely profitable, but there is a huge potential for even greater profits in auctioning off access to a system with limited capacity.” (Rawl says it sounds like freedom because it IS freedom, but if Rawl has his and the Democrats way that freedom will be lost)

“Financial Reform” – “Over $15 trillion in American wealth was destroyed. Retirement funds were drained by collapsing stock values. Governments slashed budgets for schools and libraries. Non-profit groups have radically scaled back as endowments and donations have shrunk. Over eight million people have lost their jobs.

This cannot ever happen again.” (Rawl is so concerned about “non-profits” like ACORN and Annenberg scaling back their endowments over job loss is telling so much so that he add that “it cannot EVER happen again”)

“2nd Amendment” – “Despite the claims of grandstanding special interests, gun rights have actually expanded under the Obama administration. The President signed a bill into law granting gun owners new rights to carry weapons in our national parks.” (Rawl really needs to be called out on his statement. The President signed the bill begrudgingly after the court battled was lost by “environmentalists and anti-gun lobby”. In fact Obama initially stated (about the law) “I am not in favor of concealed weapons -- Would you feel safer having more loaded and concealed guns being carried in the public places you and your family visit?”

“Social Security” – “If we do nothing, our current Social Security system can pay full benefits until 2041. While that is a legitimate concern, it’s not an immediate crisis. There are years to work out a reasonable plan if we start now. AARP has identified options that could cover over 200% of the anticipated shortfall. None of them are free. Some involve paying more into the system. Others involve taking less out through raising the retirement age. http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/econ/i3_reform.pdf. We don’t need to do all those things; just enough of them to make sure Social Security are still there for the next generation.

It will take thoughtful compromise and sharing of sacrifice between different generations and economic groups to make this monumental adjustment. It’s a job that will become harder the longer the United States waits. It’s the type of job Jim DeMint, who specializes in pitting Americans against each other, doesn’t do well. If politicians like Jim DeMint squander those years in gridlock and the politics of shouting “no” and “Waterloo,” there will be a crisis that can only end with the return of widespread poverty among our elderly.” (Rawl insists Social Security is not an immediate crisis? His answer is the same as Obama’s and socialist AARP to pay more into the raided trust fund (higher taxes) and cut benefits while doing nothing to ensure this fund is not continually raided in the future.)

The fact that Mr. Nobody beat the establishment Democrat choice is not surprising to this author. When you read his stance on the issues you see establishment positions that have angered voters and constituents of all stripes. As usual, the Democrat party is in denial. They either have no clue or they are sticking their heads in the sand.

What is surprising is the candidate that won is facing a felony sexual obscenity charge that has been discovered since his win. The headline should have read Rawl Mauled. Vic Rawl probably woke up on Thursday morning feeling like he lost to a candidate that had died and his name remained on the ballot. The Democrats are in trouble and DeMint is a tea party favored candidate. Need I say more……..

Tokyo Rosey!

2010-06-10T01:21:00.000-07:00

This is what the fairness doctrine is intended to fund and give equal time to -- Rosey Odonnel calling for Obama to issue an executive order to seize BP assets and take over America in the name of Communism, Socialism whatever......

Destiny!

2010-06-09T09:44:00.000-07:00

Obama’s America has a destiny

One devoid of Christian identity
While he insists Iran soon will talk
Everything Israel say’s will be balked

America the beautiful has been changed
All the words are rearranged
From purple mountains majesty
Is now a union’s beat down tragedy

Lies, distortions and deceit
The selling of a Senate seat
Obama’s words are mere tokens
As all his promises to be broken

Our elections are paid and bought
ACORN, Blago, Sestak and Romanoff
MSM Mathews legs of thrill
Obama’s Katrina, his oil spill

Now they choke off free enterprise
While unemployment is on the rise
Government growth is now the specter
At the expense of the private sector

We watched Pelosi’s teary eyed lament
That the talk of the right is violent
Yet Salazar’s boot is on BP’s neck
And Union thugs are waiting on the deck

We now collectively share the pain
As we watch America go down the drain
The enemy within is our test
So we’ll do what we do best

We’ll throw off this yoke of tyranny
And change this course, OUR destiny
Freedom, prosperity and integrity
But most of all OUR liberty

Another "Little Green Football" touchdown!

2010-06-08T08:12:00.000-07:00

While the Obama administration and his hacks are devising ways to "bail-out" progressive journalism and force feed socialist views and propoganda on us it is important to note the contribution to the truth that exposes such journalist lies and distortions by those in their pajamas in the dark of night.

The bloggers have played pivotal roles in exposing lies and distortions spewing from MSM sources with regularity and as such diminished the trust most people have towards the "old media".

Now, Little Green Footballs has done it again when they exposed Reuters photo doctoring to fit the narrative of Isreal evil, flotilla peaceful. It seems that Reuters was caught doctoring the photos of the Israelis raid to "airbrush" the weapons the peace activists were wielding when they attacked the Israeli Commando's.

According to the weeklystandard.com -- The way Reuters cropped the photos depicted practically all the terrorists without weapons. But bloggers, such as Charles Johnson at Little Green Footballs, caught on when a Turkish newspaper posted the full pictures. And, lo and behold, once the full photos were shown, it appears that these so called "peace activists" are nothing of the sort. The photos show wounded Israeli soldiers being attacked by knife-wielding thugs, with their lives clearly at risk."

High Crimes and Misdemeanors!

2010-06-08T07:09:00.000-07:00

Did you know that most people who read the words above think that it relates to the law, because after all the words “crimes and misdemeanors” are indicative of criminal statutes everywhere?

Most Americans who read or hear those words understand them in the context of Presidential Impeachment.

Did you also know who said the following about the term listed above --"I think the definition should include any criminal acts plus a willful failure of the president to fulfill his duty to uphold and execute the laws of the United States. [Another] factor would be willful, reckless behavior in office; just totally incompetent conduct of the office and the disregard of the necessities that the office demands.”

The Founding fathers had devised a brilliant form of Government replete with checks and balances to protect its citizens from tyranny. In a way, the constitution is a lot like Newton’s Third law (law of relativity) because when there is an action there is also a direct and opposite reaction built into the law.

For instance the President of the United is elected into office by the trust of its people. Likewise for the same reason, the President of the United States is removed from office through Constitutional mechanisms for the very same reason – Trust (more aptly, lack thereof).

In the Federalist papers James Madison wrote the following – “[S]ome provision should be made for defending the community against the incapacity, negligence, or perfidy of the chief magistrate. He might pervert his administration into a scheme of peculation or oppression. He might betray his trust to foreign powers."

Alexander Hamilton wrote the following on the subject -- "offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to society itself." He went on to say: "Men in public trust will much oftener act in such a manner as to render them unworthy of being any longer trusted, than in such a manner as to make them obnoxious (subject) to legal punishment."

When you gauge the public trust of Obama you see it falling like another Newton law – “gravity”. Obama’s trust has plummeted consistently since his election night victory.

The President can be removed from office by constitutional methods that were built into our form of government by the people for this reason. One constitutional scholar wrote that this includes behavior that is – “egregious, grossly incompetent, grossly negligent, outright distasteful, or which clearly show malevolence toward this country.”

Which of those words above come to mind when you think about our “hope and change” President?

Note: information about this article came from Human Events author Susan Dale’s article “Impeachment -- What are we waiting for?”

Does it surprise you when High Schoolers invent a game called “beat the Jew”?

2010-06-07T14:07:00.000-07:00

Especially when Helen Thomas speaks at high schools around the country!

On June 1, 2010 America leaned that a High School in California was engaged in a game called “beat the Jew”.

“In the “game”, a runner is called a “Jew” and chased by groups of people in cars called “Nazis”.

‘The objective for the Jew is to run down Hwy. 111 to a specified checkpoint before the Nazis can catch up to him, tackle him down and capture him,’ according to a Facebook page that was taken down on Friday.”

After a student tipped off authorities to the game, this is their response:

“Desert Sands Unified School District Superintendent Sharon McGehee:

‘(It’s) their freedom of speech; there’s not much we can do except be disappointed,’ Desert Sands Unified School District Superintendent Sharon McGehee said, adding that many students apologized.

Local police department spokesman:

Indio police spokesman Ben Guitron said that, assuming all people playing the game are willing participants, whether any criminal wrongdoing had been committed would depend on if participants using vehicles were following traffic laws.

‘If they’re driving, are they obeying the speed laws? Are they driving erratically?’ he said. ‘Are they blowing lights? Are they speeding to get to them? Then there are going to be complications.’”

I cannot speak for my readers so I pose the question to you:

Does the accepted attitude against Jews acceptable to you?

I know, I know – the MSM has been long on anti-semitic attitude and short on support for Israel. One only need look at the coverage of the Helen Thomas anti-Jewish rant recently where the following organizations call her comments a “flap”:

www.summitdaily.com/article/20100607/APA/1006070535

thestate.com/2010/.../helen-thomas-high-school-speech.html

theolympian.com/.../helen-thomas-high-school-speech.html

star-telegram.com/.../helen-thomas-high-school-speech.html

adn.com/2010/06/06/.../helen-thomas-high-school-speech.html

www.10news.com/politics/23813157/detail.html

The Press seems to think it is just a “flap”. If she were to say, for instance, that all “black people” need to go back to Africa would it be a flap? If she were to say that all “gays need to go back into the closet” would that be a flap? If she were to say that all “Muslims” need to go back to the desert would that be a flap? Of course not, it would be hate speech plain and simple.

The left are mourning her loss in the journalist ranks regardless of her hate filled venom. On huffingtonpost, an article titled:

Helen Thomas Retirement leaves Significant Void: Anti-war voices fret

"Regardless of that comment she made that was so controversial in the last few days, on the war she has been the only person asking the really hard questions of this administration and the prior administration," said Darcy Burner a progressive political stalwart and two-time congressional candidate.”

So you see, if you are against the war it is OK to be anti-semitic. You will be mourned.

To answer the question that I posed to the readers “I find it unsurprising that the left have been indoctrinating our children” through the classroom and have led to this reality of today. In spite of the Jewish Holocaust during WWII the MSM and the left have made it fashionable once again to actively persecute Jews. You need only to understand how pervasive this is when just days after discovery of this game, Helen Thomas was speak at a high school which has since been cancelled due to the “flap”.

This is exactly what the left fears when tea party members rally!

2010-06-07T13:07:00.000-07:00

Obama’s “Bay of Rigs” to “Pay for Play”!

2010-06-03T20:08:00.000-07:00

We are on to you!

Remember when hurricane Katrina hit and the Bush Administration was relentlessly pummeled by the Democrats and the MSM for the failure to act quickly and decisively?

The Bush Administration was hit for all sides on the left including the hurricane itself because of his policies and their effect on global warming. In fact, we still are treated with “it’s Bush’s fault” for just about everything under the sun (no pun intended).

In spite of the fact that the State and local governments own failures to act which was their duty not the Federal Governments. Remember the images of all of those school buses under water instead of ferrying local residents to higher ground. In fact it is best described as such – “Criticism from politicians, activists, pundits and journalists of all stripes was directed at the local and state and governments headed by Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans and Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco. Nagin and Blanco were criticized for failing to implement New Orleans' evacuation plan and for ordering residents to a shelter of last resort without any provisions for food, water, security, or sanitary conditions. Perhaps the most important criticism of Nagin was that he delayed his emergency evacuation order until 19 hours before landfall, which led to hundreds of deaths of people who (by that time) could not find any way out of the city.”

The media’s criticism of the Federal Government mainly, while glossing or ignoring the fact that it was the State of Louisiana’s duty to act first and then with the assist of the Federal Government was so blown out of proportion that those on the left (like Kayne West) accusing Bush and his Administration with wanting “black people to die” charges!

Now, Obama is dealing with a “Katrinalike” disaster but the circumstances are reversed where it IS the Federal Government’s responsibility to act first (because the oil rig was in Federal waters) and now we have a Republican Governor trying to act because of the Federal level inaction. The MSM initially has provided Obama and his lack of leadership to this disaster with cover but now that is changing. Democrats are starting to criticize his handling of the mess and it is getting louder. This is why he has now, in the past week made three trips down to the Gulf Coast to appear engaged when he ignored his role until the criticism reached a crescendo from those on the left.

The schizophrenic nature that liberals exhibit ensure that they cannot deal with reality because of their ideological nature. For instance, their fellow travelers in the environmental groups have pushed America’s own oil discovery and recovery into such distances and depths that it makes it almost impossible economically and environmentally to be successful yet the Liberals whine that we are not doing enough to ensure energy independence to cut off our oil based energy consumption.

Predictions of an Obama resignation increase

On December 9, 2009, OEN posted a poll that asked Progressives if Obama should resign because of his mirroring of Bush policies, sending troops to Afghanistan, Allows Israel to continue building settlements, failure to lead on HC reform, failure to hold Bush accountable for crimes, economy, unemployment and rising school tuitions. The result of 49% believed it was time for Obama to resign.

Now, even the most ardent of Obama supporters (Chris “tingle up my leg” Mathews and James Carville) are openly critical of the Administrations’ inaction to stand on ground zero with a “bullhorn” vs. golfing or White House parties on Wednesday nights.

These recent development from the far left are political in nature, but it is that segment of the left that elected the man. The more ominous storm clouds gathering though are not political but legal.

The Nixon Watergate scandal and to a certain extent the Clinton Monica Lewinsky issue had proven that the President of the United is NOT above the law. President Obama, likewise, is not above the law either. The liberals and this Administration has been operating under a different belief system though, the one that they believe they ARE above the law and in fact are very arrogant about this belief in a “in your face kinda way”.

There are three issues of criminal behavior that are threatening to envelop Obama and his administration – Rod Blagojevich; Joe Sestak and now Andrew Romanoff. All three of these issues by and among themselves are damaging and criminal.

When Obama got caught up in the Blago “pay for play” case involving the Senate Seat vacated by Obama the new White House Counsel Greg Craig performed an in house investigation, wrote a report and the White House said “nothing here improper, move along”!

While the Sestak affair came to light, the White House first said that Sestak lied, now we know he didn’t and according to the White House (now) he was just confused and misunderstood the discussions. Sestak was initially offered the Secretary of the Navy position, but quickly became a “non-paying job offer” delivered by Bill Clinton and according to the White House there is nothing here, move along…..

Now, we learn that the White House had offered Romanoff 3 paying jobs to drop out of the Colorado race to pave the way for Bill Bennett. The White initially said that this was done at the local level, not the White House until today when we learned that Romanoff released emails from the White House that actually list the 3 job descriptions. Maybe this is what the Obama Administration meant when they promised to create or save jobs……

What is ironic is that team Obama threw the entire Colorado Democrat party under the bus in order to save his skin and now we know it wasn’t them.

In light of both of the above “pay for play” implications in which one should be considered a coincidence and two incidents can be labeled as such – thinly, but three is definitely a conspiracy to defraud American voters of their constitutional rights to elect office holders. This is criminal. In all three instances the White House has tried to perform cover-ups and as such have broken an all new set of criminal laws….

With falling approval numbers and the left abandoning him left and right (again, no pun intended) the final storm will only intensify as the Blagojevich trial begins today. I believe that not only will the Democrats lose large in November, but Obama will end up resigning office in disgrace. I am not alone in this belief……

Obama told by bus crowd just what they think of him!

2010-06-02T19:49:00.000-07:00

An ironic twist for a job offer by Clinton to Joe Sestak!

2010-06-02T10:11:00.000-07:00

Photo: Firedog Lake
From left to right: Adm. Joe Sestak (Ret.), former Clinton Administration National Security Advisor Tony Lake, and Richard Clarke, former National Security Coordinator for Security and Counter-Terrorism, speaking at Swarthmore College on September 18, 2006

Political deck chair shuffling!

In July 2005 on the first day as the newly appointed Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Mike Mullen (Obama’s current Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff) fired the then two star Admiral Joe Sestak, for “poor command climate”. This was confirmed in an article written in the Navy Times a month after his sacking, though denied by Sestak to this day. Multiple sources from the Pentagon and the Navy call the move by Mullen a “firing” and “a swift sacking”.

Fast forward – Sestak publicly admitted, and the White House now confirms that he was offered a job in Government if he stepped aside and allowed Arlen Specter the Democrat nomination. The White House states it was a “non-paying” advisory committee position but sources have already claimed the job was actually the “Secretary of the Navy”.

The irony here is the Democrats are hanging their hats on the credibility of Bill Clinton’s word, which in a court of law is impeachable due to his conviction for lying under oath during the Paula Jones/Monica Lewinsky investigation. Furthermore, Sestak, during the Clinton years was the man who decimated the size and scope of the Navy for Clinton. As his reward Sestak was offered the top Navy job in spite of his military career that was ended by “poor command climate”.

The irony doesn’t stop there because Sestak was angered by the “bribe” to step aside for benedict Arlen and blew the whistle on the White House only to go on to beat Specter for the nomination and is now stuck with the mess he whistle blew into fruition.

Rewind – Sestak began his career in politics in 2006 out of nowhere. He did not live in the State of Pennsylvania for over 30 years and to win the seat he would have to face and defeat a long term Republican incumbent, Curt Weldon. How could a no-name former military washout enter into the fray of Washington politics and beat a mighty Republican incumbent? Answer, the democrat machine and their allies in the MSM. If there is one man that can be accredited with the creation and rise of the Sestak political career it is none other than ‘Sandy Berger”. The same man caught stuffing secret documents into his socks and underwear before his testimony in front of the 9/11 Commission. Here is how they did it:

After a meager $10,000 fine and the loss of his security clearance for stealing secret documents from the National Archives, Sandy Berger re-emerged from his quiet hiding hole in March 2006 to spearhead Sestaks‘first fundraiser which was held at the law firm of Harold Ickes. In addition to the first two Clinton powerhouses mentioned above there were other Democrat power brokers that jumped into the Sestak fundraising effort, they are:

Janice Enright (Treasurer of the 2006 Hillary Clinton Senate Campaign)

per Harpers Magazine – “A small number of lobbyists are super insiders. They don’t just donate money to their favorite congressional causes — they serve as treasurers of the lawmakers’ campaign committees. One of them is Janice Enright, a registered lobbyist who is also treasurer of HillPAC, one of the political committees of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton… Enright is the lobbying partner of Harold Ickes, a Clinton presidential campaign adviser, and they both worked in the Clinton White House. The Senate Appropriations Committee listed Clinton as having jointly requested, with Sen. Charles E. Schumer , D-N.Y., hundreds of millions of dollars that the spending law earmarks for New York projects. About $4 million of that funding went to clients of Enright and Ickes, including $292,000 designated for a United Auto Workers training program that is a part of an umbrella group, Consortium for Worker Education, that Enright represents.”

Madeline Albright

Richard Clark
Anthony Lake
John Podesta
Hillary Clinton

Other donors who joined Berger in the initial support of Sestaks political run from obscurity and have prior “national secrets” mismanagement or the questionable handling of these secrets are:

John Deutch (Former Director of the CIA) - Soon after Deutch's departure from the CIA in 1996 it was revealed that classified materials were being kept on several of Deutch's laptop computers designated as unclassified. In January 1997, the CIA began a formal security investigation of the matter. Senior management at CIA declined to fully pursue the security breach. Over two years after his departure, the matter was referred to the Department of Justice, where Attorney General Janet Reno declined prosecution. She did, however, recommend an investigation to determine whether Deutch should retain his security clearance. President Clinton pardoned Deutch on his last day in office

Mary McCarthy (Former CIA employee) who was dismissed for leaking national secrets to NBC – “On April 21 2006, NBC reported that the "leak pertained to stories on the CIA's rumored secret prisons in Eastern Europe", commonly known as black site.”

Is it any surprise that the Obama White House enlisted former President Bill Clinton as the cover for the Sestak job offer? Sestak was created out of whole cloth in 2006 by the Clinton Machine. The Philadelphia Delco Times explained it best when they reported “a Sestak Victory” would muzzle a Republican congressman who blames Clinton for doing irreparable harm to America’s national security during the 1990’s.”

In order for Sestak to take down the 10 term congressman (Weldon) it started in the usual fashion, an organization funded by George Soros (CREW). The executive director of CREW sent a petition to the Justice Department requesting an investigation into Weldon for violations of federal bribery laws. This petition was then amplified by a media blitz as well as a “spontaneous grassroots protest” when 17 so-called citizens protested his district office. Here is an excerpt from the news article describing the protest:

Note: The protester that was interviewed was painted in such a light that there was no political motivation, just an average tax payer with concerns about corruption in Congress and no connections to Sestak!

“About noon today, a group of 17 protesters arrived outside Weldon's district office in Upper Darby, carrying signs and the kind of foam hands usually seen at sporting events to proclaim "Number One." But these rose-colored hands said "Caught Red-Handed."

"This is the first time I've come out and done something like this," said Judy Voet of Rose Valley. "This Congress is just so corrupt."

Most of the protesters were Democrats, but they said they were not involved in the campaign of Weldon's opponent, Joe Sestak, and they included at least one Republican, Chuck Ries of Havertown.

"I don't know what to believe anymore, they lie so much," said Ries, holding a sign linking Weldon to current and former Republican colleagues Tom DeLay, Mark Foley and Bob Ney - all of whom have been embroiled in career-ending scandals.”

If the newspaper would have done just a cursory search on “Judy Voet of Rose Valley” they would have discovered that “she's been campaigning for Sestak at least since August, when she and her husband threw a fundraiser for him at the "Voet residence."

Note: The source for the fundraiser that the Voet’s held for Sestak was on the website of the Delaware County Democratic Party, but has since been scrubbed of this fact.

This “spontaneous protest” of concerned citizens occurred on October 16, 2006 yet less than a month before this “first timer” picketed Weldon’s office Sestak, Richard Clark, Tony Lake (see list of Clinton supporters that created Sestaks career above because they are all on this list) spoke at Swarthmore College (See photo). Did I also mention that Swarthmore College is where Judy Voet is a professor along with her husband.

On Swarthmore “Womens Studies 30” webpage the college writes of Judith Voet: “Dr. Judy Voet, a self identified "mutt" with ancestors from all over eastern Europe, was raised in a lower middle class Jewish family in New York City during the 1940's and 50's. Her sole sibling, a younger sister by four years, and her parents lived in a Jewish neighborhood in the Bronx. Although the school she attended was racially mixed she was a minority. At twelve years old her family moved to Queens where she again lived in a Jewish neighborhood, but here she attended a predominantly white school.”

I can remember another prominent Democrat who was created out of whole cloth like Sestak who described himself in the same fashion (Barrack Obama):

Once Weldon was obliterated by the manufactured allegation of corruption, Sestak sailed into Congress.

The Clintons creation of Sestak and the destruction of Weldon show how ruthless and calculating the Democrats really are. The relationship between them are so intertwined that if and when an investigation (independent prosecutor) is called the implications are enormous and potentially devastating not only for the Clintons, Sestak and the Obama Administration, but the country as well.

The Obama Administration is working overtime to deflect and confuse the Sestak bribe and the house of cards is quickly falling apart. The MSM is starting to catch on and are starting to actually act like journalists by questioning the inconsistencies and deflections. At the time the Obama Administration wants this to go away (this pay for play matter) another drama is starting that will only amplify the Administrations worst fears of silence when the trial of Rod Blagojevich begins next week.

One thing is for sure about this whole sordid mess – If Sestak was offered the Secretary of the Navy Job (which he has never denied http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=66384) then he would have been placed atop the very military department that relieved him of his command in 2005. That revelation is bad enough, but even more disturbing is if the White House version about the “job” is to be believed then it is just another example of the seriousness of the lack of national security priorities this White House is guilty of. If Sestak is offered a job on the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board by the mere fact of performing a political act then what does that say about the others on this advisory board that has the President’s ear on national intelligence matters? I will tell you, it is already filled with people who are affiliated with members of the “Club of Rome”).

America's freedom should include the freedom to enforce our laws!

2010-06-01T06:38:00.000-07:00

I found it very inspiring to hear this lovely hispanic woman tell Tucson Councilmembers what it is to be American and that wasting taxpayer money in times of economic crisis to advocate pro-illegal immigration and sue the State over the anti-Arizona pro-immigration law is a disgraceful waste of funds.

Stockton Police can no longer guarantee your safety!

2010-05-31T08:02:00.000-07:00

Billboard message from the unions sucking the life out of the city

The Mayor of Stockton, California summed it up best – “Stockton mayor Ann Johnston said with police and fire department expenses accounting for 78 percent of the city's budget, labor groups representing officers and firefighters will have to make more concessions.

"We can not sustain the contracts that we have. We can not pay for the people that we have employed today without concessions from the unions," Stockton mayor Ann Johnston said.”

The Unions across America are bleeding counties, cities and states dry by their hefty retirement packages that are unsustainable. The unions then, when they are forced to deal with reality, choose “fear tactics” of its citizens to avoid concessions.

This is exactly the socialist system that Europe is faced with when massive strikes occur in transportation sectors that effectively shut down government. This is where America is quickly treading if we do not shut these corrupt and dangerous enterprises we call “Labor Unions”…….

Glenn Beck Homework Assignment III - The Ted Turner/Maruice Strong Show!

2010-05-30T16:27:00.000-07:00

As if marrying Hanoi Jane wasn’t anti-American enough!

There is a long list of anti-American accomplishments attributed to Ted Turner (including the one listed above). Glen Beck has made a request of his audience to research Maurice Strong (which I have already posted 2 lengthy articles about the man and his associates). In those articles that I mention, nowhere amongst them have I mentioned the name Ted Turner who has single handedly used his wealth to promote the downfall of the United States, the country that he gained his wealth from.

I have gone to great lengths to document David Rockefeller and Maurice Strong. The wealth of the Rockefeller family, through the efforts of David Rockefeller, have paved the way for the creation of the UN, UNESCO, Council of Foreign Relations, The Tri-lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, The Club of Rome and the American Eugenics Society.

The vast wealth of Rockefeller and Turner has poured into these anti-American, World order organizations for over 75 years. A more disturbing detail is that Bill Gates, George Sorros and Warren Buffet are intertwined with the same philosophies of Eugenics, Global Warming and the UN through a direct connection to the Club of Rome. Combined, the amount of money available for the transformation and downfall of individual sovereignty of free countries to a few socialist elites is frightening.

Ted Turner was in the news yesterday when he suggested that the following in a CNN interview (CNN is owned by Ted Turner):

“Ted Turner: Is God speaking in Gulf Coast Spill?”

I recall Ted Turner publicly stating those who observe “Ash Wednesday are Jesus Freaks” and those who oppose abortions “Bozo’s”.

According to the CNN interview: “his suggestion that God may have had a hand in the oil disaster that killed 11 and is threatening the Gulf Coast may take some by surprise.

“Could be,” God’s work, he told CNN’s Poppy Harlow. “He’s sending us a message.”

“I’m not a real religious person, but I’m somewhat religious. And I’m just wondering if God is telling us he doesn’t want us to drill offshore,” he said. “And right before that we had that coal mine disaster in West Virginia where we lost 29 miners,” as well as repeated mining disasters – “seems like there’s one over there every week” – in China.”

Please take note here that he also speaks about repeated coal mine disasters. In my Glen Beck Homework Assignment II article I described the common link between the “Gulf Oil spill and the 988 point stock market dive (due to a purported error in the sale of billions vs. millions of Proctor & Gamble stocks). That link was “The Club of Rome” and one of its members (Ernesto Zedillo) who sits on both the BP (Oil Rig disaster) and Proctor & Gamble (988 point loss event).

In the article I also point out an interview that Maurice Strong gave about a “secret organization” of elites who plot to topple the stock markets and hire “mercenaries to hold politicians and diplomats hostage. I thought it was strange that after a delay in responding to the oil platform disaster, Obama dispatched S.W.A.T. teams to the other platforms in the gulf?

In using his network to tell America that God was “at work” in the gulf, he himself is Godless.

Turner, father of 5 children and owns 15 ranches (he is the largest land owner in the US) with over 50,000 head of Bison (also the largest heard in N. America) that supplies his “Ted’s Montana Grill” restaurants (a burger restaurant chain specializing in Bison burgers). Yet, in 2008, Turner stated on the “Charlie Rose” show (PBS) – “if steps aren’t taken to address global warming, most of the people will have died and the rest of us (notice how he includes himself as one of the survivors) will be cannibals.”

Note: according to the “Scientific American” -- Producing beef for the table has a surprising environmental cost: it releases prodigious amounts of heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

He also stated that the “US should drastically cut its military budget and the Americans should have no more than 2 children (yet he has 5)!

In a 2006 Reuter’s Newsmaker Conference, on Iran’s nuclear position, “They’re a sovereign State. We have 28,000 (nukes). Why can’t they have 10?”

Recap:

Turner turns to God as the culprit of the evils of “offshore oil drilling” yet demeans those who practice it as “Jesus Freaks”. He divorced Jane Fonda when she found religion.

He calls those who oppose abortions “bozo’s” and advocates 2 child only policies in America, yet he himself has 5 children.

He warns us to take steps to address global warming or cannibalism will ensue, yet he owns the largest heard of heat-trapping greenhouse gas emitting bison’s in the US that fuels (no pun intended) his burger chain of restaurants.

The man is a walking contradiction. But wait, I am just getting warmed up (again, no pun intended).

We know that Ted Turner and Maurice Strong have a mutual affection for each other, other than their membership in “the Club of Rome”. In 1985, Ted Turner founded the “Better World Society”. Ted’s choice for the man to lead this new endeavor was Maurice Strong. Here is the account that show’s how much influence Maurice Strong had over the American billionaire –

“In 1985, Turner established the Better World Society to promote two of his pet issues: environmentalism and the UN. In Where on Earth Are We Going?, Strong describes how in 1991 Turner persuaded him to lead the organization: "Midway through lunch, [Turner] abruptly put down his knife and fork and got down on his knees… ‘Maurice,' he said, ‘I'm down on my knees because I want you to become president of the Better World Society, and I beg you not to say no.'" Strong didn't.

The Better World Society was only the beginning. In January 1998, Turner donated $1 billion to the new United Nations Foundation. Its goal is to distribute $100 million a year for the next ten years to U.N. programs dealing with poverty, malnutrition, peacekeeping and the environment. Turner named Strong to the founding board of directors.”

The same article sums up their conclusion about Maurice Strong in this fashion (and can be applied to the global warming alarmist crowd in total):

“Environmental politicians like Maurice Strong don't follow the science. They push for power. Strong has devoted his life to establishing international legal procedures to enforce his vision. And his imagination is haunted by a parade of environmental horribles. Scientists doubt they may ever come to pass, but Strong, like many contemporary environmentalists, is motivated more by fervent conviction than scientific evidence. Paul Ehrlich's "population bomb" never exploded, and the Club of Rome's reports on the limits to growth are famously wrong. Not one catastrophe hypothesized by Strong and other environmentalists has occurred. But that hasn't stopped them from building the environmental movement”

Next in my series of “homework” assignments for Mr. Beck I will try to unravel the United Nations Foundation and the relationship with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Warren Buffet connection. The billionaires that are all connected to George Sorros and the Democrat Party as well as SEIU, ACORN and other non-profits and NGO’s…….

The American flag circa 1982

2010-05-30T09:39:00.000-07:00

The friends of Obama

2010-05-29T21:19:00.000-07:00

If you have a spare hour and a half, here is the documentary on the Weather Underground that goes through the roots and history of this "communist" organization that spun off of the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society).

This will show you the character of those Obama calls friends and the shared philosophy of them:

Obama's deceit is catching up to him!

2010-05-27T14:34:00.000-07:00

Whether it is the soon to be uncomfortable spotlight that will shine on Obama and his administration during the upcoming Blagojevich "pay for play" trial or the impending disaster that is brewing on the Joe Sestak "pay for play" White House job offer -- one thing is clear -- a wreckoning is looming.

For me, there is no difference between Blago and Obama's (Sestak) implications other than Blago is not a "Federal" politician and the law is different, but the circumstances and the players are all the same. I have written ad-nausem regarding the Blago case and Obama's involvement and that of his minions around him including Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, SEIU and the whitewash "legal" report that the White House Counsel issued saying "nothing here, move along".

I found it ironic that the President, when the issue became heated and they could no longer suppress it, that Obama called Sestak a liar from one side of his mouth and then said that the Democrats and the White House support and endorse him for Senator.

Maybe it's just me or is this endorsement in and of itself "furthering the crime"?

Again, ironic that he calls the man a liar and then tells everyone the "liar" is his choice for politician.

Furthermore, the irony is not lost that, according to Sestak himself publically, that he was told to stand down running against Benedict Arlen (and didn't) only to beat Arlen himself. Arlen switched loyalties to stick his finger in the Republicans eyes when he couldn't win their primary and gave the Dems another "healthcare" yeah. It is just another upside down reality thingy that the Hope and Change has brought to us.

I look forward to a little truth and the following wreckening that ensues. Maybe we will see a "Presidential resignation" and give America something they want, for a change.......

Glen Beck Homework Assignment II

2010-05-17T07:42:00.000-07:00

What if?

To understand and to put into context the paradigm shift from America’s shift from free markets to a global order of socialism that is wrapped in environmentalism, we must first identify the individuals and organizations that have laid this faulty foundation.

Glen Beck wants his viewers to delve into a single and dangerous player in this endeavor (Maurice Strong), but, upon scratching the surface of the man you will begin to see that Strong’s path was paved by numerous, and extremely wealthy list of Americans dating back to the late 19th century. Before I divulge the names of these Americans that preceded Strong’s emergence, I will, briefly tell you of Strong!

In essence, I will start at the end of the story and then take the reader back into time and history. When I began this journey to discover the man that Mr. Beck was so alarmed about, I quickly found myself immersed into areas that we have been told, through modern media outlets on the left and liberal pundits, are nothing more than “conspiracy theorist clap-trap”! These are subjects that are to be quickly dismissed and the subsequent character assassinations of those who purvey these thoughts (New World Order and socialist fundamental changes to American liberty and beliefs), to ensue.

Glen Beck has a very unique line that he uses when he divulges the truth, with factual sourced information. Facts that he knows the MSM and their fellow travelers derides as “danger talk” by asking the views a simple, yet thought provoking question:

“I May be lying, who knows, but ask yourself one thing “What if it IS true?”

So, I ask the readers to digest the information here, in this article, to ask yourself this very same question – “What if IT is true?”

Current Events

There have been a couple of significant news events that have transpired recently – they are:

1. Oil Platform disaster in the Gulf of Mexico (Involving British Petroleum)
2. 998 point stock market dive (before recovering to a 400+ point loss) that has been tentatively attributed to the erroneous data entry stroke of an extra zero resulting into a “sell order” of billions vs. millions of “Proctor and Gamble Stock”!

I want the reader to make a mental note of these because I am going to let you hang for a bit before I give my thoughts on them a little later.

Maurice Strong

Bio Brief: Head of the United Nations Environmental Program (former); Chief Policy Advisor to Kofi Anan (former); Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit; Co-Author of the Kyoto Protocol and the Co-Founder of the Earth Council.

Maurice Strong, in 1990, gave an interview to a reporter who was covering the “World Economic Forum” (Strong is on the World Economic Forum Board) and the 1,000+ politicians who were in attendance. In this interview he (Strong) asked:

“What if a small group of these World leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from rich countries? In order to save the planet, this group decides – Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?”

Strong continues – “This group of World leaders form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists. They’re World leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodities and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock markets and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world at Davos as hostage. The markets can’t close.”

Secret Society
(put on your tin foil hats)

In my first article, I detailed the creation, by David Rockefeller in 1961, an organization called “the Club of Rome” in which Maurice Strong is a member. In addition to Rockefeller founding and funding the Club of Rome he was also the founder, and honorary chairman of the “Tri-lateral Commission” and was the “Director of the “Council of Foreign Relations and it’s Chairman of the Board (from 1970-1985).

The Tri-Lateral Commission was founded in 1973 by Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski the former National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (who recently urged Obama to shoot down Israeli war planes should they make a move to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities).

In an interview about the threat to Israel, Brzezinski said:

“We are not exactly impotent little babies,” said Brzezinski, national security adviser during the Carter administration, in an interview with The Daily Beast Web site when asked how aggressive President Obama can be in telling Israel that a military strike in Iran is not in America’s interest. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?”

Notice how Brzezinski calls Iraq airspace “ours”! Yet in, 2005 he was critical of our presence in Iraq (without more international troop presence) an occupation. His specific comment was:

“Brzezinski agreed that Bush should make a renewed push for international troops that could significantly swell the overall security force in Iraq. If no other countries are willing to participate at meaningful levels, he said, the U.S. should begin withdrawing its troops from the country this year.

If large numbers of U.S. forces remain in Iraq without more international support, Brzezinski said, "we will be viewed eventually as the other side of the coin of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinians."

Brzezinski, during the Carter administration has the following accomplishments:

Normalization of relations with the People's Republic of China (and the severing of ties with the Republic of China)
Signing of the second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT II)
Brokering of the Camp David Accords
Transition of Iran from an important US client state to an anti-Western Islamic Republic
Arming of the mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight against the Soviet-allied Afghan government to increase the probability of Soviet invasion and later entanglement in a Vietnam-style war and later to counter the Soviet invasion and the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties relinquishing overt US control of the Panama Canal after 1999.

Rockefeller was a fan of Brzezinski and approached him to be the Tri-lateral Commission’s first Executive Director after reading his publication titled “Between two ages”. He was so impressed that the publication was adopted as the Tri-lateral Commissions “blueprint”. The following is a quote from “Between two ages”:

“Though Stalinism may have been a needless tragedy for both the Russian people and communism as an ideal, there is the intellectually tantalizing possibility that for the world at large it was, as we shall see, a blessing in disguise.

Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external man over the inner, passive man and victory of reason over belief.

Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control.

The Soviet Union could have emerged as the standard-bearer of this century’s most influential system of thought and as the social model for resolving the key dilemmas facing modern man.”

For those in the MSM and the left who call those who believe that the Tri-lateral Commission, CFR, Bilderbergs and now the Rome Club are conspiring to rule the globe, conspiracy theory kooks (or tin foil hat crowd), look at what Rockefeller admits in his biography (keeping in mind he has either founded, or sits on each organization listed above):

On page 405 of his own (David Rockefeller) autobiography (as Glen Beck say’s, “in his own words”, not mine):

“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

So, now you know that Rockefeller is an elitist socialist who has used his family’s wealth to slowly erode American wealth and sovereignty through the funding anti-American, so-called philanthropies or secret organizations. The Rome Club and the Tri-lateral commission being only 2.

In my prior article, I delved into Rockefeller’s “eugenics” beliefs and the money donated to fund that dream of de-populating the earth of “useless eaters” (you and me). When Rockefeller merged the “American Eugenics Society” into his newly created “Population Council” in 1953 it lead to that organizations’ granting money and sponsorship of the “Hasting Center” effectively changing the name “eugenics” (which fell out of public favor after the Jewish Holocaust at the hands of the Nazi’s) to “Bio-ethics”! The Hasting Center is now “headquarters” for the Obama administration reform agenda. The author of the “healthcare bill” is Rahm Emmanuel’s (Obama’s Chief of Staff) brother, Dr. Ezekial Emmanuel who is a “Senior Fellow” at the Hasting Center.

I digress, back to the Club of Rome and my tin foil hat.

In the 1991 Club of Rome publication titled “The First Global Revolution” (mentioned in my prior article), they tipped their hand (keep in mind the Maurice Strong interview mentioned above regarding the “secret society” who’s responsible for bringing about the economic collapse of the US to save the planet) on pages 104-5 with the following statement:

“In searching for a new energy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would “fit the bill”… “All of these dangers are caused by human intervention.”

We also know that there is a concerted effort to push this agenda through the “Nobel Prize” committees that have awarded the following “Club of Rome” members with the political prize of Laureate status”

Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Mikhail Gorbachev, Kofi Anan, Wangari Maathis, The Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu and Betty Williams. I could find no record of Obama having membership into the Club of Rome but we know he shares their visions and have multiple members on his Staff who is.

In my last article I highlighted Obama’s first “State Dinner” held for the Indian Prime Minister (a Rome Club Member) and I now believe that the “gate crasher” incident was just a diversion to keep this fact in the background while pushing the “gate crashers” into the forefront. You know the old Democrat trick of “look over here, nothing going on over there, routine.”

It would also go a long way to explaining why a fellow Nobel Prize winner was hustled out the White House Back door when the Dalai Lama (a Rome Club member) came knocking on Obama’s door.

Note: Maurice Strong’s statement about “secret society of Government leaders”?

Remember at the beginning of this article I asked that you to make a mental note of certain “current events” that occurred recently, both of which have huge economic and ecological ramifications for the US? Specifically the Gulf Oil Spill and the 998 point Dow Jones plunge due to a supposed Proctor and Gamble sell mistake.

Both of these events occurred separately and seem unrelated, right?

What if I told you that these events have something in common, a connection that links them through a specific individual who has a specific membership in the Club of Rome?

What if I told that this individual happens to sit on Proctor & Gambles (since 2001) board & British Petroleum’s international advisory board?

What if I told you he also sits on the International Advisory Board of the Council on Foreign Relations and oh, by the way he also sits on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (oops, Bill Gates is also a Club of Rome member).

Going back to the statement Maurice Strong mentioned above –

“What if a small group of these World leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from rich countries? In order to save the planet, this group decides – Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?”

and

“These aren’t terrorists. They’re World leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodities and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock markets and computers and gold supplies, a panic.”

According to NY Daily news “SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment on the probe – but insiders told Bloomberg News that investigators will try to determine whether the “costly typo”—billions instead of millions – were intentional or accidental.”

Who is this Club of Rome Member? Ernesto Zedillo, the former President of Mexico!

Ernesto Zedillo, prior to becoming President of Mexico was with the Central Bank of Mexico (1978-87) serving as their Deputy Manager of Economic Research and Deputy Director.

When he was elected (remember Obama’s campaign contribution issues) in 1994 it was amid an illegal campaign contribution scandal. It seems that Zedillo pressured troubled banks to pay $4 million dollars in campaign expenses (guess ACORN and SEIU wasn’t up to the task in Mexico). Opposition parties were outraged, at the time, over the huge donations even though the government knew that the banks were “sliding into bankruptcy”! After elected into office, Zedillo provided a $4 Billion dollar bailout to the banks with taxpayer funds (sound familiar).

Again, after the election, the President and his party blocked all outside scrutiny of the campaign finances (again, sound familiar). The bank owner came forward with the allegations but was immediately excoriated and deemed to lack any credibility by Zedillo and his state run media (again, sound familiar). Despite the lack of credibility, the owner was able to provide documents and bank records that corroborated most his claims.

Again, the President and his party fought hard to keep this secret due to the apparent use of the banks as “their party’s own funding agencies”!

One can only wonder why socialists, who almost always diametrically oppose capitalism, utilize the very instruments of commerce to achieve their ends. Zedillo is no different in this regard as he is well schooled and a very well connected banker himself He has also a Yale School since 2002 as the “Frederick Iseman Director for the Study of Globalization (really?, Huh!)

He is also (at Yale) Professor in the field of International Economics and Politics, Professor of International and Area Studies and Professor Adjunct of Forestry & Environmental Studies (International politics, economics and environmental issues, huh). It was at Yale that he received his Master’s in Philosophy and his PHD.

Once again, I digress – getting back to Maurice Strong…

The same years that Zedillo was a board member of various State owned enterprises in Mexico including PEMEX (Mexico’s nationalized oil company) Sadaam Hussein lost the first gulf war and was violating his “umpteenth UN Security Council Resolutions”.

It was during this period that Kofi Anan, Secretary General of the United Nations (Rome Club member) and various agencies within the UN were embroiled in the “oil for food” scandal. The UN image took a big political hit as the US Congress was holding their investigation into the scandal since the UN was not. The fallout reached a crescendo and the UN ultimately appointed Paul Volker (CFR member) to conduct an internal investigation.

The Volker inquiry found that Maurice Strong (while in official UN capacity) accepted a personal check for $1 million dollars from a controversial businessman who was working closely with the Iraqi regime of Sadaam Hussein.

Again, this was Iraq who was lobbing scud missiles indiscriminately into populated city center and rewarding suicide bomber families with stipends to those who martyr themselves against Israel.

According to Indymedia “Korean born Tonsun Park, who has since been charged with influence peddling for Sadaam Hussein, allegedly carried $1 million in cash out of Iraq in July 1997.”

Again, this was during the time that another Club of Rome member (Bill Clinton) allowed Iraq to defy UN sanctions at will throughout his US Presidency.

Furthermore, according to the report, Park was given the cash by then-Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz, who gave him $1 million in a cardboard box to be used in the regimes campaign to win favorable treatment from the UN. Park took the cash to a Jordanian bank in a plastic bag where he deposited it before writing “Mr. M. Strong” on a cheque for $988,885 to purchase a stake in CORDEX Petroleum, Inc., a company controlled by the Strong family.”

It wasn’t until July 2005 that Strong lost his job as UN envoy to N. Korea due to his previous dealings with Park.

The Volker inquiry found the evidence circumstantial. Just to clarify the whitewash, the following UN members (in addition to Maurice Strong) who are members of the “Club of Rome”:

Kofi Anan – Secretary General of the United Nations (former)
Javier Perez de Cuellar – Secretary General of the United Nations (former)
Robert Muller – Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations (former)
Timothy Wirth – President of the UN Foundation
Ruud Lubbers – UN High Commissioner for Refugees
Mary Robinson – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
Koichiro Matsura – Director General UNESCO
Jerome Binde – Director of Foresight, UNESCO
Federica Mayer – Director General of UNESCO (former)
Tapio Kanninen – Director of Policy & Planning, UN
Konrad Osterwalder – Under Secretary General of the UN

It is important to remember that the Rockefellers were very active in the establishment of the UN and donated the land in NY where the current UN Headquarter sits today.

Additionally, UNESCO was formed in 1946 and the first Director “Sir Julian Huxley wrote the “purpose” (Charter) in 1948:

“The general philosophy of UNESCO should be scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background…its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization…Political unification in some sort of world government will be required…Tasks for the media division of UNESCO (will be) to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures…to help the emergence of a single world culture…Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable….”

As you can see, since 1948 at least, the UN has been populated with socialists that have one goal in mind – the eradication of national sovereignty and replacing it with global governance that will effectively force billions into a form of indentured servitude yet this not where they intend to stop. They also have created “cottage industries” filled with those who also wish to radically de-populate the planet through a vigorous “eugenics” program. We have ample proof that Barrack Obama has filled the halls and offices of the White House with people who favor the charters of the Council of Foreign Relations, Tri-lateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and nefarious organizations like “the Club of Rome.”

We have seen the policy and actions that Obama has paraded in front of us since January 2009 and have been startled in the destructive economic maneuvers that almost seem surreal. We ask ourselves “is he stupid”? or “is he doing these things intentionally?” We see his out of control spending that to anyone who either has spent or saved a dollar understands the unsustainability of these actions. We see the weakness against our enemies and the disrespect to our allies, his unjustified hostility towards Israel while fostering a cozy relationship with Iran is troubling at best. He advocates pulling our troops, closing Gitmo, open borders and a feckless Department of Homeland Security that gives our airport security screeners secrets to those who look for an opening, any opening to commit mass murder all the while ignoring unemployment. We now know that “Cap and Trade”, illegal immigration amnesty and Global Warming are on the front burner. I know now, with conviction, that the tin foil hat on my head is a badge of honor because it no longer represents a “conspiracy theory” – no, it has evolved into a fact based realm for me. The question you should ask yourself is “what if I AM right?” America is the last truly free land on the planet. So, where will those seeking refuge in our open arms (legally) turn to if we fail to turn back the “red tide”?

Glen Beck – Homework assignment

2010-05-12T22:43:00.000-07:00

Obama quote – “Middle Class under assault”

Maurice Strong

"It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns the affluent middle-class..involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles, small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable...A shift if necessary toward life-styles less geared to environmental damaging consumption patterns."

The Obama quote above was not to warn us about Maurice Strong but to hide the views of Strong that Obama relates to in rhetoric that it is Obama that will save the middle class pay and benefits and protect them from taxation.

In 1953 The American Eugenics Society merged with, and moved its offices into the headquarters of the Rockefeller family’s new Population Council.

In 1968, the “Club of Rome” was formed at the Rockefeller private estate in Ballagio, Italy. Maurice Strong is an avid member.

The purpose of the “Club of Rome” is to formulate crisis, through which the world can be united under global governance. Sound familiar – Rahm Emanuels favorite term is you cannot let a crisis go to waste.

This plan goes hand in hand with the “culling” of the majority of the world population of “useless eaters” in the name of overpopulation. Remember this term “useless eaters” as it comes up later in this article (see Nazi “Euthanasia program” prime directive described by the US Military Tribunal)

Sound familiar – Obama Science Czar John Holdren advocates forced sterilization.

In 1969, John Holdren penned an article with Paul R. Ehrlich that argued “if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology that man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”

Maurice Strong – “was made a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation in 1971 (and serves still today as a board member), which gave a grant for running his Stockholm Conference office. He hired the British political intelligence operative Barbara Ward (Lady Jackson), who wrote much of the preparatory materials for the conference.”

In 1972, the “Club of Rome” published “Limits to Growth” as their warning to limit over-population through “sustainable development (population reduction)”.

In 1973 John Holdren encouraged the decline in fertility to well below replacement (i.e., more people dying than being born).

Time Magazine (1989 article titled Planet of the Year: Too many mouths):

“Prospects are so dire that some environmentalists urge the world to adopt the goal of cutting in half the earth's population growth rate during the next decade. "That means a call for a two-child family for the world as a whole," explained Lester Brown, president of the World watch Institute.”

The website of “world watch institute” -- read the forward:

Mikhail Gorbachev – “It is for reasons such as these that I founded Green Cross International 12 years ago and continue to advocate for a global value shift on how we handle Earth, a new sense of global interdependence, and a shared responsibility in humanity's relationship with nature. It is also for these reasons that I helped draft the Earth Charter, a code of ethical principles now endorsed by over 8,000 organizations representing more than 100 million people around the world. And it is for these reasons that Maurice Strong, Chair of the Earth Council, and I have initiated the Earth Dialogues, a series of public forums on ethics and sustainable development.”

Notice the term at the end of this paragraph – “sustainable development” ( see Club of Rome publication titled “Limits to growth” in 1972).

Connecting dots

To do so I must go back to the early 20th century in what Glen Beck calls the “progressive era” in America. Before I go back to the founding of this era, I want to share with you the modern day elitist view.

The following is an excerpt from an essay in Amy Kass’s edited volume “Giving Well, doing good: readings for thoughtful philanthropists.”

“Remember when Warren Buffet announced he was giving his billions and billions to charity, specifically the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? If not, here is what Buffet said in that announcement (taken from Hudson Institute essay titled: The Ungodly bright: Should They Lead Philanthropy into the Future?

“WHEN WARREN Buffett announced his multi-billion dollar bequest to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in the summer of 2006, he explained his generous if unconventional act of charity by claiming that “if your goal is to return the money to society by attacking truly major problems that don’t have a commensurate funding base – what could you find that’s better than turning to a couple of people who are young, who are ungodly bright…”

American philanthropy’s romance with the “ungodly bright” has a long, if not always noble, pedigree. After all, the first large foundations – Carnegie, Rockefeller, Russell Sage – were established during, and fully reflected the predilections of, America’s progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. The progressives were persuaded that, just as disease was rapidly being conquered by modern science and medicine, so “social pathogens” – the ultimate source of our social ills – could be tracked down and eradicated once and for all, given new sciences of human behavior like sociology, psychology, and public administration. But this would require that the management of human affairs be taken out of the hands of the benighted many and put into the care of the enlightened few, trained and credentialed in the new social sciences. Not coincidentally, this was precisely the direction history itself wished to take. As their name suggest, progressives were convinced that history was the story of inexorable progress from the selfish individualism and parochial localism of the past to a new era of social-minded brotherhood. But only the ungodly bright avant garde had the historical and scientific insight to break with the parochial allegiances of the past, and persuade or compel the many to follow them into a more promising, socially conscious, collective future.”

Dots:

I will show you two things, first I will show you that the modern day eugenics which was born by this “ungodly bright avant garde” in the early 20th century (Rockefeller) is alive and well today and second the environmental cabal’s belief in Population control as a means to promote eugenics in such ways as Abortion, sterilization and other ways.

This evil institution that was formerly called “the American Eugenics Society” (today eugenics has been renamed “bioethics) and the new institution is called “The Hastings Center.

The Eugenics Society worked hand in hand with their British counterparts (elites) in Nazi Germany preceding the holocaust. It is what gave Hitler his idea of “culling the imperfect human herd” to achieve the German Master Race through a Nazi program known as “Tiergarten 4” (T4 for short), the history in one moment.

The transformation of the American Eugenics Society into The Hastings Center:

After the war, with corpses still smoking in Europe, the eugenics/euthanasia movement laid low for a time, inventing new names for itself such as “social biology” and “the right to die.” The British royal family, whose palace physicians such as Lord Thomas Jeeves Horder had officially run the eugenics/euthanasia movement all through the Hitler era, now teamed with their Wall Street moneybags to retool the movement behind population reduction, especially for non-white peoples.

• The American Eugenics Society merged with, and moved its offices into the headquarters of the Rockefeller family’s new Population Council in 1953.
• A eugenics zealot in the Ernst Rudin tradition, Daniel Callahan, got a Population Council grant and continual Rockefeller family sponsorship in 1968-69 to found the Hastings Center, in Garrison, N.Y., to push euthanasia under the new title, “Bioethics.”
• Geneticist and evolutionary biologist Theodore Dobzhansky was simultaneously a founding director of the Hastings Center and chairman of the American Eugenics Society. Hastings founder Callahan became a director of the Eugenics Society.
• The Hastings Center is now headquarters for the Obama reform agenda, still under the active leadership of emeritus president Callahan, the Hitlerian eugenist.

Guess who is a “Senior Fellow” at the Hastings Center, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel!

According to “The Hastings Center” website, regarding “End of Life”:

“Death may not have changed, but dying is quite different from what it used to be, thanks to medical technologies that have extended life and made dying frequently a lingering process rather than a sudden event. People with failing kidneys can survive on dialysis for 20 or more years. People with incurable cancer can live for months or years with chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Victims of car accidents who would once have died of head trauma can now be kept alive by ventilators and feeding tubes. Meantime, life-saving therapies for what were once sudden killers, like heart attack, mean that increasing numbers of us end up with chronic complications or decline into dementia.

Given these trends, questions about the quality of life at its very end, and the care provided to the dying have assumed an unprecedented importance and complexity, engaging policy, law, ethics, and economics. What if a patient refuses treatment? What if a dying patient no longer has the capacity to make decisions? What if the family disagrees with his wishes? How useful are advance directives? If treatments can keep somebody alive for added months, weeks, or days, when and to whom should they be given? Who takes care of the caretakers?

With an aging baby boom population, and with end-of-life care consuming an estimated 10% to 12% of the annual health care budget, these and other questions continue to need probing, debating, and—ultimately—answering.”

Obama & Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahm Emanuel’s brother)

“The U.S. National Military Tribunal identified as a prime motive of the euthanasia program, “to eliminate ‘useless eaters’ from the scene, in order to conserve food, hospital facilities, doctors and nurses for the more important use of the German armed forces.” That euthanasia program, and the rise to power of the Nazi regime that perpetrated it, had been sold to a population frantic from economic collapse and predisposed, from years of propaganda by the eugenics/euthanasia movement, to consider some lives unworthy to be lived.

German advocates of eugenics (a crackpot notion of hereditary superiority and inferiority), law professor Karl Binding and psychiatry professor Alfred Hoche, had written a sensational 1920 pamphlet, The Permission To Destroy Life Unworthy of Life, a prime theoretical basis for the Nazi genocide. Binding and Hoche argued that society should cast aside the “obsolete”

Hippocratic Oath, that binds doctors to do no harm to patients and commits them to consider only the patient’s welfare.”

On June 18, 2009, Dr. Emanuel wrote an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association that suggested that doctors throw away the Hippocratic Oath, when he said “Doctors “are trained to identify and praised for . . . enumerating all possible diagnoses and tests that would confirm or exclude them. . . . Peer recognition goes to the most thorough and aggressive Physicians. . . . This culture is further reinforced by a unique understanding of professional obligations, specifically, the Hippocratic Oath’s admonition to ‘use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment’ as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of cost or effect on others.”

Remember, in May 2009 Obama demanded that $2 Trillion be cut from insurers and health care providers.

“The $2 trillion health-care cuts, now demanded by Obama and the financiers, were previously promoted in a speech by Dr. Gerhard Wagner, head of the Nazi organization for physicians, at the Sept. 8-14, 1936 Nazi Party rally at Nuremberg: “The millions and billions that we have spent . . . for care of the genetically ill, is a squandering of our national resources that we National Socialists cannot justify when we consider the needs of the healthy population. Healthy working class families with numerous children today earn only enough for the necessities of life, which means that it is irresponsible that the state must provide the money for some genetically ill families who may have several family members in institutions costing thousands of marks annually. The previous year, Hitler had told this same Dr. Wagner, that the doctors, primed for murder through the eugenics/euthanasia movement, would have to wait for the crisis of the war to convince the public to give up their moral principles. -- the identical point made by

Ezekiel Emanuel in October 2008:

“The world economy is teetering ... With trillions of dollars evaporating in this crisis, millions of middle-class Americans face the prospect of losing their homes and jobs, and witnessing a dramatic contraction of their retirement savings. In response, the public will desperately want financial security.... Bailing out bankers and other gamblers [and the] huge increase in the federal debt that these bailouts will entail intensifies the pressure to rein in health-care costs....

The dean of health-care economists, Victor Fuchs of Stanford, has long maintained that we will get health-care reform only when there is a war, a depression or some other major civil unrest. It's beginning to look like we might just have all three....?

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, "The Financial Crisis and Health Care," the Chicago Tribune, Oct. 12, 2008

Never let a crisis go to waste – Rahm Emanuel

It is important to remember that Obama had nominated former Senator Tom Daschle to be his “Health Czar” who withdrew his nomination after we learned he did not pay $140,000 in back taxes. America dodged a bullet that day because what people do not realize is that Mr. Daschle shares Dr. Emanuel’s philosophy.

“In his (Daschle’s) 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis” Daschle calls for a rule, that all who register for Medicare must sign a document outlining the degree to which they consent to be killed in an “end of life” situation.

The other dark side of the Obamacare bill is the tax payer funded abortion provision.

If you think after reading everything above that Obama has surrounded himself with the individuals who share the “eugenics” philosophy by ignorance then just recall the exchange the President had with Jane Sturm:

“Jane Sturm told the story of her nearly 100-year-old mother, who was originally denied a pacemaker because of her age. She eventually got one, but only after seeking out another doctor.

“Outside the medical criteria,” Sturm asked, “is there a consideration that can be given for a certain spirit … and quality of life?”

“I don’t think that we can make judgments based on peoples’ spirit,” Obama said. … “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking painkillers.“

Note: The Youtube video of this was scrubbed from their site.

Eugenics and the link to the Environment movement – Overpopulation

The radical environmental “Science Czar” John Holdren who has survived the onslaught of Conservative ire for his beliefs:

“Overpopulation was an early concern and interest. In a 1969 article, Holdren and co-author Paul R. Ehrlich argued that, "if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come." In 1973 Holdren encouraged a decline in fertility to well below replacement in the United States, because "210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many." In 1977, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, and Holdren co-authored the textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment; they discussed the possible role of a wide variety of solutions to overpopulation, from voluntary family planning to enforced population controls, including forced sterilization for women after they gave birth to a designated number of children, and recommended "the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences" such as access to birth control and abortion."

Rockefeller Foundation – Today

I have touched upon the past with the Rockefeller Foundation and their grant to establish the Hastings Center (formerly “The American Eugenics Society”) but wanted to share with you, the current Leadership.

The President of “The Rockefeller Foundation” since 2005 is Judith Rodin. In 199 she was the President of the University of Pennsylvania when a death was caused from “experimental human gene therapy” that touched off a national outrage and eventually a “Congressional Investigation”:

The patient/guinea pig:

Jesse Gelsinger - The key facts to date are these: On Sept. 17, 1999, Jesse Gelsinger, an 18-year-old with a rare metabolic disease known as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency ("OTC"), who was participating in an experimental gene therapy trial at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania, died at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania four days after being injected with corrective genetic material for the disease.

The letter from Judith Rodin to Senator William Frist:

--------------------------------------------------------
"The Honorable William Frist
U.S. Senate
416 Russell Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-3802

Dear Senator Frist:

I want to take this opportunity to provide you with some background on our activities in support of the current investigation of clinical trials at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy ("IHGT") at the University of Pennsylvania.

First and foremost, I want you to know how seriously the University is approaching this matter. The death of Jesse Gelsinger was a terrible tragedy, and we are determined to learn everything we can about it to understand precisely what happened and what might be done to improve clinical trials throughout the University and at all institutions affiliated with us. We intend for our research programs, particularly those involving human subjects, to meet the highest standards. Nothing less is acceptable.

We have several, extensive efforts underway to achieve this goal and to respond to the important concerns raised by federal regulators. We have launched two independent reviews, led by eminent scientists, and we have been and will continue to be strongly committed to cooperating fully with the FDA, NIH, Congress and any other appropriate body as they review these issues.

The key facts to date are these: On Sept. 17, 1999, Jesse Gelsinger, an 18-year-old with a rare metabolic disease known as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency ("OTC"), who was participating in an experimental gene therapy trial at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania, died at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania four days after being injected with corrective genetic material for the disease. OTC is an inherited disorder that in its most common form causes death in affected newborn males because of their inability to properly process nitrogen in food proteins due to a genetic defect in the liver. The clinical trial was voluntarily halted pending review. All appropriate regulatory agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, which approved the trial, were notified promptly; we pledged to cooperate, fully and completely, with any agency reviews undertaken. Thereafter, the FDA began a review of the clinical trial. On Jan. 19, 2000, the FDA completed its on-site review and issued a Form 483 raising important questions about IHGT's monitoring and oversight of this and other clinical trials. Two days after issuing the Form 483, the FDA placed a hold on all clinical trials at IHGT. On Jan. 18, 2000, the Office for Protection from Research Risk ("OPRR") forwarded to us a citizen complaint with regard to the review of the OTC clinical trial by Penn's Institutional Review Board and commenced an investigation.

The University takes the FDA's action and OPRR's letter--and the questions raised about IHGT's monitoring and oversight of clinical trials--extremely seriously. A team of scientists and administrators is working around-the-clock to ensure that the IHGT provides a comprehensive, detailed and accelerated response to the FDA and the OPRR as soon as possible.

Additionally, I have initiated two separate reviews related to this matter--an independent review by outside experts and an internal review by Penn faculty--both of which will involve distinguished research scientists with a wealth of academic expertise and relevant experience.

The independent panel will be made up of senior academic leadership and renowned research scientists who are unaffiliated with the University of Pennsylvania. It will be chaired by William H. Danforth, M.D., Chancellor Emeritus and Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Washington University in St. Louis, and it will include Joseph B. Martin, M.D., Ph.D., Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Edward J. Benz, Jr., M.D., Sir William Osler Professor and Director of the Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Inder Verma, Ph.D., American Cancer Society Professor of Molecular Biology, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, Calif.; Rochelle Hirschhorn, M.D., Professor of Medicine and Cell Biology and Chief of the Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine; and Daniel Callahan, Ph.D., Director of International Programs, The Hastings Center, Garrison, N.Y. They will have a broad mandate to conduct a comprehensive review of every aspect of IHGT's procedures for oversight and monitoring of clinical trials.

This committee will report directly to me; its charge follows below:

1. To conduct a thorough, independent review in order to carefully evaluate and assess IHGT's oversight and monitoring of clinical trial programs, with particular emphasis on the FDA's findings about the OTC Therapy Trial and IHGT's response to those findings.

2. To recommend any additional actions necessary to ensure the highest standards are set and met in the conduct, oversight and monitoring of future IHGT clinical trials, including a framework for University monitoring of compliance with these recommendations.

3. To report findings of review to the President of University of Pennsylvania and recommend issues to be referred to the University's faculty committee charged with reviewing human subject research.

Additionally, I have formed a committee of Penn faculty, chaired by Provost Robert L. Barchi, himself a distinguished scientist and scholar, and comprised of research scientists with a wealth of talent and relevant experience, who will conduct a proactive review of all aspects of research involving human subjects anywhere at Penn. They will examine everything we do, from the mechanics of the approval process, to oversight and the functions of our Institutional Review Board, to ultimate accountability for this research.

Again, we deeply regret Jesse Gelsinger's death, and we want to learn everything we can about how and why he died. We also want to consider everything and anything we can do to improve our oversight and monitoring procedures for essential clinical research. As I said, nothing less than the highest possible standards are acceptable. And, Penn is deeply committed to cooperating fully with the appropriate regulatory agencies and public officials examining these complex issues.

We welcome any suggestions you may have on how we are approaching this matter, and, of course, we will keep you informed of all significant developments.

Respectfully,

Judith Rodin"

--------------------------------------------

This death did not hinder her rise to another prominent position within the Rockefeller Foundation some 5 years later. Human experimentation was at the core of the Nazi Eugenics program as well as the famed Nazi “Dr. Mengele”.

The Club of Rome, in 1991 published “The first Global Revolution” and the following statement can be found on pages 104 and 105:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…all these dangers are caused by human intervention.”

Now, again the Mikhail Gorbachev forward notated above, first paragraph:

“Five years ago, all 191 United Nations member states pledged to meet eight Millennium Development Goals by 2015, including eradicating extreme poverty and hunger and ensuring environmental sustainability. These critical challenges were reaffirmed by health officials from across the globe in October 2004 at the tenth anniversary of the landmark International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo.

The overarching conclusion from this 2004 meeting was that while considerable, albeit erratic, progress was indeed being made in many areas, any optimism must be tempered with the realization that gains in overall global socioeconomic development, security, and sustainability do not reflect the reality on the ground in many parts of the world. Poverty continues to undermine progress in many areas. Diseases such as HIV/AIDS are on the rise, creating public health time bombs in numerous countries. In the last five years, some 20 million children have died of preventable waterborne diseases, and hundreds of millions of people continue to live with the daily misery and squalor associated with the lack of clean drinking water and adequate sanitation.

This “State of the World” assessment by Gorbachev was given in 2005. Oh, did I mention Gorby is also a “Club of Rome” member?

See his bio at the Club of Rome website:

“In recognition of his outstanding services as a great reformer and world political leader, who greatly contributed in changing for the better the very nature of world development, Mikhail Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on October 15, 1990.

He is also the founding president of Green Cross International. In January 1990 during an address to the Global Forum on Environment and Development for Survival held in Moscow, President Gorbachev brought up the idea for an organization that would apply
the medical emergency response model of the International Committee of the Red Cross to ecological issues and expedite solutions to environmental problems that transcend national boundaries. Developing this idea, delegates at the Earth Summit in Rio de
Janeiro (June 1992), approached President Gorbachev, mandating him to create and launch this organisation.

President Gorbachev also founded the Gorbachev Foundation in 1992. He is a member of the Club of Madrid and the Club of Rome. He is also founder of the World Political Forum and the World Summit of Nobel Peace Laureates.

As you can see Gorbachev won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990 and was followed by another Rome Club member to the Nobel list when Al Gore won his prize.

I thought I would throw in one more “Rome Club” member who was recently received by the Obama’s for a “State Dinner” on January 5, 2010 – Prime Minister Monmohan Singh. You remember the “White House Gate Crasher incident”? Could it be that Obama received the Prime Minister for his “Rome Club” agenda? Both Emmanuel Brothers were in attendance.