On December 17th I posted an article here at America's Living Room taking a semi-serious pot-shot at Pajama Boy of Obamacare fame. In as much as I did disparage this "man-child" and the image he portrayed as basically a microcosm of the emasculation of the American male over the past few decades. In addition, I admit that my visceral reaction initially was also along the lines of the atypical youth camping out in their parents basement (aka living at home, still). It goes hand-in-hand with the left wing belief of "taking no responsibility for oneself" being behaviorally or professionally. That said, I came across an article this morning written by Jay Michaelson at "Forward.com" titled Obamacare "pajama boy" controversy wrapped in anti-Semitism.
We are to give credibility to this yahoo because his website is actually called "The Jewish Daily Forward". If you actually look closely at the original ad, there is absolutely no reference or credence to indicate the effeminate pajama boy as Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Kwanzic or any other religion what so ever. Yet, Mr. Michaelson wants us to connect the thought police dots that he is spewing.
He advocates the following -- "The Right went apoplectic, calling Pajama Boy “a metrosexual in a plaid onesie,” “an insufferable man-child,” and various other vaguely sexist and homophobic epithets. Apparently, real men don’t wear pajamas.
Or glasses. What’s interesting about the Right’s freakout about men who don’t measure up to the standards of the 1950s is how Pajama Boy’s obvious Jewishness has been subsumed by these other characteristics.
Yes, Virginia, Pajama Boy is a member of the tribe. Look at him. Pale Ashkenazic skin, Jew-fro’d black curls, Woody Allen specs. Even the smart-ass expression on his face screams of the Wise Son from the Passover Seder.
Parenthetically, the model himself is one Ethan Krupp, an Organizing for America staffer who is, in fact, Jewish. But whether Krupp himself is circumcised or not, Pajama Boy is semiotically Jewish, even stereotypically so."
First, let me address the last sentence -- Ewwwww.... I did not need that visual on top of the stereotypical one I already had (which I wrote about).
According to this author we were to draw the Jewish conclusion because of "Pale Ashkenazic skin, Jew-fro’d black curls, Woody Allen specs. Even the smart-ass expression on his face screams of the Wise Son from the Passover Seder."
Yeah, that is exactly what I thought when I saw that photo. He caught me, red handed (oops -- another racist term). I believe the Yiddish term for idiot liar is schakren putz.
He ends his screed by saying we (those who berated this man child) as facists. His exact words were --
"Whether or not the Pajama-Boy bashers are unconsciously anti-Semitic or not, I don’t know. Consciously, they are against everything “Judaism” stands for, at least as construed by its enemies: outsiderness, cosmopolitanism, liberalism, a progressive rather than nativist agenda, an opposition to the notion that there is one kind of “normal” person, a sympathy for the underdog and the immigrant as opposed to the successful and the privileged, and, yes, a rejection of a certain gendered, masculinist understanding of justice wherein the strong survive and the weak are trampled underfoot like the untermenschen they are.
That fascistic outlook has long been a part of far-right conservatism – whether in revisionist Zionism, contemporary French/Hungarian/Greek nationalism, American Republicanism, or German fascism. Real men are strong, and the weak don’t deserve our pity. Let them get sick for lack of healthcare; they probably deserve it. And as for women, and the parasitic “Jewish” men who resemble them? They are to be suppressed and domesticated, not empowered. Patriarchy is good. Sexism is natural. Get out of your onesies, America. And put on your jackboots.
Schakren putz indeed!
Update:
I came across this article just now, This is what I am talking about!!!!
Monday, December 30, 2013
Saturday, December 28, 2013
Thursday, December 26, 2013
CON, an apt acronym
The Wall Street Journal has just posted an article titled "What to do when Obamacare unravels" and provided me with insight to something I knew existed but did not quite understand, until now. Here is a quote from the article that I zeroed in on --
"There is an alternative. A much freer market in health care and health insurance can work, can deliver high quality, technically innovative care at much lower cost, and solve the pathologies of the pre-existing system.
CON = Certificate of Need
Since new hospitals cannot be constructed without proving a "need," the certificate-of-need system grants monopoly privileges to already existing hospitals. Consequently, Alaska House of Representatives member Bob Lynn has argued that the true motivation behind certificate-of-need legislation is that "large hospitals are... trying to make money by eliminating competition" under the pretext of using monopoly profits to provide better patient care.
As you can see from the reference above, CON laws have been repealed in many states already.
This fix, as the Wall Street Journal writer proposes is prophetic more than he knows. The reason why I was already familiar with the term CON was because of an article I wrote here at ALR titled "Making a Strong Case out of Circumstantial Evidence" (Link here).
As usual, Obama has ties to the massive corruption associated with CON. Here is a quote from that article --
"It is ironic that Obama will probably go unscathed in the “Board games” prosecution because Obama contributed a great deal that allowed it to happen. I speak of Obama’s Illinois Senate role when he pushed through the legislation that reduced the number of Illinois Health Facilities Planning board (This is the governmental entity that determines and then issues the CON's) from 15 down to 9 that allowed Blagojevich to pack the board with a majority of 5 to control it. The majority of those 5 members gave heavily to Obama’s campaign after they were appointed by Blagojevich.
In addition to facilitating this change of Board membership through legislative means that utilized Obama’s position on the Committee responsible for the review of the legislation, he was also tasked with vetting the 5 candidates (including Levine) during the “confirmation hearings” of Blagojevich’s picks which sailed through the Illinois Senate. Obama was one of the first recipients of “tainted kickback money” from Operation Board games when he received $20,000 from a bank account held by the pizza business Rezko owned.
Obama wants the public to believe that his associations were merely circumstantial and random in nature but, like the “Fibonacci Sequence”, it is a pattern that is detectable if you look at all the evidence that is being amassed that appears random in the singular but collectively paints a true sequence of events that is interrelated.
Obama, Blagojevich, Emanuel, Rezko, Giannoulias, Allison Davis, Valerie Jarrett, Robert Harris, William Cellini, Sr., Broadway Bank, Campaign Contributions followed by political appointments, political endorsements followed by campaign contributions, land deals and kickbacks."
All the familiar names are involved. Three of them ended up in the White House. This is why it is prophetic that with the Obamacare implosion, CON is the first suggested repeal efforts for reform. When you think about the monopolistic aspect of CON's and the monopoly that existing Hospitals have enjoyed as a result of these "Certificate of Needs" it has stifled true free market competition. Competition is what drives down cost. You hear the same false arguments from politicians that the reason of high health care is because of evil insurance companies or frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits. The rampant corruption of the Boards to swerve construction contracts to their crony's or political contributions to their politicians like Blagojavich has more graft expense that insurance or lawsuits.
I advise that my readers read the link to the 2009 article above and think about what you are reading and remember Obama's involvement in it back then as well as the other things that he was connected to involving health care. For instance, Blagojavich wanted Obama to appoint him to the HHS position now occupied by Sebelius in return for placing Jarrett in the Seat. Blagojavich also wanted to run SEIU if the HHS job wasn't on the table for Obama's vacated seat. All the usual suspects.
"There is an alternative. A much freer market in health care and health insurance can work, can deliver high quality, technically innovative care at much lower cost, and solve the pathologies of the pre-existing system.
The U.S. health-care market is dysfunctional. Obscure prices and $500 Band-Aids are legendary. The reason is simple: Health care and health insurance are strongly protected from competition. There are explicit barriers to entry, for example the laws in many states that require a "certificate of need" before one can build a new hospital. Regulatory compliance costs, approvals, nonprofit status, restrictions on foreign doctors and nurses, limits on medical residencies, and many more barriers keep prices up and competitors out. Hospitals whose main clients are uncompetitive insurers and the government cannot innovate and provide efficient cash service."
CON = Certificate of Need
Since new hospitals cannot be constructed without proving a "need," the certificate-of-need system grants monopoly privileges to already existing hospitals. Consequently, Alaska House of Representatives member Bob Lynn has argued that the true motivation behind certificate-of-need legislation is that "large hospitals are... trying to make money by eliminating competition" under the pretext of using monopoly profits to provide better patient care.
As you can see from the reference above, CON laws have been repealed in many states already.
This fix, as the Wall Street Journal writer proposes is prophetic more than he knows. The reason why I was already familiar with the term CON was because of an article I wrote here at ALR titled "Making a Strong Case out of Circumstantial Evidence" (Link here).
As usual, Obama has ties to the massive corruption associated with CON. Here is a quote from that article --
"It is ironic that Obama will probably go unscathed in the “Board games” prosecution because Obama contributed a great deal that allowed it to happen. I speak of Obama’s Illinois Senate role when he pushed through the legislation that reduced the number of Illinois Health Facilities Planning board (This is the governmental entity that determines and then issues the CON's) from 15 down to 9 that allowed Blagojevich to pack the board with a majority of 5 to control it. The majority of those 5 members gave heavily to Obama’s campaign after they were appointed by Blagojevich.
In addition to facilitating this change of Board membership through legislative means that utilized Obama’s position on the Committee responsible for the review of the legislation, he was also tasked with vetting the 5 candidates (including Levine) during the “confirmation hearings” of Blagojevich’s picks which sailed through the Illinois Senate. Obama was one of the first recipients of “tainted kickback money” from Operation Board games when he received $20,000 from a bank account held by the pizza business Rezko owned.
Obama wants the public to believe that his associations were merely circumstantial and random in nature but, like the “Fibonacci Sequence”, it is a pattern that is detectable if you look at all the evidence that is being amassed that appears random in the singular but collectively paints a true sequence of events that is interrelated.
Obama, Blagojevich, Emanuel, Rezko, Giannoulias, Allison Davis, Valerie Jarrett, Robert Harris, William Cellini, Sr., Broadway Bank, Campaign Contributions followed by political appointments, political endorsements followed by campaign contributions, land deals and kickbacks."
All the familiar names are involved. Three of them ended up in the White House. This is why it is prophetic that with the Obamacare implosion, CON is the first suggested repeal efforts for reform. When you think about the monopolistic aspect of CON's and the monopoly that existing Hospitals have enjoyed as a result of these "Certificate of Needs" it has stifled true free market competition. Competition is what drives down cost. You hear the same false arguments from politicians that the reason of high health care is because of evil insurance companies or frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits. The rampant corruption of the Boards to swerve construction contracts to their crony's or political contributions to their politicians like Blagojavich has more graft expense that insurance or lawsuits.
I advise that my readers read the link to the 2009 article above and think about what you are reading and remember Obama's involvement in it back then as well as the other things that he was connected to involving health care. For instance, Blagojavich wanted Obama to appoint him to the HHS position now occupied by Sebelius in return for placing Jarrett in the Seat. Blagojavich also wanted to run SEIU if the HHS job wasn't on the table for Obama's vacated seat. All the usual suspects.
Wednesday, December 25, 2013
The Un-Rev. Jesse Jackson
The Master of the Race Baiters has weighed in the Duck fiasco. Jesse Jackson said the following --
"These statements uttered by Robertson are more offensive than the bus driver in Montgomery, Alabama, more than 59 years ago," Jackson said in a statement obtained by ABC News.
"At least the bus driver, who ordered Rosa Parks to surrender her seat to a white person, was following state law. Robertson's statements were uttered freely and openly without cover of the law, within a context of what he seemed to believe was 'white privilege."
Jackson was referring to the comment by Phil Robertson when he said --
"Nazis needed Jesus, that he never saw the mistreatment of African Americans while growing up in Louisiana before the civil rights era and that homosexuality was a sin."
I'm not quite sure what part of the Robertson statement that Jackson equates to the bus driver that ordered Rosa Parks to give up her seat for a white passenger? Perhaps it was the mistreatment part. I am 54 years old and I did not personally witness any racial mistreatment of African Americans where I grew up (Ohio, Los Angeles) except those images that came through our television sets. Personally, as always, I find anything that Jackson says, offensive and disingenuous. I find it offensive because I believe he spews his bigotry for profit. I also think that as an ordained Christian Reverend he should be more equipped to understand the context of what Robertson was saying when he quoted the bible. But then again, the collar around Jackson is just a prop as is the color of his skin (I will probably be labeled a racist for saying this and taken out of context).
"These statements uttered by Robertson are more offensive than the bus driver in Montgomery, Alabama, more than 59 years ago," Jackson said in a statement obtained by ABC News.
Jackson was referring to the comment by Phil Robertson when he said --
"Nazis needed Jesus, that he never saw the mistreatment of African Americans while growing up in Louisiana before the civil rights era and that homosexuality was a sin."
I'm not quite sure what part of the Robertson statement that Jackson equates to the bus driver that ordered Rosa Parks to give up her seat for a white passenger? Perhaps it was the mistreatment part. I am 54 years old and I did not personally witness any racial mistreatment of African Americans where I grew up (Ohio, Los Angeles) except those images that came through our television sets. Personally, as always, I find anything that Jackson says, offensive and disingenuous. I find it offensive because I believe he spews his bigotry for profit. I also think that as an ordained Christian Reverend he should be more equipped to understand the context of what Robertson was saying when he quoted the bible. But then again, the collar around Jackson is just a prop as is the color of his skin (I will probably be labeled a racist for saying this and taken out of context).
Barack Obama, who?
So, the President of the United States pay taxes every year right? In order to become eligible for President he had to submit his birth certificate, right? In spite of all the above board information that he has provided to us the rabble it should be no problem to find him and verify him from multiple sources, right? Wrong!
In a publicity stunt to show how easy it is to sign up for his signature legislation, his legacy, the website could not verify Barack Hussein Obama. This forced his handlers to come back to the media and explain that because he is, you know, ah, the commander in chief his personal information is restricted from government databases? Wait a minute, didn't he post his birth certificate on the White House website so it can't be his birth certificate. If he files taxes every year, his social security number must be on that database, right?
If a website touted as easy peasy to enroll into an affordable healthcare plan for every American then it should be able to enroll the most famous American today, right?
If not, then maybe there is a problem with his records that need to be looked into. Wait, does this qualify me as a "birther" for just saying that? Ok, I'm a birther.
In a publicity stunt to show how easy it is to sign up for his signature legislation, his legacy, the website could not verify Barack Hussein Obama. This forced his handlers to come back to the media and explain that because he is, you know, ah, the commander in chief his personal information is restricted from government databases? Wait a minute, didn't he post his birth certificate on the White House website so it can't be his birth certificate. If he files taxes every year, his social security number must be on that database, right?
If a website touted as easy peasy to enroll into an affordable healthcare plan for every American then it should be able to enroll the most famous American today, right?
If not, then maybe there is a problem with his records that need to be looked into. Wait, does this qualify me as a "birther" for just saying that? Ok, I'm a birther.
Flash Mob of God
It is refreshing to see that some in the military still promote God though I doubt the leader of the Air Force Band will be around much longer after his choice of music. This occurred at the National Air and Space Museum that had tourists and school groups surprised at the impromptu concert.
Joy to the World , the Lord is come!
Let earth receive her King;
Let every heart prepare Him room,
And Heaven and nature sing,
And Heaven and nature sing,
And Heaven, and Heaven, and nature sing.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/air-force-band-hits-high-note/#0TtIQIcbfiYBDsrb.99
Let earth receive her King;
Let every heart prepare Him room,
And Heaven and nature sing,
And Heaven and nature sing,
And Heaven, and Heaven, and nature sing.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/air-force-band-hits-high-note/#0TtIQIcbfiYBDsrb.99
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Death Penalty is the answer for Treason
I am sure that Obama's Socialist cheerleaders believe that "In the end, treason is a matter of dates"! Today I was struck by two separate articles in the news. The first was found on "Canada Free Press" and was titled
"Conservative Lawmakers' secret trip to Mideast could foreshadow Obama's downfall".
The second was found on "Breitbart" and was titled
"Dem Bill would End Death Penalty for Espionage-Treason-Assassinations"
The question I have is this -- Are the two mutually exclusive events or are they inextricably linked?
I'm sure it hasn't escaped the attention of the readers as it pertains to my opening sentence and the use of the term "Obama's Socialist Cheerleaders". There are a lot of detractors that believe throwing bombs and accusing someone of something such as being a "socialist" is to dismiss the author as extreme; racist; conspiratorial or worst. That said, I intentionally used that phrase because it is widely believed that Obama does in fact have deep roots of socialist proclivities. More specifically thought, I used the term to describe the Democrats who put forth the Bill (HR 3741) to end the death penalty. The sponsors and co-sponsors of that bill are:
Rep. Donna Edwards (D) - MD (Sponsor)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D) - CA (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Henry Johnson (D) - GA (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. John Lewis (D) - GA (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Jose Serrano (D) - NY (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D) - MD (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Janice Schakosky (D) - IL (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Keith Ellison (D) - MN (Co-Sponsor)
Do not take my word for it, here is the list from the "Democrat Socialist of America" itself!
So, why do a bunch a socialists want to abolish the Death Penalty for Treason? After all, treason is just a matter of dates! It is of no surprise that it is a pet peeve of Democrats that America has a "Capital Punishment" statute on a Federal Level as well as in the States. That said, I find the timing of the two separate news items to be suspect. But, I will leave the readers to draw their own conclusions as to whether or not they are related. If they are, why? To speculate a little, one could say that they are doing it in order to spare their "Dear Leader" from the ultimate punishment if in fact the trip by the three members of Congress turn up with irrefutable evidence that Obama has committed "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the Middle East.
The very definition of "Treason" is to "give aid and comfort to America's enemies". So the question we must ask is this. Was Egypt (at the time the Muslim Brotherhood were in power) considered an enemy of America? The answer is -- Yes. The reason is because the Muslim Brotherhood has been on the State Department list of terrorist organizations and one can say by extension that they were elevated to "State sponsors of terror" when they came to power.
The other question has to do with Iran. Are they enemies of America. Again, the answer is Yes. They are on the State Department list of States that sponsor terror.
Finally, according to Breitbart -- "The Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act. (HR 3741) would "end the death penalty for assassination or kidnapping that results in the death of the president or vice president, and also ends it for the murder of a member of Congress."
The list goes on: "using a weapon of mass destruction, or murder done via torture, child abuse, war crimes, aircraft hijackings, sexual abuse, bank robberies or the willful wrecking of a train."
And there is even more like "using chemical or biological materials to kill could also no longer result in the death penalty, nor could deaths related to treason or espionage. The death or injury of an unborn child could not result in the death penalty either."
Just looking at the list defies reason as to abolishment? The one crime that does jump out is the murder of a member of Congress. If I were one of the three Republican Congressmen that took that secret trip in order to obtain evidence about our foreign policy transgressions that could possibly end in "Treason" charges then I would watch my back. Why, because if this bill passes, then the President would be spared death for treason and if anyone assassinated those three for their part in his downfall, then those assassins would also be spared. You decide. The trip and the legislation came about within one week of each other.
"Conservative Lawmakers' secret trip to Mideast could foreshadow Obama's downfall".
The second was found on "Breitbart" and was titled
"Dem Bill would End Death Penalty for Espionage-Treason-Assassinations"
The question I have is this -- Are the two mutually exclusive events or are they inextricably linked?
I'm sure it hasn't escaped the attention of the readers as it pertains to my opening sentence and the use of the term "Obama's Socialist Cheerleaders". There are a lot of detractors that believe throwing bombs and accusing someone of something such as being a "socialist" is to dismiss the author as extreme; racist; conspiratorial or worst. That said, I intentionally used that phrase because it is widely believed that Obama does in fact have deep roots of socialist proclivities. More specifically thought, I used the term to describe the Democrats who put forth the Bill (HR 3741) to end the death penalty. The sponsors and co-sponsors of that bill are:
Rep. Donna Edwards (D) - MD (Sponsor)
Rep. Barbara Lee (D) - CA (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Henry Johnson (D) - GA (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. John Lewis (D) - GA (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Jose Serrano (D) - NY (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Elijah Cummings (D) - MD (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Janice Schakosky (D) - IL (Co-Sponsor)
Rep. Keith Ellison (D) - MN (Co-Sponsor)
Do not take my word for it, here is the list from the "Democrat Socialist of America" itself!
So, why do a bunch a socialists want to abolish the Death Penalty for Treason? After all, treason is just a matter of dates! It is of no surprise that it is a pet peeve of Democrats that America has a "Capital Punishment" statute on a Federal Level as well as in the States. That said, I find the timing of the two separate news items to be suspect. But, I will leave the readers to draw their own conclusions as to whether or not they are related. If they are, why? To speculate a little, one could say that they are doing it in order to spare their "Dear Leader" from the ultimate punishment if in fact the trip by the three members of Congress turn up with irrefutable evidence that Obama has committed "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the Middle East.
The very definition of "Treason" is to "give aid and comfort to America's enemies". So the question we must ask is this. Was Egypt (at the time the Muslim Brotherhood were in power) considered an enemy of America? The answer is -- Yes. The reason is because the Muslim Brotherhood has been on the State Department list of terrorist organizations and one can say by extension that they were elevated to "State sponsors of terror" when they came to power.
The other question has to do with Iran. Are they enemies of America. Again, the answer is Yes. They are on the State Department list of States that sponsor terror.
Finally, according to Breitbart -- "The Federal Death Penalty Abolition Act. (HR 3741) would "end the death penalty for assassination or kidnapping that results in the death of the president or vice president, and also ends it for the murder of a member of Congress."
The list goes on: "using a weapon of mass destruction, or murder done via torture, child abuse, war crimes, aircraft hijackings, sexual abuse, bank robberies or the willful wrecking of a train."
And there is even more like "using chemical or biological materials to kill could also no longer result in the death penalty, nor could deaths related to treason or espionage. The death or injury of an unborn child could not result in the death penalty either."
Just looking at the list defies reason as to abolishment? The one crime that does jump out is the murder of a member of Congress. If I were one of the three Republican Congressmen that took that secret trip in order to obtain evidence about our foreign policy transgressions that could possibly end in "Treason" charges then I would watch my back. Why, because if this bill passes, then the President would be spared death for treason and if anyone assassinated those three for their part in his downfall, then those assassins would also be spared. You decide. The trip and the legislation came about within one week of each other.
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Race baiters rejected in Chicago
A very promising thing happened in the City of Chicago (and not the windy kind being provided by Al Sharpton) -- An honest and open discussion about the problems that plague the crime ridden Chicago. On December 19th, Sharpton and company held a townhall meeting to discuss issues that would give him a racial anti-gun platform but instead was met with angry black constituents. It was truly amazing thing to watch. Watch here.
To hear angry blacks speak about "being trained to vote a certain way" or "It's not just the white people who are the problem, it's our elected officials" or even calling for "tea party townhalls" in the most affected neighborhoods "just like the Republicans hold".
Honesty broke out and the villagers are angry and restless.
To hear angry blacks speak about "being trained to vote a certain way" or "It's not just the white people who are the problem, it's our elected officials" or even calling for "tea party townhalls" in the most affected neighborhoods "just like the Republicans hold".
Honesty broke out and the villagers are angry and restless.
The Duck Call heard around the world
I would like to open this thread by making a declaration that constitutes my coming "out of the closet" -- "I am a married, heterosexual that has a personal relationship with God!" I am not the first to make this declaration. I follow the lead from Conservative Curmudgeon.
My faith took a long time to arrive as a good deal of my life was more based on scientific belief. I simply didn't believe if I could not "see it, taste it or touch" so to speak. I relied on proven, peer reviewed statistical data to form my opinions. So when it came to the subject of God I was essentially an agnostic. I did have some open mindedness that it was possible that God did exist, but that was small as I did not see much in the way of scientific evidence.
It wasn't until I read the "Bible Code" and the scientific proof, peer reviewed by esteemed Mathematicians around the globe, provided me the proof I needed. God does work in mysterious ways. In my case it was because of Eliyahu Ripps, Professor of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Now that I have made my declaration of faith it is now time to comment on the assault on it by those on the left. In some cases, the assault I speak of even constituted violent ones. The man that shot and killed a security guard at the "Family Research Council" premises comes to mind. The gunman was a "gay rights activist". Floyd Corkins, 28, punctuated his violent message by arming himself with posters and sandwiches from Chic fil a. As you recall, that fast food chain came under assault when their CEO advocated his belief in traditional marriage and was a financial supporter of the Family Research Council.
The gay community rose up and demanded a boycott of the restaurants but instead an outporing of support flooded in their doors.
Before I found my faith I found myself arguing with my brother who was a devout Christian. I pointed to TV evangelists as proof of exploiting believers into giving up their money all the while the preachers adorning themselves with Rolex's and Rolls Royces. I argued they were anything but pious.
Though I did not understand the ramifications of my brother's counter argument at the time, I surely do now. He told me that "yes" there are corrupt men and women that exploit religion for personal gain but in doing so are they not also spreading the word of God at the same time?
Jeannie DeAngelis at American Thinker put it like this -- "The more time the left spends vocally ruminating over what Phil Robertson said, the more the Word of God, which never comes back void, goes forth and impacts lost and hurting lives. A&E and GLAAD may not realize it, but thanks to mutual religious intolerance, they've assisted Phil Robertson in getting out the message that he was originally denounced for expressing. Let's not forget -- as with Balaam, if God has something to say, He will get a donkey to say it. And at present the message being sent clearly condemns homosexuality, but with it also comes the hope of God's unconditional love and forgiveness, and the free gift of salvation."
I do not pretend to know how the whole Duck Dynasty controversy will play out but I do know that it is already galvanizing the Christian Community just as they did with Chic fil a. At a time when the left is pushing religion out of schools, the public square and into basically the same closet the gays came out of they are advancing their lifestyles exponentially. It is obvious they are a minority as poll after poll and law after law is passed to preserve traditional marriage. Yet the incoherence and dementia like left hoists the Pope onto the cover of Time magazine as the person of the year. The left is allowed to teach our children, in our schools, on how to masturbate and the proper way to put on a condom yet the laws of child pornography is on the books do not apply to even mandatory reporters (which teachers are legally bound).
There is a reckoning coming and the land of Gammorah should be trembling.
My faith took a long time to arrive as a good deal of my life was more based on scientific belief. I simply didn't believe if I could not "see it, taste it or touch" so to speak. I relied on proven, peer reviewed statistical data to form my opinions. So when it came to the subject of God I was essentially an agnostic. I did have some open mindedness that it was possible that God did exist, but that was small as I did not see much in the way of scientific evidence.
It wasn't until I read the "Bible Code" and the scientific proof, peer reviewed by esteemed Mathematicians around the globe, provided me the proof I needed. God does work in mysterious ways. In my case it was because of Eliyahu Ripps, Professor of Mathematics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Now that I have made my declaration of faith it is now time to comment on the assault on it by those on the left. In some cases, the assault I speak of even constituted violent ones. The man that shot and killed a security guard at the "Family Research Council" premises comes to mind. The gunman was a "gay rights activist". Floyd Corkins, 28, punctuated his violent message by arming himself with posters and sandwiches from Chic fil a. As you recall, that fast food chain came under assault when their CEO advocated his belief in traditional marriage and was a financial supporter of the Family Research Council.
The gay community rose up and demanded a boycott of the restaurants but instead an outporing of support flooded in their doors.
Before I found my faith I found myself arguing with my brother who was a devout Christian. I pointed to TV evangelists as proof of exploiting believers into giving up their money all the while the preachers adorning themselves with Rolex's and Rolls Royces. I argued they were anything but pious.
Though I did not understand the ramifications of my brother's counter argument at the time, I surely do now. He told me that "yes" there are corrupt men and women that exploit religion for personal gain but in doing so are they not also spreading the word of God at the same time?
Jeannie DeAngelis at American Thinker put it like this -- "The more time the left spends vocally ruminating over what Phil Robertson said, the more the Word of God, which never comes back void, goes forth and impacts lost and hurting lives. A&E and GLAAD may not realize it, but thanks to mutual religious intolerance, they've assisted Phil Robertson in getting out the message that he was originally denounced for expressing. Let's not forget -- as with Balaam, if God has something to say, He will get a donkey to say it. And at present the message being sent clearly condemns homosexuality, but with it also comes the hope of God's unconditional love and forgiveness, and the free gift of salvation."
I do not pretend to know how the whole Duck Dynasty controversy will play out but I do know that it is already galvanizing the Christian Community just as they did with Chic fil a. At a time when the left is pushing religion out of schools, the public square and into basically the same closet the gays came out of they are advancing their lifestyles exponentially. It is obvious they are a minority as poll after poll and law after law is passed to preserve traditional marriage. Yet the incoherence and dementia like left hoists the Pope onto the cover of Time magazine as the person of the year. The left is allowed to teach our children, in our schools, on how to masturbate and the proper way to put on a condom yet the laws of child pornography is on the books do not apply to even mandatory reporters (which teachers are legally bound).
There is a reckoning coming and the land of Gammorah should be trembling.
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
New Obamacare Strategy
From the Obama website. The feminine male model in this ad is disturbing on too many levels. He was probably given Ritalin at age 3.
The best comment I read so far for this ad was "Wear cammies, drink scotch and talk about taking our country back"!
The best comment I read so far for this ad was "Wear cammies, drink scotch and talk about taking our country back"!
Merry Christmas from ALR
That's right I said Merry Christmas, not happy holidays! God bless all of you.....enjoy
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
When only the police have guns!
If anyone recalls this last September the NYPD opened fired on a man in NYC who was causing a disturbance and hit 2 women bystanders instead. The two officers that shot into the crowd while aiming at 250lb man thought he was reaching for a gun. There was no gun. Obviously these two officers missed the "situational awareness" part of the handgun course and perhaps didn't do so well on target practice either because let's face it, he was a rather large target.
Of course there are lawsuits pending, by the women, against the NYPD for their injuries but a funny thing happened on the way to saneville and the NYC District Attorney has filed charges against the man for causing the situation in which the women were injured. So the gist of the story is this -- "An unarmed man is prosecuted for shooting people.
I think if this actually succeeds we will see people being hauled off in paddy wagons from McDonalds because someone else has a heart attack and dies.
Of course there are lawsuits pending, by the women, against the NYPD for their injuries but a funny thing happened on the way to saneville and the NYC District Attorney has filed charges against the man for causing the situation in which the women were injured. So the gist of the story is this -- "An unarmed man is prosecuted for shooting people.
I think if this actually succeeds we will see people being hauled off in paddy wagons from McDonalds because someone else has a heart attack and dies.
Sunday, December 8, 2013
The Color of his Skin
Has anyone noticed Obama's feckless attempts to connect his persona to historical figures. The most recent is the death of Nelson Mandela. The media are scrambling to equate Obama's presidency to that of the anti-apartheid prisoner. It is despicable that they portrait Obama in this manner when in fact all he is doing is standing on the shoulders of those who have done great things without doing a damn thing to deserve it personally. Rosa Parks and Nelson Mandela would not be who they are if not for Obama. That is what they want us to believe. It's all about the color of Obama's skin and nothing to do with his character.
Remember the death of Rosa Parks. Again, it's about the color of his skin and not the content of his character.
The Democrats and Obama have compared him to Abraham Lincoln on many occasions yet he did not attend the Gettysburg address commemoration. He did pen a tribute, but even then omitted God from the actual speech.
Obama also failed to attend the anniversary tribute of John F. Kennedy at Arlington National Cemetery. What do these two historic figures, that the Democrats and Obama supposedly cherish, have in common? Both were assassinated. Perhaps Obama has a superstitious side to him.
The way things are going for Obama and his lawlessness he will actually be on a bus, heading to a prison cell of his own where he can actually play a martyr for real because if he is prosecuted it will be because of the color of skin and not the content of his character. The media will ensure this narrative regardless of the facts.
The truth of Obama is that he has done nothing as a Senator or as a President that can equate to success. The economy, jobs, Obamacare, foreign policy, domestic policy are all suffering as the clock ticks. Everything he has touted, touched, advocated and boasted are abject failures. He is NOT a champion of civil rights for blacks or any color. He is the most racially divisive figure the world has not seen since World War II.
Remember the death of Rosa Parks. Again, it's about the color of his skin and not the content of his character.
The Democrats and Obama have compared him to Abraham Lincoln on many occasions yet he did not attend the Gettysburg address commemoration. He did pen a tribute, but even then omitted God from the actual speech.
Obama also failed to attend the anniversary tribute of John F. Kennedy at Arlington National Cemetery. What do these two historic figures, that the Democrats and Obama supposedly cherish, have in common? Both were assassinated. Perhaps Obama has a superstitious side to him.
The way things are going for Obama and his lawlessness he will actually be on a bus, heading to a prison cell of his own where he can actually play a martyr for real because if he is prosecuted it will be because of the color of skin and not the content of his character. The media will ensure this narrative regardless of the facts.
The truth of Obama is that he has done nothing as a Senator or as a President that can equate to success. The economy, jobs, Obamacare, foreign policy, domestic policy are all suffering as the clock ticks. Everything he has touted, touched, advocated and boasted are abject failures. He is NOT a champion of civil rights for blacks or any color. He is the most racially divisive figure the world has not seen since World War II.
Obama's Box
Just as the fable Pandora opened the box, so too has Obama! Just like the kid who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar, so too are the Democrats!
Obama and the Democrats own the box that was once called Obamacare though they are desperately trying to change the name, paint over the box and want us to pretend we do not see it for what it is. This is typical behavior for them and in most cases in the past, has worked but this time too much evil has escaped for everyone to see and feel.
Enough of the analogies.
You know what I am saying. In order to get this passed into law (which by the way they are ignoring most everything codified) the Democrats bamboozled the people of the State of Minnesota and gerrymandered the deciding vote in getting Al Franken elected. Not one Republican has ever voted for it. Pelosi lost her gavel as a result of the force feeding and her infamous words "you have to pass this law before you can read what's in it" will continue to haunt her and them.
The Democrats have poured millions into campaign-like propaganda ever since in order to try to sway the masses that we actually will want this crap. All of that money and effort has not moved the public opinion on Obamacare. Yet they continue to tout we will come to love it. All of the lies about being able to keep your current insurance, your doctor and the affordability have further damaged their reputations. HHS has announced it's winner in the video contest. No lie, the winner named their video "Forget about the price tag"! Now we find out that Obama and Sebelius have met once in all this time in spite of all the problems.
Conservative estimates show that by December 23 (deadline for enrollment to ensure coverage Jan 1) 5 million will have their policies cancelled. Only 6% of those will have them restored and that does not include anyone who has not had insurance in the first place. That means the Democrats or Obama will not be able to find a rock large enough to hide behind.
More aptly said, however, is the article at American Thinker about what will happen once the employer mandate kicks in. It says -- "So far, the law applies to a relatively small number of people -- when it expands to cover employer mandates and more millions are thrown into the UFA pool, the disaster will snowball. As my friend DoT notes: "Once the employer mandate kicks in they'll be hunting Democrats with dogs in this country."
Obama and the Democrats own the box that was once called Obamacare though they are desperately trying to change the name, paint over the box and want us to pretend we do not see it for what it is. This is typical behavior for them and in most cases in the past, has worked but this time too much evil has escaped for everyone to see and feel.
Enough of the analogies.
You know what I am saying. In order to get this passed into law (which by the way they are ignoring most everything codified) the Democrats bamboozled the people of the State of Minnesota and gerrymandered the deciding vote in getting Al Franken elected. Not one Republican has ever voted for it. Pelosi lost her gavel as a result of the force feeding and her infamous words "you have to pass this law before you can read what's in it" will continue to haunt her and them.
The Democrats have poured millions into campaign-like propaganda ever since in order to try to sway the masses that we actually will want this crap. All of that money and effort has not moved the public opinion on Obamacare. Yet they continue to tout we will come to love it. All of the lies about being able to keep your current insurance, your doctor and the affordability have further damaged their reputations. HHS has announced it's winner in the video contest. No lie, the winner named their video "Forget about the price tag"! Now we find out that Obama and Sebelius have met once in all this time in spite of all the problems.
Conservative estimates show that by December 23 (deadline for enrollment to ensure coverage Jan 1) 5 million will have their policies cancelled. Only 6% of those will have them restored and that does not include anyone who has not had insurance in the first place. That means the Democrats or Obama will not be able to find a rock large enough to hide behind.
More aptly said, however, is the article at American Thinker about what will happen once the employer mandate kicks in. It says -- "So far, the law applies to a relatively small number of people -- when it expands to cover employer mandates and more millions are thrown into the UFA pool, the disaster will snowball. As my friend DoT notes: "Once the employer mandate kicks in they'll be hunting Democrats with dogs in this country."
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
American Citizen Armed Revolt
An expert testified today to Congress -- "He said that the precedent set by Obama could eventually lead to an armed revolt against the federal government.
On Tuesday, Michael Cannon, Cato Institute’s Director of Health Policy Studies, testified before a congressional committee about the dangers of the president’s legal behavior.
“There is one last thing to which the people can resort if the government does not respect the restrains that the constitution places on the government,” Cannon said. “Abraham Lincoln talked about our right to alter our government or our revolutionary right to overthrow it.”
“That is certainly something that no one wants to contemplate,” he continued. “If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws then they will conclude that neither are they.”
“That is a very dangerous sort of thing for the president to do, to wantonly ignore the laws,” Cannon concluded, “to try to impose obligation upon people that the legislature did not approve.”
Mr. Cannon indicates that - “If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws then they will conclude that neither are they.” This statement is ironic because if the people rise up they will be within the Constitution to do so and in fact not break the law in doing so.
On Tuesday, Michael Cannon, Cato Institute’s Director of Health Policy Studies, testified before a congressional committee about the dangers of the president’s legal behavior.
“There is one last thing to which the people can resort if the government does not respect the restrains that the constitution places on the government,” Cannon said. “Abraham Lincoln talked about our right to alter our government or our revolutionary right to overthrow it.”
“That is certainly something that no one wants to contemplate,” he continued. “If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws then they will conclude that neither are they.”
“That is a very dangerous sort of thing for the president to do, to wantonly ignore the laws,” Cannon concluded, “to try to impose obligation upon people that the legislature did not approve.”
Mr. Cannon indicates that - “If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws then they will conclude that neither are they.” This statement is ironic because if the people rise up they will be within the Constitution to do so and in fact not break the law in doing so.
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Kayne West addresses racism
In the fantasy world of Kayne West, Obama could not execute the policies he wanted to because he doesn't have the same connections as Jewish people.
He said -- "Man, let me tell you something about George Bush and oil money and Obama and no money. People want to say Obama can't make these moves or he's not executing. That's because he ain't got those connections. Black people don't have the same level of connections as Jewish people. Black people don't have the same connection as oil people.
You know we don't know nobody that got a nice house. You know we don’t know nobody with paper like that we can go to when we down. You know they can just put us back or put us in a corporation. You know we ain’t in situation. Can you guarantee that your daughter can get a job at this radio station? But if you own this radio station, you could guarantee that. That’s what I’m talking about.
Time to dissect!
Let's just forget for a moment that Obama's former Chief of Staff is Jewish. Or, say that one of his biggest fans is Jewish Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein who recently said it was embarrassing to be American because of that pesky 2nd Amendment. Or Michelle Obama friend David Frankel?
There isn't a lack of liberal Jewish people surrounding, giving and supporting a radical agenda that this President wants to impose.
Then Kayne indicates and laments that Obama doesn't have the oil money either.
Perhaps, if Obama and the fellow travelers such as Kayne bothered to stop bashing big oil, insurance, banking and wall street long enough to ask for their input maybe he would have some ears that listen. Instead it is just more excuses that tend to say, hey, Obama has no faults other than the fact he is black.
I was listening to a radio talk show on Monday that had Eric Erickson (RedState) as a guest and he indicated a profound sense of why Obama fails. It goes something like this:
Successful people surround themselves with successful people. A types hire and listen to other A types because they know they, personally, are very smart and are not afraid to listen to others just as smart. They are comfortable in the knowledge.
B Types (that aspire to be A types) tend to hire C and D types because they want everyone around them to think they are the smartest ones in the room. Obama is this type of individual. Much worse is the fact that Obama surrounds himself with sycophants that reinforce his self worthiness by agreeing with the fact they believe he is the smartest one in the room and never make an opposing opinion with anything he says or does.
It doesn't help that his cabinet is comprised of a historically low percentage (8%) of people who have real world business experience. 8%.
Kayne needs to keep telling himself and others that will listen to him that they are always the victim of fat old white guys who happen to be jewish.
He said -- "Man, let me tell you something about George Bush and oil money and Obama and no money. People want to say Obama can't make these moves or he's not executing. That's because he ain't got those connections. Black people don't have the same level of connections as Jewish people. Black people don't have the same connection as oil people.
You know we don't know nobody that got a nice house. You know we don’t know nobody with paper like that we can go to when we down. You know they can just put us back or put us in a corporation. You know we ain’t in situation. Can you guarantee that your daughter can get a job at this radio station? But if you own this radio station, you could guarantee that. That’s what I’m talking about.
Time to dissect!
Let's just forget for a moment that Obama's former Chief of Staff is Jewish. Or, say that one of his biggest fans is Jewish Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein who recently said it was embarrassing to be American because of that pesky 2nd Amendment. Or Michelle Obama friend David Frankel?
There isn't a lack of liberal Jewish people surrounding, giving and supporting a radical agenda that this President wants to impose.
Then Kayne indicates and laments that Obama doesn't have the oil money either.
Perhaps, if Obama and the fellow travelers such as Kayne bothered to stop bashing big oil, insurance, banking and wall street long enough to ask for their input maybe he would have some ears that listen. Instead it is just more excuses that tend to say, hey, Obama has no faults other than the fact he is black.
I was listening to a radio talk show on Monday that had Eric Erickson (RedState) as a guest and he indicated a profound sense of why Obama fails. It goes something like this:
Successful people surround themselves with successful people. A types hire and listen to other A types because they know they, personally, are very smart and are not afraid to listen to others just as smart. They are comfortable in the knowledge.
B Types (that aspire to be A types) tend to hire C and D types because they want everyone around them to think they are the smartest ones in the room. Obama is this type of individual. Much worse is the fact that Obama surrounds himself with sycophants that reinforce his self worthiness by agreeing with the fact they believe he is the smartest one in the room and never make an opposing opinion with anything he says or does.
It doesn't help that his cabinet is comprised of a historically low percentage (8%) of people who have real world business experience. 8%.
Kayne needs to keep telling himself and others that will listen to him that they are always the victim of fat old white guys who happen to be jewish.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Democrat Cowardice
Whodat running out the back door? Evie Hudak. Whodat you ask? She is the third Democrat in the great State of Colorado facing another historic recall effort against her for her brazen and ill conceived gun control grab. Two democrats already lost their seats, and face when they thought they could impose their will, grab our guns and insult our intelligence all in one midnight move.
So, instead of standing up for her beliefs as the other two losers did when they stood and faced the music, she, rumor has it, will resign her seat in order to save it from falling into Republican hands which will tip the majority in their favor.
Where is all that outside money and leftist anti-gunners coming to her rescue? Could it be because she is a woman? The democrats may think that her resignation will guarantee a Democrat majority (1 seat) until the next election but the thing is, they will have to face the wrath of gun lover voters in the next election anyway. Look for a little stronger showing from Republicans to take a large majority at that time. Gotta love them Coloradans.
So, instead of standing up for her beliefs as the other two losers did when they stood and faced the music, she, rumor has it, will resign her seat in order to save it from falling into Republican hands which will tip the majority in their favor.
Where is all that outside money and leftist anti-gunners coming to her rescue? Could it be because she is a woman? The democrats may think that her resignation will guarantee a Democrat majority (1 seat) until the next election but the thing is, they will have to face the wrath of gun lover voters in the next election anyway. Look for a little stronger showing from Republicans to take a large majority at that time. Gotta love them Coloradans.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Fat, Drunk and Stupid is no way to go through life
Remember those infamous words by Dean Wormer in the movie Animal House? I just saw a news article that was quoting Toronto's version of Fat, Drunk and Stupid. The "Crack" smoking mayor in Canada has been ridiculed for admitting to abusing Crack, then again for admitting he purchased the illicit drugs. Calls for his resignation echo throughout Canada.
Through his haze and stupor he had a moment of clarity and truth. In an interview, the "Chris Farley look-a-like said that "Obamacare was stupid"! He clarified the misconception about him when he said -- "I'm not a lefty, I'm a righty," the controversial mayor told The O'Reilly Factor correspondent Jesse Watters Monday, reports The Daily Caller. "Come on. Some of the stuff you guys are doing down there, to me — are you crazy?"
Looks like he still has a few brain cells left in the old brainpan.
Through his haze and stupor he had a moment of clarity and truth. In an interview, the "Chris Farley look-a-like said that "Obamacare was stupid"! He clarified the misconception about him when he said -- "I'm not a lefty, I'm a righty," the controversial mayor told The O'Reilly Factor correspondent Jesse Watters Monday, reports The Daily Caller. "Come on. Some of the stuff you guys are doing down there, to me — are you crazy?"
Looks like he still has a few brain cells left in the old brainpan.
Monday, November 25, 2013
America's Loyal Purge-a
I have written many times, as a US Military Veteran who took the oath to "uphold and defend" the US Constitution again all enemies foreign and domestic, to plead with our military commanders to do the same against this Administrations transgression against the same. I always believed that at some point active duty military may step in when a certain point was reached in order to uphold their oaths. I always believed that it would happen because I, any many more former military still regard this oath as having no expiration date. What I mean is, we former military still hold this oath as self evident. This is born out of the fact that we have seen the rise of "Oath Keepers" comprised of former (and active) military, and law enforcement banding together to publically state as much. Though many in the ranks of Oath Keepers have transitioned out of the service for their country they still actively voice this love of Constitution publically. This is why the Administration, through the DHS is demonizing them as potential domestic terrorists to be watched. They do not share, or care, about their oaths.
We have seen and heard of the Administration purging top military brass from the ranks of active duty for no justifiable reason except that it trumps up. The public downsizing that has occurred should have alarmed many in the military to reach this point of action in the forced removal and trials of lawless Administration members, up to and including the President of the US. Though this has not occurred as of yet, something has. "America’s Provisional Leadership Council" has been established by some of those highly decorated and lofty Generals who were at the end of the purges sword.
Their 8 point plan calls for the forced resignation of Obama and those transgressors. The link to this plan is here.
The Americans Project is riding to the rescue. I think that they should merge with Oath Keepers and take their show on the road. One thing is for sure, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the DHS will be branding these former military brass as agitators and provocateurs soon and will probably be tarred and feathered if not incarcerated for inciting Americans into grassroots action against them.
We have seen and heard of the Administration purging top military brass from the ranks of active duty for no justifiable reason except that it trumps up. The public downsizing that has occurred should have alarmed many in the military to reach this point of action in the forced removal and trials of lawless Administration members, up to and including the President of the US. Though this has not occurred as of yet, something has. "America’s Provisional Leadership Council" has been established by some of those highly decorated and lofty Generals who were at the end of the purges sword.
Their 8 point plan calls for the forced resignation of Obama and those transgressors. The link to this plan is here.
The Americans Project is riding to the rescue. I think that they should merge with Oath Keepers and take their show on the road. One thing is for sure, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the DHS will be branding these former military brass as agitators and provocateurs soon and will probably be tarred and feathered if not incarcerated for inciting Americans into grassroots action against them.
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Obama Dangerously
Same Sh*% different day. Obama supposedly was not able to attend the Gettysburg thingy because he was clacking away at his computer fixing Ocare. This too was exposed as a lie because his scheduling conflict that kept him away from the same past President he insists he channels was a speech he gave that told his fellow travelers that once he fixes what the Republicans broke, then they will have to rebrand and resell the product.
Caught in a daily web of lies (no pun intended) that are stacking up one atop the other that even Sigmond Freud would have a hard time analyzing, the President and his ilk are still blaming Republicans. The only person they haven't blamed yet is George Bush, but we all know they will at some point. Same bag of tricks, different day.
The most disturbing point of this lesson the Democrat Socialists are teaching Americans is how not to trust them again, ever. The President yesterday insists that there will be a period shortly after the fix to rebrand and resell. Same bag again. Remember Global Warming's rebranding to "Climate Change" when pesky facts got in the way of their narrative? Maybe they will also rebrand the "Democrat Party" to "You can Trust us more than anything else" party. The most disgusting aspect of this display of "sticktoitness" to such a failure that they own lock, stock and barrel is the fact that they know that the web portal is a fantasy come true for identity thieves and they want to rebrand it and sell it so we can be stolen from. They have crossed the threshold of incompetent to extremely dangerous and should not be trusted with finishing their current office let alone anything else they have created. It will fail and we are their intended victims.
Caught in a daily web of lies (no pun intended) that are stacking up one atop the other that even Sigmond Freud would have a hard time analyzing, the President and his ilk are still blaming Republicans. The only person they haven't blamed yet is George Bush, but we all know they will at some point. Same bag of tricks, different day.
The most disturbing point of this lesson the Democrat Socialists are teaching Americans is how not to trust them again, ever. The President yesterday insists that there will be a period shortly after the fix to rebrand and resell. Same bag again. Remember Global Warming's rebranding to "Climate Change" when pesky facts got in the way of their narrative? Maybe they will also rebrand the "Democrat Party" to "You can Trust us more than anything else" party. The most disgusting aspect of this display of "sticktoitness" to such a failure that they own lock, stock and barrel is the fact that they know that the web portal is a fantasy come true for identity thieves and they want to rebrand it and sell it so we can be stolen from. They have crossed the threshold of incompetent to extremely dangerous and should not be trusted with finishing their current office let alone anything else they have created. It will fail and we are their intended victims.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
While Obama sing's his legacy sinks
Michelle Obama sat for an interview with BET and said BHO is a man with Swag -- The interview was with media powerhouse Bow Wow!
Mrs. Obama also said that the president of the United States "sings all the time." She continued, "Oh, yes, he’s in the bathroom all the time just singing."
Either she is trying to put on a brave face in light of the never ending scandals, crises' and sheer panic from everyone one the left and those who carry their water, or they (Obama's) are living in an alter reality of fantasy and lollipops.
Right next to this headline on Drudge was the latest CBS poll that indicates the singing man's approval rating is now down to 37%. Obamacare polls have also dropped to 31% approve and 61% disapprove.
When you look back at a CBS poll result for GW Bush's final approval rating it was at 22%. Interestingly they also said the following about Obama:
"As for the incoming president, the CBS News poll also asked about expectations of President-elect Barack Obama. Sixty-eight percent think Mr. Obama will be a good or very good president - 25 points higher than expectations for Mr. Bush.
Nine in 10 Democrats expect Mr. Obama to be a good president, including 48 percent who think he will be a "very good" one. Republicans are less hopeful, but 38 percent still say Mr. Obama will be a good president."
How long will it take for Obama to surpass the other prolific government spending big government President?
Mrs. Obama also said that the president of the United States "sings all the time." She continued, "Oh, yes, he’s in the bathroom all the time just singing."
Either she is trying to put on a brave face in light of the never ending scandals, crises' and sheer panic from everyone one the left and those who carry their water, or they (Obama's) are living in an alter reality of fantasy and lollipops.
Right next to this headline on Drudge was the latest CBS poll that indicates the singing man's approval rating is now down to 37%. Obamacare polls have also dropped to 31% approve and 61% disapprove.
When you look back at a CBS poll result for GW Bush's final approval rating it was at 22%. Interestingly they also said the following about Obama:
"As for the incoming president, the CBS News poll also asked about expectations of President-elect Barack Obama. Sixty-eight percent think Mr. Obama will be a good or very good president - 25 points higher than expectations for Mr. Bush.
Nine in 10 Democrats expect Mr. Obama to be a good president, including 48 percent who think he will be a "very good" one. Republicans are less hopeful, but 38 percent still say Mr. Obama will be a good president."
How long will it take for Obama to surpass the other prolific government spending big government President?
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Can we ever "walkback" a "walkback"?
There have been many instances in the news these days where someone of a political stripe or media worthy individual has said something in the media (either MSM or social media) and has had to "walkback" their comments. This is the climate in which we live. After all we have free speech rights and with those rights come consequences that compel those who have spoken to try to unspeak them.
I think two of those recent examples of walk backs were done out of sheer political pressure mixed with a good dose of "political correctness" thrown in.
The examples I am about to give now, in hindsight, actually did not require a walk back at all because the statements made were spot on true. Also, in retrospect, they also provide another nail in the coffin of the Obama Administrations' parade of lies as well as lawlessness that is quickly coming to a point of public prosecution at the least and civil prosecution at the worst.
Example one:
CNN - Rep. Joe Wilson shocked many observers Wednesday night when he shouted, "You lie!" after the president denied that health care legislation would provide free coverage for illegal immigrants."
Why does anyone think that our elitist leaders are pushing so hard, right now, especially right now, to pass "immigration reform" (aka amnesty). Because if they do not, then the only hope for Obamacare to be salvaged is to sign up all those illegals who, if Congressional Republicans as well as Democrats are trying to legalize. It is a "Joe Wilson" self fulfilling prophesy. Paul Ryan is now pushing hard to help in this passage. Paul freekin Ryan.
Joe Wilson had walked back his outburst.
Example two:
Conservatives were outspoken in 2009 when the White House moved the Census Bureau from the Commerce Department to the, er, White House. Now, it appears that they were correct in their fears because the NY Post ran a story that exploded the news that the unemployment numbers one month prior to the election were falsified. Election fraud? IRS targeting conservatives? Benghazi Gate? Fast & Furious?
Instead of a "walk back" how about a "perp walk"!
I think two of those recent examples of walk backs were done out of sheer political pressure mixed with a good dose of "political correctness" thrown in.
The examples I am about to give now, in hindsight, actually did not require a walk back at all because the statements made were spot on true. Also, in retrospect, they also provide another nail in the coffin of the Obama Administrations' parade of lies as well as lawlessness that is quickly coming to a point of public prosecution at the least and civil prosecution at the worst.
Example one:
CNN - Rep. Joe Wilson shocked many observers Wednesday night when he shouted, "You lie!" after the president denied that health care legislation would provide free coverage for illegal immigrants."
Why does anyone think that our elitist leaders are pushing so hard, right now, especially right now, to pass "immigration reform" (aka amnesty). Because if they do not, then the only hope for Obamacare to be salvaged is to sign up all those illegals who, if Congressional Republicans as well as Democrats are trying to legalize. It is a "Joe Wilson" self fulfilling prophesy. Paul Ryan is now pushing hard to help in this passage. Paul freekin Ryan.
Joe Wilson had walked back his outburst.
Example two:
Conservatives were outspoken in 2009 when the White House moved the Census Bureau from the Commerce Department to the, er, White House. Now, it appears that they were correct in their fears because the NY Post ran a story that exploded the news that the unemployment numbers one month prior to the election were falsified. Election fraud? IRS targeting conservatives? Benghazi Gate? Fast & Furious?
Instead of a "walk back" how about a "perp walk"!
Obamacare and the 70% problem
As of today, we learn that 70% of the Obamacare website has yet to even been built. That's right, built. Let alone, tested, built.
Monday, November 18, 2013
FBI's 10 MOST WANTED
BERNADINE DOHRN
Remember her? This is the person who gave Obama his first campaign kickoff at her house in Chicago with fellow terror leader Bill Ayers.
In case you forgot, here is his FBI mug shot picture, followed by his recent photo and look at his continued defiance and non-repentance:
BILL AYERS then
BILL AYERS, now:
What's is he standing on?
The image was taken for the Chicago Magazine article (on 9/11/2001) no less titled "No regrets".
So, all of this imagery was brought to my mind this weekend when another image was posted on an article at "Canada Free Press" titled -- Northwestern's Patriotic Uniforms
For those who are lost in this irony, Northwestern University is where Bernadine Dohrn is Clinical Associate Professor at the law school there. I wonder if the unrepentant terrorist and his wife attended the game and if so, do you think they left early?
Remember her? This is the person who gave Obama his first campaign kickoff at her house in Chicago with fellow terror leader Bill Ayers.
In case you forgot, here is his FBI mug shot picture, followed by his recent photo and look at his continued defiance and non-repentance:
BILL AYERS then
BILL AYERS, now:
What's is he standing on?
The image was taken for the Chicago Magazine article (on 9/11/2001) no less titled "No regrets".
So, all of this imagery was brought to my mind this weekend when another image was posted on an article at "Canada Free Press" titled -- Northwestern's Patriotic Uniforms
For those who are lost in this irony, Northwestern University is where Bernadine Dohrn is Clinical Associate Professor at the law school there. I wonder if the unrepentant terrorist and his wife attended the game and if so, do you think they left early?
Sunday, November 17, 2013
The inept, corrupt and stupidity of Obama
What to do with the proposed "smartest guy in the room" when he does things that are so stupid it defies comprehension?
When the dear leader took office he immediately telegraphed to our enemies and all those terrorists we had been beating back in Iraq and Afghanistan that he was ending the military involvement and pulling our troops. All they had to do (enemies and terrorists) was to go to the nearest equivalent of a Starbucks and sit back and enjoy the coffee until such time they can fill the enormous vacuum left by our departure.
Telegraph sent and received because special envoys have been dispatched from those countries begging us for help because of a "resurgence" in "insurgents"!
Now, we have the debacle of the Obamacare rollout or fallout and what does this administration do today? He sends another telegraph to those who are working on fixing the problem.
"OBAMA TO CHANGE TEAM AFTER WEBSITE'S FIXED"
You know it is one thing to "root for failure" with this administration but he makes it so easy to do so. What do you think the "team" is going to do when they received Obama's latest telegraph? They will try to keep their jobs/paychecks as long as possible, meaning, the website will not be fixed anytime soon.
Can it get any more bizarre?
When the dear leader took office he immediately telegraphed to our enemies and all those terrorists we had been beating back in Iraq and Afghanistan that he was ending the military involvement and pulling our troops. All they had to do (enemies and terrorists) was to go to the nearest equivalent of a Starbucks and sit back and enjoy the coffee until such time they can fill the enormous vacuum left by our departure.
Telegraph sent and received because special envoys have been dispatched from those countries begging us for help because of a "resurgence" in "insurgents"!
Now, we have the debacle of the Obamacare rollout or fallout and what does this administration do today? He sends another telegraph to those who are working on fixing the problem.
"OBAMA TO CHANGE TEAM AFTER WEBSITE'S FIXED"
You know it is one thing to "root for failure" with this administration but he makes it so easy to do so. What do you think the "team" is going to do when they received Obama's latest telegraph? They will try to keep their jobs/paychecks as long as possible, meaning, the website will not be fixed anytime soon.
Can it get any more bizarre?
Saturday, November 16, 2013
BREAKING NEWS
For all of you out there in "Birther land" there are new developments coming out of the State of Georgia.
Here is the complete Amicus Brief submitted by the Alabama Democrat Party.
Here is the WH website that posted what is says is Obama's real Birth Certificate.
According to information, the Democrats filed the brief objecting to the appeal of the original case.
"McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish "inadmissible and not worthy of belief," they also stated "A county sheriff from Arizona is not an 'official source' of anything in Alabama." -- "Freedom outpost"
The documents that the Alabama Democrats have filed with their brief now include yet another different copy of Obama's Birth Certificate.
The case is sitting before Judge Roy Moore's court. You remember him, the Judge who refused to remove the 10 commandments from his court.
In a somewhat related bit of information, Sherriff Arapaos' Cold Case Posse is onto a much wider and deeper investigation that will make the Birth Certificate issue that they forensically show was forged by the WH website team. This new tact of the investigative offshoot from that original investigation promises to divulge the evidence they are currently collecting nationwide by their investigators.
Once divulged it will make the Birth Certificate scandal pale in comparison.
Here is the complete Amicus Brief submitted by the Alabama Democrat Party.
Here is the WH website that posted what is says is Obama's real Birth Certificate.
According to information, the Democrats filed the brief objecting to the appeal of the original case.
"McInnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public."
While the Alabama Democrats attacked the merits of the appeal, calling the evidence by McInnish "inadmissible and not worthy of belief," they also stated "A county sheriff from Arizona is not an 'official source' of anything in Alabama." -- "Freedom outpost"
The documents that the Alabama Democrats have filed with their brief now include yet another different copy of Obama's Birth Certificate.
The case is sitting before Judge Roy Moore's court. You remember him, the Judge who refused to remove the 10 commandments from his court.
In a somewhat related bit of information, Sherriff Arapaos' Cold Case Posse is onto a much wider and deeper investigation that will make the Birth Certificate issue that they forensically show was forged by the WH website team. This new tact of the investigative offshoot from that original investigation promises to divulge the evidence they are currently collecting nationwide by their investigators.
Once divulged it will make the Birth Certificate scandal pale in comparison.
Obama's early lies
The media has had so many chances to do investigative reporting on the man who became President without any of us knowing who or what he was. If they would have explored just a little this President and the Democrats would have been exposed and most of what is happening today could have been averted.
For instance, when Nanci Pelosi and the Democrats were asked by the media if she read the Obamacare law she laughed and boldly told them that everyone could find out what it says when it is passed into law. Well, it was passed by the Democrats alone and to this day they (media) haven't read it or interpreted it's intent. The media was more interested in carrying Obama's water than serving as watchdogs to the masters designs.
This has been the case since before he was elected and started spouting his lies, distortions, deflections and deviations.
We do know, from conservative sources, that Obama began his political career in the living room of his Hyde Park, Chicago neighbor Bill Ayres. The very house in which the Obama's resided in that Hyde Park neighborhood was purchased from Tony Rezco the convicted felon.
I speak of these early revelations of the type of individuals that the chronic and habitual liar we have come to know in Obama to amplify the media's malpractice in investigative reporting and to show that Obama is still engaged in the Chicago way of politics in spite of the fact that many of his longtime friends are now behind bars yet he still remains behind the "Resolute Desk" in the oval office.
The closest we came to exposing the high crimes and misdemeanors of Obama was in late 2007 and early 2008 when his Senate seat was up for sale, literally. If Obama got his way back then we would have seen the following:
1. Valerie Jarrett would have slid into his Illinois Senate seat instead of the White House advisory job she ultimately accepted.
2. Rod Blagojevich would have slid into the Cabinet post (HHS) instead of Kathleen Sebelius.
3. Jesse Jackson, Jr. would still be going to jail after his attempt to buy Obama's Senate seat for unrelated corruption charges.
Remember the term "pay for play" that was coined during the Blagojevich trial. It described the Chicago way of politics that switch political office holder seats, or appoints cronies and those who have allowed themselves to be extorted for political cash into other posts.
How is this different from the "pay for play" scenarios that have been visible so many times in this administration? Ambassador posts for Obama contributors, cushy jobs for Wall Street insiders that provided contributions to Democrat causes and no-bid contracts to friends of the Obama's that are at the root of the Obamacare website portal mess.
In spite of the rash of felons being perp walked into prison for this very dynamic in the State of Illinois it is business as usual in the WH. I think I would be as bold knowing I had the media behind me as well as a political lackey at the head of Justice.
Obama wasn't in office but a short time when the revelation that his staff was in secret discussions to place Jarrett in his old Senate seat. Obama denied this of course (one of his earliest lies) when Rahm Emannuel had already gone in front of camera's to explain he had. The whole thing was washed away when Obama's WH counsel Greg Craig performed an "internal investigation" and issued a report of findings that basically said nothing to see here, move along.
Greg Craig if you recall had a resume at the time that showed:
1. Represented John Hinckley, Jr. that resulted in an acquittal of attempted assassination based on mental reasons.
2. Special Counsel to Bill Clinton directing the defense against impeachment.
3. Represented the father of Cuban boy Elian Gonzalez that resulted in the boy being returned to Cuba.
4. Represented UN Secretary General Kofi Anan during the "oil for food" scandal (another pay to play scenario).
and wait for it........
5. Represented In 1977, he represented the first FBI agent ever to be indicted, John J. Kearney, who was accused of illegal wiretapping breaking and entering and mail opening in connection with the FBI investigation of the Weatherman.
There's that pesky weatherman connection again with Obama.
I believe that the domino's are about to fall as it pertains to Obama. Too many lies and too much treachery against the country that he purports to defend and represents. Perhaps the fundamental transformation can meet it's abrupt and timely end soon. The investigative journalism to follow in all things connected and surrounding Obama will reach many and hopefully set back those who have succeeded in destroying our constitutional freedoms for a more sinister socialist model of Alinsky and carried out in the Cloward-Piven strategy.
For instance, when Nanci Pelosi and the Democrats were asked by the media if she read the Obamacare law she laughed and boldly told them that everyone could find out what it says when it is passed into law. Well, it was passed by the Democrats alone and to this day they (media) haven't read it or interpreted it's intent. The media was more interested in carrying Obama's water than serving as watchdogs to the masters designs.
This has been the case since before he was elected and started spouting his lies, distortions, deflections and deviations.
We do know, from conservative sources, that Obama began his political career in the living room of his Hyde Park, Chicago neighbor Bill Ayres. The very house in which the Obama's resided in that Hyde Park neighborhood was purchased from Tony Rezco the convicted felon.
I speak of these early revelations of the type of individuals that the chronic and habitual liar we have come to know in Obama to amplify the media's malpractice in investigative reporting and to show that Obama is still engaged in the Chicago way of politics in spite of the fact that many of his longtime friends are now behind bars yet he still remains behind the "Resolute Desk" in the oval office.
The closest we came to exposing the high crimes and misdemeanors of Obama was in late 2007 and early 2008 when his Senate seat was up for sale, literally. If Obama got his way back then we would have seen the following:
1. Valerie Jarrett would have slid into his Illinois Senate seat instead of the White House advisory job she ultimately accepted.
2. Rod Blagojevich would have slid into the Cabinet post (HHS) instead of Kathleen Sebelius.
3. Jesse Jackson, Jr. would still be going to jail after his attempt to buy Obama's Senate seat for unrelated corruption charges.
Remember the term "pay for play" that was coined during the Blagojevich trial. It described the Chicago way of politics that switch political office holder seats, or appoints cronies and those who have allowed themselves to be extorted for political cash into other posts.
How is this different from the "pay for play" scenarios that have been visible so many times in this administration? Ambassador posts for Obama contributors, cushy jobs for Wall Street insiders that provided contributions to Democrat causes and no-bid contracts to friends of the Obama's that are at the root of the Obamacare website portal mess.
In spite of the rash of felons being perp walked into prison for this very dynamic in the State of Illinois it is business as usual in the WH. I think I would be as bold knowing I had the media behind me as well as a political lackey at the head of Justice.
Obama wasn't in office but a short time when the revelation that his staff was in secret discussions to place Jarrett in his old Senate seat. Obama denied this of course (one of his earliest lies) when Rahm Emannuel had already gone in front of camera's to explain he had. The whole thing was washed away when Obama's WH counsel Greg Craig performed an "internal investigation" and issued a report of findings that basically said nothing to see here, move along.
Greg Craig if you recall had a resume at the time that showed:
1. Represented John Hinckley, Jr. that resulted in an acquittal of attempted assassination based on mental reasons.
2. Special Counsel to Bill Clinton directing the defense against impeachment.
3. Represented the father of Cuban boy Elian Gonzalez that resulted in the boy being returned to Cuba.
4. Represented UN Secretary General Kofi Anan during the "oil for food" scandal (another pay to play scenario).
and wait for it........
5. Represented In 1977, he represented the first FBI agent ever to be indicted, John J. Kearney, who was accused of illegal wiretapping breaking and entering and mail opening in connection with the FBI investigation of the Weatherman.
There's that pesky weatherman connection again with Obama.
I believe that the domino's are about to fall as it pertains to Obama. Too many lies and too much treachery against the country that he purports to defend and represents. Perhaps the fundamental transformation can meet it's abrupt and timely end soon. The investigative journalism to follow in all things connected and surrounding Obama will reach many and hopefully set back those who have succeeded in destroying our constitutional freedoms for a more sinister socialist model of Alinsky and carried out in the Cloward-Piven strategy.
Friday, November 15, 2013
In spite of
In spite of Obama and his socialized plan for insurance reform the inherent American phenomena known as free markets are about to have a baby, and a really big baby at that. A whopper. I know what you are thinking, is Rosey getting stoned again? Here me out. Then you decide whether the free market system is set to run loose, like a pack or herd or whatever you call a large group of horses thundering over the meadowland.
This baby we will call "free market reform"!
OK, this is going to get a little lengthy because the whole Gordian knot is so intertwined I must untangle it with thought.
First, we as individuals have never had "free market insurance" of any kind. Think about this for a moment. The purse strings, money, and lots of it was all in the hands of the employer. As long as we have been alive here in America we sought out employers, hopefully the largest and deepest pocketed one to gain the best coverage that their size and strength could leverage. If you went to work for say, 3M and they had roughly 500,000 employees that they provide coverage for then you knew they could leverage better policies (groups of policies actually) for their employers than say, mom and pop restaurant who could not afford such luxuries. These reason the employers provided healthcare, dental, vision, ADD&D, life, etc was to get the best workers the field could provide. It was built into their "cost of doing business" models. You would pay a percentage of the policy premiums and they would cover the rest.
I don't know about all of you, but all my life I have always had a wary eye on my employer because they had my most sensitive health information by being the ones who provided the coverage.
In spite of Obamacare employers have been looking for those tendrils to cut now they have the excuse to in order to save cost. This is not evil, it is free market. Why should an employer continue to pay, as a cost of doing business, anything when there is a new law of the land call Obamacare?
They shouldn't, and won't.
Mulling that over for awhile you now see that the money is shifting away from the employers and healthcare. This is now a powerful dynamic.
Think about it, now that the employer has sent out those cancellations of employee coverage by either 1) cutting your hours in order to comply with the law so they don't have to provide the cost, or
2) cutting your access through them because they know that Obamacare will do it.
OK, remember that when all of us had these policies that "we wanted to keep" and no longer can they weren't free for us, were they? No, some of us pay a hefty monthly expense out of our own paychecks (through payroll deductions). This money will no longer be taken through electronic means and will be now retained by us, individually.
Sure, we don't have insurance at the moment but we are a little richer because we don't. When I say a little richer I mean, a lot richer. Most Americans that purchase these policies through your employer do so in groups, or types. Medical, Dental, Life, ADD&D and so on. In my case, my last employer was deducting $375.00 per month from my wages for the policy I chose for myself and my family. That is a $4,500.00 a year raise. That is $4,500.00 a year now in my pocket as an individual that will make my own decision of who get's that cold hard cash. Free market.
No longer do the insurance companies woo big business for the business, they have to woo me as an individual. They have to compete for my money, from me. This is going to open up the medical insurance market wide open to competitiveness we have not seen, ever. HMO's will have to compete with Dr. Silver who has a private practice down the street. This correction of free markets will be huge and just another example of American exceptionalism. No longer will the government, big businesses and lobbyists control 1/6th of the entire economy. We will.
This baby we will call "free market reform"!
OK, this is going to get a little lengthy because the whole Gordian knot is so intertwined I must untangle it with thought.
First, we as individuals have never had "free market insurance" of any kind. Think about this for a moment. The purse strings, money, and lots of it was all in the hands of the employer. As long as we have been alive here in America we sought out employers, hopefully the largest and deepest pocketed one to gain the best coverage that their size and strength could leverage. If you went to work for say, 3M and they had roughly 500,000 employees that they provide coverage for then you knew they could leverage better policies (groups of policies actually) for their employers than say, mom and pop restaurant who could not afford such luxuries. These reason the employers provided healthcare, dental, vision, ADD&D, life, etc was to get the best workers the field could provide. It was built into their "cost of doing business" models. You would pay a percentage of the policy premiums and they would cover the rest.
I don't know about all of you, but all my life I have always had a wary eye on my employer because they had my most sensitive health information by being the ones who provided the coverage.
In spite of Obamacare employers have been looking for those tendrils to cut now they have the excuse to in order to save cost. This is not evil, it is free market. Why should an employer continue to pay, as a cost of doing business, anything when there is a new law of the land call Obamacare?
They shouldn't, and won't.
Mulling that over for awhile you now see that the money is shifting away from the employers and healthcare. This is now a powerful dynamic.
Think about it, now that the employer has sent out those cancellations of employee coverage by either 1) cutting your hours in order to comply with the law so they don't have to provide the cost, or
2) cutting your access through them because they know that Obamacare will do it.
OK, remember that when all of us had these policies that "we wanted to keep" and no longer can they weren't free for us, were they? No, some of us pay a hefty monthly expense out of our own paychecks (through payroll deductions). This money will no longer be taken through electronic means and will be now retained by us, individually.
Sure, we don't have insurance at the moment but we are a little richer because we don't. When I say a little richer I mean, a lot richer. Most Americans that purchase these policies through your employer do so in groups, or types. Medical, Dental, Life, ADD&D and so on. In my case, my last employer was deducting $375.00 per month from my wages for the policy I chose for myself and my family. That is a $4,500.00 a year raise. That is $4,500.00 a year now in my pocket as an individual that will make my own decision of who get's that cold hard cash. Free market.
No longer do the insurance companies woo big business for the business, they have to woo me as an individual. They have to compete for my money, from me. This is going to open up the medical insurance market wide open to competitiveness we have not seen, ever. HMO's will have to compete with Dr. Silver who has a private practice down the street. This correction of free markets will be huge and just another example of American exceptionalism. No longer will the government, big businesses and lobbyists control 1/6th of the entire economy. We will.
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Dear Leader has spoken
Forget about the "socialist slip" with Joe the Plumber when Obama said he should help the little guy on the ladder beneath him. If there was any doubt what-so-ever about his Marxist/socialist proclivities it can now be put to rest.
Obama rode to the rescue on his great white steed today in jaw dropping fashion. No only did he make it very clear that HIS idea (which of course wasn't) to allow us rubes to keep our policies, as he suggested but we misunderstood, but the manner in which he has placed the socialist yoke on the insurance industry was striking.
He has basically ordered them to accept his terms in such a way that will be utterly impossible to do but he has set them up to be the straw man when they can't.
Not only has he directed private and public companies to do his bidding but these were the very same ones that he demonized in the first place. The arrogance he exhibited was astounding when he refused to even consider "dragging us back to the dark ages" in further talk of scrapping the law entirely.
Well, dear leader, the talk is still going on and it is coming a lot from your ranks. Panic has set in and it won't go away because you wish it or order it to. The first domino in many are about to fall and once it does the rest of those non scandals are going to come home to roost.
Obama rode to the rescue on his great white steed today in jaw dropping fashion. No only did he make it very clear that HIS idea (which of course wasn't) to allow us rubes to keep our policies, as he suggested but we misunderstood, but the manner in which he has placed the socialist yoke on the insurance industry was striking.
He has basically ordered them to accept his terms in such a way that will be utterly impossible to do but he has set them up to be the straw man when they can't.
Not only has he directed private and public companies to do his bidding but these were the very same ones that he demonized in the first place. The arrogance he exhibited was astounding when he refused to even consider "dragging us back to the dark ages" in further talk of scrapping the law entirely.
Well, dear leader, the talk is still going on and it is coming a lot from your ranks. Panic has set in and it won't go away because you wish it or order it to. The first domino in many are about to fall and once it does the rest of those non scandals are going to come home to roost.
Monday, November 11, 2013
Obamacare's lack of enthusiasm
Obama's media machines have been in overdrive ever since the idea of the law was uttered from his lips to God's ears (and ours). He has lied to everyone who doesn't have Cochlear implants and those too that this law is what is right for us because He knows better than we. In spite of all of the money, effort and "campaign style" messaging to improve our understanding that it is just right for us the law has remained an unpopular idea and product. Poll after poll after poll after poll has shown that the level of Americans who do not want or need His healthcare reformed social engineered belief system has not moved one iota upward in Obama's favor. Not one!
What is wrong with us. He has spent and spent, talked and talked, lied and lied and yet he knows what is right for us. He has even apologized on our behalf that we didn't understand him well enough to know that the millions who have lost or soon to lose those policies are really what is best. You know, what we have chosen.
The Ponzi scheme of Obamacare is predicated upon the absolute need for the young and healthy to pay into the system up front to take care of the sick and old today. We have heard all the news reports of the Obamacare website challenges (de-emphasization added by me) but what about those State exchanges with their own websites that have eagerly awaited the great Ones program?
"President Barack Obama's healthcare reform has reached only about 3 percent of its enrollment target for 2014 in 12 U.S. states where new online health insurance marketplaces are mostly working smoothly, a report released on Monday said.
States with functioning exchanges have signed up 49,100 people compared with the 1.4 million people expected to be enrolled for 2014, according to the report by healthcare research and consultancy firm Avalere Health." -- Reuters
I say we have a lack of enthusiasm for Obamacare but then again we always have.
What is wrong with us. He has spent and spent, talked and talked, lied and lied and yet he knows what is right for us. He has even apologized on our behalf that we didn't understand him well enough to know that the millions who have lost or soon to lose those policies are really what is best. You know, what we have chosen.
The Ponzi scheme of Obamacare is predicated upon the absolute need for the young and healthy to pay into the system up front to take care of the sick and old today. We have heard all the news reports of the Obamacare website challenges (de-emphasization added by me) but what about those State exchanges with their own websites that have eagerly awaited the great Ones program?
"President Barack Obama's healthcare reform has reached only about 3 percent of its enrollment target for 2014 in 12 U.S. states where new online health insurance marketplaces are mostly working smoothly, a report released on Monday said.
States with functioning exchanges have signed up 49,100 people compared with the 1.4 million people expected to be enrolled for 2014, according to the report by healthcare research and consultancy firm Avalere Health." -- Reuters
I say we have a lack of enthusiasm for Obamacare but then again we always have.
Obama's apology, about that
The President has been criticized for giving his "non-apology" to the American public. I too am guilty of such criticism on this site. First, it is my ardent belief that a President of the United States should never be in such a position to render an apology. It is HIS job to ensure that his policies, words, deeds and actions do not harm those that he has sworn to serve. If it becomes apparent that he feels compelled to apologize for something he caused then he and his administration has been weakened to a point that he is no longer effective to serve us.
When he sat in front of America to apologize he said the following:
"I am sorry that they are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me."
While it is true that the statement he made above was in context of the train wreck roll out of the Obamacare website, it can also aptly be applied to just about everything he has done since 2008 (his assurances). For instance --
President Obama to the unemployed: "We are going to be doing everything we can to create the environment where the private sector can come in and start creating jobs. But, I'm not any more satisfied than they are and until they can find a job, I expect to held accountable."
HE assures that every man, woman and child in America that needs a job will get a job and he will not rest until that occurs. Does golfing or vacations constitute rest? But hey, just insert the following:
"I am sorry that they are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me."
Next, the following quote from Obama actually falls into two different categories (Iran and Benghazi):
“I will not hesitate to use force when it is necessary to defend the United States and its interests,”
Obama was saying this in context to assuring Israel so they wouldn't strike Iran in 2012. Well Israel didn't strike, because of this assurance and now the French have actually scuttled Obama's secret deal with Iran to lift sanctions.
In regards to Benghazi, I would like to know whether an Embassy full of American diplomats considered American soil and should be defended by force if attacked?
Of course it is, and should, but wasn't.
When he sat in front of America to apologize he said the following:
"I am sorry that they are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me."
While it is true that the statement he made above was in context of the train wreck roll out of the Obamacare website, it can also aptly be applied to just about everything he has done since 2008 (his assurances). For instance --
President Obama to the unemployed: "We are going to be doing everything we can to create the environment where the private sector can come in and start creating jobs. But, I'm not any more satisfied than they are and until they can find a job, I expect to held accountable."
HE assures that every man, woman and child in America that needs a job will get a job and he will not rest until that occurs. Does golfing or vacations constitute rest? But hey, just insert the following:
"I am sorry that they are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me."
Next, the following quote from Obama actually falls into two different categories (Iran and Benghazi):
“I will not hesitate to use force when it is necessary to defend the United States and its interests,”
Obama was saying this in context to assuring Israel so they wouldn't strike Iran in 2012. Well Israel didn't strike, because of this assurance and now the French have actually scuttled Obama's secret deal with Iran to lift sanctions.
In regards to Benghazi, I would like to know whether an Embassy full of American diplomats considered American soil and should be defended by force if attacked?
Of course it is, and should, but wasn't.
Well the oceans of discontent are rising and YOU are powerless to stop it.
Saturday, November 9, 2013
Time for a Rinoplasty
Let’s just put aside a moment the ever mounting list of
lies that Obama has coming out of his mouth.
There is a gage that monitors all of them which is called the “Pinocchio
meter”. The more lies told, the longer the
nose grows.
I think it is time to put a spotlight on the prominent proboscis
that the Republican Establishment has been growing also. It is time for a Rinoplasty.
The establishment Republicans have lost their way a long
time ago and we are now being told that they are in it to win it (meaning the
Senate and White House). The only way
that their advisors advise us, is to do it with a big tent and bipartisan
cooperation with a moderate, middle of the road, tack.
They say it is the only way. This tack brought us losing Presidential
candidates the likes of John McCain and Mitt Romney. Tell me how that moderation went for you, yet
you keep insisting it’s the only way to win.
So what is the NRSC saying these days? On November 5th, Brad Dayspring
(NRSC Strategist) – “Our mission is
simple: winning. That means conservatives. That means pro-biz that means Tea
Party. EVERYONE.”
The nose get’s longer
and longer.
It is time for a
Rinoplasty.
Let’s ask Ken
Cuccinelli. The New York Times explains
the moderate GOP leaders this way – “The party leaders pushing for changes want
to replace state caucuses and conventions, like the one that nominated Mr.
Cuccinelli, with a more open primary system that they believe will draw a
broader cross-section of Republicans and produce more moderate candidates.”
I know we should take
whatever the NYT espouses because they have a prominent proboscis as any other
in recent memory but there is a truth to it.
They report that an open
primary will draw a broader cross-section of “moderate” candidates. This, at first glance appears to grow their
noses longer because the NRSC website clearly states “Dedicated to building aConservative Senate!”
Once again, the nose
grows.
You don’t have to look much further past the NRSC’s snub of Cuccinelli to
see past the lies. The NRSC backed two
other candidates recently, over a more conservative choice. The first was none other than Arlen Specter. You remember him. In April 2009 he was up for re-election in
Pennsylvania. What did the NRSC do? “The Senate Republican campaign operation formally voiced its
support for Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter in a letter to
Keystone State Republicans asking them to support the incumbent in his 2010
re-election bid. Specter is facing a tough primary campaign as more conservative members of the GOP are lining up to defeat him in the states April 2010 primary.” – WSJ
Specter defected to the Democrats in an attempt to keep his Senate seat. He lost to Joe Sestak (D) in the primaries and then to Pat Toomey (Conservative R).
It is wise to remember that Specter was a longtime Democrat before switching to Republican (Moderate R).
The other moderate candidate that the NRSC backed was Charlie Crist (Moderate R) from Florida.
When Crist lost to Marco Rubio (Conservative R) of Tea Party fame he then pulled a “Specter” and switched parties to the Democrat side.
Crist said the following after defeated by Rubio and switch hitting -- In August of this year, Crist announced his support for Mr. Obama’s reelection, and scored himself a prime speaking slot at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C.
“What changed is the leadership of the Republican Party,” Crist told the Tampa Bay Times in a phone interview Friday night. “As I said at the convention, I didn’t leave the Republican Party, it left me. Whether the issue was immigration, or education, or – you name it – the environment. I feel at home now.” – The RightScoop
So, after Presidential candidates McCain and Romney and Senate Candidates Specter and Crist the only thing that is more prominent on their proboscis is blood.
Friday, November 8, 2013
Obama apologizes that YOU misunderstood HIM
The non apology is classic. He apologized that we rubes didn't understand the law enough to know they had our best interest at hart though their words betrayed it.
This of course is another lie that sits atop yet another he gave when he told Americans that any bill or law that made his way through Congress will be debated and the text will be put out there for all to read. So the debates between Republicans never happened as they were shut out of negotiations every step of the way and told this is the result of the election. They won, you lost. Next, the bill was placed out for all to see at the very last moment without anyone, including Congressional Repubes to see what it said. When Democrat Nanci Pelosi was asked, she said laughingly that she would find out after it was passed along with the Public.
So, when the President apologizes that we weren't smart enough to know that they know better about our healthcare it was mainly due to the above mentioned dynamics. Most of all it was passed in the dead of night without any comments or debates and then signed into law without any lawmakers (the ones who crafted it also) knowing its contents.
So, Mr. President you can keep your hollow words of contrition because we still aren't buying your snake oil salesman lies. You have no credibility nor do you have any integrity.
This of course is another lie that sits atop yet another he gave when he told Americans that any bill or law that made his way through Congress will be debated and the text will be put out there for all to read. So the debates between Republicans never happened as they were shut out of negotiations every step of the way and told this is the result of the election. They won, you lost. Next, the bill was placed out for all to see at the very last moment without anyone, including Congressional Repubes to see what it said. When Democrat Nanci Pelosi was asked, she said laughingly that she would find out after it was passed along with the Public.
So, when the President apologizes that we weren't smart enough to know that they know better about our healthcare it was mainly due to the above mentioned dynamics. Most of all it was passed in the dead of night without any comments or debates and then signed into law without any lawmakers (the ones who crafted it also) knowing its contents.
So, Mr. President you can keep your hollow words of contrition because we still aren't buying your snake oil salesman lies. You have no credibility nor do you have any integrity.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Obama lies, America Dies
The video that condenses the lies he has spoken. Warning this video may induce vomiting and severe depression
Note: I still have about 30 "Obama lies America Dies" bumper stickers to give away. You just need to comment on this post and send me an email with your name and address and I'll drop it in the mail. Please note once supplies are gone, so is this offer.
Note: I still have about 30 "Obama lies America Dies" bumper stickers to give away. You just need to comment on this post and send me an email with your name and address and I'll drop it in the mail. Please note once supplies are gone, so is this offer.
To Catch a liar
Pinning the tail on the Donkey
Obama and the Democrats have been exposed for the liars that they are. So, what do pathological liars do best? They layer the lies with more lies. What a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive. Obama stood in front of the camera's on 30 different occasions, not to mention other venues, and had the first lie immortalized in stone. Irrefutable, undeniably caught telling millions of Americans that "If you want to keep your current health insurance policy, you can -- Period!"
So, when Americans started to receive their notices that insurers sent advising their policies were being cancelled it was all according to his plan. The gifted orator could simply spin his way by denying and lying all the while the MSM has his flank.
Now, with millions poised to lose their coverage if the Obamacare website doesn't activate and enroll them the pressure is building because his new lie has this dynamic woven into it --
"
If we had allowed these old plans [to continue]… then we would have broken an even more important promise — making sure that Americans gain access to health care that doesn’t leave them one illness away from financial ruin,” he announced.
“So the bottom line is, is that we are making the insurance market better for everybody"
A couple of things come to mind here. First "If we had allowed these old plans" indicates malice that they never intended for them to continue. Second, with millions of American actually losing their health care instead of "making sure that Americans gain access to health care" is a contradiction. When the calls for legislation to grandfather these millions to ensure they will not lose their coverage which will certainly come up because of intense political pressure will Obama sign on the dotted line? What do you think?
Obama and the Democrats have been exposed for the liars that they are. So, what do pathological liars do best? They layer the lies with more lies. What a tangled web we weave when we first practice to deceive. Obama stood in front of the camera's on 30 different occasions, not to mention other venues, and had the first lie immortalized in stone. Irrefutable, undeniably caught telling millions of Americans that "If you want to keep your current health insurance policy, you can -- Period!"
So, when Americans started to receive their notices that insurers sent advising their policies were being cancelled it was all according to his plan. The gifted orator could simply spin his way by denying and lying all the while the MSM has his flank.
Now, with millions poised to lose their coverage if the Obamacare website doesn't activate and enroll them the pressure is building because his new lie has this dynamic woven into it --
"
If we had allowed these old plans [to continue]… then we would have broken an even more important promise — making sure that Americans gain access to health care that doesn’t leave them one illness away from financial ruin,” he announced.“So the bottom line is, is that we are making the insurance market better for everybody"
A couple of things come to mind here. First "If we had allowed these old plans" indicates malice that they never intended for them to continue. Second, with millions of American actually losing their health care instead of "making sure that Americans gain access to health care" is a contradiction. When the calls for legislation to grandfather these millions to ensure they will not lose their coverage which will certainly come up because of intense political pressure will Obama sign on the dotted line? What do you think?
Monday, November 4, 2013
Why is impossible to educate our children
We have all heard the term "dumbing down" education. We all know that the Democrats have hijacked the education system and have kept our children from succeeding. We all know that illiteracy rates are enormous and we lag behind other developed nations of the world when we spend more on education than any other.
Is it intentional?
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams --
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
". . . whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that, whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them right."
Me thinks it is intentional as to impede the attraction to notice when things get so far wrong -- as it is in today's America......
Is it intentional?
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams --
"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
". . . whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government; that, whenever things get so far wrong as to attract their notice, they may be relied on to set them right."
Me thinks it is intentional as to impede the attraction to notice when things get so far wrong -- as it is in today's America......
Naked and near defeat, Part IV
In the last installment of "Naked and Near Defeat, Part III" I pointed out that the whole premise of Obamacare to sustain itself is placed on the presumption that the age group 18-34 buy the policies that they do not need (nor want). I marveled at the level of need placed on this age group that is surely meant to fail. The trust in the young to sustain the old, at their expense. Misguided trust given the very nature that today's youth are lazy (for the most part) and selfish beyond belief. I guess that the Obama administration feel that they are stupid and pliable given the lefts indoctrination of children through college in our education centers. I think the socialists actually believe they have spent decades molding these minds into good little collectivists. They, after all, were the first to hit the streets to give the Occupy Wall Street movement, movement.
It is not by chance that Obama, when his popularity began to dwindle back in 2009, he has attended so many of his appearances at Colleges across America. He wasn't filling stadiums anymore, but filling an auditorium at a left leaning indoctrination center gave him the photo optics that he was still relevant. Starting in January 2012, Obama increased his appearances on campus by 175%. In fact, Obama has appeared on campus 1 out of every 10 days since his Administration began. Yep, he is placing all his chips on this age group and it shows.
Again, Obamacare's success is placed on the backs of the young. So, when they aren't taking some college course on different ways to achieve an orgasm or mix gender studies they are going to studiously going to reach into their wallets for the wealth redistribution efforts, right? In my last installment I showed the study where college age kids were all for wealth redistribution, until it came to them. They are generous with the 1%ers money, but not their own. First, when Obama visited Iowa State University he boasted about his policy that allowed most of those in his audience to stay on their parents insurance plans. Here, they look at it as more freebies because after all they aren't paying for it their parents are. 7 million youngsters in all when he gave that speech. What he did not tell them though was they had to either be unemployed or underemployed to qualify. Again, no problem for them. At the time of that speech more than half of them, according to statistics were just that -- unemployed or underemployed. For those who do work and do not qualify, or do not have parents that have insurance they saw their "college insurance" premiums skyrocket 1,112% because of Obamacare mandates. Those who do have parents to cover them, their insurance rates increased by thousands of dollars.
What has Obama actually done for them? Let's take a little look:
High unemployment or underemployment
Student loans increased by 25% under Obama
Job market that is decimated once they leave college
This means that once they are no longer on the parents teat, they will have to be on the Governments teat. The only problem with that thought is it is them that Obama and the socialists are relying upon for their money to redistribute to those who are not healthy.
It is not by chance that Obama, when his popularity began to dwindle back in 2009, he has attended so many of his appearances at Colleges across America. He wasn't filling stadiums anymore, but filling an auditorium at a left leaning indoctrination center gave him the photo optics that he was still relevant. Starting in January 2012, Obama increased his appearances on campus by 175%. In fact, Obama has appeared on campus 1 out of every 10 days since his Administration began. Yep, he is placing all his chips on this age group and it shows.
Again, Obamacare's success is placed on the backs of the young. So, when they aren't taking some college course on different ways to achieve an orgasm or mix gender studies they are going to studiously going to reach into their wallets for the wealth redistribution efforts, right? In my last installment I showed the study where college age kids were all for wealth redistribution, until it came to them. They are generous with the 1%ers money, but not their own. First, when Obama visited Iowa State University he boasted about his policy that allowed most of those in his audience to stay on their parents insurance plans. Here, they look at it as more freebies because after all they aren't paying for it their parents are. 7 million youngsters in all when he gave that speech. What he did not tell them though was they had to either be unemployed or underemployed to qualify. Again, no problem for them. At the time of that speech more than half of them, according to statistics were just that -- unemployed or underemployed. For those who do work and do not qualify, or do not have parents that have insurance they saw their "college insurance" premiums skyrocket 1,112% because of Obamacare mandates. Those who do have parents to cover them, their insurance rates increased by thousands of dollars.
What has Obama actually done for them? Let's take a little look:
High unemployment or underemployment
Student loans increased by 25% under Obama
Job market that is decimated once they leave college
This means that once they are no longer on the parents teat, they will have to be on the Governments teat. The only problem with that thought is it is them that Obama and the socialists are relying upon for their money to redistribute to those who are not healthy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)