Who says you cannot predict when and where an earthquake will strike next. OK, I am now going over to read my seismic monitor in order to read the "tea leaves."
That first squiggly line represents 87% of Americans who disapprove of the job Congress is doing (NBC/WSJ) while 57% would replace every member of Congress if they could.
"There is a palpable unhappiness with Washington," says pollster Peter D. Hart said of the results."
That second squiggly line represents 53% of "Americans who think that the Federal government represent a threat to personal freedoms. (Pew 2013)."
I could go on and on with statistics and polls but each and every one will show that the American Public is fed up with the Washington insider establishment. This brings me to the very real possibility that the 2016 Presidential election will again see a Clinton/Bush contest. The establishment Democrats have been positioning Hillary since the 2008 loss. On the other side (and I say this loosely because there is virtually no difference between an R and D anymore) the political kingmakers have been prodding Jeb Bush to run and the tea leaves indicate he will. Make no mistake both supposed primaries in both camps will have the establishment clear the fields against any and all who choose to run against them.
So, what if?
Will the American public stand for another Clinton or Bush dynasty? While Benghazi burned Hillary was AWOL and during this time Jeb Bush was pushing for bigger government and more illegals becoming legal. I say that an earthquake will shake both parties into oblivion as the resulting implosion will see a "third party" rise to take the mantle.
The term behavioral sciences encompasses all the disciplines that explore the activities of and interactions among organisms in the natural world. It involves the systematic analysis and investigation of human and animal behavior through controlled and naturalistic observation, and disciplined scientific experimentation. It attempts to accomplish legitimate, objective conclusions through rigorous formulations and observation. Examples of behavioral sciences include psychology, psychobiology, and cognitive science. - Wikipedia
Obamacare is, to the left, what Ronald Reagan is to Conservatism and their lifelong pursuit of socialized medicines Utopian dreams. The whole concept of theirs is predicated on lies and false assumptions that was forced down America's throat when the left had control of all three branches of our Government. The law was written behind secret and closed doors and passed in the dead of night. Now, we get to sit back as individuals and see this grand social experiment implode under it's own weight. While we wait for the impending implosion we get to observe the left's behavior in their own cultural petrie dish, thus the positive effects I speak of.
Here are some of those effects that I consider positive:
Nanci Pelosi's downfall and the wrenching of her gavel from her politically dead fingers. The 2010 midterm landslide defeats of those in the left that effected this whole charade of "insurance reform" was one of the first tangible "effects" reverberating outward from the law. If Nanci Pelosi and others wanted to know what was in store for their political futures, then they were going to have to read the election results after they passed this law.
One of the most delicious and savory moments I have witnessed to date thought has to do with the very Federal organization that is tasked with Obamacare oversight responsibilities is the IRS and their Union.
"National Treasury Employees Union officials are urging members to write their congressional representatives in opposition to receiving coverage through President Obama’s health care law." -- Washington Examiner
The left insist that everyone else be forced into this systems unless you are a card carrying member of the liberal elites. The petrie dish is under our microscope and watching the amoeba's fight it out in the swill of their own making is telling. The hypocrisy is on display and we see it occur in real time.
The latest news of this behavioral infighting that isn't quite related to Obamacare is playing itself out in the news. This time it is between two left powerhouse stalwarts: The ACLU and the UAW. Being a good leftist organization the ACLU has been, for a long time, a union shop for it's office workers and it is "collective bargaining time" again. ACLU management insists they are operating under an $8 million dollar deficit and therefore want their workers to contribute $20 per month towards their own health care insurance. Union officials, being Union officials, are picketing the ACLU headquarters in protest. Chants on the street can be heard loud and clear -- "ACLU says giveback, we say fight back!” Oh, and the other issue that the UAW is fighting is one little clause that the ACLU wants to include in the contract that will allow them to terminate an employee for -- "loyalty clause"! Though the language doesn't specify what is deemed "unloyal" I think we know as outside observers into our little microscopes. Delicious, I say.
Typical leftist want Americans to cede their personal protection rights to law enforcement while at the same time they attack police time and time again for excessive use of force. Typical Americans know and understand that they cannot wait for police to respond to handle situations of imminent danger. Crime statistics bear this out. Take for example the Sandford area crime statistics where Zimmerman was augmenting security in his neighborhood because of this need. It starts with presence in the face of lawlessness. Travon Martin, assuming he can read at age 17 would have seen these exact signs posted throughout the neighborhood in which he was traversing the night he was killed. If so, why should he or any of us for that matter be surprised he was being followed at that time of the evening? Zimmerman did everything that this warning sign warned. He watched and then before acting he reported to the Sanford Police Department. He identified himself, the situation as "a suspicious individual" in his neighborhood and then followed. It was his decision to follow that led to the confrontation. I think most of us who were following the events post shooting have come to the conclusion that that decision was reasonable. Obviously Mr. Zimmerman did.
We average Americans do not live in Sanford so our "frame of reference" is skewed because we haven't experienced their crime yet we do know, or empathize with those who have been victims. So Zimmerman was at ground zero for his own judgment to follow. Ground zero (Sanford) crime index rating is 4. What that means is Zimmerman's neighborhood is safer than 4% of all other American cities. 4%.
How many times have we heard from the Democrat side that terrorism is a "Law Enforcement" matter. Come on, you know what I'm talking about here. How many times have we picked up a NY Times and see some liberal advocating that enemy combatants being held in Guantanamo Bay be given legal rights to our criminal courts or that the war on terror shouldn't involve the military that when we "bring these people to justice" it is done in some court room that is devoid of person in uniform with rank.
After 9/11 there was a period of time that liberals knew it wasn't fashionable to espouse this line of reasoning because a lot of innocents were slaughtered at the hands of terror. That didn't last too long before they couldn't help themselves any longer and started to yell into the echo chamber that we shouldn't profile young men of Middle Eastern heritage between the ages of 17 and 23. If we succumb to this racial inequity then we are racist. I am a white male and I will tell you that ever since 9/11 and whenever I am about to board an airplane I am scanning the people I know will be getting on this very same plane. I am looking for Middle Eastern men that fit the profile of the terrorists of 9/11. Hell that profile fits most terrorist atrocities that have been perpetrated. This is a fact. Does this make me a racist or does this actually make me prudent? There have been many instances where I go through this "profile" process in my mind and someone actually sticks out as a "potential". I do not approach this individual and make them uncomfortable racially, or do anything aggressively towards them. I watch/observe them like a hawk and make damn sure that I am aware of my surroundings, where they sit in relation to my position on the plane. I prepare myself to act if the need arises and only then. Make no mistake, I will act. I would almost certainly think that 99% of my fellow passengers are going through the same thought processes.
So, this brings me to the hypocrisy of those on the left that scream for handling everything as a "law enforcement" issue. George Zimmerman saw a suspicious looking man in his neighborhood that had experienced a spate of crime against it's homeowners and residents. The man was wearing a hoodie and fit many characteristics of a criminal and was profiled as such. Ann Coulter wrote an article that touched on this titled "TO AVOID LOOKING LIKE A CRIMINAL, DON'T COMMIT A CRIME". I am not suggesting that Travon Martin was committing a crime before beating Zimmerman senseless, I am saying he fit a certain criteria for concern before he even set foot in Zimmerman's sight. Zimmerman, after all, was the neighborhood WATCH. He was watching everything within his purview and when Travon came into it something obviously stood out. Something obvious enough for him to call the police first. This call was a result of "criminal profiling".
From the outset of this media circus the MSM themselves were guilty of "racial profiling" when they declared Zimmerman white. From that point forward the left up to and including the President himself have engaged in racial profiling. For instance, when the President made the following comment about perceived racism that blacks experience, including himself --
"There are very few African-American men in this country who haven't had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me.
There are probably very few African-American men who haven't had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars. That happens to me - at least before I was a senator.
There are very few African-Americans who haven't had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she had a chance to get off.
That happens often.
And, you know, I - I don't want to exaggerate this, but those sets of experiences inform how the African-American community interprets what happened one night in Florida.
This comment by the President is by itself racist. The comment about being followed in a Department store is obviously "store security" and not fellow shoppers. I say this because he other comments bear this out because we are so afraid of unknown black shoppers that we clutch our purses, lock our doors and hold our breaths in their presence. We would never engage in an act such as following these unknown and dangerous individuals regardless of our own racism. We are simply too fearful. We can assume, because Obama has already on separate occasions identified with Travon (as being the son he never had and that he (Obama) himself could have been Martin 35 years ago), his own behavior mirrored that of Martin. That particular time in Obama's own life (high school age) we know that
Please excuse the youtube link as radical, but the words spoken on this video are with Obama's own voice that came from his audio version of "Dreams of my Father" book.
It is safe to say that a drug hazed man such as Obama would have certainly been profiled by Department Store security and perhaps followed closely. But, as with Zimmerman, Department Store personnel profile based on known criminal behavior and not by the color of his skin.
We now know that Travon was not the person that the liberal press, the White House, the race baiters and the prosecutor painted as. We know that the Miami School system failed him and continues to fail their students when they covered up the crimes committed by Martin on School grounds in order to paint another false narrative that crime on campus was reduced by 60%. The result of the crimes committed by Travon and covered up by the school police could have resulted in a much different outcome had Martin been processed through the criminal justice system and not walking the streets that night. We also know that the cherub faced boy we were shown was into fighting, drugs and lawlessness. Obama again changed the narrative when he asked we, as a nation, reconsider the "stand your ground laws" in the various states that have them on the books. We know that Zimmerman did not invoke Florida's stand your ground laws as a defense but that of "self defense". Again, Obama changes the narrative to "not allow a crisis to go to waste". Obama went as far to say the following -- "And for those who resist that idea that we should think about something like these "stand your ground" laws, I just ask people to consider if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman, who had followed him in a car, because he felt threatened?" This is again a reference of African American perception Obama eludes to by shamelessly painting an analogy to draw a different conclusion to that of reality. The link above ("stand your ground") dissects this in detail by comparing the actual language of the Florida law Obama referenced as dangerous. I say shameless because Obama himself is a Harvard Educated lawyer and should be able to read and interpret the law. Instead, Obama misrepresents it to fulfill his agenda of disarming the American public. The article shows, for instance -- Obama statement: "And for those who resist that idea that we should think about something like these "stand your ground" laws, I just ask people to consider if Trayvon Martin was of age and armed, could he have stood his ground on that sidewalk? And do we actually think that he would have been justified in shooting Mr. Zimmerman, who had followed him in a car, because he felt threatened?" Florida Criminal Code:
"A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony." I think we can safely conclude that if Trayvon would have been armed with a handgun Zimmerman would have met with a different fate. In conclusion, the bully pulpit that this President employs to get his message across to us is exactly that a BULLY pulpit.
"You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot, I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me, 35 years ago," -- Barack Obama 7/19/13
The One has finally come out of silence to throw gasoline on the racial fires that are not only burning across America, but spreading in intensity. Where to begin?
First, is there anyone else disturbed that our President self identifies with the troubled youth that tragically lost his life. I'm not speaking of the youth that was created out whole cloth, disproved and regurgitated after Zimmerman's acquittal as if the evidence, or lack thereof ever existed at all. No I speak of the real Travon Martin who abused drugs (both legal ones and illegal ones) and had serious behavioral issues that included vandalism, fighting and most likely burglary. That Travon Martin.
Instead of identifying more with the man falsely accused of 2nd degree murder who was born to a Peruvian Hispanic mother and Non-Hispanic father. You know, the white-Hispanic. We all know that Obama was born under similar circumstances yet the President distances himself from his "white" side.
Remember Obama saying -- "The point I was making was not that my grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn't. But she is a typical white person who, uh, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know there's a reaction that's been been bred into our experiences that don't go away and that sometimes come out in the wrong way and that's just the nature of race in our society. We have to break through it..." - Senator Barack Obama
Now, compare it to what he just said today -- "There are very few African-American men in this country who haven't had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me," he said.
He said he sometimes heard the clicks of car doors locking when he walked across the street in his younger days.
"There are very few African-Americans who haven't had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she had a chance to get off. That happens often," he said.
Typical White people, always following African Americans or locking their car doors or clutching their purses. Let's try a little reverse analogy about what "experiences" White people have. Obama used the term "typical White people" in describing his own White Grandmother's fear of unknown black men on the street that causes her to change sides in order to avoid confrontation or perceived racially motivated danger.
The liberal Main Stream Media will have you believe that White on Black violence is rampant. They will also tell you that Florida's, as well as the 19 States, "stand your ground" law is part and parcel to this institutional and historic American racism. There have been many theories bantered about the Internet about the motive behind the false narrative claims of the MSM, liberals and the race baiting machine to include painting Zimmerman white in order to maintain the illusion that they are still champions of those with "brown skin" as the 2016 election draw closer. But, I say we look no further than Barack himself for the answer by exposing his words and behavior to gain understanding.
Twice now he has compared himself personally to Travon Martin to try to personalize or humanize the perpetrator of violence against another. This is meant to somehow justify his acts as some knee jerk reaction to many, many years of racism. Does this mean that every time someone walks behind an African American in the grocery store and that person feels that he is being followed that it is OK to pull out a can of whoop ass? Of course not. Yet this is the message Obama sends. So, for now Zimmerman has to hide while Eric Holder and the race agitators call for his hide even though he is Hispanic. Zimmerman self identifies himself as such, yet the enlightened intellectuals do not hold him to the same standard they do with someone who identifies themselves as Gay, or transgender.
So, until this whole unfortunate situation plays itself out against a man that was found, in the eyes of his peers to be innocent of the legal charges that were leveled against him, lay low until those of his own race defend him against all others. It is rumored that until this happens he will be changing his name to "Ben Ghazi" so the Main Stream Media as well as the Obama WH and race baiter will forget to even mention him again.
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.'
I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character
When this whole unfortunate business of race-baiting began in the Travon Martin death it had the usual players involved along with some notable names the likes of Martin Luther King III. Though the Son of the slain civil rights leader has since kept a low profile since the opening salvo being fired by Al Sharpton (on the day his own mother died) when he descended into the fray with bus loads of protesters.
Ever since the trial has ended and George Zimmerman acquitted of all charges those who seek to stir up racial divides and hatred of whites continue unabated by truth of the matter. Make no mistake about it this trial and George Zimmerman particularly was covered wall to wall by the media throughout. There was so much coverage that we, the public, had access to so much information that the sequestered jurors never saw or heard as it related to Travon Martin. Most of it was information concerning Travon Martin and the picture it painted wasn't what those in Main Stream Media or those race baiters were screaming night after night after night. The State prosecutors aided by the Judge made sure the Jurors didn't hear a peep about Travon other than what the prosecutors painted. On the other hand the Jurors got to hear everything the Judge allowed as it referred to Zimmerman which was in wide latitudes in comparison.
That said, George Zimmerman has been painted outside the confines of the sequestration of the courtroom as a racist by those who worked so hard with Dr. King to ensure racial equality in this country. Gone was the notion that George Zimmerman lived in a nation where he will not be judged by the color of his skin, but by the content of his behavior. The media at once labeled him as White. When that didn't stick, he became a "White Hispanic" racist.
When the trial was over and the unsatiated lust for social justice went awry did the political leaders as well as the so-called civil rights leaders started to attack the women on the jury as racist. This is just another example of just who is engaged in a war on women.
No, we see who are racist in this country and it is those who purport to represent those of color. Al Sharpton is "doubling down" and organizing a 100 city protest. People are getting killed because of the flames being fanned. The media is complicit to this day in throwing the gasoline on the flames while Sharpton is fanning them. When are those of color going to understand that these are no friends of theirs. Everyone else sees it.
Update 7/16/13:
The niece of Martin Luther King believes the NAACP and other groups are race-baiting with their call for a federal civil-rights case to be lodged against George Zimmerman, and believes they may be getting paid to do so.
"It is not helpful to race-bait," Dr. Alveda King told "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.
"The other thing is, Mr. Zimmerman is not a Caucasian. He’s a Hispanic. The media is somehow forgetting that, so [there are] all of these nuances, all of the race-baiting, all of the pain."
Helter Skelter
The Obama Administration, Eric Holder and the Dept of Justice, the Main Stream Media, the NAACP, Angela Corey and the New Black Panther Party are taking a play from the Charles Manson playbook. They are using an issue (the killing of a black teenager) and twisting the facts to whip up racial tensions and succeeding in having the "New Black Panther Party" declare racial war. This is exactly what Charles Manson was trying to accomplish when he directed HIS followers to commit heinous crimes and blame the black man for them. Zimmerman isn't white yet the narrative continues. Mobs of demonstrators that are being organized and let loose in the streets are targeting white individuals for violence and now Hispanics. The true hate crime are those taking to the streets with racial animosity and perpetrating violence in the name of Travon Martin. The situation is so volatile that those pulling the strings must be held accountable for their actions because deep down they know what everyone else who is witnessing these events unfold know -- Zimmerman is Hispanic and he is innocent of murder, manslaughter, child abuse and all other trumped up charges our irresponsible government leveled against him.
Jury duty will never be the same. The bravery that those Juror members will now be tested as they have stood up and declared what we, the sane and rational public, have known for some time now that George Zimmerman (Hispanic male of non-white descent) is not guilty of murder, manslaughter or child abuse. Those who still harbor ill-will towards him and anyone of non-color or gender should be ashamed of themselves. The race-baters, of course are calling on the Justice Department to file some Civil Rights suits against him and I fear that Zimmerman's legal issues are far from over as those who still wish to keep moving this issue farther down the field take a page from the OJ playbook. For now though, our prayers go out to Mr. Zimmerman and the parents and loved ones of Travon Martin as well as those who did their civic duty without bias. The verdict that was rendered was the only one that could have been issued as the State failed to prove anything but innocence. The State did not fumble on presenting their case as their really wasn't a case to begin with. In spite of the Justice that prevailed in the case of Zimmerman there have been set-backs in many areas as a result of this wayward prosecution. Some of those areas are truth, race and the trust in our Government that they will be trusted with the power they wield over the individual who doesn't deserve a target on their back because it doesn't fit their model of behavior politically. We can only hope that the ensuing discussions around the water cooler and in the media can be honest and frank because we have all seen how the last train left the station when this whole unfortunate business began.
There is a reason that depictions of "Lady Justice" have her sporting a blindfold, it is to show that she is above external forces outside the realm of fact. She sees no color for she is color blind. She sees only black and white (no pun intended). So why then is the Zimmerman case being tried by the MSM, race advocates, celebrities, Politicians and even the US Justice Department as a racial crime? The press, before any real facts emerged from police sources painted Zimmerman as White. We now know that his ethnicity is Hispanic yet the very same press sources have created a whole new race category just for him, "White Hispanic". Why? I will go out on a limb here and speculate that it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the politics of gun control. There has been a lot of talk that Zimmerman shot and killed an innocent unarmed man (er, boy) who was just walking home with his ice tea and skittles. The trial, as put forth by the State, tell a different story when facts enter the scene. Zimmerman had the legal right to carry that weapon that night. He had done everything he must in order for him to obtain his concealed carry permit from law enforcement. He had to submit to a criminal background check, take gun safety courses, etc., yet the caricature painted of him is HE is the criminal without the presumption of innocence. I will go even further to say that the Government is engaging in "thought crimes" prosecution for even bringing this case to trial. I find it reprehensible that Zimmerman is again fighting for his very life and the only thing he is armed with is a legal team of competent jurists. I have written before that this sham prosecution has all the earmarks of another legal railroad job (Duke Lacrosse) that found that prosecutor disbarred. The damage being done in the attempted manipulation of reality outside this courtroom which invariably spills into it has a chilling effect on the public that anyone, anywhere at anytime can see the Government use a blinded Lady Justice for their own nefarious purposes to silence or disarm its citizens when our constitution boldly lists freedom of speech and the right to bear arms as the first two amendments to that venerable document we live under. After this trial is in the history books and all the facts laid bare for all to see we will see how Lady Justice performs. The real question in my mind is what if Trevon Martin was also armed?
On May 23, 2012 President Obama stood in front of the American people and addressed the Trayvon Martin shooting. Here are some of the things he said:
"Well, I'm the head of the executive branch and the attorney general reports to me, so I've got to be careful about my statements to make sure that we're not impairing any investigation that's taking place right now.
But, obviously, this is a tragedy. I can only imagine what these parents are going through. And when I think about this boy, I think about my own kids. And, you know, I think every parent in America should be able to understand why it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this and that everybody pulls together -- federal, state and local -- to figure out exactly how this tragedy happened.
So I'm glad that not only is the Justice Department looking into it, I understand now that the governor of the state of Florida has formed a task force to investigate what's taking place. I think all of us have to do some soul-searching to figure out how does something like this happen. And that means that we examine the laws and the context for what happened, as well as the specifics of the incident.
But my main message is to the parents of Trayvon Martin. You know, if I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon. And, you know, I think they are right to expect that all of us, as Americans, are going to take this with the seriousness it deserves and that we're going to get to the bottom of exactly what happened."
I hope the President is ready for the soul searching America has done since the trial of George Zimmerman has got underway. Unlike the juror's in the case who are basically sequestered from all external news about the trial as well as investigative journalism who paint a drastically different picture of the "boy who would look like a king".
While the neighborhood watch volunteer fights for his freedom after fighting for his life we know just who Travon Martin was and what he represented. He represented drugs, thugs and guns. The prosecution took 9 days to parade their tarnished witnesses in a manner that was reminiscent of the "Duke Lacrosse" case and prosecutor Mike Nifong.
"From the beginning of the affair, other observers voiced strong, often harsh, opinions about the players, the district attorney, the university and nearly every other aspect of the story. Initial criticism focused on the players, with protesters assembling outside the house where the party occurred, banging pots and shouting their concerns. As doubts grew about the charges, criticism shifted to Nifong and his team, as well as to some administrators, students, community members and others – including a group of faculty members who published an ad in The Chronicle – who were accused of prejudging the players or of using the case to promote their own agendas."-- Duke University
The government, yes all the way to the White House, all rushed to paint us a picture of an incident that didn't really happen. If we were to believe them, we would be angry that a White man shot and killed an unarmed cherub faced black teenager innocently on his way home with his skittles for nothing more than his hatred. We watched the disgusting prosecution witnesses lie and weave their tales to fit the narrative of a racial hate crime when in fact the true narrative is something more nuanced.
The soul searching we are now doing is how do we rectify this travesty of wayward justice that is vengeful and wrong. How do we hold accountable those who jumped, and mugged Zimmerman more than Travon Martin could have because once the trial is over and an innocent verdict is read do you for one minute believe that Zimmerman's life will go back to normal? He has, and continues to receive death threats across the internet by true racist believers in the kool aid that Obama, Sharpton, the New Black Panthers and the Main Stream Media have been serving to a nation currently underway in its soul searching.
The recent post on this site brought patriotic mist to my eyes as I listened to the below version of the National Anthem. I salute the Astute Blogger as they were able to bring this patriotic emotion to its highest levels in my American mind. Hats off to you........
My next post will be to post many different versions of our great National Anthem.
While the trial of George Zimmerman is quickly heading to a surreal close those who stoked the fans of racism brace for the violence they say they fear. The Main Stream media and the liberal point men have called for Zimmerman's head on a pike and have proclaimed his guilt from the outset in order to create another scenario of racism that we Americans were presumably over when we elected the first African American President.
The symbolic lynching of George Zimmerman in the press in the land where jurisprudence dictates, through our Bill of Rights, that we are innocent until PROVEN guilty has been sickening. These people, race-baiters, have turned the heat up underneath the social fabric until it has reached a boiling point just in time for the verdict. We all know what that verdict will be because we all know Zimmerman acted appropriately under the Florida "stand your ground" law. We all knew that the States case was a house of cards from the outset. We have seen the MSM doctor their photo's and their stories in order to portray a counter reality in which they were caught red handed.
When Zimmerman was not arrested after the shooting the miscreants came crawling out of their cesspools to demand the lynching. The two most prominent players who came crawling were Al Sharpton who, on the day of his own mothers' death, stood on the steps of the Sanford City Hall and called for his arrest. According to WFTV -- "Sharpton told WFTV reporter Daralene Jones that the case is not about being black or white, it's about anyone who has children should realize that Martin could be their child. "We can not allow for it to be a legal precedent that unarmed young men can be shot down and killed and people walk away from it like they stepped on an insect," Sharpton said. "To leave him in the medical examiner's office and not go through his cell phone, like he wasn't even a human being that died, one has to wonder the mentality of the police department."
The WFTV news account was on 3/22/12. In this same news article the following was reported:
"Robin Magee drove from South Florida and said that as a mother of two, she understands her children could've been Martin.
"When did you make the decision that you wanted to be here?" Jones asked.
"When I heard the 911 call, I said whatever rally there's going to be, I'm going to be there," Magee said."
The following day Obama ran with Sharpton's comment and declared that ""If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," Obama said during a press gathering in the Rose Garden, after he was asked about the incident that has sparked national debate."
If anyone recalls, the 9/11 tape was doctored and aired on NBC's Today show.
Finally, on July 2 Sanford Police Chief tells us that he is coordinating with city, State and Federal law enforcement to prepare for racial unrest after the verdict. Of course they all know what the verdict is going to be barring that un-reality thing and now they will have to deal with the fruits of their racial stirring labor.
