Billboard message from the unions sucking the life out of the city
The Mayor of Stockton, California summed it up best – “Stockton mayor Ann Johnston said with police and fire department expenses accounting for 78 percent of the city's budget, labor groups representing officers and firefighters will have to make more concessions.
"We can not sustain the contracts that we have. We can not pay for the people that we have employed today without concessions from the unions," Stockton mayor Ann Johnston said.”
The Unions across America are bleeding counties, cities and states dry by their hefty retirement packages that are unsustainable. The unions then, when they are forced to deal with reality, choose “fear tactics” of its citizens to avoid concessions.
This is exactly the socialist system that Europe is faced with when massive strikes occur in transportation sectors that effectively shut down government. This is where America is quickly treading if we do not shut these corrupt and dangerous enterprises we call “Labor Unions”…….
As if marrying Hanoi Jane wasn’t anti-American enough!
There is a long list of anti-American accomplishments attributed to Ted Turner (including the one listed above). Glen Beck has made a request of his audience to research Maurice Strong (which I have already posted 2 lengthy articles about the man and his associates). In those articles that I mention, nowhere amongst them have I mentioned the name Ted Turner who has single handedly used his wealth to promote the downfall of the United States, the country that he gained his wealth from.
I have gone to great lengths to document David Rockefeller and Maurice Strong. The wealth of the Rockefeller family, through the efforts of David Rockefeller, have paved the way for the creation of the UN, UNESCO, Council of Foreign Relations, The Tri-lateral Commission, The Bilderberg Group, The Club of Rome and the American Eugenics Society.
The vast wealth of Rockefeller and Turner has poured into these anti-American, World order organizations for over 75 years. A more disturbing detail is that Bill Gates, George Sorros and Warren Buffet are intertwined with the same philosophies of Eugenics, Global Warming and the UN through a direct connection to the Club of Rome. Combined, the amount of money available for the transformation and downfall of individual sovereignty of free countries to a few socialist elites is frightening.
Ted Turner was in the news yesterday when he suggested that the following in a CNN interview (CNN is owned by Ted Turner):
“Ted Turner: Is God speaking in Gulf Coast Spill?”
I recall Ted Turner publicly stating those who observe “Ash Wednesday are Jesus Freaks” and those who oppose abortions “Bozo’s”.
According to the CNN interview: “his suggestion that God may have had a hand in the oil disaster that killed 11 and is threatening the Gulf Coast may take some by surprise.
“Could be,” God’s work, he told CNN’s Poppy Harlow. “He’s sending us a message.”
“I’m not a real religious person, but I’m somewhat religious. And I’m just wondering if God is telling us he doesn’t want us to drill offshore,” he said. “And right before that we had that coal mine disaster in West Virginia where we lost 29 miners,” as well as repeated mining disasters – “seems like there’s one over there every week” – in China.”
Please take note here that he also speaks about repeated coal mine disasters. In my Glen Beck Homework Assignment II article I described the common link between the “Gulf Oil spill and the 988 point stock market dive (due to a purported error in the sale of billions vs. millions of Proctor & Gamble stocks). That link was “The Club of Rome” and one of its members (Ernesto Zedillo) who sits on both the BP (Oil Rig disaster) and Proctor & Gamble (988 point loss event).
In the article I also point out an interview that Maurice Strong gave about a “secret organization” of elites who plot to topple the stock markets and hire “mercenaries to hold politicians and diplomats hostage. I thought it was strange that after a delay in responding to the oil platform disaster, Obama dispatched S.W.A.T. teams to the other platforms in the gulf?
In using his network to tell America that God was “at work” in the gulf, he himself is Godless.
Turner, father of 5 children and owns 15 ranches (he is the largest land owner in the US) with over 50,000 head of Bison (also the largest heard in N. America) that supplies his “Ted’s Montana Grill” restaurants (a burger restaurant chain specializing in Bison burgers). Yet, in 2008, Turner stated on the “Charlie Rose” show (PBS) – “if steps aren’t taken to address global warming, most of the people will have died and the rest of us (notice how he includes himself as one of the survivors) will be cannibals.”
Note: according to the “Scientific American” -- Producing beef for the table has a surprising environmental cost: it releases prodigious amounts of heat-trapping greenhouse gases.
He also stated that the “US should drastically cut its military budget and the Americans should have no more than 2 children (yet he has 5)!
In a 2006 Reuter’s Newsmaker Conference, on Iran’s nuclear position, “They’re a sovereign State. We have 28,000 (nukes). Why can’t they have 10?”
Recap:
Turner turns to God as the culprit of the evils of “offshore oil drilling” yet demeans those who practice it as “Jesus Freaks”. He divorced Jane Fonda when she found religion.
He calls those who oppose abortions “bozo’s” and advocates 2 child only policies in America, yet he himself has 5 children.
He warns us to take steps to address global warming or cannibalism will ensue, yet he owns the largest heard of heat-trapping greenhouse gas emitting bison’s in the US that fuels (no pun intended) his burger chain of restaurants.
The man is a walking contradiction. But wait, I am just getting warmed up (again, no pun intended).
We know that Ted Turner and Maurice Strong have a mutual affection for each other, other than their membership in “the Club of Rome”. In 1985, Ted Turner founded the “Better World Society”. Ted’s choice for the man to lead this new endeavor was Maurice Strong. Here is the account that show’s how much influence Maurice Strong had over the American billionaire –
“In 1985, Turner established the Better World Society to promote two of his pet issues: environmentalism and the UN. In Where on Earth Are We Going?, Strong describes how in 1991 Turner persuaded him to lead the organization: "Midway through lunch, [Turner] abruptly put down his knife and fork and got down on his knees… ‘Maurice,' he said, ‘I'm down on my knees because I want you to become president of the Better World Society, and I beg you not to say no.'" Strong didn't.
The Better World Society was only the beginning. In January 1998, Turner donated $1 billion to the new United Nations Foundation. Its goal is to distribute $100 million a year for the next ten years to U.N. programs dealing with poverty, malnutrition, peacekeeping and the environment. Turner named Strong to the founding board of directors.”
The same article sums up their conclusion about Maurice Strong in this fashion (and can be applied to the global warming alarmist crowd in total):
“Environmental politicians like Maurice Strong don't follow the science. They push for power. Strong has devoted his life to establishing international legal procedures to enforce his vision. And his imagination is haunted by a parade of environmental horribles. Scientists doubt they may ever come to pass, but Strong, like many contemporary environmentalists, is motivated more by fervent conviction than scientific evidence. Paul Ehrlich's "population bomb" never exploded, and the Club of Rome's reports on the limits to growth are famously wrong. Not one catastrophe hypothesized by Strong and other environmentalists has occurred. But that hasn't stopped them from building the environmental movement”
Next in my series of “homework” assignments for Mr. Beck I will try to unravel the United Nations Foundation and the relationship with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Warren Buffet connection. The billionaires that are all connected to George Sorros and the Democrat Party as well as SEIU, ACORN and other non-profits and NGO’s…….
If you have a spare hour and a half, here is the documentary on the Weather Underground that goes through the roots and history of this "communist" organization that spun off of the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society).
This will show you the character of those Obama calls friends and the shared philosophy of them:
Whether it is the soon to be uncomfortable spotlight that will shine on Obama and his administration during the upcoming Blagojevich "pay for play" trial or the impending disaster that is brewing on the Joe Sestak "pay for play" White House job offer -- one thing is clear -- a wreckoning is looming.
For me, there is no difference between Blago and Obama's (Sestak) implications other than Blago is not a "Federal" politician and the law is different, but the circumstances and the players are all the same. I have written ad-nausem regarding the Blago case and Obama's involvement and that of his minions around him including Rahm Emanuel, David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, SEIU and the whitewash "legal" report that the White House Counsel issued saying "nothing here, move along".
I found it ironic that the President, when the issue became heated and they could no longer suppress it, that Obama called Sestak a liar from one side of his mouth and then said that the Democrats and the White House support and endorse him for Senator.
Maybe it's just me or is this endorsement in and of itself "furthering the crime"?
Again, ironic that he calls the man a liar and then tells everyone the "liar" is his choice for politician.
Furthermore, the irony is not lost that, according to Sestak himself publically, that he was told to stand down running against Benedict Arlen (and didn't) only to beat Arlen himself. Arlen switched loyalties to stick his finger in the Republicans eyes when he couldn't win their primary and gave the Dems another "healthcare" yeah. It is just another upside down reality thingy that the Hope and Change has brought to us.
I look forward to a little truth and the following wreckening that ensues. Maybe we will see a "Presidential resignation" and give America something they want, for a change.......
To understand and to put into context the paradigm shift from America’s shift from free markets to a global order of socialism that is wrapped in environmentalism, we must first identify the individuals and organizations that have laid this faulty foundation.
Glen Beck wants his viewers to delve into a single and dangerous player in this endeavor (Maurice Strong), but, upon scratching the surface of the man you will begin to see that Strong’s path was paved by numerous, and extremely wealthy list of Americans dating back to the late 19th century. Before I divulge the names of these Americans that preceded Strong’s emergence, I will, briefly tell you of Strong!
In essence, I will start at the end of the story and then take the reader back into time and history. When I began this journey to discover the man that Mr. Beck was so alarmed about, I quickly found myself immersed into areas that we have been told, through modern media outlets on the left and liberal pundits, are nothing more than “conspiracy theorist clap-trap”! These are subjects that are to be quickly dismissed and the subsequent character assassinations of those who purvey these thoughts (New World Order and socialist fundamental changes to American liberty and beliefs), to ensue.
Glen Beck has a very unique line that he uses when he divulges the truth, with factual sourced information. Facts that he knows the MSM and their fellow travelers derides as “danger talk” by asking the views a simple, yet thought provoking question:
“I May be lying, who knows, but ask yourself one thing “What if it IS true?”
So, I ask the readers to digest the information here, in this article, to ask yourself this very same question – “What if IT is true?”
Current Events
There have been a couple of significant news events that have transpired recently – they are:
1. Oil Platform disaster in the Gulf of Mexico (Involving British Petroleum)
2. 998 point stock market dive (before recovering to a 400+ point loss) that has been tentatively attributed to the erroneous data entry stroke of an extra zero resulting into a “sell order” of billions vs. millions of “Proctor and Gamble Stock”!
I want the reader to make a mental note of these because I am going to let you hang for a bit before I give my thoughts on them a little later.
Maurice Strong
Bio Brief: Head of the United Nations Environmental Program (former); Chief Policy Advisor to Kofi Anan (former); Secretary General of the Rio Earth Summit; Co-Author of the Kyoto Protocol and the Co-Founder of the Earth Council.
Maurice Strong, in 1990, gave an interview to a reporter who was covering the “World Economic Forum” (Strong is on the World Economic Forum Board) and the 1,000+ politicians who were in attendance. In this interview he (Strong) asked:
“What if a small group of these World leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from rich countries? In order to save the planet, this group decides – Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?”
Strong continues – “This group of World leaders form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse. It’s February. They’re all at Davos. These aren’t terrorists. They’re World leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodities and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock markets and computers and gold supplies, a panic. Then, they prevent the world’s stock markets from closing. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world at Davos as hostage. The markets can’t close.”
Secret Society
(put on your tin foil hats)
In my first article, I detailed the creation, by David Rockefeller in 1961, an organization called “the Club of Rome” in which Maurice Strong is a member. In addition to Rockefeller founding and funding the Club of Rome he was also the founder, and honorary chairman of the “Tri-lateral Commission” and was the “Director of the “Council of Foreign Relations and it’s Chairman of the Board (from 1970-1985).
The Tri-Lateral Commission was founded in 1973 by Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski the former National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter (who recently urged Obama to shoot down Israeli war planes should they make a move to destroy Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities).
In an interview about the threat to Israel, Brzezinski said:
“We are not exactly impotent little babies,” said Brzezinski, national security adviser during the Carter administration, in an interview with The Daily Beast Web site when asked how aggressive President Obama can be in telling Israel that a military strike in Iran is not in America’s interest. “They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch?”
Notice how Brzezinski calls Iraq airspace “ours”! Yet in, 2005 he was critical of our presence in Iraq (without more international troop presence) an occupation. His specific comment was:
“Brzezinski agreed that Bush should make a renewed push for international troops that could significantly swell the overall security force in Iraq. If no other countries are willing to participate at meaningful levels, he said, the U.S. should begin withdrawing its troops from the country this year.
If large numbers of U.S. forces remain in Iraq without more international support, Brzezinski said, "we will be viewed eventually as the other side of the coin of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinians."
Brzezinski, during the Carter administration has the following accomplishments:
Normalization of relations with the People's Republic of China (and the severing of ties with the Republic of China)
Signing of the second Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT II)
Brokering of the Camp David Accords
Transition of Iran from an important US client state to an anti-Western Islamic Republic
Arming of the mujahideen in Afghanistan to fight against the Soviet-allied Afghan government to increase the probability of Soviet invasion and later entanglement in a Vietnam-style war and later to counter the Soviet invasion and the signing of the Torrijos-Carter Treaties relinquishing overt US control of the Panama Canal after 1999.
Rockefeller was a fan of Brzezinski and approached him to be the Tri-lateral Commission’s first Executive Director after reading his publication titled “Between two ages”. He was so impressed that the publication was adopted as the Tri-lateral Commissions “blueprint”. The following is a quote from “Between two ages”:
“Though Stalinism may have been a needless tragedy for both the Russian people and communism as an ideal, there is the intellectually tantalizing possibility that for the world at large it was, as we shall see, a blessing in disguise.
Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision. Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external man over the inner, passive man and victory of reason over belief.
Such a society would be dominated by an elite whose claim to political power would rest on allegedly superior scientific know-how. Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would not hesitate to achieve its political ends by the latest modern techniques for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and control.
The Soviet Union could have emerged as the standard-bearer of this century’s most influential system of thought and as the social model for resolving the key dilemmas facing modern man.”
For those in the MSM and the left who call those who believe that the Tri-lateral Commission, CFR, Bilderbergs and now the Rome Club are conspiring to rule the globe, conspiracy theory kooks (or tin foil hat crowd), look at what Rockefeller admits in his biography (keeping in mind he has either founded, or sits on each organization listed above):
On page 405 of his own (David Rockefeller) autobiography (as Glen Beck say’s, “in his own words”, not mine):
“For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
So, now you know that Rockefeller is an elitist socialist who has used his family’s wealth to slowly erode American wealth and sovereignty through the funding anti-American, so-called philanthropies or secret organizations. The Rome Club and the Tri-lateral commission being only 2.
In my prior article, I delved into Rockefeller’s “eugenics” beliefs and the money donated to fund that dream of de-populating the earth of “useless eaters” (you and me). When Rockefeller merged the “American Eugenics Society” into his newly created “Population Council” in 1953 it lead to that organizations’ granting money and sponsorship of the “Hasting Center” effectively changing the name “eugenics” (which fell out of public favor after the Jewish Holocaust at the hands of the Nazi’s) to “Bio-ethics”! The Hasting Center is now “headquarters” for the Obama administration reform agenda. The author of the “healthcare bill” is Rahm Emmanuel’s (Obama’s Chief of Staff) brother, Dr. Ezekial Emmanuel who is a “Senior Fellow” at the Hasting Center.
I digress, back to the Club of Rome and my tin foil hat.
In the 1991 Club of Rome publication titled “The First Global Revolution” (mentioned in my prior article), they tipped their hand (keep in mind the Maurice Strong interview mentioned above regarding the “secret society” who’s responsible for bringing about the economic collapse of the US to save the planet) on pages 104-5 with the following statement:
“In searching for a new energy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would “fit the bill”… “All of these dangers are caused by human intervention.”
We also know that there is a concerted effort to push this agenda through the “Nobel Prize” committees that have awarded the following “Club of Rome” members with the political prize of Laureate status”
Al Gore, Jimmy Carter, Mikhail Gorbachev, Kofi Anan, Wangari Maathis, The Dalai Lama, Desmond Tutu and Betty Williams. I could find no record of Obama having membership into the Club of Rome but we know he shares their visions and have multiple members on his Staff who is.
In my last article I highlighted Obama’s first “State Dinner” held for the Indian Prime Minister (a Rome Club Member) and I now believe that the “gate crasher” incident was just a diversion to keep this fact in the background while pushing the “gate crashers” into the forefront. You know the old Democrat trick of “look over here, nothing going on over there, routine.”
It would also go a long way to explaining why a fellow Nobel Prize winner was hustled out the White House Back door when the Dalai Lama (a Rome Club member) came knocking on Obama’s door.
Note: Maurice Strong’s statement about “secret society of Government leaders”?
Remember at the beginning of this article I asked that you to make a mental note of certain “current events” that occurred recently, both of which have huge economic and ecological ramifications for the US? Specifically the Gulf Oil Spill and the 998 point Dow Jones plunge due to a supposed Proctor and Gamble sell mistake.
Both of these events occurred separately and seem unrelated, right?
What if I told you that these events have something in common, a connection that links them through a specific individual who has a specific membership in the Club of Rome?
What if I told that this individual happens to sit on Proctor & Gambles (since 2001) board & British Petroleum’s international advisory board?
What if I told you he also sits on the International Advisory Board of the Council on Foreign Relations and oh, by the way he also sits on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (oops, Bill Gates is also a Club of Rome member).
Going back to the statement Maurice Strong mentioned above –
“What if a small group of these World leaders were to conclude that the principle risk to the earth comes from rich countries? In order to save the planet, this group decides – Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?”
and
“These aren’t terrorists. They’re World leaders. They have positioned themselves in the world’s commodities and stock markets. They’ve engineered, using their access to stock markets and computers and gold supplies, a panic.”
According to NY Daily news “SEC spokesman John Nester declined to comment on the probe – but insiders told Bloomberg News that investigators will try to determine whether the “costly typo”—billions instead of millions – were intentional or accidental.”
Who is this Club of Rome Member? Ernesto Zedillo, the former President of Mexico!
Ernesto Zedillo, prior to becoming President of Mexico was with the Central Bank of Mexico (1978-87) serving as their Deputy Manager of Economic Research and Deputy Director.
When he was elected (remember Obama’s campaign contribution issues) in 1994 it was amid an illegal campaign contribution scandal. It seems that Zedillo pressured troubled banks to pay $4 million dollars in campaign expenses (guess ACORN and SEIU wasn’t up to the task in Mexico). Opposition parties were outraged, at the time, over the huge donations even though the government knew that the banks were “sliding into bankruptcy”! After elected into office, Zedillo provided a $4 Billion dollar bailout to the banks with taxpayer funds (sound familiar).
Again, after the election, the President and his party blocked all outside scrutiny of the campaign finances (again, sound familiar). The bank owner came forward with the allegations but was immediately excoriated and deemed to lack any credibility by Zedillo and his state run media (again, sound familiar). Despite the lack of credibility, the owner was able to provide documents and bank records that corroborated most his claims.
Again, the President and his party fought hard to keep this secret due to the apparent use of the banks as “their party’s own funding agencies”!
One can only wonder why socialists, who almost always diametrically oppose capitalism, utilize the very instruments of commerce to achieve their ends. Zedillo is no different in this regard as he is well schooled and a very well connected banker himself He has also a Yale School since 2002 as the “Frederick Iseman Director for the Study of Globalization (really?, Huh!)
He is also (at Yale) Professor in the field of International Economics and Politics, Professor of International and Area Studies and Professor Adjunct of Forestry & Environmental Studies (International politics, economics and environmental issues, huh). It was at Yale that he received his Master’s in Philosophy and his PHD.
Once again, I digress – getting back to Maurice Strong…
The same years that Zedillo was a board member of various State owned enterprises in Mexico including PEMEX (Mexico’s nationalized oil company) Sadaam Hussein lost the first gulf war and was violating his “umpteenth UN Security Council Resolutions”.
It was during this period that Kofi Anan, Secretary General of the United Nations (Rome Club member) and various agencies within the UN were embroiled in the “oil for food” scandal. The UN image took a big political hit as the US Congress was holding their investigation into the scandal since the UN was not. The fallout reached a crescendo and the UN ultimately appointed Paul Volker (CFR member) to conduct an internal investigation.
The Volker inquiry found that Maurice Strong (while in official UN capacity) accepted a personal check for $1 million dollars from a controversial businessman who was working closely with the Iraqi regime of Sadaam Hussein.
Again, this was Iraq who was lobbing scud missiles indiscriminately into populated city center and rewarding suicide bomber families with stipends to those who martyr themselves against Israel.
According to Indymedia “Korean born Tonsun Park, who has since been charged with influence peddling for Sadaam Hussein, allegedly carried $1 million in cash out of Iraq in July 1997.”
Again, this was during the time that another Club of Rome member (Bill Clinton) allowed Iraq to defy UN sanctions at will throughout his US Presidency.
Furthermore, according to the report, Park was given the cash by then-Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Tariq Aziz, who gave him $1 million in a cardboard box to be used in the regimes campaign to win favorable treatment from the UN. Park took the cash to a Jordanian bank in a plastic bag where he deposited it before writing “Mr. M. Strong” on a cheque for $988,885 to purchase a stake in CORDEX Petroleum, Inc., a company controlled by the Strong family.”
It wasn’t until July 2005 that Strong lost his job as UN envoy to N. Korea due to his previous dealings with Park.
The Volker inquiry found the evidence circumstantial. Just to clarify the whitewash, the following UN members (in addition to Maurice Strong) who are members of the “Club of Rome”:
Kofi Anan – Secretary General of the United Nations (former)
Javier Perez de Cuellar – Secretary General of the United Nations (former)
Robert Muller – Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations (former)
Timothy Wirth – President of the UN Foundation
Ruud Lubbers – UN High Commissioner for Refugees
Mary Robinson – UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
Koichiro Matsura – Director General UNESCO
Jerome Binde – Director of Foresight, UNESCO
Federica Mayer – Director General of UNESCO (former)
Tapio Kanninen – Director of Policy & Planning, UN
Konrad Osterwalder – Under Secretary General of the UN
It is important to remember that the Rockefellers were very active in the establishment of the UN and donated the land in NY where the current UN Headquarter sits today.
Additionally, UNESCO was formed in 1946 and the first Director “Sir Julian Huxley wrote the “purpose” (Charter) in 1948:
“The general philosophy of UNESCO should be scientific world humanism, global in extent and evolutionary in background…its education program it can stress the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization…Political unification in some sort of world government will be required…Tasks for the media division of UNESCO (will be) to promote the growth of a common outlook shared by all nations and cultures…to help the emergence of a single world culture…Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable….”
As you can see, since 1948 at least, the UN has been populated with socialists that have one goal in mind – the eradication of national sovereignty and replacing it with global governance that will effectively force billions into a form of indentured servitude yet this not where they intend to stop. They also have created “cottage industries” filled with those who also wish to radically de-populate the planet through a vigorous “eugenics” program. We have ample proof that Barrack Obama has filled the halls and offices of the White House with people who favor the charters of the Council of Foreign Relations, Tri-lateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group and nefarious organizations like “the Club of Rome.”
We have seen the policy and actions that Obama has paraded in front of us since January 2009 and have been startled in the destructive economic maneuvers that almost seem surreal. We ask ourselves “is he stupid”? or “is he doing these things intentionally?” We see his out of control spending that to anyone who either has spent or saved a dollar understands the unsustainability of these actions. We see the weakness against our enemies and the disrespect to our allies, his unjustified hostility towards Israel while fostering a cozy relationship with Iran is troubling at best. He advocates pulling our troops, closing Gitmo, open borders and a feckless Department of Homeland Security that gives our airport security screeners secrets to those who look for an opening, any opening to commit mass murder all the while ignoring unemployment. We now know that “Cap and Trade”, illegal immigration amnesty and Global Warming are on the front burner. I know now, with conviction, that the tin foil hat on my head is a badge of honor because it no longer represents a “conspiracy theory” – no, it has evolved into a fact based realm for me. The question you should ask yourself is “what if I AM right?” America is the last truly free land on the planet. So, where will those seeking refuge in our open arms (legally) turn to if we fail to turn back the “red tide”?
"It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns the affluent middle-class..involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles, small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable...A shift if necessary toward life-styles less geared to environmental damaging consumption patterns."
The Obama quote above was not to warn us about Maurice Strong but to hide the views of Strong that Obama relates to in rhetoric that it is Obama that will save the middle class pay and benefits and protect them from taxation.
In 1953 The American Eugenics Society merged with, and moved its offices into the headquarters of the Rockefeller family’s new Population Council.
In 1968, the “Club of Rome” was formed at the Rockefeller private estate in Ballagio, Italy. Maurice Strong is an avid member.
The purpose of the “Club of Rome” is to formulate crisis, through which the world can be united under global governance. Sound familiar – Rahm Emanuels favorite term is you cannot let a crisis go to waste.
This plan goes hand in hand with the “culling” of the majority of the world population of “useless eaters” in the name of overpopulation. Remember this term “useless eaters” as it comes up later in this article (see Nazi “Euthanasia program” prime directive described by the US Military Tribunal)
In 1969, John Holdren penned an article with Paul R. Ehrlich that argued “if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology that man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come.”
Maurice Strong – “was made a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation in 1971 (and serves still today as a board member), which gave a grant for running his Stockholm Conference office. He hired the British political intelligence operative Barbara Ward (Lady Jackson), who wrote much of the preparatory materials for the conference.”
In 1972, the “Club of Rome” published “Limits to Growth” as their warning to limit over-population through “sustainable development (population reduction)”.
In 1973 John Holdren encouraged the decline in fertility to well below replacement (i.e., more people dying than being born).
Time Magazine (1989 article titled Planet of the Year: Too many mouths):
“Prospects are so dire that some environmentalists urge the world to adopt the goal of cutting in half the earth's population growth rate during the next decade. "That means a call for a two-child family for the world as a whole," explained Lester Brown, president of the World watch Institute.”
The website of “world watch institute” -- read the forward:
Mikhail Gorbachev – “It is for reasons such as these that I founded Green Cross International 12 years ago and continue to advocate for a global value shift on how we handle Earth, a new sense of global interdependence, and a shared responsibility in humanity's relationship with nature. It is also for these reasons that I helped draft the Earth Charter, a code of ethical principles now endorsed by over 8,000 organizations representing more than 100 million people around the world. And it is for these reasons that Maurice Strong, Chair of the Earth Council, and I have initiated the Earth Dialogues, a series of public forums on ethics and sustainable development.”
Notice the term at the end of this paragraph – “sustainable development” ( see Club of Rome publication titled “Limits to growth” in 1972).
Connecting dots
To do so I must go back to the early 20th century in what Glen Beck calls the “progressive era” in America. Before I go back to the founding of this era, I want to share with you the modern day elitist view.
The following is an excerpt from an essay in Amy Kass’s edited volume “Giving Well, doing good: readings for thoughtful philanthropists.”
“Remember when Warren Buffet announced he was giving his billions and billions to charity, specifically the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation? If not, here is what Buffet said in that announcement (taken from Hudson Institute essay titled: The Ungodly bright: Should They Lead Philanthropy into the Future?
“WHEN WARREN Buffett announced his multi-billion dollar bequest to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in the summer of 2006, he explained his generous if unconventional act of charity by claiming that “if your goal is to return the money to society by attacking truly major problems that don’t have a commensurate funding base – what could you find that’s better than turning to a couple of people who are young, who are ungodly bright…”
American philanthropy’s romance with the “ungodly bright” has a long, if not always noble, pedigree. After all, the first large foundations – Carnegie, Rockefeller, Russell Sage – were established during, and fully reflected the predilections of, America’s progressive era at the beginning of the 20th century. The progressives were persuaded that, just as disease was rapidly being conquered by modern science and medicine, so “social pathogens” – the ultimate source of our social ills – could be tracked down and eradicated once and for all, given new sciences of human behavior like sociology, psychology, and public administration. But this would require that the management of human affairs be taken out of the hands of the benighted many and put into the care of the enlightened few, trained and credentialed in the new social sciences. Not coincidentally, this was precisely the direction history itself wished to take. As their name suggest, progressives were convinced that history was the story of inexorable progress from the selfish individualism and parochial localism of the past to a new era of social-minded brotherhood. But only the ungodly bright avant garde had the historical and scientific insight to break with the parochial allegiances of the past, and persuade or compel the many to follow them into a more promising, socially conscious, collective future.”
Dots:
I will show you two things, first I will show you that the modern day eugenics which was born by this “ungodly bright avant garde” in the early 20th century (Rockefeller) is alive and well today and second the environmental cabal’s belief in Population control as a means to promote eugenics in such ways as Abortion, sterilization and other ways.
This evil institution that was formerly called “the American Eugenics Society” (today eugenics has been renamed “bioethics) and the new institution is called “The Hastings Center.
The Eugenics Society worked hand in hand with their British counterparts (elites) in Nazi Germany preceding the holocaust. It is what gave Hitler his idea of “culling the imperfect human herd” to achieve the German Master Race through a Nazi program known as “Tiergarten 4” (T4 for short), the history in one moment.
The transformation of the American Eugenics Society into The Hastings Center:
After the war, with corpses still smoking in Europe, the eugenics/euthanasia movement laid low for a time, inventing new names for itself such as “social biology” and “the right to die.” The British royal family, whose palace physicians such as Lord Thomas Jeeves Horder had officially run the eugenics/euthanasia movement all through the Hitler era, now teamed with their Wall Street moneybags to retool the movement behind population reduction, especially for non-white peoples.
• The American Eugenics Society merged with, and moved its offices into the headquarters of the Rockefeller family’s new Population Council in 1953.
• A eugenics zealot in the Ernst Rudin tradition, Daniel Callahan, got a Population Council grant and continual Rockefeller family sponsorship in 1968-69 to found the Hastings Center, in Garrison, N.Y., to push euthanasia under the new title, “Bioethics.”
• Geneticist and evolutionary biologist Theodore Dobzhansky was simultaneously a founding director of the Hastings Center and chairman of the American Eugenics Society. Hastings founder Callahan became a director of the Eugenics Society.
• The Hastings Center is now headquarters for the Obama reform agenda, still under the active leadership of emeritus president Callahan, the Hitlerian eugenist.
Guess who is a “Senior Fellow” at the Hastings Center, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel!
According to “The Hastings Center” website, regarding “End of Life”:
“Death may not have changed, but dying is quite different from what it used to be, thanks to medical technologies that have extended life and made dying frequently a lingering process rather than a sudden event. People with failing kidneys can survive on dialysis for 20 or more years. People with incurable cancer can live for months or years with chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Victims of car accidents who would once have died of head trauma can now be kept alive by ventilators and feeding tubes. Meantime, life-saving therapies for what were once sudden killers, like heart attack, mean that increasing numbers of us end up with chronic complications or decline into dementia.
Given these trends, questions about the quality of life at its very end, and the care provided to the dying have assumed an unprecedented importance and complexity, engaging policy, law, ethics, and economics. What if a patient refuses treatment? What if a dying patient no longer has the capacity to make decisions? What if the family disagrees with his wishes? How useful are advance directives? If treatments can keep somebody alive for added months, weeks, or days, when and to whom should they be given? Who takes care of the caretakers?
With an aging baby boom population, and with end-of-life care consuming an estimated 10% to 12% of the annual health care budget, these and other questions continue to need probing, debating, and—ultimately—answering.”
Obama & Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahm Emanuel’s brother)
“The U.S. National Military Tribunal identified as a prime motive of the euthanasia program, “to eliminate ‘useless eaters’ from the scene, in order to conserve food, hospital facilities, doctors and nurses for the more important use of the German armed forces.” That euthanasia program, and the rise to power of the Nazi regime that perpetrated it, had been sold to a population frantic from economic collapse and predisposed, from years of propaganda by the eugenics/euthanasia movement, to consider some lives unworthy to be lived.
German advocates of eugenics (a crackpot notion of hereditary superiority and inferiority), law professor Karl Binding and psychiatry professor Alfred Hoche, had written a sensational 1920 pamphlet, The Permission To Destroy Life Unworthy of Life, a prime theoretical basis for the Nazi genocide. Binding and Hoche argued that society should cast aside the “obsolete”
Hippocratic Oath, that binds doctors to do no harm to patients and commits them to consider only the patient’s welfare.”
On June 18, 2009, Dr. Emanuel wrote an article in the Journal of the American Medical Association that suggested that doctors throw away the Hippocratic Oath, when he said “Doctors “are trained to identify and praised for . . . enumerating all possible diagnoses and tests that would confirm or exclude them. . . . Peer recognition goes to the most thorough and aggressive Physicians. . . . This culture is further reinforced by a unique understanding of professional obligations, specifically, the Hippocratic Oath’s admonition to ‘use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment’ as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of cost or effect on others.”
Remember, in May 2009 Obama demanded that $2 Trillion be cut from insurers and health care providers.
“The $2 trillion health-care cuts, now demanded by Obama and the financiers, were previously promoted in a speech by Dr. Gerhard Wagner, head of the Nazi organization for physicians, at the Sept. 8-14, 1936 Nazi Party rally at Nuremberg: “The millions and billions that we have spent . . . for care of the genetically ill, is a squandering of our national resources that we National Socialists cannot justify when we consider the needs of the healthy population. Healthy working class families with numerous children today earn only enough for the necessities of life, which means that it is irresponsible that the state must provide the money for some genetically ill families who may have several family members in institutions costing thousands of marks annually. The previous year, Hitler had told this same Dr. Wagner, that the doctors, primed for murder through the eugenics/euthanasia movement, would have to wait for the crisis of the war to convince the public to give up their moral principles. -- the identical point made by
Ezekiel Emanuel in October 2008:
“The world economy is teetering ... With trillions of dollars evaporating in this crisis, millions of middle-class Americans face the prospect of losing their homes and jobs, and witnessing a dramatic contraction of their retirement savings. In response, the public will desperately want financial security.... Bailing out bankers and other gamblers [and the] huge increase in the federal debt that these bailouts will entail intensifies the pressure to rein in health-care costs....
The dean of health-care economists, Victor Fuchs of Stanford, has long maintained that we will get health-care reform only when there is a war, a depression or some other major civil unrest. It's beginning to look like we might just have all three....?
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, "The Financial Crisis and Health Care," the Chicago Tribune, Oct. 12, 2008
Never let a crisis go to waste – Rahm Emanuel
It is important to remember that Obama had nominated former Senator Tom Daschle to be his “Health Czar” who withdrew his nomination after we learned he did not pay $140,000 in back taxes. America dodged a bullet that day because what people do not realize is that Mr. Daschle shares Dr. Emanuel’s philosophy.
“In his (Daschle’s) 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis” Daschle calls for a rule, that all who register for Medicare must sign a document outlining the degree to which they consent to be killed in an “end of life” situation.
The other dark side of the Obamacare bill is the tax payer funded abortion provision.
If you think after reading everything above that Obama has surrounded himself with the individuals who share the “eugenics” philosophy by ignorance then just recall the exchange the President had with Jane Sturm:
“Jane Sturm told the story of her nearly 100-year-old mother, who was originally denied a pacemaker because of her age. She eventually got one, but only after seeking out another doctor.
“Outside the medical criteria,” Sturm asked, “is there a consideration that can be given for a certain spirit … and quality of life?”
“I don’t think that we can make judgments based on peoples’ spirit,” Obama said. … “Maybe you’re better off not having the surgery, but taking painkillers.“
Note: The Youtube video of this was scrubbed from their site.
Eugenics and the link to the Environment movement – Overpopulation
The radical environmental “Science Czar” John Holdren who has survived the onslaught of Conservative ire for his beliefs:
“Overpopulation was an early concern and interest. In a 1969 article, Holdren and co-author Paul R. Ehrlich argued that, "if the population control measures are not initiated immediately, and effectively, all the technology man can bring to bear will not fend off the misery to come." In 1973 Holdren encouraged a decline in fertility to well below replacement in the United States, because "210 million now is too many and 280 million in 2040 is likely to be much too many." In 1977, Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, and Holdren co-authored the textbook Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment; they discussed the possible role of a wide variety of solutions to overpopulation, from voluntary family planning to enforced population controls, including forced sterilization for women after they gave birth to a designated number of children, and recommended "the use of milder methods of influencing family size preferences" such as access to birth control and abortion."
Rockefeller Foundation – Today
I have touched upon the past with the Rockefeller Foundation and their grant to establish the Hastings Center (formerly “The American Eugenics Society”) but wanted to share with you, the current Leadership.
The President of “The Rockefeller Foundation” since 2005 is Judith Rodin. In 199 she was the President of the University of Pennsylvania when a death was caused from “experimental human gene therapy” that touched off a national outrage and eventually a “Congressional Investigation”:
The patient/guinea pig:
Jesse Gelsinger - The key facts to date are these: On Sept. 17, 1999, Jesse Gelsinger, an 18-year-old with a rare metabolic disease known as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency ("OTC"), who was participating in an experimental gene therapy trial at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania, died at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania four days after being injected with corrective genetic material for the disease.
The letter from Judith Rodin to Senator William Frist:
--------------------------------------------------------
"The Honorable William Frist
U.S. Senate
416 Russell Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-3802
Dear Senator Frist:
I want to take this opportunity to provide you with some background on our activities in support of the current investigation of clinical trials at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy ("IHGT") at the University of Pennsylvania.
First and foremost, I want you to know how seriously the University is approaching this matter. The death of Jesse Gelsinger was a terrible tragedy, and we are determined to learn everything we can about it to understand precisely what happened and what might be done to improve clinical trials throughout the University and at all institutions affiliated with us. We intend for our research programs, particularly those involving human subjects, to meet the highest standards. Nothing less is acceptable.
We have several, extensive efforts underway to achieve this goal and to respond to the important concerns raised by federal regulators. We have launched two independent reviews, led by eminent scientists, and we have been and will continue to be strongly committed to cooperating fully with the FDA, NIH, Congress and any other appropriate body as they review these issues.
The key facts to date are these: On Sept. 17, 1999, Jesse Gelsinger, an 18-year-old with a rare metabolic disease known as ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency ("OTC"), who was participating in an experimental gene therapy trial at the Institute for Human Gene Therapy at the University of Pennsylvania, died at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania four days after being injected with corrective genetic material for the disease. OTC is an inherited disorder that in its most common form causes death in affected newborn males because of their inability to properly process nitrogen in food proteins due to a genetic defect in the liver. The clinical trial was voluntarily halted pending review. All appropriate regulatory agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration, which approved the trial, were notified promptly; we pledged to cooperate, fully and completely, with any agency reviews undertaken. Thereafter, the FDA began a review of the clinical trial. On Jan. 19, 2000, the FDA completed its on-site review and issued a Form 483 raising important questions about IHGT's monitoring and oversight of this and other clinical trials. Two days after issuing the Form 483, the FDA placed a hold on all clinical trials at IHGT. On Jan. 18, 2000, the Office for Protection from Research Risk ("OPRR") forwarded to us a citizen complaint with regard to the review of the OTC clinical trial by Penn's Institutional Review Board and commenced an investigation.
The University takes the FDA's action and OPRR's letter--and the questions raised about IHGT's monitoring and oversight of clinical trials--extremely seriously. A team of scientists and administrators is working around-the-clock to ensure that the IHGT provides a comprehensive, detailed and accelerated response to the FDA and the OPRR as soon as possible.
Additionally, I have initiated two separate reviews related to this matter--an independent review by outside experts and an internal review by Penn faculty--both of which will involve distinguished research scientists with a wealth of academic expertise and relevant experience.
The independent panel will be made up of senior academic leadership and renowned research scientists who are unaffiliated with the University of Pennsylvania. It will be chaired by William H. Danforth, M.D., Chancellor Emeritus and Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of Washington University in St. Louis, and it will include Joseph B. Martin, M.D., Ph.D., Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Edward J. Benz, Jr., M.D., Sir William Osler Professor and Director of the Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Inder Verma, Ph.D., American Cancer Society Professor of Molecular Biology, The Salk Institute, La Jolla, Calif.; Rochelle Hirschhorn, M.D., Professor of Medicine and Cell Biology and Chief of the Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine; and Daniel Callahan, Ph.D., Director of International Programs, The Hastings Center, Garrison, N.Y. They will have a broad mandate to conduct a comprehensive review of every aspect of IHGT's procedures for oversight and monitoring of clinical trials.
This committee will report directly to me; its charge follows below:
1. To conduct a thorough, independent review in order to carefully evaluate and assess IHGT's oversight and monitoring of clinical trial programs, with particular emphasis on the FDA's findings about the OTC Therapy Trial and IHGT's response to those findings.
2. To recommend any additional actions necessary to ensure the highest standards are set and met in the conduct, oversight and monitoring of future IHGT clinical trials, including a framework for University monitoring of compliance with these recommendations.
3. To report findings of review to the President of University of Pennsylvania and recommend issues to be referred to the University's faculty committee charged with reviewing human subject research.
Additionally, I have formed a committee of Penn faculty, chaired by Provost Robert L. Barchi, himself a distinguished scientist and scholar, and comprised of research scientists with a wealth of talent and relevant experience, who will conduct a proactive review of all aspects of research involving human subjects anywhere at Penn. They will examine everything we do, from the mechanics of the approval process, to oversight and the functions of our Institutional Review Board, to ultimate accountability for this research.
Again, we deeply regret Jesse Gelsinger's death, and we want to learn everything we can about how and why he died. We also want to consider everything and anything we can do to improve our oversight and monitoring procedures for essential clinical research. As I said, nothing less than the highest possible standards are acceptable. And, Penn is deeply committed to cooperating fully with the appropriate regulatory agencies and public officials examining these complex issues.
We welcome any suggestions you may have on how we are approaching this matter, and, of course, we will keep you informed of all significant developments.
Respectfully,
Judith Rodin"
--------------------------------------------
This death did not hinder her rise to another prominent position within the Rockefeller Foundation some 5 years later. Human experimentation was at the core of the Nazi Eugenics program as well as the famed Nazi “Dr. Mengele”.
The Club of Rome, in 1991 published “The first Global Revolution” and the following statement can be found on pages 104 and 105:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…all these dangers are caused by human intervention.”
Now, again the Mikhail Gorbachev forward notated above, first paragraph:
“Five years ago, all 191 United Nations member states pledged to meet eight Millennium Development Goals by 2015, including eradicating extreme poverty and hunger and ensuring environmental sustainability. These critical challenges were reaffirmed by health officials from across the globe in October 2004 at the tenth anniversary of the landmark International Conference on Population and Development held in Cairo.
The overarching conclusion from this 2004 meeting was that while considerable, albeit erratic, progress was indeed being made in many areas, any optimism must be tempered with the realization that gains in overall global socioeconomic development, security, and sustainability do not reflect the reality on the ground in many parts of the world. Poverty continues to undermine progress in many areas. Diseases such as HIV/AIDS are on the rise, creating public health time bombs in numerous countries. In the last five years, some 20 million children have died of preventable waterborne diseases, and hundreds of millions of people continue to live with the daily misery and squalor associated with the lack of clean drinking water and adequate sanitation.
This “State of the World” assessment by Gorbachev was given in 2005. Oh, did I mention Gorby is also a “Club of Rome” member?
“In recognition of his outstanding services as a great reformer and world political leader, who greatly contributed in changing for the better the very nature of world development, Mikhail Gorbachev was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize on October 15, 1990.
He is also the founding president of Green Cross International. In January 1990 during an address to the Global Forum on Environment and Development for Survival held in Moscow, President Gorbachev brought up the idea for an organization that would apply
the medical emergency response model of the International Committee of the Red Cross to ecological issues and expedite solutions to environmental problems that transcend national boundaries. Developing this idea, delegates at the Earth Summit in Rio de
Janeiro (June 1992), approached President Gorbachev, mandating him to create and launch this organisation.
President Gorbachev also founded the Gorbachev Foundation in 1992. He is a member of the Club of Madrid and the Club of Rome. He is also founder of the World Political Forum and the World Summit of Nobel Peace Laureates.
As you can see Gorbachev won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1990 and was followed by another Rome Club member to the Nobel list when Al Gore won his prize.
I thought I would throw in one more “Rome Club” member who was recently received by the Obama’s for a “State Dinner” on January 5, 2010 – Prime Minister Monmohan Singh. You remember the “White House Gate Crasher incident”? Could it be that Obama received the Prime Minister for his “Rome Club” agenda? Both Emmanuel Brothers were in attendance.
I just read an explosive article over at Powerline that has connected some very serious dots and found that I had to share their thoughts and conclusions with you.
Remember back in 2005, just 4 years after 9/11 when the NY Times ran the story that divulged the NSA and their secret terrorist “eavesdropping” program. Then in 2006 the same paper ran another story about the secret “SWIFT” program that divulged, again, our proactive terror money trail tracking through banks. In both instances the NY Times deemed it necessary to give a “leg up” and a “heads up” to terror networks around the world that resulted in changing their tactics by learning what we were doing in secret. The divulging of “State Secrets” set our efforts back considerably and the results can now be seen with the recent “Times Square Bombing Attempt”.
How so, you ask?
First, let’s refresh your memory in the contents of the first article titled – Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts –
“Months after the Sept. 11 attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States to search for evidence of terrorist activity without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials.
Under a presidential order signed in 2002, the intelligence agency has monitored the international telephone calls and international e-mail messages of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of people inside the United States without warrants over the past three years in an effort to track possible "dirty numbers" linked to Al Qaeda, the officials said. The agency, they said, still seeks warrants to monitor entirely domestic communications.”
While the MSM has fervently and methodically paints this naturalized citizen in “terms of endearment” while failing to mention the fact he is a Muslim we have learned one fact early on – His use of a disposable cell phone.
Second, lets also refresh your memory in the contents of the second NY Times article titled – Bank Data is Sifted by U.S. in Secret to Block Terror –
“Under a secret Bush administration program initiated weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks, counterterrorism officials have gained access to financial records from a vast international database and examined banking transactions involving thousands of Americans and others in the United States, according to government and industry officials.
The program is limited, government officials say, to tracing transactions of people suspected of having ties to Al Qaeda by reviewing records from the nerve center of the global banking industry, a Belgian cooperative that routes about $6 trillion daily between banks, brokerages, stock exchanges and other institutions. The records mostly involve wire transfers and other methods of moving money overseas and into and out of the United States. Most routine financial transactions confined to this country are not in the database.
Viewed by the Bush administration as a vital tool, the program has played a hidden role in domestic and foreign terrorism investigations since 2001 and helped in the capture of the most wanted Qaeda figure in Southeast Asia, the officials said.”
Again, while the MSM has told us that the terrorist arrested in this case had his home foreclosed on and that he led a “Spartan existence” in their attempt to humanize this thug, we learned another tidbit of information that the Federal authorities are now searching for a “money courier” in connection to the incident.
The AP story highlights that the man arrested in the failed attempt received money from another man who was acting as a terror mule bypassing banking systems.
According to the AP story – “Investigators of the failed car bombing in Times Square are looking for a money courier they say helped funnel cash from overseas to finance a Pakistani-American's preparations to blow up the crude gasoline-and-propane bomb in the heart of New York, a law enforcement official told The Associated Press.
Investigators have the name of the courier they believe helped Faisal Shahzad pay for the used SUV and other materials to rig up a car bomb that would have caused a huge fireball in Times Square if it had gone off, the official told the AP. The official didn't know how much money may have changed hands.”
According to Politico, "the FBI was able to track down the buyer of the SUV through a cell phone number “The vehicle identification number had been removed from the bomb-laden 1993 Nissan Pathfinder left in Times Square. But investigators were able to lift it from a second location on the vehicle, and used that to track down a Connecticut man who said he had sold the Pathfinder for cash about three weeks ago.
The man had offered the vehicle on Craigslist, and FBI agents were able to recover the number from a disposable cell phone that had been used by the buyer.
The suspect didn't still have the phone. But using a lot of technology and access to database, agents located the suspect.”
You can see how the program worked in tracking down this terrorist. The law enforcement agencies can be proud of their work but the fact he used a disposable phone in his planning almost allowed him to escape the country by minutes because he boarded a plane that was readying for take off before being sent back to the terminal. The suspect managed to gain a seat after going through the myriad of security measures including a “no-fly list” snafu.
The NY Times is a serious security concern of the United States and should be investigated for “high crimes against the State”. Their reckless actions have enabled our enemies to glimpse into the arsenal of defenses used to apprehend them and save American lives. They have American blood on their hands.
The legislature that governs to the “will of the people”!
The biggest thing that Obama did that most in Arizona is extremely grateful is appointing their feckless Governor to a Cabinet Post. Janet Napolitano was an utter failure to her people there just as she is on the national level.
Since she has taken the top spot responsible for America’s “Homeland Security” her department has seen our secrets used train the Transportation Security Agency in keeping our skies safe, leaked. Not once, but twice.
She has also been at the helm when Ft. Hood was attacked then the failed “Christmas Day airline bomber plot” (which was thwarted by passengers vs. Government).
She has actively used her agency to proactively go against those domestic terrorists in the tea parties labeling them in an action memo to Federal, State and local law enforcement agencies as “right wing extremists”.
While she has been busy in her failure to govern her post at the National level, her former State legislatures have now been free (from her veto pen as Governor) to blaze a new trail that has seen some legislation that their voters have wanted for a very long time. Here are a few:
1) Pass a law allowing individuals (citizens) to carry a concealed weapon (gun) without having to apply for a permit.
2) Passed a declaration that the Federal Government has no say to regulate “light bulbs and gun manufacturing within the State”.
3) Restricted the use of “human embryos” for scientific experimentation.
4) Pass a law that makes it illegal for any school to promote any single ethnic group or any advocacy of ethnic solidarity. And finally…..
5) Pass a law making it illegal to be in the US illegally.
While the leftist in the MSM and in the halls of Congress run around blathering about Hitler and Racism over Arizona a Sheriff Deputy was shot in the Arizona Desert, by a suspected illegal alien drug smuggler. This is why 70% of population in Arizona support the recent laws. This is also why 70% of voters nationwide support the recent Arizona law.
The Usual Suspects
Harry Reid is the new face for Amnesty and the point person for the new push. Is it a coincidence that he is the one championing this new push? No, because he is pinning his hopes that the Hispanic voters will reward him for his efforts. This fact can be corroborated by the “flip-flop” of the former push for Amnesty under Bush – John McCain. He is from Arizona and he knows where the populace stands and is in a fight for his political life with his reelection hopes there. If you remember it was McCain and Kennedy that tried this in 2004 under Bush. If he were to say today, what he was championing yesterday, his campaign would be over because his people have spoken on this issue. It can be further corroborated when yesterday the MSM trotted out Karl Rove, Jeb Bush and Alberto Gonzalez in front of the cameras who all said the Arizona law was “misguided and wrong hearted”. All of these prior bush Amnesty advocates are safely out of office and have no “voter backlash” in which to deal with by making these statements that are contrary to popular wishes.
Today, it was learned that Obama has thrown Reid and the Hispanics under the bus by declaring “immigration reform” will not occur this year. The President instead, will rely on his usual suspects to agitate and separate the populace with violent marches and full frontal camera assaults by the MSM to do the dirty work in an effort to paint this as racist and dangerous.
All of this does not bode well for John McCain. His constituents know that he is a “pro-Amnesty” guy and is providing lip service to the voters with his recent “change of heart” stance.
Arizona lawmaker (Warde Nichols) summed it up best in an interview with Newsmax – “For six years, Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano's veto pen largely checked the Legislature's conservative agenda.
And while Napolitano crafted compromise state budgets by courting support from Democrats and a handful of moderate Republicans, conservatives responded by voting out key GOP moderates in primaries.
Conservative Republican Rep. Warde Nichols of Chandler said he watched the 60-member House move to the right as up to 14 GOP moderates gradually dwindled to just a handful over the past decade.
"The voters are tired of people who are not solid in what they want to do and are jumping both ways," he said.
McCain is literally fighting for his political life because even before JD Hayworth announced his opposition candidacy for his seat, the polls showed he was within 2% of McCain. The McCain campaign has already gone into “dirty trick” mode in his use of his Senate Committee influence to have JD Hayworth yanked from his “daytime” job as a radio DJ complaining he was using that show for his political campaign.
Below is an apt description that solidifies Conservative against McCain from klsouth blog:
1. Campaign finance reform. McCain tried to limit the role of money in politics with measures that, critics say, stomp on the constitutional right to free speech.
2. Immigration. McCain has been a vocal supporter of a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, although he now says he understands the border between the U.S. and Mexico must be sealed first. (Refer to recent anti-illegal immigrant legislation)
3. Tax cuts. McCain twice voted against President Bush’s tax cuts, saying in 2001 they helped the wealthy at the expense of the middle class and in 2003 that there should be no tax relief until the cost of the Iraq war was known. But he now wants to extend the tax cuts.
4. Gay Marriage. McCain refuses to support a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage.
5. Stem cell research. McCain would relax restrictions on federal dollars for embryonic stem cell research, which critics consider tantamount to abortion. (Refer to recent Arizona legislation curbing stem cell embryo’s)
6. Global warming. Among the loudest voices in Congress for aggressive action against global warming and a frequent critic of the Bush administration on the issue. (refer to recent Arizona declaration telling the Federal Government to stay out of their light bulb choices)
7. “Gang of 14″ member. One of seven Republicans and seven Democrats who averted a Senate showdown over whether filibusters could be used against Bush judicial nominees.
8. Kerry veep. McCain was approached by the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, about being his running mate. McCain talked with Kerry but rejected the offer.
9. Works with Democrats. See all of the above.
The fact that JD Hayworth has the endorsement from the National Tea Party organization as well as the Arizona and the National Association of Police organizations has ominous repercussions for McCain who has made a mainstay in the political arena as a “maverick” against issues that run contrary to conservative issues. When you couple this with the recent development in other conservative issues that have made inroads recently, such as the Texas schoolbook curriculum, 20 states fighting Obamacare in courts, Republican victories in New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts it is clear that the 70% of Americans who have been ignored by the elitists in power are making their voices and demands clear and the writing is on the wall – We are all “Arizonans” now. More important though is the symbolism of the City of Phoenix and we all know the story of the “Phoenix” rising from the ashes.
