The Truth behind all the lies and deception

It has taken a lot of reading and training myself to "read between the lines".  There are some in the Conservative media sphere that have this gift (think Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin).  They can relay a news story snatched from the MSM and while they highlight the distortions and outright lies and lies by omission they inform their audiences of the subtleties of the truth.

Keeping this in mind, David Brooks was on PBS "News Hour" this last week to pontificate his opinion on the David Brat victory over Eric Cantor.  David Brooks, as you know, is what the left wing media holds up as their "token conservative" to spew left wing dung posing as right wing conspiracies.

He is about as right wing as Al Sharpton.

I digress.

He starts out with a nugget of truth --  "ends any hopes of immigration reform making it through Congress in the near-term"

This is the fear that is currently striking at the hearts of establishment politicians and their MSM handlers.  Pro-Immigration Reform, aka Amnesty, is a death sentence politically. 

These same MSM pundits (and even some on Fox News) label David Brat as the "Tea Party" candidate when, in fact, he received no formal contributions from them at all.  They do so, because they all label the Tea Party as anti immigration and thus make Brat out to be their straw man along these lines.  David Brat was outspent by the establishment (GOP) by ridiculous numbers.  Brat spent so little on his campaign that he did not even reach the amount that Cantor's campaign staff spent at a single steakhouse restaurant.  Think about that. 

The Brooks quote above ended with the follow deception mixed with truth -- if the Republican Party doesn’t get right on immigration, it’s a threshold issue".

Here Brooks is browbeating the GOP to grow a set and defy their constituents to keep pushing the amnesty bill forward, in spite of the Cantor loss by saying they need to "get right on immigration".

The truth in the quote is that it's truly as "threshold issue" but not in the way they paint it.  The truth of the issue is in line with the David Brat victory side of things.

Illegal immigration reform was soundly rejected during the Bush term.  When that administration and those in Congress tried to move that issue forward they were inundated with letters, faxes and phone calls in the millions telling them that they are in peril politically if they do so.  They seemed to have got the message then.  Like most liberals and establishment GOP'ers, they think they can get a different result by the same actions.  The polls that show distrust of those in Congress and our Government in general are because we believe they (the establishment elite on both sides) want amnesty, but for different reasons.  The left because of a new and huge voting block they can exploit in future elections and the GOP because of cheap labor for their "Chamber of Commerce" chums.

One of the lessons the Brat victory taught us, according to Brooks, is that -- "First, you can’t buy elections."

Really?

How many times have we heard from the MSM and Democrats moan, groan, whine and complain about the "Citizen United Supreme Court case"?

Accordingly it IS about buying elections to them.  This is exactly why the IRS is targeting these very same groups that benefited from the Supreme Court decision.

The other members on the Panel with Brooks pontificated the following --

SHIELDS: But I think there’s one factor that comes out of this, and having been up on the Hill yesterday, and that is, every member is terrified.

WOODRUFF: In both parties?

SHIELDS: In both parties, but particularly because they know — immigration is dead. Let’s be very honest about it.

They aren't terrified (both parties) because immigration is dead, they are terrified that their constituents do not want it!  Period.  The establishment get their money from the pro-immigration crowd, not from the little people.  This is their fear.

Brooks isn't done yet.  He goes on -- And I think there is overwhelming data on this, that if the Tea Party — if the Republican Party doesn’t get right on immigration, it’s a threshold issue. They really do not do well in a national election for a long, long time.

And every day, there’s more evidence that comes out, more survey data and everything. And so I think this makes it extremely unlikely the Republicans does get right or some sort of immigration reform."

Here is the browbeating again.  It is established above that the reason for the fear (on both sides of the establishment) is that the voters want no part of this legislation on amnesty.  Yet, if the Republicans don't get on the right side and pass it, they won't win an election for a very long time.  The lies and deceptions are a knee-jerk reaction because THEY know they are on the wrong side of every issue as they drag this country down the "big government" path. 

The next few months are going to be fun to watch as they continue to push us, prod us, lie to us that WE are out of touch with immigration.  This is why they use fuzzy-warm language in couching the issue as "Dreamers".  Who doesn't like a dreamer?  I for one do not if they are jumping over a fence or swimming across a river illegally to bring us crime, disease and yes, democrat voting blocks.

America is my Mother

When I was a child growing up in the sleepy farmland of Ohio everything around me was an adventure.  I did not know, or even comprehend the fact that it was America, not my parents, that raised me.  I guess on some level I did as I understood that it was America, the country, that protected me from harm of distant shores and evils as I ducked underneath my desk at school during our drills designed as a result of the nuclear age.  I pledged allegiance to her and prayed every night before bed to keep everyone I knew, as well as some I did not, to keep us safe.

I loved my mother and yes, I took her for granted in my safety.  I went about life as most did in those days dreaming of rich new horizons that awaited me as long as I worked hard to achieve those goals.  I complained that life wasn't fair when I was knocked to the ground ignorant that my brothers and sisters (Americans) had it harder than I because of their skin color, religious beliefs or stations in life that were not as I had it.  It took me half my life to understand this and as a result has made me a stronger man. 

My early adolescent years were in the 1960' and 1970's.  I lived in Los Angeles during the Watts riots and witnessed (mostly on TV) the ugly side of racism and those who struggled to beat this oppression.  I do not, nor have I ever considered myself racist.  I do though concede that I am ignorant of the true suffering of those of color.  How could I understand as I have never, until now, been a victim of this dynamic.

America's children have survived some tumultuous and dangerous times during that period and in a lot of ways have become better for it.  Now, though, in this time our parent (America) is very sick and suffers a form of dementia not unlike an aged parent or grandparent who is afflicted with Alzheimer's. 

We have entered into some very dark days.  Day's that we feared as children and unfortunately our children do not even know the face of this evil.  Our children have been indoctrinated in collectivism and believe that our current parent (America) should decide what is good and bad for us as a society without the free will of consequences.

How can you explain to them that their adopted parent covets death more than life itself?  To them abortion is as natural as having a tooth pulled.  They do not consider anything morally as long as it is quick and convenient.  A botched abortion is when the baby lives.  They also have been taught that a botched execution of a convicted murderer is when the convict dies.  We are in some truly dark days my fellow Americans. 

Today schools have are not teaching our children the evil of Communism, instead they are promoting it as some dreamy landscape filled with everything equal.  They do not know that Mao; Castro, Che; Pol Pot; Stalin and their ilk have murdered millions to achieve this very landscape.  A couple of generations of ignorance and they do not know that evil is staring them in their collective faces.  Our education system is glorifying them and eradicating God at an alarming pace.  Harvard University is currently holding Satanic Rituals as a course.  Dark days.

I remember my parents commenting on the hippy movement and the anti-war demonstrators marching across America in my youth and having them comment that "one day, they will be in charge -- God help us."

Well, that day has arrived and the only thing that can help us is God.

You want some answers

image by:  kristiann1.files.wordpress.com

There have been a lot of questions that many Americans are asking these days because the landscape in which we find ourselves are quite foreign.

Here are a few!

Why is the Federal Government, through it's various Agencies, purchasing so much ammunition?

There are many answers to these questions when the BLM attempted to wrangle some cattle in the Nevada desert at the end of a gun.  During this heated operation that was ordered (though this is still debated because of the fingerprints of Harry Reid, China and Rory Reid all over it), organized and executed by the Bureau of Land Management it seems we are beginning to understand the need for the ammo.

The impetus for this armed action of the Federal Government over a private American citizen was an elusive unpaid cattle grazing fee.  There is an amount being bandied about in the MSM somewhere around $1 million dollars though the Government, through court transcripts never quantified this amount and it may be a little as a couple hundred thousand.  Be that as it may, it should send warning bells ringing that our Government is storming in, guns pointed, in order to collect a monetary debt.  The Bundy's were not targeted because of terrorism or gun running that would justify an armed incursion to bring them to justice.  They were targeted because of an uncollected monetary debt.  Through the years, the Government has had it's eyes on this land and first attempted to reclassify the grazing area as a habitat for a turtle that the other Government agency said was being endangered because it could not compete for the food that the cattle was consuming against.  So the MSM is now arguing that the Bundy's are law breakers therefore why shouldn't they be arrested, by force if necessary.  Then you have the angle that the MSM, Harry Reid and many other Democrats arguing that the Bundy supporters are domestic terrorists.  Of course these are the same domestic terrorists that are against the Federal Government and it's overreaching power grab.  You know, grandma and her friends who call themselves tea party activists.  The same people that Janet Napolitano and Homeland Security wrote those law enforcement memo's about.  The same people that have been holding training drills against in many US cities across the land.

We have gone from "Debtors Prisons" to "Debtors firing squads" here.  It is not enough that those in positions to use these over armed federal agencies to target individuals that disagree with them but that use of power is becoming more and more frequent.

In 2000, the INS stormed a private residence in Miami at gun point and took a boy to return him to Cuba.  Elian Gonzales.  Janet Reno and the Clinton Administration (with the help of Eric Holder) ordered it. 

Some years previous (1993) to this action listed above, Janet Reno and President Clinton cut their chops on another government raid in Waco Texas.  76 people inside lost their lives.

The MSM has attempted to aid the BLM and their Federal handlers by painting the Bundy's as law breakers while ignoring the other explosive story that involves Harry Reid, his son Rory and his clients the Chinese Government. 

SIT DOWN and SHUT UP already!

‘The debate over repealing this law is over,’ he insisted. ‘The Affordable Care Act is here to stay.’

Really?

Isn't it a curious thing that in the weeks preceding Obama's April 1st Rose Garden speech Democrats were trying to hide from their participation in shoving this monstrosity down America's throats.

Isn't it a curious thing that during the time that the open enrollment period for this monstrosity the Government could not come up with a coherent number of those who have actually enrolled yet on April first they have placed a highly specific number with a decimal in it in front of us.

 Obamacare “is doing what it’s supposed to do; it’s working.

Isn't it curious that millions have been dropped from their current healthcare plans, that they have liked.  Why, because Obamacare is doing what it's supposed to do?

Isn't it curious that millions cannot see the doctors that have had for years and have come to trust as their primary defense for their families healthcare.  Why, because Obamacare is doing what it's suppose to do?

Now, according to sources who actually try to follow the "intended" consequences of Obamacare, the statistics bear a different story -- "Well, he allegedly got 7.1 million enrollees on paper, but let’s look at the myriad ways that number is reduced.

National Journal reports that an estimated 15 to 20 percent of these enrollees haven’t paid their premiums, which means they won’t be covered. So right off the bat, you have to reduce the number to between 5.7 million and 6 million, which means the figures already won’t work.

Instead of 38 percent of these enrollees being in the young and healthy category, Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute reports that less than 30 percent of enrollees are younger than 35.

Also, RAND Corp. estimates that only about one-third of the new enrollees were previously uninsured, which means that two-thirds of the 5.7 million or 6 million cannot properly be counted in these figures. So we have fewer than 2 million net new enrollees. But we’re still not finished.
In addition to this, RAND estimates that nearly a million more people lost their plan because of Obamacare and couldn’t afford to replace it because Obamacare mandates coverage of additional risks and causes premiums to increase.

Does that mean we are actually down to about 1 million net new enrollees?

Not to destroy your day further, but on top of all this, Obamacare is projected to cost the government — meaning taxpayers — $2 trillion over the next decade, which isn’t even being factored in here. And how many believe that number isn’t grossly underestimated? Also, Obamacare is going to cause cuts to Medicare Advantage, which will reduce benefits or increase premiums for people by an estimated $35 to $75 per month.

As you can see, Obama is giving you only a fraction of the information you need to understand this picture and imparting the false impression that Obamacare is working now, and when premiums skyrocket next year, he can scapegoat the insurance companies and proceed to his beloved single-payer, full-blown statist scenario. - Human Events

I think the American public will show this fool and the ship of fools that have floated this turd what the real "intended consequences" will look like come November.

What good is it for citizens to have guns when the Government has tanks?

I KNOW NOTHING ABOUT MILITARY STRATEGY.. THIS ARTICLE SEEMED VERY LOGICAL TO ME... WHAT DO YOU THINK?

This is a fairly common question, that deserves an answer.

How does a gun help against a rocket fired miles away, a drone or airplane flying overhead, or a massive tank driving through your house?...

The simple answer to the question is “assymetric warfare.” Smart fighters don’t put their troops in front of the enemy’s best weapons. They use their best troops against their enemy’s week points, and exploit those weak points mercilessly.

In the hypothetical event that the federal government attempted to impose tyranny upon the citizenry of the United States, it would likely trigger the largest insurgency that the modern world has ever known.

Despite all of our awesome technology, we stink at fighting insurgencies.

We lost in Vietnam. We won the conventional war against the Iraqi military easily, but we didn’t defeat the insurgency. We’re losing Afghanistan, and our leadership has no intention of fighting to win.

All of these insurgencies have been overseas, where the supply lines were long, but relatively well-protected. The producers and supply chain itself were never threatened.

In the event of an American insurgency, it wouldn’t be a straight-up fight of partisans with rifles fighting against regime tanks, helicopters, and drones.

It would be a war where “killing” a fighter jet occurs by assassinating aircraft mechanics, or burning the homes of employees of the companies that make crucial replacement parts. It would be a war where every elected official, government employee, and skilled worker in the supply chain would be a target, every day of their lives.

In short, it would be a nasty, brutish conflict full of atrocities with no battle lines, no rear areas, no retreat, and little chance for government forces to survive over the long term.

As long as the American public outguns the military—and they do by more than 90 million firearms—no sane government would dare turn on the American people. That is the reason it is so important for the citizenry to jealously guard their Second Amendment rights.

The consequences of free speech

On the heels of the joyous news that CNN is canning the Brit (Piers Morgan) another juicy tidbit comes out of Alex Baldwin.  He has had it.  Good-bye public life.  After the endless drivel that has come out of his mouth from public humiliation of his daughter that was recorded to the gay slurs he made in public just as his MSLSD show got underway, he is reaping a whole heap of consequences that most liberals pile onto Conservatives.

While he proclaims he was misunderstood about his gay bashing remarks he is trying to show the world at the same time he say's he is leaving it that he actually sympathizes with that lifestyle.  In an article in Vulture he explains the following:

"I flew to Hawaii recently to shoot a film, fresh on the heels of being labeled a homophobic bigot by Andrew Sullivan, Anderson Cooper, and others in the Gay Department of Justice. I wanted to speak with a gay-rights group that I had researched and admired, so I called its local Honolulu branch.
The office number turned out to be some guy’s cell phone. I left him a message—I said, “I’m from out of town, I’m visiting Hawaii on business, I’d like to  get some information on your group.” After two or three more calls, he answered the phone. I said, “Yeah, I’m the guy that called about your organization.” And he said, somewhat impatiently, “Okay, well, what did you want?” I said, “Well, let me put it to you this way, Nick. Your name is Nick? Nick, let me begin by asking you a question. Who would you say, by your estimation, is the most homophobic member of the entertainment industry currently in the media?” And he paused for a long count of four and said, “Um … Alec Baldwin?”

And I said, “Ding, ding, ding, ding! Bingo, Nick, bingo! That’s who you’re talking to.”

He said, “C’mon!”

I said, “Nick, I want to come in and talk.”

I met with Nick and others from two LGBT organizations. We talked for a while about the torment of the LGBT life many of them have lived while growing up in traditional Hawaiian families. Macho fathers. Religious mothers. We talked a lot about words and their power, especially in the lives of young people."

I thought that the last paragraph was indicative of the gay rights movements plan to shove their lifestyle down everyone's throats, including Alex's.

When the LGBT people talked about the torment of growing up in "tradition families" with "Macho Fathers" and "Religious Mothers" it laid open the truth.  Traditional families are under attack as "out of the mainstream".  Next is the effeminate males that liberals are hell bent on transforming through sensitivity indoctrination as well as drugging normal boys into submissive and plyant subjects utilizing Ritalin.  Finally, it wouldn't be a hat trick unless Religion was also the target.  It seems that the LGBT group thinks it is predominately women (mothers) to blame.  Talk about liberal "war on women".   
 

CNN announces Pier's Morgan cancellation

It appears that CNN has found some reasoned decision making and decided to pull the plug on the Brit rabble rouser Piers Morgan. 

According to Politico -- CNN President Jeff Zucker has decided to bring an end to Piers Morgan’s low-rated primetime show, network sources told POLITICO on Sunday. “Piers Morgan Live” could end as early as next month, though Morgan may stay with the network in another role.

Morgan, a former British tabloid editor, replaced Larry King in the 9 p.m. hour three years ago, prior to Zucker’s tenure as president. His show earned consistently low ratings, registering as few as 50,000 viewers in the 25-to-54 year-old demographic earlier this week.

“CNN confirms that Piers Morgan Live is ending,” Allison Gollust, head of CNN communications, told POLITICO on Sunday after an earlier version of this post was published. “The date of the final program is still to be determined."

It only took 3 years of low ratings to come to this decision.  Though CNN reports that his show earned consistently low ratings I think it should have been reported as "few as 50,000 viewers in the barely able to breath demographic".  The key here is that he "earned" his low ratings which is another fine example of the low bar set by Obama in the job performance arena.

According to the NY Times article, Morgan admits -- "It’s been a painful period and lately we have taken a bath in the ratings,” he said, adding that although there had been times when the show connected in terms of audience, slow news days were problematic."

Slow news days?  This is part and parcel of his earning.  In the 3 years he has opened his mouth all things liberal and carried Democrat water, the big news stories were always there and continue to be there.  CNN, MSMBC, NBC, CBS just refuse to report the actual news.  They create slow news days.

Call to action!!!!!

Freemasons, Tri-Lateral, Bilderburgs

I have written extensively here at ALR about the Freemasons, Tri-Lateral Commission, the Bilderburg Group and the other "One World or New World Order" subject.  In fact, those who dare speak of these things are listed as kooks, conspiracy theorists or worse.  This subject actually has more information grounded in fact than Global Warming or even Darwin's Evolutionary theory.  Yet the environmentalists' as well as those who believe in evolution, as described by Darwin, tell us that their point of view is fact based in science.  Truth is neither global warming nor evolution are anything else but settled science.  Before I get into the meat of this writing here today that the above organizations (some as old as time itself) are all hurling us into the New World Order which is run by a handful of elite, rich and powerful families that go back millennia.  This order of powerful men have planned this since the beginning of history and the plan is to form and implement this order in much the same way Communism was run where the government (these men and their organizations) will tell us what to do, what to eat, when to die or even who should be born.  I know, sounds kooky, huh?

I wrote of this in a series of articles titled Glen Beck homework assignment,  Glen Beck homework Assignment I1 and Glen Beck homework assignment III (see links).

I would suggest you read all three to give yourself the basic starting point (where I left off) and do your own research further than I did.  You will see the evidence everywhere.  You will see the facts.  You will, in your gut understand that the feelings you evoke in your own research is not mental illness or early onset conspiracy kooky fruity cakeness, but truth in such a manner that evinces a visceral response within you.

Think about the environmentalist that brought us Global Warming and the billions of dollars that they have extorted from countries and corporations in the name of junk science.  These same people are puppets of the elite that the title speaks of that want to rule the globe in communistic fashion where the police state can do anything they wish and individual thought or desires are eradicated in the name of this order.

Think I'm unhinged?  Remember when the "ship of fools" incident in the Antartic recently where those Global Warmers went to the pole to document that the ice was disappearing (as Al Gore pontificated in his Nobel Prize winning pompousness in "an inconvenient truth") only to get stranded in a sea of ice for quite some time.  This incident is only one of many which have shown that Global Warming theory is just a way to transfer wealth (communist style).

Still think I'm off my rocker.  In spite of the mounting evidence to the contrary that Global Warming is bubkus they keep saying it is happening.  On January 19, 2014 the UN Climate Chief said the following -- "She stated earlier this week that democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. She also said that communist China is instead the best model."

Here we have the Climateers advocating communism.  Never mind the fact that in 2010 alone, 1.2MM Chinese died as a result of their air pollution.

In the next day or two I will be posting a new and comprehensive article that furthers the connection with some mind blowing information that I stumbled upon today.  I need time to digest the info, get further information from the source and hopefully have a certain document in hand that connects the dots undeniably.

With Friends like this, who needs enemies?

First, you must see the "Opening Statement" by Judge Jeanine Pirro on Fox News as it pertains to the recently release Congressional Investigation in the terror attack in Benghazi.  The Honorable Judge Pirro is a former prosecutor that lays the facts bare for the American public on the "criminal negligence" of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  The report really doesn't tell us much that we, the American public already knew or felt to be because the deaths of our fellow Americans on the anniversary of 9/11 in 2012 could only have been one thing and one thing only.  A terror attack and not some spontaneous demonstration over a video.  It was on 9/11.

Here is the video, commentary to follow:

Here is the complete report compiled that the bi-partisan Senate Committee submitted:

Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Benghazi

Here are some excerpts from the report:

"Following the 2009 Executive order to close Guantanamo, there has been a concerted effort by this Administration to downplay the recidivist activities of former Guantanamo detainees in support of its overtly political goal to transfer as many detainees as possible to foreign countries and even to the United States.  Listening to supporters of this ill-advised Executive order, one would believe that former detainees have universally rejected their terrorist associations and are now living peaceably throughout the world.  The facts say otherwise.  The recidivism rate among all former detainees is now over 29% and rising consistently."

"Many of us were frustrated and astounded by the great pains the Administration took after the fact to avoid the clear linkage to what happened in Benghazi to the threat of international terrorism.  The Fort Hood terrorist attack by Nidal Hassan was labeled "workplace violence," despite Hasan's email communications with al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula cleric, Anwar al-Aulaqi, in the months before he open fire, killing 13 and wounding 32 military and civilian personnel, in 2009.  Another Aulaqi protégé "Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was treated as an ordinary criminal and given Miranda warnings, despite being captured after failing to detonate plastic explosives aboard a Northwest airlines flight over Detroit on December 25, 2009.  Then there was Faisal Shahzad, the incompetent Times Square bomber, whose car bomb failed to detonate in May 2010,  The Administration tried to spin Shahzad as a "one-off" lone wolf until the media discovered he had travelled to Pakistan for 5 months and trained with the Pakistan Taliban.  As with Benghazi, the Administration's obligation to provide information to Congress about those cases seem to be superseded by a desire to script the message that al-Qa'ida had been decimated or to protect a criminal investigation in spite of equally vital intelligence prerogatives."

Again, all of this disturbing information compiled by the committee has been known or at least felt by most Americans that this Administration's zeal to end the war on terror and protect us from those who wish to do us mortal harm is sleigh of hand misinformation.  The one thing that this Federal Government IS constitutionally responsible for (it's duty) is to protect the citizens from harm both foreign and domestically.  When this Administration intentionally gives aid and comfort to terror that results in loss of human life, American life, then they have failed to uphold their solemn duty.  But, to do so with malice and forethought is criminally negligent, as the Honorable Judge Jeanine states.

So, when Hillary went before the American people the day the bodies came back home and she declared Ambassador Stevens a "close and personal friend" it comes to the question -- "With friends like Hillary, who needs enemies?"

Liberals are SOOOOOO cliche'

"Beating a dead horse" comes to mind when this administration pulls no punches in order to get the Muslim Brotherhood back into power in Egypt.  John Kerry gave a statement today regarding the election results in Egypt that approves a new constitution.  "When nearly 20 million Egyptians — more than 98 percent of votes cast — approved a new constitution to replace the one forged by Islamists, Secretary of State John Kerry said elections aren’t everything.

Really!

I can still hear the "usual suspects" on the left in America that have "beaten that same horse" to tell us little people that "They won the election" so deal with it. 

Speaking about the usual suspects, Jimmy Carter and his "Carter Center" who brought us election monitoring in favor of Hugo Chavez and the Muslim Brotherhood also chimed in before the election with the following -- "the Center is deeply concerned about the polarized environment and the narrowed political space surrounding the upcoming referendum, as well as the lack of an inclusive process for drafting and publicly debating the draft constitution.

Despite these concerns, it is clear that many Egyptians view the constitutional referendum as an important opportunity to voice their opinion about the transition roadmap and the way forward. To increase the credibility of this process, the Center recommends that Egyptian authorities reverse the crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood and other opposition activists and rescind the recently enacted protest law that severely restricts public gatherings and rallies, including for electoral campaigning. Restrictions on media outlets sympathetic to Islamists also should be lifted. While the fundamental freedoms of association and expression must be protected, it also is essential for all Egyptians to refrain from acts of violence, incitement, and intimidation, and that security forces refrain from the use of excessive force in the event of disturbances."

Notice the "pro-Islamic" tilt in this statement.  If you remember, it was the Carter Administration that brought us the Iranian Islamic rulers in the 70's and the resulting violence that that ideology has wrought.

Carter wishes that the Muslim brotherhood and the Islamic caliphates be allowed to take to the streets and in the case they get violent get a safe pass from the Egyptian military.  The violence, incitement and intimidation IS the Muslim Brotherhood watermark and not the average citizen.

So, if 98% of the population rejects sharia law and this Administration say that this is just one election then maybe they should complain from the back of the bus.  Egypt will of course allow you on that bus to begin with.

I'm black therefor you dislike me

That is what Obama said in an interview on January 17. 

"President Barack Obama said that racial tensions may have softened his popularity among white voters within the last two years, according to a story posted on the New Yorker magazine’s website today.

“There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black president,” Obama said in the article by David Remnick, appearing in the magazine’s Jan. 27 edition."

Maybe it's just because he is a liar!  Maybe it's just because HE is a racial president that plays divided class/racial politics.  Maybe it's because if he had a son he would look like Travon Martin.  Maybe it's because he disregards the constitution and is an utter failure.  Maybe it's just because........it is anything other than his skin color.

The "Citizen X" factor

With the release of the book by Robert Gates we find the not so stunning revelation that Obama and Hillary Clinton were making state decisions based upon political calculations. 

For instance, in 2007 when both Obama and Clinton were running against each other they opposed the Iraq "surge" on politics alone.  The quote from Gates was "Hillary told the president that her opposition to the [2007] surge in Iraq had been political because she was facing him in the Iowa primary.  … The president conceded vaguely that opposition to the Iraq surge had been political. To hear the two of them making these admissions, and in front of me, was as surprising as it was dismaying.”

It is exactly this revelation that is the crux of the argument for those who say that a government in control of all of us is wrong and constitutionally illegal.  When decisions are made by our elected leaders that do NOT consider all of the facts and rely on decisions purely for political reasons is, well, dangerous.  We all know this, including those who are making decisions purely for political expediency.  The quote above should say it all because before either Obama and Hillary arrived in their lofty positions, Bush enacted the surge in 2007.  By all accounts, it worked.

We also know that all failed Communist states as well as Socialist ones had a robust propaganda department that was fueled by "political officers".  The Soviets had them in every industry throughout the motherland.  The idea that every bit of information is dissected and spun into propaganda to strengthen the State vs. individualism is paramount to idea that the State is best for the people.  The State makes all decisions about individual things because they are incapable of making the right decisions for themselves.  Thus political officers had to take adverse information and spin it into something ideal for the State, or worse, get rid of all evidence to the contrary including the individuals with such dangerous information or thought.

I think the best example that we can take to illustrate how the political decisions made for the benefit for the State over its peoples is the true life story of Andrei Chikatilo.  Mr. Chikalito was responsible for the serial murders of 53 women and children in the Soviet Union between 1978 and 1990.  Holly wood made a movie titled "Citizen X".  The reason I chose this example is because Citizen X's crimes and resulting investigation spanned the time period before and after the Soviet Union's collapse.  It wasn't until after the collapse (1991) that the police quickly caught the man responsible.  53 Women and Children lost their lives because, as the political apparatchik in charge of the investigation who put it -- "Serial Killers are a decadent Western Phenomena and do not exist in the Soviet State". 

To watch the movie is to understand what the realities of life under government rule is all about.  Instead of following the forensic evidence in the killers' wake, the political officer in charge of the decision making targeted homosexuals (who himself was a homosexual).  In fact, citizen x was arrested with his killing kit and the political officer demanded his release because he was a "communist party member in good standing".

The idea that the State is the best thing in which to live our lives under is dangerous and inherently -- un-American!

Be Prepared

For those who are worried about this lawless administration and the ever encroaching police state I have a resource for you to consider.  Plans are being drawn, by State, in any eventuality.  Operation American Spring (borrowed from the moniker used to describe the "arab spring" movement but not to be confused with).

Here is the link to join and get started.  Please consider this as a viable vehicle to protecting yourself, family and this country.

Patriots for America

Is Dennis Rodman just misunderstood?

I have strayed away from commentary with the antics and political aspirations from a former NBA player named Dennis Rodman.  Since Rodman started his love affair with the North Korean dictator thug I, personally, lumped Rodman in the same camp and category as Sean Penn and Harry Belefonte who are outspoken advocates of communism.  Sean Penn as you recall was highly public about his fondness with Hugo Chavez as was Belefonte was with Castro.

These former famous people have grappled with their diminishing public roles and have decided to be so controversial in their attempt to gain attention in the media that it borders on insanity or at least a major case of narcissism. 

Others that have tried to side with tyranny as they tell us these tyrants are misunderstood and are actually doing good were:

Dennis Kucinich -- Refused to meet with our own troops and instead sat down with Bashar Assad the ruthless Syrian dictator.

Cindy Sheehan -- Travelled to Syria (at the same time as Kucinich) with member of Code Pink to be "human shields" in order to prevent the US from striking Syria for gassing their people.  These useful idiot were to be standing side by side with Syrian prisoners who were taken from prisons around Syria to become forced shields.

So, the next time that Rodman is thinking without the aid of alcohol, maybe he will see that the man he so adores is a dangerous thug.  Perhaps Kim will want to show Dennis his hungry dogs that the dictators uncle had the displeasure of meeting.

BREAKING NEWS

Obama's College Records released after long fought court battle.  Guess what -- he applied as a "foreign student"///

Chris Christie for President -- "Fat Chance"

Leave it to the Main Stream Media to find their inner muse.  In typical fashion headlines take a glory filled glee in Christie's fatness while torpedoing his Presidential aspirations.  First, let me say two things that come to mind.  It is about time the press started to act like the citizens watchdogs that hold elected officials accountable in seeking to get to the bottom of this affair.  I do not care one iota that the person who is thrust into the microphones for 107 minutes is a Republican.  If Christy did do something this horrendous then he should be perp walked out of office and into jail because the effect of the incident saw someone die as a result of the action.

Second, where were the hound dog press for the "Fast and Furious" scandal that also resulted in deaths and could still result in many more until all of those weapons walked across the border by our Government are recovered and accounted for?

Maybe this incident will open a wider prism into political power and the capability to wield it by using government assets to exact retribution.  To understand better the gist of my hope, just look at what the DNC Chair said about Christie==

"DNC chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz said the "revelations are troubling for any public official." But she said: "They also indicate what we've come to expect from Gov. Christie -- when people oppose him, he exacts retribution. When people question him, he belittles and snidely jokes. And when anyone dares to look into his administration, he bullies and attacks."
Now, replace Christies' name with Obama's.  Maybe the MSM will wake up after all, one can only hope but to coin an offensive MSM headline "Fat Chance".

The scarecrow's are winning

The last state in the US to allow concealed handgun permits have the anti-gun kooks in a blather.  When DC V. Heller landmark case ink was drying the City of Chicago was in a literal war zone of crime as murders were piling up in the streets.

The pressure was building for the liberals in charge and all they could say was the crime spike is due to handguns, or just guns simply.  They said that it wasn't because the laws on the books preventing law biding citizens from owning firearms for personal protection against the onslaught, it was because neighboring counties and states were selling more guns to straw men that were finding their way into the hands of criminals.  If everyone else would just ignore the 2nd amendment as they were, then there would be no guns coming into the city and we could all just sing kumbaya.

Of course this argument, as usual, is a lie.  Straw men indeed.

In the latest drawback against fighting the constitution instead of crime the latest judges ruling against the City of Chicago's ban against legal gun sales within their borders.  Again, the straw men were attacked -- "Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel "strongly disagrees" with the court's decision, according to a statement from the city, adding that he has instructed the city's lawyer to consider all options to better regulate the sale of firearms within the city's borders.

"Every year Chicago police recover more illegal guns than officers in any city in the country, a factor of lax federal laws as well as lax laws in Illinois and surrounding states related to straw purchasing and the transfer of guns," the statement said. "We need stronger gun safety laws, not increased access to firearms within the city."

Gun sales are allowed outside of Chicago, including in neighboring suburbs, and anti-gun activists have complained that criminals use "straw buyers" to buy guns outside of Chicago and bring them into the city."

Here, Mayor McCheese (Emanuel) complains of lax federal, Illinois and surrounding states laws as the usual suspects but in reality those laws are not lax, their justified under the constitution.  The liberals just can't stand it that they can't pry that gun from your warm and ready fingers.

Relax your eyeballs!

See anything?

Quote of the Year

"If Muslims are so peaceful then why are so many people afraid to offend them?
"If Christians were so dangerous then why is no one afraid to offend them?

Think about it!

Al Gore's relative missed Titanic's Iceberg

Did you know that Al Gore has closed 90% of his carbon offset businesses and has laid off all his staff.  No joke.  His prophetic doomsday deadline is upon us and guess what -- there be ice, everywhere.

Polar Bears and Penguins are frolicking in the winterwonderland of the Artic.  This brings me to the latest cartoon I found at Obama Cartoons:

I Though the artist nailed this with semi-seriousness. I believe the caption should read:

"You finally found some ice where your "hockey stick" WILL work.