The US ARMY is actively seeking “internment/resettlement” specialist job applicants!
Yesterday, in Tampa Florida another town-hall erupted into chaos and violence. This is the second incident of violence in as many days. Representative Cathy Castor (D) Florida, in an attempt to “stage” a photo-op on the quick by arranging a town-hall meeting that was NOT made public and contacted the media and invited SEIU as the attendees to show the world how much Obama’s Healthcare plan is wanted.
What they did not expect was the speed and efficiency of Twitter to mobilize the opposition to this stage event. What they expected was to fill the 250 capacity with SEIU members all bowing in reverence to Castors speech for the cameras. When Castor showed up for this propaganda event she was looking at over 1,250 people waiting for her.
The photographs of violence are below. The “couple” shown in the photos are pro-Obama supporters and the individual is the anti-health care opponent. Before you really look at the photos (which are shot in rapid sequence and show the violence escalation) you have wonder why the “couple” is actually for the Obama plan because they are both obviously over the age of 50 (which targets them for rationed care due to their age) and both are obviously obese (which also will categorized them as ones who will be shunned care due to the health complications due to their weight). When you look at the opponent, he is 20 years younger and fit and would fit into the maximum benefits he would receive under the plan, yet he is opposed to it?
Finally, the reporter includes captions next to each photo and indicates the woman was “protecting” her husband due to a “heart condition” (another disqualifier as a bi-product of his obesity).
That said, when you examine the photos in the sequence they were taken you have to look at a couple of things. First, the body language of the couple compared to the opponent. Second, find the doorway in the rear of the shot as a landmark to see that the opposer to Obama is standing still while the couple in moving forward into HIS face and space and are obviously the aggressors.
The photos are 9-16:
http://www.tampabay.com/specials/2009/photo_galleries/TownHall/
Obama calls in his Union shock troops though they are not completely for the bill:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/06/unions-joining-the-fray-in-health-care-overhaul/?pagemode=print
Quoting from the article - “Generally, the unions have supported President Obama’s desire to change the health-care system, even if they differ on some of the particulars. But it remains to be seen whether the unions will fully back the president’s final position. For now, they seem eager to fight on his behalf against the insurance companies and to try to staunch any sense that he is losing the war for public support.
Yesterday, in Tampa Florida another town-hall erupted into chaos and violence. This is the second incident of violence in as many days. Representative Cathy Castor (D) Florida, in an attempt to “stage” a photo-op on the quick by arranging a town-hall meeting that was NOT made public and contacted the media and invited SEIU as the attendees to show the world how much Obama’s Healthcare plan is wanted.
What they did not expect was the speed and efficiency of Twitter to mobilize the opposition to this stage event. What they expected was to fill the 250 capacity with SEIU members all bowing in reverence to Castors speech for the cameras. When Castor showed up for this propaganda event she was looking at over 1,250 people waiting for her.
The photographs of violence are below. The “couple” shown in the photos are pro-Obama supporters and the individual is the anti-health care opponent. Before you really look at the photos (which are shot in rapid sequence and show the violence escalation) you have wonder why the “couple” is actually for the Obama plan because they are both obviously over the age of 50 (which targets them for rationed care due to their age) and both are obviously obese (which also will categorized them as ones who will be shunned care due to the health complications due to their weight). When you look at the opponent, he is 20 years younger and fit and would fit into the maximum benefits he would receive under the plan, yet he is opposed to it?
Finally, the reporter includes captions next to each photo and indicates the woman was “protecting” her husband due to a “heart condition” (another disqualifier as a bi-product of his obesity).
That said, when you examine the photos in the sequence they were taken you have to look at a couple of things. First, the body language of the couple compared to the opponent. Second, find the doorway in the rear of the shot as a landmark to see that the opposer to Obama is standing still while the couple in moving forward into HIS face and space and are obviously the aggressors.
The photos are 9-16:
http://www.tampabay.com/specials/2009/photo_galleries/TownHall/
Obama calls in his Union shock troops though they are not completely for the bill:
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/06/unions-joining-the-fray-in-health-care-overhaul/?pagemode=print
Quoting from the article - “Generally, the unions have supported President Obama’s desire to change the health-care system, even if they differ on some of the particulars. But it remains to be seen whether the unions will fully back the president’s final position. For now, they seem eager to fight on his behalf against the insurance companies and to try to staunch any sense that he is losing the war for public support.
“The question for us is, will we let them make health care ‘Obama’s Waterloo’ or will we make it the next big step in our march to turn around America?” Mr. Sweeney wrote in a memo, first reported by the Huffington Post.”
And further from Huffington – “But while the union conglomerate seems poised to flex its political muscle on Obama's behalf, it may find some friction on the policy front. Detailed in Sweeney's memo are certain legislative priorities that are clearly at odds with what seems likely to be produced in the Senate Finance Committee's compromise bill.
Sweeney describes it as a "requirement that ALL employers 'pay or play,'" that the final bill have "a robust public health insurance plan to compete with private insurers and drive down health costs," and that the legislation contain "relief for company/union funds providing pre-Medicare retiree coverage, and no taxation of health benefits!"
“The nation's largest federation of labor organizations has promised to directly engage with boisterous conservative protesters at Democratic town halls during the August recess.
In a memo sent out on Thursday, AFL-CIO President John Sweeney outlined the blueprint for how the union conglomerate would step up recess activities on health care reform and other topics pertinent to the labor community. The document makes clear that Obama allies view the town hall forums as ground zero of the health care debate. It also uses the specter of the infamous 2000 recount "Brooks Brothers" protest to rally its members to the administration's side.
"The principal battleground in the campaign will be town hall meetings and other gatherings with members of Congress in their home districts," reads the memo. "We want your help to organize major union participation to counter the right-wing "Tea-Party Patriots" who will try to disrupt those meetings, as they've been trying to do to meetings for the last month. ...”
The nomenclature that Unions identify with:
White House: “If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard,” Messina said, according to an official who attended the meeting.
AFL/CIO President: “The principal Battleground”; “Directly engage”
White House: “If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard,” Messina said, according to an official who attended the meeting.
AFL/CIO President: “The principal Battleground”; “Directly engage”
SEIU violence:
In addition to the acts of violence perpetrated at the St. Louis Town Hall and the one in Tampa, Florida, here are other incidents (notice that both are directed against rival unions):
PRN News wire (April 2008) –
OAKLAND, Calif., April 24 /PRNewswire/ -- Desperate to hide the truth about a brutal attack on a labor conference in Michigan April 12, Andy Stern's Service Employees International Union is now peddling a video that does not show the violence ... as proof that the attack never happened. Stern's denials contradict dozens of first-person accounts of journalists, non- partisan trade unionists, and the organizers of the conference.
As a result, the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee call on Stern to "renounce the use of violence, end the lies, and stop targeting women, nurses, and working people for threats and harassment."
The labor movement was shocked by seiu’s attack, which sent one woman to the hospital, introduced the use of violence to labor politics, and was widely covered and reported on by the 1,000 attendees.
"The violence in Michigan and the specific targeting of women labor leaders is reprehensible and should have no place in our labor movement or our country," said Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of CNA/NNOC. "For Andy Stern to direct this attack and its cover up is abusive, immoral, and unacceptable behavior. He demonstrates why RNs across the country want no part of an organization like seiu."
The Business Journal (June 2009) –
“Home care workers in Clovis and Kerman who support the National Union of Healthcare Workers say people have come to their door, torn down signs in support of NUHW and replaced them with flyers in support of SEIU.
Today marked the day when 10,000 workers in the Fresno area would begin receiving ballots in the mail. The election is to determine if workers want to remain members of SEIU or join NUHW.
“I was extremely upset,” said Silbenia Conley of Kerman. She said she witnessed a heavyset African-American male come to her door, allegedly tear down a red NUHW support sign, replace it with a SEIU magnetized sign, then speed off in a newer silver-gray Chevy Malibu. “I was cussing. That (sign) was given to me,” Conley said.
Conley and her husband are both in-home care workers, and she said she doesn’t know how SEIU received their home address. “
And
“In a separate incident, Lesalie Kyle of Clovis said she witnessed a man wearing a purple SEIU t-shirt allegedly kick in the screen on her front door, then place several SEIU flyers in front of her NUHW support poster.
“I couldn’t believe what I was seeing,” Kyle said.
Pete Janhunen, a spokesperson for SEIU, said that workers that help with the campaign are told clearly to conduct themselves in a professional manner.
“We are very confident that our people are conducting themselves in the most professional manner possible,” Janhunen said. He went on to say that any allegations of inappropriate or criminal behavior would be looked into by SEIU and the organization would take the proper actions against the offender.”
US ARMY posting jobs for “internment/resettlement specialists” on GOARMY.com:
Read the US Army’s Regulations in place (as of 1997 and updated here in 2005) regarding “Civilian Labor inmate program”:
This job announcement was a mere two weeks after the DHS issued the “right wing extremist report”.
This is just another step in the U.S. government’s long term plan to build the infrastructure that could be used to contain wide spread popular revolt. Combine this with the swine flu fear mongering and the potential for a mass swine flu vaccination operation and it is easy to see what might happen. Refuse to take their poisonous vaccine and you might risk being locked up as being a hazard to public safety. With the economy in the toilet and more and more people not trusting either political party or the corporate media, the "powers that be" realize that they need to continue building their martial law apparatus. These Army National Guard job listings are just another piece to that puzzle proving what we already know is being built. There is certainly no guarantee that they will immediately use the already existing infrastructure to round up large numbers of people but we should certainly all be aware of what they are building.
A bill (HR 645) was introduced into Congress (one day after Obama was inaugurated) to fund “camps”:
KBR issued contract from DHS to build camps in the guise of “detaining illegal immigrants”.
Note: Bush, McCain and all of the Democrats (including Obama) are pushing for “Amnesty” of illegal immigrants, so why the need?
The “Japanese Internment Camps” in the US have already been refurbished and are prisoner ready.
The only thing left to do is manufacture a “civil unrest” or “emergency” in order to begin rounding up dissidents and anti-government right wing radicals. The one thing we know for sure is that the Democrats and Obama are "against Guantanamo and other prison camps" so these camps, on american soil can only be used for one purpose - against americans.
No comments:
Post a Comment