Thursday, August 6, 2009

Canada Free Press is more open than US MSM, Explosive investigation into Obama Birth coverup

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Director, & Judi McLeod, founding editor of Canada Free Press

4 August 2009

Do you remember Watergate? Thirty-five years ago this Sunday, U.S. President Richard M. Nixon submitted his letter of resignation for his role in the scandal. There was the crime - the break-in, and then there was the cover-up by the Nixon administration. There were threats, media manipulation and disinformation. It was the cover-up more than the crime itself in the aftermath of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall of the Nixon administration. It was a politically critical time for our country, but we survived because of the strength of the U.S. constitution.

Now, we potentially face a new constitutional crisis stemming from the refusal of Barack Hussein Obama to produce a one-page document that would confirm his eligibility to hold the highest office in the land. Eligibility to hold office is not a “fringe” matter, but a core constitutional issue that lies at the very heart of a growing controversy.Although we do not have the birth certificate or proof of ineligibility, Canada Free Press and the Northeast Intelligence Network have documentation of a cover-up relating to the issue of Obama’s eligibility to hold office. The proof we possess not only exposes a well orchestrated cover-up, but also provides critical insight into why the topic of Obama’s eligibility has failed to gain traction in the corporate media.The Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are in possession of extremely sensitive investigative documents, including a stunning written admission by a nationally known talk show host stating that he was threatened with his career - or worse - should he talk about the issue of Barack Hussein Obama’s birth records to a national audience. This document was obtained on December 10, 2008, and provides explicit detail of a “gag order” imposed on this host before and immediately following the national election last November.

After receiving and authenticating the document, US based veteran private investigator Douglas J. Hagmann opened a full scale investigation into the media blackout, with specific emphasis on tracing the blackout origins to those issuing them. This investigation was conducted in conjunction with Judi McLeod, founding editor of Canada Free Press and Brian Thompson, CFP managing editor following a meeting near Toronto, Ontario last December. At that meeting, it was decided to keep the existence of the document secret until additional evidence could be obtained.

Today, after an extensive eight month investigation, the Northeast Intelligence Network and Canada Free Press are breaking their silence and revealing explosive information about a widespread cover-up that began at the earliest stages of the Obama presidential campaign. The cover-up trace back to some of the most powerful and influential people in the U.S. and continues today.

Summary of the EvidenceAs noted above, we are in possession of a written account by a well known national talk show host who details how he was prohibited to discuss the controversy of Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility as president of the United States. This signed document cites exact dates and times when he was forbidden to discuss any aspect of the birth certificate controversy, and includes direct references to the individuals responsible for such prohibitions. Further, his statement identifies the individuals who originated the orders and their positions, and confirms that failure to adhere to the order would likely end his career in that industry. He also confirms that other, less specific but more menacing threats were implied during conversations with those making the subject off limits.

Although we possess the original document containing the name and contact information of the talk show host, we have decided not to publish his name or network affiliation at this time. Based on the correspondence from this individual and respecting the nature of the threats to him personally and professionally, it is our decision to allow him to enjoy anonymity until such time as he decides to reveal the facts himself at a time of his choosing.

From multiple interviews conducted within the last eight months, we have obtained information from other sources, independent of the above, who have also been instructed to avoid any discussion of the birth certificate issue at all costs, to wit:

The account of an administrative assistant employed in New York City by a cable network news station who provided significant, detailed information of a 2008 meeting between the top network executive and four-(4) well-known news anchors. This source confirmed that she drafted the memo to the various hosts to arrange notify them of the date, time and location of this high-level meeting at the request of the network’s top executive.Present at this meeting, she verified that the network official issued “warnings” to the personalities “to avoid any on-air discussion of the birth place, eligibility, and news accounts of litigation compelling [Barack Hussein] Obama to produce a legitimate copy of his birth certificate.” She stated that the network executive had her arrange the conference immediately following a meeting “between [the network executive] and an attorney closely associated with candidate Obama who was acting on his behalf.”

The statement of a corporate secretary for a major news network confirming the existence of a one-page inter-office memo, bearing the markings “confidential” and “not for dissemination,” addressed and distributed to news anchors and on-air talent” that specifically instructed the recipients to avoid any discussion pertaining to the Obama birth certificate controversy. The memo was written and distributed in October 2008, and specifically instructed on-air talent to “advise guests, as necessary, to refrain from citing any news story, legal proceedings, Internet ‘blogs’ or other sources that pertain to the ongoing eligibility controversy of future President Barack Obama.”

As outlined above, our Investigation has uncovered both direct and indirect evidence of threats being made against some of the nation’s top radio and television personalities, which would explain some giving this topic mere lip service.As one source interviewed during the course of this investigation stated, “I’ve got a career and family to think about.”Although no one should be surprised over the manipulation of the news, the nature of this manipulation, and the extent of the threats against journalists, should shock even the most well grounded.

Any reasonable person must question the motivation of the media moguls. The individuals who have - and continue to threaten talk show hosts, news anchors, and others are the top people. We are not talking about mid or upper level management - this is from the very top in all cases. If there is nothing here, why the secrecy?

So who is the mysterious "radio personality" that was threatened. Could it be Ann Coulter?
Ann wrote an article yesterday titled:
Obama Birth Certificate Spotted In Bogus Moon Landing Footage

On the Conservative site Human Events Ann Coulter wrote the above article that painted those who want Obama to release his long form birth certificate as, well, loons. This article was posted dated 8/5/09 and in its relative short time span on the internet (hours) it has drawn a whopping 655 comments.

There is the possibility that Coulter has sympathy for Obama’s dilemma because she herself was caught up in a “birth issue” scandal herself over the stated age on her drivers license which she has to this day refused (as Obama) to release her true age. In this scandal which could have been a federal crime because she had a drivers license in Connecticut when she first registered to vote saying she was 18 (the legal age to vote in Connecticut) and listing her birth date as 12/8/61. Years later when she obtained a Washington, DC drivers license her stated age was listed as 12/8/63. This revelation came about in a Washington Times article penned by Lloyd Grove (2002) titled “Mystery of the Ages”. If Ann had indeed lied and obtained a drivers license to vote when she was only 16, then she would have committed a crime. At least she isn’t a hypocrite for demanding Obama’s birth certificate when she herself refuses to do the same.

I read the first 4 pages of comments (out of 33) and tallied those who agreed with Ann or disagreed with Ann. I am cognizant of the fact that this is a predominately conservative site and I expected the “disagreed” side to be skewed as such. I tallied 40 in the disagreed to the 4 agreed. Some of the 40 were very heated and angry that Ann would “turn” on her base with this subject and some were reasonable and thoughtful in their disagreement but the one thing it did show was a lot of conservatives want this answered one way or the other.

For most reasonable and thoughtful people who are labeled or proudly wear the title “birther” it is because they are worried or even scared that a “foreigner” is sitting in the White House when our constitution is clear about the matter. The reason the founding fathers did not want anyone who is not a citizen of this country is because of the possibility that they (Usurpers) would not have their personal allegiance with this country.

So, those who are witnessing the policies and ideologies coming from this man are beginning to see that the “allegiance to America” is simply not there.
When trying to imagine who the specific individual who was threatened and looking at the own "age/birth certificate" scandal of Ann's, it is not hard to image that maybe it was her (But this is supposition on my part only as there is no proof to that assertion).

No comments:

Post a Comment