Blue Man Group stand aside, her comes the "Pink Glove" group!

Sit Down, and prepair to enjoy battling cancer!  In the infamous words of Lynyrd Skynard "TURN IT UP"!

Rangle asks for "more time"!

Now that the investigation portion of this dispicable character has finally wormed its way to a conclusion after years of footdragging and delay tactics by those on the left who claimed to have opened a new chapter in political ethics in Washington Rangle is set to go to trial.  We must not forget those who have repeatedly come forward to protect his political backside and have given him a pass in order for him to remain the "Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee" -- namely Nanci Pelosi.

Now that all the delay is over and he stands naked in front of a "softcore" media establishment, Rangle is asking for more time.  I say that we should give him more time -- more time behind bars.

Will Arizona become the “new Alamo?”

Governor Jan Brewer the new Commander in Chief!


In an interesting argument, Arizona is on firm “war footing” if the State wishes to engage in War with Mexico. What? Wait just a minute – hear me out.

U.S. Constitution - Article 1 Section 10 (Read Clause 3)

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

In March 2010 a prominent Arizona rancher was murdered on his property. At the time of his killing authorities found (the day before) 290 pounds of marijuana on his property and tracked footprints back to 8 illegal immigrants and arrested them. According to Fox News –  “Giffords said if Krentz's killing is connected to drug cartels or smugglers, the federal government must respond appropriately.


"All options should be on the table, including sending more Border Patrol agents to the area and deploying the National Guard," Giffords said.


Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard said government has a clear responsibility to aid law enforcement resources at all levels along the border.


"I call on our federal and state governments to work together to bolster the law enforcement resources needed to better protect Arizonans living on the border," Goddard said.


Meanwhile, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer joined U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in calling for federal officials to send more National Guard troops to the Mexican border.”

That was in March and this week Obama sent a token order to send 1,200 National Guard to the border and only half of which will go to Arizona.

In April 2010 a Pinal County Deputy Sheriff was shot and wounded by fire from an illegal drug smuggler with an AK-47. According to AZ Family news – “According to Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu, Puroll had been following a group of five men who were transporting drugs. One of the suspects allegedly hid while the others moved on, and Puroll continued to follow the group. Around 4:00 p.m. the suspect ambushed Puroll and shot at him, grazing his left side above his abdomen.


"They've become more aggressive," Babeu said, referring to the ambush. "They're always armed, but we've never had this happen."

US Federal Government authorities have failed to address the problem on every level and in most cases refuse to do so. It is even more distressing that the Mexican Government is aiding and abetting the invasion of their nationals into our sovereign (I use this term loosely) nation. In June 2010, Mexico opened a satellite “Consular” office on the Island of Catalina to specifically issue illegal invaders “matricular ID Cards”. According to the Washington Examiner – “The Mexican government is opening a satellite consular office on Catalina Island -- a small resort off the California coast with a history of drug smuggling and human trafficking -- to provide the island's illegal Mexican immigrants with identification cards, The Washington Examiner has learned.


The Mexican consular office in Los Angeles issued a flier, a copy of which was obtained by The Examiner, listing the Catalina Island Country Club as the location of its satellite office. It invites Mexicans to visit the office to obtain the identification, called matricular cards, by appointment.”


"Handing out matricular cards to Mexicans who are not in this country legally is wrong no matter where it's done," he said. "But on Catalina it will do more damage. It's a small island but there's evidence it's being used as a portal for illegals to access mainland California."

So, as Eric Holder and the US Dept. of Justice sue the State of Arizona to scrap the new law they should take into consideration that Arizona is on sound Constitutional footing in declaring war on Mexico (as a State) and deploying troops to combat the armed and dangerous invaders to our southern border.

Compulsory Education & Compulsory Gun Control

What keeps Liberals up at night?


Public Schooling is not about education and Gun Control is not about curtailing crime –

It is about controlling the message and the masses. I found that a more apt description of Public Schools is the moniker “Public Hatcheries” as progressives seek to take and mold young minds in the ways of “Saul Alinsky” and “Homosexuality”.

On many fronts in the area of education there is a focused and concerted attack by progressives. These attacks are focused on home-schooling, sex-ed, vouchers and charter schools and come from powerful Unions, Main Stream Media outlets, professors from the ivory halls of collegiate education as well as non-profits and NGO’s.

The venom that these individuals and the organizations they come from are very explicit in making their beliefs more mainstream as the former “veil” is lowered now that they are more emboldened. For instance:

“The husbands and wives in these families feel themselves to be under a religious compulsion to have large families, a homebound and submissive wife and mother who is responsible for the schooling of the children, and only one breadwinner. These families are not living in romantic, rural, self-sufficient farmhouses; they are in trailer parks, 1,000-square-foot homes, houses owned by relatives, and some, on tarps in fields or parking lots. Their lack of job skills, passed from one generation to the next, depresses the community’s overall economic health and their state’s tax base.” – Robin West, Professor – Georgetown University

It gets better (or worse if you are a parent):

“Parents in many states have full authority, free of all state oversight, to determine the content of their children’s education,” a situation almost as unendurable as life in a 1,000-square-foot house. Professor West writes longingly of the golden age when practically all education was conducted under the tutelage of the state and opting out of the system was forbidden — and “parents who did so were criminals.”

This attitude that the State should be the sole practitioner in what your own children are taught is typical of the venom and statist dogma the liberals have, for so long now, gone unchecked.

Likewise, the gun control advocates who have been so busy trying to wrest our guns from our hands have their minions in full force ridiculing the recent Supreme Court Decisions (Heller & McDonald) that the right to bear arms extends to us, well, little people who don’t know any better.

For instance, The Washington Post headline that screamed “The Supreme Court Gun Decision Moves Us toward Anarchy” by David Ignatius. Mr. Ignatius had this to say:

“My biggest worry with Monday’s Supreme Court decision is that by ruling, in effect, that every American can apply for a gun license, the justices will make gun ownership much more pervasive in a society that already has too many guns. After all, if I know that my neighbor is armed and preparing for Armageddon situations where law and order break down (as so many are — just read the right-wing blogs) then I have to think about protecting my family, too. That’s the state-of-nature, everyone for himself logic that prevails in places such as Lebanon, Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Here the writer is overtly concerned about those who possess guns “legally”, who go through the proper procedures in applying for a license as pervasive and dangerous. He couldn’t help himself in bashing the “right-wing” blogs either but again there is truth hidden between his lines of vitriol. If the “right wing” blogs are so overtly concerned about the break down of law and order, or in his words Armageddon situations then he must be concerned enough to think about arming himself too. If he is so concerned about protecting himself and his family against law abiding citizens, then why not against criminals who would do harm to his family?

It is all about control and power. Rush Limbaugh said it eloquently when he said that conservatives (those who favor education alternatives to state run indoctrination and adherence to the US Constitution) are the “Party of NO as well as the Party of KNOW”!

If you have knowledge (other than that the State feeds you) and you are also adequately armed then the grassroots are a danger to their quest for total domination.

Another example of this power grab against the grassroots was the speech Michele Obama gave just prior to the Obama’s vacation in Maine about childhood obesity and her comment that dessert is not a right, yet the first image we saw of Obama in Maine was of him gobbling down an ice cream cone. I guess he didn’t get the message or maybe it was just that he is better than the rest of us. It started with Trans fat and the outlawing of fast food restaurants in certain cities to the attempt to ban salt and now sugar. To even consider that the State in essence is criminalizing eating of food the most oppressive power grab yet. It only gets worse unless of course you are on you way home from a home schooling session and decided to stop at McDonalds packing your 357, then you have a fighting chance.

A DemoKKKrat history lesson!

When the racists call others racist!


Here is a brief history lesson about racism in the United States and its progression through time thanks to Michael Zak:

1) the Ku Klux Klan was established by the Democratic Party

a. the Republican Party and a Republican President, Ulysses Grant, destroyed the KKK with their Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871.

2) The Ku Klux Klan was reborn in the early 20th century by Democrat President Woodrow Wilson with the movie premier (held in the White House) of “The Birth of a Nation”.

3) The KKK so dominated the 1924 Democratic Convention that Republicans, speaking truth to power, called it the Klanbake!

4) In the 1930s, a Democrat President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, appointed a Klansman, Senator Hugo Black (D-AL), to the U.S. Supreme Court.

5) The notorious police commissioner Bull Conner, who attacked African-Americans with dogs and clubs and fire hoses, was both a Klansman and the Democratic Party’s National Committeeman for Alabama.

6) Starting in the 1980s, the Democratic Party elevated a recruiter for the Ku Klux Klan, Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), to third-in-line for the presidency.

The former Grand Dragon of the KKK, Byrd was rewarded by becoming the longest serving US Senator in US history. His death also ushered another record in the history books when his body was placed in the Senate Chambers to lie in state. This has never before occurred with any Senator.

So, when the NAACP, Democrats and socialists say that Republicans and the Tea Party movement, who align themselves with American principles – racist, they are trying to rewrite history to elude their guilt for standing with those who are – racist…..

2010 - Year of the "Pro-Life" women

We have been treated to the recent polling data that has a remarkable amount of women candidates who are running for office in 2010 at every level of politics.  The most famous of which is Carly Fiorina who is taking on the Abortion queen herself, Barbara Boxer in the California Senate race.  Another Pro-Life woman is leading another abortion friendly Senator in the State of Nevada in which candidate Sharon Angle is ahead of Obama's favorite lap dog, Harry Reid.

The resurgence in life respecting women are a welcomed trend, but more so when they directly take out a pro-abortion incumbent.  All of this redefining "feminism" to include the choice of life is ultimately leading to the most famous of Pro-life women of late -- Sarah Palin who has yet to decide if she will run for President in 2012......

Justice partially served, but justice all the same!

Today, in a New York Courtroom a Judge has increased the jail time for the traitorous, jihad loving leftist lawyer Lynne Stewart to a term of 10 years (the prosecution sought 15) which was an increase to the paultry 28 month sentence she received in her 2005 trial.  Now, maybe she will die behind bars instead of the comfort of her American bed in her American home which she sold to the blind Islamic Terror leader who was convicted of the bombing of the twin towers during the Clinton years.

She bears a striking resemblance to Elena Kagan, dost she not?

Obama and the Titanic!

The ship of State is taking on water!


I posted an article the other day marveling at the recent news conference held by the White House Spokesman (Baghdad Bob Gibbs) when he, for the first time, told the truth.

The truth he told was that the House of Representatives were in trouble and that the Democrats would lose their majority. Of course it did not take long for Obama to scold him (for truth telling) and to counter his message with the “he misspoke” one.

Today, when perusing the headlines my attention focused on a Financial Times article titled “Obama facing growing credibility crisis”. I have learned long ago to pay attention to “key words” in article titles and in the body of the text of them as the MSM has a way of using certain verbiage to diminish (or amplify) twist bad news (or good) to lend their political hand to this Administration.

For instance, when the MSM has to report “bad” employment figures it does so preceding the bad news with a word like “unexpected” or “unforeseen” to make it appear to be an anomaly versus real world reality, like those who are actually standing in the unemployment line experience.

The title of the article is another example of this helping hand lent by the MSM. Though the title is actually factual as it is supported by polling data, but the article makes it appear to be a recent development when in fact Obama (and the public) has seen his polling data continue to fall since his inauguration. It is as though the magic number (40% approve) is the start of the credibility crisis. When 60% of Americans disprove of the job, or credibility of his Presidency then I think the magic number that should have triggered this article is (49%) approve.

The article is replete with the distaste for the truth. For instance, a snipet taken from it says:

“Add to that the continuing woes of Harry Reid, the Senate Democratic majority leader, in Nevada, where the Republican party’s recent nomination of Sharron Angle, a far-right and highly eccentric Tea Party supporter, appear to have had no positive effect on Mr Reid’s prospects, and the Grand Old party has a good shot at taking control of both houses of Congress. Worse for Mr Obama, political scientists say that at this stage in the calendar, there is almost nothing he can do about it.”

Here the author paints Sharron Angle as “a far right and eccentric Tea Party supporter” and the Republicans as the “Grand Old Party” and the use of these labels in describing the candidate and the party as “out of the mainstream (eccentric) and outdated (Grand “Old” party) are far too obvious.

Another example in this article is the following:

“Astonishingly, 55 per cent of citizens think Mr Obama is a “socialist” against only 39 per cent who do not share that diagnosis. The same poll shows 48 per cent support for Republicans against just 42 per cent for Democrats. The numbers are eerily similar to 2006, except that it was George W. Bush’s Republicans who were on the receiving end four years ago.”

The use of the word “Astonishingly” is laughable. When did the media stop doing their jobs? Any third grade student recognizes “socialism” when they see it and Obama fits that bill perfectly in spite of the MSM’s non reporting of it.

Since taking off, Mr. Obama has socialized Medicine, Banks and Financial Institutions, Education and other aspects of the “free market system” in the name of crisis. To say it is “astonishing” is journalist malpractice at its core.

The reason why this administration has failed the economic, jobs and quite frankly public opinion is because he IS a socialist and more accurate is the fact his administration is filled with like minded un-American, anti free-market and anti-business people who hail from Unions, Universities and Community Organizer groups who have historically opposed the American Way.

Townhall erupts in disgust over Congressman feigning ignorance on Black Panther dismissal!

I guess that since the Tea Party crowd is again being labelled as racist by the NAACP and Michelle Obama calling for blacks to "bring it up a notch" against the tea party this Congressman from California should have felt his answer would just slide on by without recrimination.  The woman at the microphone had the issue framed correctly, which again shows that the constituents are on top of issues that the MSM is failing to report.  It is a pleasure to see this idiot get blasted, he should have......

Where is Osama Bin Laden?

This is a question that the Democrats (in time for the elections) have been pumelling the Republicans (and of course GW Bush).  I think it time we ask the very same question this time directed at the Democrats (before and in time for the November mid term elections).

So Democrats - you have had control of the House and Senate since 2006 (for those Democrats who are math challeged it is 4+ years) and the White House since 2008 (again for the math challenged 1+ years) and what, no Bin Laden? 

You have offered everything to the extreme Muslim Community up to and including NASA and the carrots aren't working?  Maybe you can offer him a primetime MSMBC slot alongside Oberman & Mathews so he can get his message across easier than the cave system he has occupied for the last 9+ years.  Hopefully, once you have signed an executive order allowing amnesty for illegals, it will finally allow him to enter this country free and unfettered to get his message of peace and love out to an adoring, albeit minority of Americans like the New Black Panthers who have applauded him.

New Black Panther Party press conference

It was the racist George Bush and John McCain that prompted their call to intimidate voters and end up on the butt end of a Federal Civil Rights lawsuit, but it was the Black Eric Holder (their words not mine) that came to their rescue.  When will the jihaidst radical warrior wannabe's of the left ever learn that their words of celebration and in your face rhetoric will come back to bite you.....



The legal case is nowhere near being filed away in the dusty drawers of some Federal Courthouse basement.  The political fallout of a racial politicized dismissal and a two tiered Justice Department that will only uphold Federal Civil Rights laws when the offenders are White against Black is only beginning.  When the Justice Department dropped the case the Justice Department made erroneous and factually incorrect statements, on the record, about how high this decision went because we now now Holder and Obama were briefed. 

The uproar is only beginning to gain momentum in spite of the MSM non-reporting the issue.

Update:  If you need to see the true nature of this "terrorist organization" called the New Black Panther Party that the Holder, Obama Administration is attempting to roam free to intimidate and wage their own jihad, just look at the same individual (Shabazz) in 2002.  Remember that 9/11 occurred less than 1 year prior to this video clip:

Happy Fourth of July - relfection after the article!

Ooh, socialist donuts!

Yesterday, I posted this article found in the Canadian on-line news site “The Globe”. I was so profoundly disgusted by this “revered and highly awarded” individual’s venomous take on America that I wanted everyone to read it for what it was – delusional.


The old axiom “chew on for a day before you decide” applies here because that is exactly what I did. Over breakfast, my wife and I discussed the article and as Americans the “bread and butter” issues we discuss over our mealtimes together should be a microcosm of what other patriotic, conservative Americans (who are the majority) discuss over meals, around water coolers at work and anywhere we congregate.

We are fiercely patriotic, Christian and ascribe to the embedded notion that America’s Constitution is to be revered, respected and followed. We believe in “legal immigration”, freedom, liberty and the vision that we are to leave America to our children in such a way that they will have more than we, when we depart.

We listen to Glen Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin and the host of other conservative talk radio personalities who have stepped up to fill the void of information (truth) that our Main Stream Media refused to give us and most of all we consider ourselves active “tea party members”. That said, we have discussed the path that America has traveled and the trajectory it course has taken since the middle of Bush’s second term. That’s right, we believe that our discourse with the so-called conservatives began under Bush (we blame him). Though we applaud his handling of national security issues, we deride him for his blatant out of control fiscal policies and his misguided attempt to give amnesty for illegal immigrants.

The discourse discussions had quickly changed in tone and content with the election of Barrack Obama and the elevation of the Democrats in both the House and Senate. The tone of our talk was now of fear of transformation and the complete disintegration of America as we have come to love in our lifetime. The one thing that I have consistently told my wife in the discussion was that in the end “America will persevere”! I have told her that America (the men & women across the country) will never let it happen. I have told her that what we have taken for granted (freedom, liberty and the bedrock fundamental principles of our founding fathers) will reassert itself as the pressure from the socialist transformation tries to take hold. I liken the socialist dream of this transformation to that of a “splinter” in America’s body. It is foreign and festering and the body is in the process of rejecting it naturally as our body would reject a splinter. The body America simply does not accept these principles that have been forced into us because it goes against everything we have set into place in this experiment called America. The wound that began with corrupt and weak Republicans is now a fully blown infection that the Democrats have furthered with their lies, distortions and forceful thuggery. We Americans reject this and thus we are the anti-bodies fighting to reject this internal invader called “socialism”.

Now that a day has passed since I posted this article from Jeffrey Simpson I will address the content in the context of what I have just articulated:

"We can only hope that our American friends enjoy their national holiday weekend. Let them wave their flags, enjoy their picnics and show their love of country, because they need a holiday.

It is disturbing these days for the country’s friends to watch the Great Republic’s politics, to wonder about its economy, to tremble at its deficits, and to shake their heads at its Supreme Court that has struck down corporate contribution limits in politics and reaffirmed the right to bear arms, to the intense joy of the gun lobby.

This opening statement exposes the author quite profoundly as he is openly disdainful of the America in which my wife and I (as well as the majority of other American’s) ascribe. Mr. Simpson exposes his hatred for those who show national pride by his comment of flag waiving, picnics and love of country diatribe. He can only hope WE take a holiday from our beliefs because this is the underlying sentiment he talks of.


It is furthered by his next paragraph – his hostility towards our court for reaffirming two of our bedrock principles freedom of speech (corporate contributions in politics) and our right to bear arms. This is evident by the false and deceptive attack on business. The thing he does not understand or refuses to understand is that corporations are made up of people (individuals) and as such the freedoms of our constitution extend to them also. The other misunderstanding is the deflection of the intense joy to a “lobby group” when in fact it is the American public who is breathing a collective sigh of relief that the Supreme Court has finally placed our right to bear arms back into our arms as individuals. The left have tried to bastardize the legal system through legalese and legislative fiat to take away this right for many years now.

The United States gave itself the most gifted President in several generations, handed his party a majority in both houses of Congress, only to watch his presidency be swamped by the doleful legacy of the Bush years, a worldwide recession and its parlous aftermath, and a ferocious Republican opposition bent on a search-and-destroy mission of his presidency.

Once again Obama is the tip of the “splinter”. To call him the “most gifted President” in several generations is misguided. The over the top vocabulary he uses (Doleful and Parlous) underscore the continued hatred of Bush and the blame they continue to throw at his feet given the fact that he admits the majority status of his beloved Obama and his socialist brethren in both houses of Congress (since 2006). You can say Bush contributed to the out of control spending but the economy and its “parlous aftermath” are a direct result of the control of the Democrats since 2006 (remember its mid 2010) and the 4+ years of their legislation and largess. Finally, the ferocious opposition of the Republicans is not an apt description either. They have stood in a complete and unified voice of opposition to the Healthcare bill, cap and trade further bail out measures being forced upon America but to say we are “bent on a search and destroy mission” is melodramatic because the author equates “ferocious opposition” to personal destruction of the President.

To make matters worse, the war in Afghanistan, into which President Barrack Obama has poured thousands of additional soldiers and billions of borrowed dollars, is going poorly. As The Economist belatedly recognized this week, “America and its allies are losing in Afghanistan.”

The U.S. commander there, Stanley McChrystal, was sacked for impolitic remarks about various high officials in the Obama administration, a dismissal even the choleric Republicans did not criticize.

His replacement, David Petraeus, somehow has to salvage something from the Afghan mess, at a time when Americans are growing increasingly weary of that war, now into its ninth year.

The very best that Americans (and allies) might hope for is to inflict sufficient damage on the Taliban in the next year that some insurgents might be inclined to negotiate inclusion in an Afghan government. To say that this is a long shot understates the odds.

The Pakistanis are already assuming an American departure and defeat, and are therefore looking to strengthen ties with the insurgents and the Afghan government of Hamid Karzai, so that they, and not the Indians, will have a more important influence on the government in Kabul.

The “America is losing the war” rhetoric is a tired one. The fierce opposition the author describes in the section above this one disappears to show that McChrystal’s firing was a just one but he still couldn’t help but call the Republican “Choleric”. I especially liked the “Obama has poured thousands of additional soldiers” into the war when the truth is he was feckless, indecisive and had to be dragged into that decision against the wishes of his far left constituency.

The U.S., far away, burdened with debt, its public having turned against the war has already imposed a deadline for beginning some kind of withdrawal next year. Time is therefore running against the Americans, as are its allies, some of whom want out next year, including Canada, the Netherlands and Poland.

It is this Obama deadline that has emboldened the Taliban. The coalition of the unwilling “Canada, Netherlands and Poland” is the only ones he could cite for those who want out next year vs. finishing what we went their do.

What to do about Afghanistan will be the subject of intensive debate at year’s end, after the mid-term elections, the prospects for which colour everything in political Washington.

The mid-term elections do colour everything in political Washington, this much is true. It is the only thing keeping those Democrats who believe they have a modicum of a chance of re-election from doing anything stupid. But, once the elections are over and the Democrats (and left leaning Republicans) lose their majority then the lame ducks will be even more dangerous to America as they will have nothing else to lose and will not be bound to their constituents any longer.

It had been hoped, for example, by those who want action on climate change that the U.S. Senate might produce an energy and environment bill that the President could sign. Nothing seems likely now, given the stout opposition of the Republicans to any serious measures, including a cap-and-trade system. Democrats, too, are divided, with legislators from the coal- and oil-producing states protecting their industries. One of these Democrats just died, Senator Robert Byrd, a pork-barreler par excellence from West Virginia, who used to oppose action against acid rain.

Here the author is lamenting at the “global warming” failure to convince us argument. Again, the descriptor “stout opposition by Republicans” is humorous. At least he says that some Democrats also are divided, but he describes the opposition minded Democrats as “big oil and energy” lap dogs. The true description of those Democrats in opposition are “cowards” because they know their political lives are at stake because the majority of the opposition Democrats (Blue Dogs) are from and were elected by conservative constituents.

In this, as in much else, what happens or does not in the U.S. directly affects Canada. The Harper government has said it will follow any U.S. measures against greenhouse gas emissions. But if the U.S. Congress is unable to decide anything, what does the Canadian government do? Given the Harper government’s lassitude toward climate change action, this result might suit the Conservatives, if not the country.

The immense borrowing requirements of the U.S. – requirements that stretch over the horizon – are the single most destabilizing, or at least worrisome, of all the factors at play in the world’s economy. And no country is more exposed to the ups and downs of the U.S. economy than Canada.

Those U.S. borrowing requirements are daily sapping the influence of the U.S. worldwide, and heightening all the international uncertainties about deflation/inflation, high unemployment, sluggish growth, the volatility of the U.S. dollar.

Last weekend, Mr. Obama lent his name to a G20 declaration calling for halving deficits by 2013-14, a statement easy for him to make, but impossible for him to fulfill without congressional approval.

In the House and Senate, no appetite exists for doing more than nibbling at the edges of the deficit/debt problem, certainly not before the mid-term elections and very likely not thereafter. Without taking aim at the defense budget and considering higher taxes, all debate about the deficit/debt is an illusion wrapped in rhetoric.

As stated above, the economy is owned lock, stock and barrel by the Democrats who have been the majority in power since 2006 regardless of the blame Bush argument. The author again, is lamenting that he believes we Americans will not cut our defense budgets (a favorite of Democrats who want to decimate our military strength) and will not impose higher taxes (again a favorite of Democrats and socialists who are anti-business and pro government).

At the state level, governments constitutionally required to balance budgets are slashing everywhere: welfare, universities, health, children’s programs.

Corporate profits and industrial production are recovering in the U.S. That’s the good news. The discouraging news is that consumers remain hesitant, unemployment is high, the housing market remains awful, and the country’s fiscal situation is appalling.

This last section takes the cake! Again, the author has the disdain of our Constitution requirements. Notice the “slashing” everywhere comment is focused on the socialists four favorites (Welfare, Universities, Health and of course the oft mentioned “children’s” programs).


Finally, his information of corporate and industrial production recovery is another dishonest bone being thrown for the benefit of the “most gifted President of the last several generations” but the truth is what he ends with – “consumers remain hesitant, unemployment is high, the housing market remains awful, and the country’s fiscal situation is appalling.”

Happy Fourth of July to them. They need it."

What this article really transmits is the desperation before the death of the Democrat Socialist party of America just prior to the Mid-term elections. The Democrats and those aligned with them in the MSM (as is the author of the Globe article) are seriously depressed about their utopian dream unraveling before their eyes. It goes to show that America’s spirit cannot be lied, cheated or beaten into submitting to false and foreign behavior in the most cherished “Golden City of the Hill”! Lastly my wife has a suggestion for this particular author as well as the Democrats in General – “quit your daytime job!”

Jeffrey Simpson books (need I say more):

• 1980 - Discipline of Power, winner of the 1980 Governor General's Award for Non-Fiction.
• 1988 - Spoils of Power
• 1993 - Faultines, Struggling for a Canadian Vision
• 1996 - The Anxious Years
• 2000 - Star-Spangled Canadians
• 2001 - The Friendly Dictatorship
• 2007 - Hot Air: Meeting Canada's Climate Change Challenge (co-authored with Mark Jaccard and Nic Rivers)

Notice the progression of his writing:
Discipline of Power, Spoils of Power, Faultlines, Struggling for Canadian Vision, The Anxious Years, Star Spangled Canadians, The Friendly Dictatorship and finally Canada's Climate Change!

This lays out the socialist agenda in its timelines that mirror exactly what has transpired up to and including its failure to allure the masses.

If you have the stomach, you need to read this garbage!

Article posted on The Globe newsite titled "Happy Fourth of July - America Needs it! by Jeffrey Simpson

Warning, the content will make your head explode like a mortar fired firework display.  I hope your gag reflex is not a weak one because you will need all the strength you can possible muster to keep from projectile vomiting.  I would suggest once you read the article which I have linked to their site, feel free to leave a comment -- I did.

"We can only hope that our American friends enjoy their national holiday weekend. Let them wave their flags, enjoy their picnics and show their love of country, because they need a holiday.


It is disturbing these days for the country’s friends to watch the Great Republic’s politics, to wonder about its economy, to tremble at its deficits, and to shake their heads at its Supreme Court that has struck down corporate contribution limits in politics and reaffirmed the right to bear arms, to the intense joy of the gun lobby.

The United States gave itself the most gifted President in several generations, handed his party a majority in both houses of Congress, only to watch his presidency be swamped by the doleful legacy of the Bush years, a worldwide recession and its parlous aftermath, and a ferocious Republican opposition bent on a search-and-destroy mission of his presidency.

To make matters worse, the war in Afghanistan, into which President Barack Obama has poured thousands of additional soldiers and billions of borrowed dollars, is going poorly. As The Economist belatedly recognized this week, “America and its allies are losing in Afghanistan.”

The U.S. commander there, Stanley McChrystal, was sacked for impolitic remarks about various high officials in the Obama administration, a dismissal even the choleric Republicans did not criticize.

His replacement, David Petraeus, somehow has to salvage something from the Afghan mess, at a time when Americans are growing increasingly weary of that war, now into its ninth year.

The very best that Americans (and allies) might hope for is to inflict sufficient damage on the Taliban in the next year that some insurgents might be inclined to negotiate inclusion in an Afghan government. To say that this is a long shot understates the odds.

The Pakistanis are already assuming an American departure and defeat, and are therefore looking to strengthen ties with the insurgents and the Afghan government of Hamid Karzai, so that they, and not the Indians, will have a more important influence on the government in Kabul.

The U.S., far away, burdened with debt, its public having turned against the war, has already imposed a deadline for beginning some kind of withdrawal next year. Time is therefore running against the Americans, as are its allies, some of whom want out next year, including Canada, the Netherlands and Poland.

What to do about Afghanistan will be the subject of intensive debate at year’s end, after the mid-term elections, the prospects for which colour everything in political Washington.

It had been hoped, for example, by those who want action on climate change that the U.S. Senate might produce an energy and environment bill that the President could sign. Nothing seems likely now, given the stout opposition of the Republicans to any serious measures, including a cap-and-trade system. Democrats, too, are divided, with legislators from the coal- and oil-producing states protecting their industries. One of these Democrats just died, Senator Robert Byrd, a pork-barreler par excellence from West Virginia, who used to oppose action against acid rain.

In this, as in much else, what happens or does not in the U.S. directly affects Canada. The Harper government has said it will follow any U.S. measures against greenhouse gas emissions. But if the U.S. Congress is unable to decide anything, what does the Canadian government do? Given the Harper government’s lassitude toward climate change action, this result might suit the Conservatives, if not the country.

The immense borrowing requirements of the U.S. – requirements that stretch over the horizon – are the single most destabilizing, or at least worrisome, of all the factors at play in the world’s economy. And no country is more exposed to the ups and downs of the U.S. economy than Canada.

Those U.S. borrowing requirements are daily sapping the influence of the U.S. worldwide, and heightening all the international uncertainties about deflation/inflation, high unemployment, sluggish growth, the volatility of the U.S. dollar.

Last weekend, Mr. Obama lent his name to a G20 declaration calling for halving deficits by 2013-14, a statement easy for him to make, but impossible for him to fulfill without congressional approval.

In the House and Senate, no appetite exists for doing more than nibbling at the edges of the deficit/debt problem, certainly not before the mid-term elections and very likely not thereafter. Without taking aim at the defence budget and considering higher taxes, all debate about the deficit/debt is an illusion wrapped in rhetoric.

At the state level, governments constitutionally required to balance budgets are slashing everywhere: welfare, universities, health, children’s programs.

Corporate profits and industrial production are recovering in the U.S. That’s the good news. The discouraging news is that consumers remain hesitant, unemployment is high, the housing market remains awful, and the country’s fiscal situation is appalling.

Happy Fourth of July to them. They need it."

Ancient Egyptians, Masons, and Revelations!

Are humans capable of “singularity”?


Let me begin by saying that “I believe in God”! My Religion is Christian. I also believe that Extraterrestrial beings exist. I also believe that they, like me, are all children of God. I believe that these extraterrestrial beings are technologically advanced to a point that they either mastered “time travel” or the ability to bend time to travel quickly so as to make long distance travel, from their home to ours without dying en-route. To clarify this belief I do so to explain that though they are far more advanced than we, they were still created as we were by a higher power than they (i.e., God).

For me my belief in God was not always so. I was one of many who “needed to see” and quantify His being real, by scientific proof though I have always kept an open mind of His existence.

I looked for archeological empirical evidence, or something tying Jesus to something scientific. Scientists have been trying to prove and disprove Gods existence for many millennia. Religion and science have always been antagonistic towards each other yet there have been scientific breakthroughs that work hand and hand with each other (i.e., Science & Religion). One that comes to mind is the current research taking place at the Super Collider on the “God Particle”.

Another lesser known experiment that will gain more traction with the recent book by Dan Brown “The Lost Symbol” is in the field of Noetics. Scientists claimed that they have actually weighed a human beings’ soul. The “soul weighing” experiment was followed very closely by the Vatican and the Pope and commented on its findings as being pleased that the “soul” has been quantified. This experiment was not conducted by anyone religious but by famous communists.

The Experiment:

In 1988 German scientists weighed 200 terminally ill patients directly before and after their deaths. In each and every instance the weight of these people reduced 1/3,000th of an ounce. Thus is the science of Noetics.

According to the scientists – “The inescapable conclusion is that we have now confirmed the existence of the human soul and determined its weight,” Dr. Becker Mertens of Dresden said in a letter printed in the German science journal Horizon.

“The challenge before us now is to figure out exactly what the soul is composed of”, he continued. “We are inclined to believe that it is a form of energy. “But our attempts to identify this energy have been unsuccessful to date.”

The expert’s report, co-authored by physicist Elke Fisher, got mixed review from top scientists around the world. Gerard Voisart, the leading French pathologist, was especially critical, saying that the weight difference between the living and the dead could be accounted for by air leaving the lungs. But Drs. Fisher and Mertens said they took that into account in making their calculations. They further stated that the device they used to weigh the soul has a margin of error of less than 1/100,000th of an ounce.

“It occurred to us that the weight loss could be the result of an instantaneous physical deterioration,” said Dr. Fisher. “But after exhaustive study we agreed that was not the case. The only possible explanation is that we were measuring the loss of the human soul or some kind of life force.”

Is the soul a singularity? There are many who say, yes. Once the soul breaks free from its “prison” (human body) and is released it is no longer bound to this plane of existence. It, in essence, becomes “god like”. The bible describes that “we all have God in us” and that “God created man in his image.” The “resurrection of Christ” describes the souls’ release from its earthy prison.

Furthermore – “In the Roman Catholic Church, Saint Michael has four main roles or offices. He is the Christian angel of death, carrying the souls of all the deceased to heaven, where they are weighed in his perfectly balanced scales (hence Michael is often depicted holding scales). At the hour of death, Michael descends and gives each soul the chance to redeem itself before passing, thus consternating the devil and his minions. St Michael is the special patron of the Chosen People in the Old Testament and is guardian of the Church; it was thus not unusual for the angel to be revered by the military orders of knights during the middle Ages. Last, he is the supreme enemy of Satan and the fallen angels.”

I found this evidence (of Gods existence) the moment I opened and begun to read “The Bible Code” and the “Bible Code II - The Countdown”. In the opening chapters, in laymen terms, I was given the scientific proof that was peer reviewed by the worlds leading mathematicians (Eliyahu Rips) who set out not to prove that the a code was imbedded in the 3,000 year text of the bible -- but disprove it as a hoax because they believed that it flew in the face of scientific probability. In doing so and to the contrary, they not only validated the findings, but added their own personal scientific mathematical expertise that expanded the work and the findings.

The code that was found in the Bible, Torah’s and other religious texts show it was imbedded (hidden) over 3000 years ago. Similarly, Ancient Egypt pre-dated Christ by 3000 years. The code that was found has allowed scientists (mathematicians) to pull events that have transpired historically directly from the biblical texts proving that these events have been foretold. Events like Hitler, Al-Qaeda 9/11 strike, etc. The scientists surmise from the code that there is a “key” here on earth that will be divulged when the time is right to avert Armageddon.

The intensity of the research was now focused on breaking the code to allow the scientists to see into the future events instead of verifying the past. On page 31 of the book, Michael Drosnin (author and founder of the Bible Code) explained the following discovery:

“They key. It played on my mind the whole time I was in Israel, and then one night I opened my laptop and looked into the Bible Code for “Code Key (mentioned in the opening paragraph).” It was there four times.

Twice as an obscure Hebrew word I didn’t recognize crossed “Code Key.” It wasn’t even in my dictionary. But in the definitive Hebrew dictionary it was translated as “obelisks.”

It was also found that the “Code Key” that was engraved onto an obelisk contained the “language of the Chaldeans.” According to the bible code “in the opening verses, the “plain text tells the story of a siege on Jerusalem by a king of Babylon, who brought back to his palace some of the children of Israel. They were taught all that was known in the ancient world, “all wisdom, and knowledge, and science,” including the language of the first known civilization, the “language of the Chaldeans.” In the hidden text of Daniel it spoke of the children “standing in the palace” the same words in Hebrew could be translated “pillar in the palace (Obelisk).”

An Obelisk is the one object (real world) that ties Ancient Egypt (which is where they first appeared) with the Vatican, Washington DC, Ancient Rome, Modern Rome and the Masons for the mere fact they all possess one (or many).

Obelisks – Date back to early 3,000 b.c.e. and the Ancient Egyptian Culture.

1) Washington Monument was designed by Freemason Robert Mills and is the tallest Obelisk in the world.

2) Vatican Obelisk originally erected in Rome around 30-28 BC and moved to the Vatican in 27.

The word “Revelations” as is described in the bible, torah and other religions come from the “root” “Reveal” (To make known, To bring to view – show). We know that in many religions, Revelations describes the “end times, or end of days” or the final battle between good and evil.

There have long been comparisons between certain aspects of the Christian religion and Ancient Egyptian beliefs. For clarification, the Preface of the book written by Moustafa Gadalla titled “The Ancient Egyptian roots of Christianity” indicates – “The very thing that is now called the Christian religion was already in existence in Ancient Egypt, long before the adoption of the New Testament. The British Egyptologist, Sir E.A. Wallis Budge, wrote in his book, "The Gods of the Egyptians"[1969], "The new religion which was preached there by St. Mark and his immediate followers, in all essentials so closely resembled that which was the outcome of the worship of Osiris, Isis, and Horus."

The similarities, noted by Budge and everyone who has compared the Egyptian Osiris - Isis - Horus allegory to the Gospel story, are striking. Both accounts are practically the same, e.g. the supernatural conception, the divine birth, the struggles against the enemy in the wilderness, and the resurrection from the dead to eternal life. The main difference between the "two versions," is that the Gospel tale is considered historical and the Osiris - Isis - Horus cycle is an allegory. The spiritual message of the Ancient Egyptian allegory and the Christian revelation is exactly the same

For me, I know that God created the universe. The scientific claptrap that it just was and not created is ludicrous. It had to be created - it just didn’t magically appear long ago out of thin air. Likewise, the argument of Darwin that man climbed out of some primordial ooze and evolved into the complex life form now known as man is equally ludicrous. I believe that there was evolution going on because life is nothing but evolving. To age is to evolve. But that single cell that supposedly climbed out the soup had to come from somewhere just as the universe itself.

The special nature of man is his soul. Now that the soul has been weighed it has mass at the subatomic level in the form of energy?

When the soul departs its prison and becomes one with the universe the realm of possibilities are endless. It means we do not die (in the conventional sense), we evolve. Do we then have our conscience intact? This “singularity” of our soul removes us from our current plane of existence and if we are truly one with the universe at this point then we simple would only have to think about a place and we would be there. This pure form of teleportation could explain how extraterrestrials travel such great distances without dying along the way.

This is what I believe is to be discovered (Code Key) - the answers that saves mankind from its destiny of Armageddon. We already know that our minds are yet to be unraveled and understanding how it works. For instance, take the following excerpt from the book “Law of Success” written by Napolian Hill:

“It happened on Armistice Day in Chicago in 1918. That day, he woke at 3 a.m., feeling as someone had tried to awake him using physical force. As he sat up in bed, he knew immediately that something out of the ordinary had happened. He felt so strange that it had driven him to get up get dressed and leave for the streets in Chicago in the middle of the night. Outside, he found that there had already been thousands of others who had felt the touch of the same influence, yet everybody was wondering what happened, why everyone was on the streets?

They didn’t know at that time that what happened was that millions of men had received instructions to cease fighting and there combined joy set in to motion a thought wave that swept the entire world and made itself felt in every normal mind. Never before had so many people though of the same thing, in the same manner at the same time. Everybody felt something in common, effectively creating a mastermind.”

Napoleon Hill was also a “Freemason”.

This is exactly the dynamic, or group mastermind would have if the obelisk described in the bible code is found, uncovered and divulged to everyone one the planet. It would be a powerful uniter in a time when religions divide the world over whose God is the true God.

Gore believes his Nobel “Piece Prize” has benefits!

The reason behind the Gore divorce is coming into clarity!

When Al Gore received the Nobel “Peace Prize” he obviously believed it said “Piece Prize” because he felt obliged to get a “little somethin, somethin” from a Portland, Oregon masseuse in 2007.


As it is typical for the Portland Police (from little Moscow on the Willamette) they did not have the political will to warrant a formal investigation into the serious sexual allegations against the liberal icon. Just as Lewinski had her “blue dress” with semen stains from the “liar in chief” bodily fluids on her garment, so does this young lady (except it’s jeans and not a dress) that purportedly captured gores spores.

It should also be noted that Gore’s definition of “Global Warming” should now include a new dynamic (warming up to her globes) that is of course up to interpretation of what the word “is”, is!

Once again, the “National Inquirer” has scooped the Main Stream Media on the story and has now identified the 54 year old victim with the revelation that it no long a “he said, she said” case because according to the Inquirer the victim stated “"I want justice served," Hagerty said as she reveals the key witness who could blow the case wide open, the secret hotel video surveillance and the DNA evidence!

As the Portland Police Department was caught “flat footed” (no pun intended) in their egregious non-handling of this sex crime they have since “re-opened their investigation” into the matter. It kinda sounds like the recent mass murder suspect in the University of Alabama, Huntsville police case in the suspects 1980’s death of her brother.

While Gore has now come out and “unequivocally and categorically denies” any wrongdoing we will have to wait and see if a warrant for DNA is served on the future “sex offender” registry candidate.

I can only wonder if he ever thought that when he was stripping for his "piece prize" that he would actually be stripped of the other "Peace Prize" if convicted?

Petreaus Confirmed 99-0 in Senate exposes Democrats alliance with netroots!

Remember the infamous 2007 MoveOn.org full page ad in the NY Times titled "General Peteaus or General Betray Us".  The ad generated much controversy and forced the democrats who, up until that point, overwhelmingly criticized the surge as a failure and the war -- well, lost -- to openly condemn the ad as over the top.  The vote condemning MoveOn was taken and two of the Democratic Presidential hopefuls chose not to vote.  Who were the two Democrats that chose not to condemn?  Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama!

In addition to Clinton and Barrack siding with MoveOn over Petraeus and our war effort we saw Harry Reid on CNN before the Congressional testimony on the surge in Iraq by Patraeus answering the CNN reporters question "will you believe Petreaus if he testifies the surge is working?" -- His answer - NO.

If you go to the MoveOn site to see the infamous ad today you will find that they have removed (scrubbed) it from their site because the narrative of the 99-0 confirmation of Petreaus does not fit with the Obama narrative.  They are attempting to rewrite history, again.

If anyone recalls the NY Times controversy on MoveOn did not end with the mere ad itself.  It was also learned that they (NYT) charged MoveOn 2/3rds less for this political ad over all others.

The confimation of Petreaus affirms that the Iraq war surge was a success and that the Democrats were on the wrong side of history.  This history is one that they and their MSM allies are busy scrubbing in search of a better narrative to support "Obama's stunning success in firing McCrystal in Afghanistan."

This also means that the success of the surge is a vindication of George Bush though you won't hear that being uttered anywhere on the left side of the isle.......