Saturday, December 12, 2009

Firearm "Factoid" - from we the People blogsite


An interesting letter in the Australian Shooter Magazine this week, which I quote: "If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq theater of operations during the past 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths, that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.


The firearm death rate in Washington, DC is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period. That means you are about 25 percent more likely to be shot and killed in the US capital, which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the US, than you are in Iraq ... Conclusion:

"The US should pull out of Washington ..."

Ft. Hood deadline comes and goes quietly


John O. Brennan needs to go just a quietly!

Back in November 2009 I wrote an article regarding Obama handing the Ft. Hood terrorist attack (that’s right I said it! Terrorist attack!) investigation to his “Assistant to the President, for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, John Brennan. In that article I was focused on the fact that Brennan somehow went from the CEO of the company that breached the State Department passport files of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential elections to the Assistant to the President, for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. A contract employee from his firm “the Analysis Corp” was one of three individuals that breached the State Department files. The other two worked for another firm and were fired before the investigation and the employee from Analysis was “disciplined”. More importantly and in addition to the Federal Investigation of the breach, a witness that was cooperating with Federal Investigators was murdered and that case still remains unsolved to this day.


A memorandum from President Obama.

His top intelligence/counterterrorism/homeland security adviser at the White House, former CIA official John Brennan, will direct an investigation that will wrap up at the end of the month to determine what U.S. intelligence knew about “warning signs” from alleged Fort Hood shooter Nidal Malik Hasan.


On November 6, 2009, I directed that an immediate inventory be conducted of all intelligence in U.S. Government files that existed prior to November 6, 2009, relevant to the tragic shooting at Fort Hood, Texas, especially anything having to do with the alleged shooter, Major Nidal Malik Hasan, U.S. Army. In addition, I directed an immediate review be initiated to determine how any such intelligence was handled, shared, and acted upon within individual departments and agencies and what intelligence was shared with others. This inventory and review shall be conducted in a manner that does not interfere with the ongoing criminal investigations of the Fort Hood shooting. The results of this inventory and review, as well as any recommendations for improvements to procedures and practices, shall be provided to John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, who will serve as the principal point of contact on this matter for the White House.”

The brunt of the investigation is highlighted in red and basically asks about intelligence sharing between different members of the intelligence community as it related to Hasan.

This is a complete waste of time and a misdirection of attention. This is proven by the White House demand that Congress stand down until the White House investigation has run its course. The reason I say this is a waste of time is because we have already gone down this exact course in the investigation (9/11 Commission) back in 2004.

John Brennan wants to know how this could have happened, why it happened and will undoubtedly seek ways to improve them. At the time of the 9/11 Commission, John Brennan was the Director, Terrorist Threat Integration Center, Central Intelligence Agency.

In the book titled “The complete investigation”
The 9/11 Report
The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
With reporting and analysis by The New York Times

The appendix (Pg. 633) titled “Preventing Further Attacks Inside the United States

Lists John O. Brennan, Director, Terrorist Threat Integration Center, Central Intelligence Agency.

So, we are to believe, that John O. Brennan wants to get to the bottom of a “2009 Attack inside the United States” when in 2004 he had all the answers that he provided to the commission?

The following is John O. Brennan’s 9/11 Commission statement in April 2004, as reported by msmbc:

“Good morning, Chairman Kean, Vice Chairman Hamilton, and Members of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.


I welcome the opportunity to join my colleagues from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to discuss intelligence and law enforcement efforts to prevent terrorist attacks against U.S. interests. It is also a privilege for me to represent the many men and women from throughout the Government who have joined forces in an unprecedented manner in the new Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC).


As members of the Commission and the American public well know, the scourge of international terrorism poses a serious threat to U.S. interests, both at home and abroad. Since the devastating attacks of September 11, 2001, hundreds of innocent lives have been lost in terrorist attacks in Tunisia, the Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkey, and Spain. More attacks are in the planning stages, and U.S. lives and property are being actively targeted by al-Qa’ida and other terrorist organizations that have death and destruction as their principal goals.


We learned some painful lessons on September 11, 2001. We learned that while we had developed a wide array of U.S. Government counterterrorism capabilities and accrued a vast amount of information about those who would do us harm, we lacked a government-wide ability to integrate knowledge, data systems, expertise, mission, and capabilities, which are the critical weapons in the fight against terrorism. It is only through such integration of effort that we will be able to prevent future 9/11s.


As we strive as a nation to create such a framework, a key objective of the U.S. Government’s counterterrorism strategy today is to ensure that all agencies and departments involved in the fight against terrorism share threat information and finished analysis that can be used to prevent terrorist attacks. At the direction of the President, TTIC began its mission May 1, 2003, specifically to achieve this objective for counterterrorism analysis.


TTIC represents a new way of optimizing the U.S. Government’s knowledge and formidable capabilities in the fight against terrorism. For the first time in our history, a multi-agency entity has access to information systems and databases spanning the intelligence, law enforcement, homeland security, diplomatic, and military communities that contain information related to the threat of international terrorism. In fact, TTIC has direct-access connectivity with 14 separate U.S. Government networks -- with connectivity to another 10 networks planned -- enabling information sharing as never before in the U.S. Government. This unprecedented access to information allows us to gain a comprehensive understanding of terrorist threats to U.S. interests at home and abroad and, most importantly, to provide this information and related analysis to those responsible for detecting, disrupting, deterring, and defending against terrorist attacks.


A key objective of TTIC is to develop an integrated information technology architecture so that sophisticated analytic tools and federated search capabilities can be applied to the many terabytes of data available to the Federal Government. We must be able to cross check these different data sets, which are collected by departments and agencies statutorily authorized to do so, in a manner that allows us to identify terrorists and their supporters before they reach our shores or when they emerge within our midst. Simply put, we need to create new knowledge from existing information. We can do this, with complete respect for the privacy rights of U.S. persons and in accordance with the Constitution, as we work together in a collaborative and integrated manner.


There exists within the TTIC “joint venture” real-time collaboration among analysts from a broad array of agencies and departments who sit side-by-side, sharing information and connecting the scattered pieces of the terrorism puzzle. These partners include not only the FBI, CIA, and the Departments of State, Defense, and Homeland Security, but also other Federal agencies and departments, currently including the Capitol Police, the Department of Energy, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Other federal departments and agencies have been invited to join.


As envisioned by the President, this physical integration of expertise and sharing of information enables and empowers the key organizations involved in the fight against terrorism. Collectively, they are fulfilling their shared responsibilities in a fused environment, “doing business” jointly as TTIC. This fusion and synergy will be further enhanced when TTIC and most of CIA’s Counterterrorist Center and FBI’s Counterterrorism Division collocate at a state-of-the-art facility this summer.


This integrated business model not only capitalizes on our respective and cumulative expertise, but it also optimizes analytic resources in a manner that allows us to cover more effectively and comprehensively the vast expanse of terrorist threats that will face the Homeland and U.S. interests worldwide for the foreseeable future.


In simple terms, we are closing the seams among U.S. Government entities engaged in the identification and analysis of terrorism information.


The integration of perspectives from multiple agencies and departments represented in TTIC is serving as a force multiplier in the fight against terrorism. On a strategic level, TTIC provides the President and key Cabinet officials a daily analytic product on the most serious terrorist threats and related terrorism information that serves as a common foundation for decision-making regarding the actions necessary to disrupt terrorist plans. Rather than multiple threat assessments and disparate information flows on the same subject matter being forwarded separately to senior policymakers, information and finished analysis are now fused in a multi-agency environment so that an integrated and comprehensive threat picture is provided. If there are analytic differences on the nature or seriousness of a particular threat, they are incorporated into the analysis.


Similar mechanisms transform threat information and analysis into alerts and advisories in order to better prepare the Nation as well as to warn targets of potential terrorist attacks.


For example, TTIC issued a terrorist threat alert at 11:00 p.m. on 20 December of last year, which triggered senior-level discussions and a subsequent decision before noon the following day to raise the national threat condition level to “orange.”


TTIC’s analytic assessments also have had an impact overseas. TTIC advisories, warnings, and alerts about threats to U.S. interests in the Middle East, Europe, and Southeast Asia have prompted reviews and adjustments of security postures and procedures at various locations over the past year.


As part of this warning and analytic orchestration role, TTIC has been designated by the Director of Central Intelligence to lead an integrated Intelligence Community analytic effort focusing on the potential terrorist threat to the 2004 Summer Olympics in Greece.


In addition to connecting the proverbial intelligence “dots” and doing analytic assessments, TTIC also is actively working to ensure that terrorist threat information and finished analysis are disseminated to those who play a role in protecting U.S. interests at home and abroad. For example, TTIC sponsors a top secret website, TTIC Online, that has in excess of 3 ½ million terrorism-related documents at various levels of classification from the intelligence, law enforcement, homeland security, diplomatic, and military communities.


TTIC Online currently is available to over 2,600 users at every major Federal department and agency involved in counterterrorism activities.


In the coming months, TTIC Online will be replicated at lower classification levels that will enhance the ability of DHS and FBI to make more terrorism-related material available to state and local government officials, law enforcement entities, and the private sector.

In addition, a joint information-sharing program office of TTIC partner agencies is currently focused on addressing key impediments to the free flow of terrorism-related information.


The Intelligence Community traditionally has used a marking called “ORCON,” or “Originator Control," which limits the dissemination of intelligence reports. The Intelligence Community has reduced the percentage of terrorism-related ORCON documents by about half since the latter part of 2001, from approximately 11 percent then to 6 percent now.


In addition, significant progress has been made by the Intelligence Community on the use of “tear-line” reporting -- reporting where sensitive sources and methods information has been removed so the information can be disseminated in a timely manner to a broader audience. The availability and use of tear-lines has increased nearly 70 percent since 2001.


Under Homeland Security Presidential Directive 6 of September 2003, TTIC is also responsible for integrating and maintaining a single repository of all U.S. Government international terrorist identities information in support of a streamlined Government-wide system for “watchlisting” and terrorist screening activities. To date, TTIC has approximately 100,000 known or suspected international terrorist identities catalogued. This information is provided to the FBI-administered Terrorist Screening Center, which ensures that front line law enforcement officers, consular officials, and immigration and border personnel have the capability to rapidly screen individuals known or suspected to be terrorists before they enter the United States.


I cannot tell you that all of these efforts have enjoyed smooth sailing, as there are many challenges associated with what is, in essence, the crafting of a new national terrorism analysis and information-sharing framework to better protect this nation. We need to implement this revolutionary concept in a thoughtful and evolutionary fashion, as my colleagues on this panel are actively engaged in fighting a global war against terrorism, and I believe that we cannot afford to adversely affect these activities by dislocations associated with organizational change or abrupt shifts in analytic responsibility. In particular, this new national framework for the cross-government integration of information systems, expertise, and analytic missions should not come at the expense of operational, collection, covert action, and investigative activities of our Intelligence, Law Enforcement, and Homeland Security Communities.


As we continue in what is destined to be a multiyear battle against the deadly forces of international terrorism, my colleagues and I have a special obligation to learn from the painful lessons of 9/11 and to continue the task of implementing a national counterterrorism system and strategy that maximizes the security and safety of all Americans, wherever they live or work. In my personal opinion, the organizational and information-sharing status quo that existed on September 11, 2001 was inadequate to safeguard America. While significant progress has been made since then, I believe that we, as a government and as a nation, are not yet optimally configured to deal with the terrorist threat. This Commission, with its studied and comprehensive review of the events and factors that resulted in the tragedies in New York, the Pentagon, and the fields of Pennsylvania, is ideally suited to take a fresh look at how all the eclectic parts of the national counterterrorism effort fit together and whether we need to adopt new and better ways to organize ourselves. It is only by enhancing the security of Americans everywhere that we will truly honor the lives and the sacrifice of those who died more than two-and-a-half years ago.

The TTIC that was headed by Brennan was responsible for the communication sharing of the following departments.

Members of the Intelligence Community:

Department of Defense

Defense Intelligence Agency; National Security Agency; National Reconnaissance Office; National Geospacial-Intelligence Agency; Army Intelligence and Security Command; Office of Naval Intelligence; Marine Corps Intelligence Agency; Air Intelligence Agency and finally Counterintelligence Field Activity.

Non-Department of Defense members

Central Intelligence Agency; National Clandestine Service; Department of Homeland Security; Coast Guard (Intelligence; Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection); State Department; Bureau of Intelligence and Research; Energy Department; Treasury Department (Office of Intelligence and Analysis; Office of Terrorism & Financial Intelligence); Federal Bureau of Investigation; Drug Enforcement Agency and finally the Office of National Security Intelligence.

Hasan’s radical warning signs that would have been on many of the agencies listed above but not shared were:

In 2001, Hasan attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia. which was also attended by Nawaf al-Hazmi, Hani Hanjour —two September 11 hijackers—and Ahmed Omar Abu Ali (who was convicted of providing material support to al Qaeda and conspiracy to assassinate President George W. Bush) during this period; a law enforcement official said that the FBI will probably look into whether Hasan associated with the hijackers.

Anwar al-Awlaki was the mosque's imam at the time. The imam was a spiritual adviser to the hijackers, and Hasan has been reported to have deep respect for al-Awlaki's teachings. Hasan sent Awlaki as many as 20 e-mail messages from December 2008 on, but a counter-terrorism specialist who reviewed the emails at the time was of the view that the e-mails were innocuous. Soon after the attack, on his website Anwar al-Awlaki praised Hasan for the shooting, and encouraged other Muslims serving in the military to "follow in the footsteps of men like Nidal."

In a November 2009 interview through a Yemeni reporter, Al-Awlaki said Hasan arrived at his own conclusions regarding the acceptability of violence in Islam. Asked whether Hasan mentioned Fort Hood as a target in his e-mails, the reporter declined to comment. However, al-Awlaki said the shooting was acceptable in Islam because it was a form of jihad, as the West began the hostilities with the Muslims. Referring to his blog post praising the shootings after they occurred, al-Alwaki said he "blessed the act ... the soldiers who were killed were not normal soldiers, but those who were trained and prepared to go to Iraq and Afghanistan".

Faizul Khan, the former imam of a Silver Spring, Maryland, mosque where Hasan prayed several times a week said he was "a reserved guy with a nice personality. We discussed religious matters. He was a fairly devout Muslim." Hasan often expressed his wish to get married, and Khan said "I got the impression that he was a committed soldier."

During his psychiatry fellowship at USUHS, Air Force Lt. Col. Dr. Val Finnell, a medical school classmate, said that while other students' projects focused on topics such as water contamination, Hasan's project dealt with "whether the war on terror is a war against Islam." According to retired Colonel Terry Lee, "He said 'maybe Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor'. At first we thought he meant help the armed forces, but apparently that wasn't the case. Other times he would make comments we shouldn't be in the war in the first place."

Hasan's business card describes him as a psychiatrist specializing in Behavioral Health - Mental Health - Life Skills, and contains the acronyms SoA(SWT). According to investigators, the acronym "SoA" is commonly used on jihadist websites as an acronym for "Soldier of Allah" or "Servant of Allah", and SWT is commonly used by Muslims to mean "subhanahu wa ta'ala" (Glory to God). The cards neglected to mention his military rank.

A review of Hasan's computer and his multiple e-mail accounts has revealed visits to websites espousing radical Islamist ideas, a senior law enforcement official said.

Hasan had come to the attention of federal authorities at least six months before the attacks, because of internet postings he appeared to have made discussing suicide bombings and other threats, though authorities did not at the time definitively tie the postings to him. The postings, made in the name "Nidal Hasan," likened a suicide bomber to a soldier who throws himself on a grenade to save his colleagues, and sacrifices his life for a "more noble cause." No official investigation was opened.

ABC News reported that officials were aware that Hasan had attempted to contact Al Qaeda, and that Hasan had "more unexplained connections to people being tracked by the FBI" than just Anwar al-Awlaki.

Hasan was investigated by the FBI after intelligence agencies intercepted at least 18 emails between him and al-Awkali, who was under surveillance, between December 2008 and June 2009. According to journalist Brian Ross, in one of the emails Hasan wrote al-Awlaki: "I can't wait to join you [in the afterlife]," and said Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer, a military analyst at the Center for Advanced Defense Studies: "It sounds like ... he's actually either offering himself up or that he's already crossed that line in his own mind." Hasan also asked al-Awlaki when jihad is appropriate, and whether it is permissible if innocents are killed in a suicide attack. In the months before the attacks, Hasan increased his contacts with al-Awlaki to discuss how to transfer funds abroad without coming to the attention of law authorities.

Despite two Defense Department investigators on two joint task forces having looked into Hasan's communications, higher-ups at the Department of Defense stated they were not notified before the incident of such investigations

So to reiterate the need to investigate the failure of John Brennan who during the 9/11 Commission bragged that the inter-communication network of all the intelligence areas would prevent further attacks on US soil is a mockery of intelligence period.

Obama, the Department of Defense and Janet Napolitano all stated initially that we must not jump to conclusions and to await the investigation to run its course. We know that this course has already been run and the answers given to the problem. We know that the very man who had the answers, testified that he had the answers is now spearheading a new investigation less than 5 years since he testified. The Obama Administration is not interested in answers, but stifling new questions of answers given long ago by John Brennan.

One final note, Hasan when killing Americans on American soil shouted “Allah Akbar”. John Brennan testified he had the answers to prevent this in the future, that his department has all intelligence agencies sitting side by side to share information that will prevent this from happening in the future. A future less than 5 years from his testimony is all it lasted.

Friday, December 11, 2009

Democrats usher in potential “man-made-disasters”


From the NY Times to TSA

The recent outrage of the disclosure (on the internet) of the TSA Manual by Department employees is indicative of the level of misconduct and treasonous action by those on the left to hamper our national security. I am not indicating that the employees who posted the information on the internet are democrats but the Department as a whole as it is run by Obama appointee Janet Napolitano.

The latest information of the leak reports that 5 of the agencies employees have been placed on “paid administrative leave” which in the political correct world can mean one of three things:

First, the employees are truly placed on paid leave for committing this national security breach just in time to enjoy the Christmas holidays with their families, life uninterrupted.

Second, they are Union employees and in spite of the seriousness of the leak to national security breach will enjoy the Christmas holidays with their families, life uninterrupted until their union rep successfully gets them reinstated with apology letters, or

Third, the employees will enjoy this Christmas on paid furlough until such a time the news of the incident wears down and they will ultimately be scapegoats to protect their bosses.

Ms. Napolitano has already been under fire due to her lack of leadership when an underling released, ostensibly without her review, the “right wing extremist, report that listed anyone who disagrees with the socialist line, well a terrorist. Ironic they can use that term when explaining returning vets but not an Islamic holy warrior bent on our destruction.

I for one am sick and tired of the Democrats, their allies in the MSM as well as political cabinet appointees that are busy at aiding terrorists and putting this country in grave danger. It can be said (in whispered conversations) that ever since 9/11 liberals have been busy rewinding this country to 9/10.

When the 9/11 Commission wrapped up their findings (July 2004) and published their politically correct and flawed report we Americans were to feel safe that our elected leaders have found, identified and corrected our security situation.

When I say flawed it is because of the political nature of the makeup of the panel (I liken it to the “internal ACORN investigative panel” members). For instance, one of the major factors that allowed the 9/11 high-jackers to succeed in their deeds was due to the “wall” erected by Jamie Goerlick at the Justice Department that prevented law enforcement agencies at the Federal Level from communicating and sharing information on potential terror suspects. Ms. Goerlick was a prominent member of the 9/11 Commission.

The other thing that came to mind was the “Sandy Burglar” theft of Federal Archives documents before the former National Security Advisor was to testify before the panel on the Clinton Administrations handling of the “millennium plot”.

Flawed or not, the commission findings were put in place as a consensus to the “who, what, where’s and why’s of the attacks. It was intended to ensure the public that their entrusted leaders found and fixed the unfortunate circumstances surrounding the successful attacks on that fateful day that claimed so many innocent American lives, on our soil.

In July 2004 when the commission findings and recommendations were released to the public the New York Times was busy readying their first treasonous acts that gave aid and comfort to the Islamic enemies of America.

By December 16, 2005 the NYT released an article disclosing “national security secrets” on a Bush secret eavesdropping program.

The Times said they delayed reporting this story at the request of the Administration:

The White House asked The New York Times not to publish this article, arguing that it could jeopardize continuing investigations and alert would-be terrorists that they might be under scrutiny. After meeting with senior administration officials to hear their concerns, the newspaper delayed publication for a year to conduct additional reporting. Some information that administration officials argued could be useful to terrorists has been omitted.”

This means that the NYT’s was considering leaking this secret information as far back as December 2004 (just 4+ months after the 9/11 Commission report findings were made public).

The NY Times, in August 2004 published “The Complete Investigation: The 9/11 Report” with reporting and analysis in paperback book form (which this author owns).

The extensive coverage of the commission by the Times gave them full knowledge of the dangers we faced after 9/11 and with that in mind, disclosed secret US Government anti-terror tactics. There is no excuse for their treasonous actions other than the deliberate and wonton damage to national security.

The NY Times again disclosed secret (six months after their first leak and less than 2 year after the 9/11 commission report) US Government anti-terrorist tactics in mid-June 2006 when they explained our efforts at tracking terror financing.

The proof is in the pudding that the Democrats have fought the anti-terror efforts of this country and now comes sharply into focus with the actions of the Obama Administration, his Cabinet and those in Congress who have decided to allow those terror captives who planned and executed the 9/11 terror attack as well as many others around the globe a podium to spew their propaganda in a court room.

It is evident they all live in a 9/10 world! It has been roughly 9 years since the attack and they have systematically pulled this country backwards in time to that mentality. Their actions prove it beyond a shadow of doubt. To this day they push for the release of US military torture photos but do not want to disclose the terror photo’s of 9/11.

Air Force One “Flying into ignored turbulence”!


From Norway to Copenhagen the sky is blue.


As Barack Obama gave his acceptance speech to an audience in Oslow that defended his decision to a “troop surge” in war he accepted the “Peace Prize” all the while the “Conference on Global Warming” awaits his arrival to give another speech about what commitments America will give to their fraudulent cause.

Is the World upside down? As I sat down to write this article about how the obvious biased political award (the Nobel) has become over the years, the Obama trip has come into perspective due to the inter-related separate events.

When Obama was nominated 2 weeks into his Presidency for the Nobel obviously it wasn’t because of his “community organizing experience” nor for his “extensive Presidential”.

The Nobel was intended to shape his future actions on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars and to boost his “global street cred” as it had with Yassir Arafat (1994), Jimmy Carter (2002), IAEA & Mohamed ElBardei (2005) and then Al Gore & the IPCC (2007).

By nominating Obama it would put him in a difficult position politically if he decided to do anything but “cut and run” in regards to Iraq and Afghanistan.

The Award ensured that it bestowed upon him a certain path of decision making that was designed to be “anti-war”. This explains a lot when he had taken so much time in deciding what to do with General McChrystal’s request for 40-60,000 additional troops.

According to press accounts, “Obama refused to renounce war for his nation or under his leadership, saying defiantly that "I face the world as it is" and that he is obliged to protect and defend the United States.

"A nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al-Qaida's leaders to lay down their arms," Obama said. "To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism; it is recognition of history."

The president laid out the circumstances where war is justified -- in self-defense, to come to the aid of an invaded nation and on humanitarian grounds, such as when civilians are slaughtered by their own government or a civil war threatens to engulf an entire region.

"The belief that peace is desirable is rarely enough to achieve it," he said.”

“And yet Obama was staying here only about 24 hours and skipping the traditional second day of festivities. This miffed some in Norway but reflects a White House that sees little value in extra pictures of the president, his poll numbers dropping at home, taking an overseas victory lap while thousands of U.S. troops prepare to go off to war and millions of Americans remain jobless.”

The fact that Obama only spent 24 hours in the Norway is due to the low profile he intends because of the obvious shocked reaction of his winning the award in the first place coupled with those in his far left base that want him to live up to the award’s standard of appeasement and leave the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now, Obama is focusing on his other trip to Copenhagen where a conference is underway to further the “Global Warming” fraud. The credibility to the science that was hailed by the alarmists as “irrefutable and settled” is deliberately ignoring the ramifications that the “email-gate scandal” has completely discredited the foundation of their scientific claims.

Once again this behavior and the attempts to diminish the effects of the hacked emails have been surreal. Until you look at how the “Nobel” has been used to further both the anti-war efforts as well as global governance through a taxation model disguised as “man made global warming” where trillions of dollars are at stake and the erosion of American economic dominance that have stood in the way.

When you go back in time and see how the Nobel Prize has been used as a socialist tool it makes total sense:

1994 – Arafat awarded Nobel Peace Prize

"A pistol and an olive branch


In 1974, Yasser Arafat addressed the UN General Assembly. He said he was holding an olive branch for peace in one hand and a freedom fighter's pistol in the other. Twenty years later he and the Israeli leaders Peres and Rabin received the Peace Prize for having opted for the olive branch by signing the so-called Oslo Accords in Washington. The agreement was aimed at reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians."

Six years later Arafat declares his interfada and has never looked back at peace.

2002 - Jimmy Carter Awarded Peace Prize

"For his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts.

At a time when the cold war between East and West was still predominant, he placed renewed emphasis on the place of human rights in international politics.


Through his Carter Center, which celebrates its 20th anniversary in 2002, Carter has since his presidency undertaken very extensive and persevering conflict resolution on several continents. He has shown outstanding commitment to human rights, and has served as an observer at countless elections all over the world. He has worked hard on many fronts to fight tropical diseases and to bring about growth and progress in developing countries. Carter has thus been active in several of the problem areas that have figured prominently in the over one hundred years of Peace Prize history."

The failure of Jimmy Carter in Iran and North Korea (both Axis of Evil) has elevated and ushered both countries to the nuclear arms club. Yet three years after Carter receiving the award, the IAEA and ElBaradei have received it and have equally failed in this same task.

One further observation of Carter’s failure in Iran has resulted in the following:

Ironically, one Nobel (2003) recipient that did deserve the recognition was Shirin Ebadi of Iran:

"for her efforts for democracy and human rights. She has focused especially on the struggle for the rights of women and children."

In early November 2009 the Government of Iran confiscated her medal and other awards much to the dismay of the prize committee.

2005 – IAEA & Mohamed ElBaradei

"for their efforts to prevent nuclear energy from being used for military purposes and to ensure that nuclear energy for peaceful purposes is used in the safest possible way"

2007 – IPCC & Al Gore awarded Nobel Peace Prize

"for their efforts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change"

In furthering the fraud of the IPCC and Al Gore’s claims, he also won an Oscar for his movie “An Inconvenient Truth” which was discredited through fact checks in the substance of his claims.

In spite of all the propaganda in the Nobel prize to further the agenda of the global socialist, we now have Barack Obama taking Air Force One to attend the climate talks. In a bold “one-upmanship” move before the conference and after the email disclosure discrediting man made global warming as a hoax, the EPA has declared and threatened Congress with a sweeping new mandate that “breathing is dangerous” and CO2 emission are deadly. This was intended to show Copenhagen that the Socialists in America are onboard with continuing the charade and intend on handing our sovereignty over to the global elites.

Yeah, it is blue skies for Air Force One but dark skies over America.

Monday, December 7, 2009

Of US Civil War and Military Coups d’ tat


Two reports, separate days = truth?

The EU Times online news reports that the foot dragging Afghanistan troop decision by Obama was just to mask US troop movements (back to the US from other than Iraq and Afghanistan theaters) to prepare for anticipated American anarchy that will ensue in January due to complete financial system collapse. When I first read this column earlier this morning, the link to the EU Times was fine, when I went back later after researching the second half of this article the link doesn’t work anymore?


Here is a portion of that article before it was blocked:

Obama Orders 1 Million US Troops To “Prepare For Civil War”

“Russian Military Analysts are reporting to Prime Minister Putin today that US President Barack Obama has issued orders to his Northern Command’s (USNORTHCOM) top leader, US Air Force General Gene Renuart, to “begin immediately” increasing his military forces to 1 million troops by January 30, 2010, in what these reports warn is an expected outbreak of civil war within the United States before the end of winter.


According to these reports, Obama has had over these past weeks “numerous” meetings with his war council about how best to manage the expected implosion of his Nations banking system while at the same time attempting to keep the United States military hegemony over the World in what Russian Military Analysts state is a “last ditch gambit” whose success is “far from certain”.


And to Obama’s “last ditch gambit”, these reports continue, he is to announce in a nationwide address to his people this coming week that he is going to expand the level of US Military Forces in Afghanistan by tens of thousands of troops, while at the same time using the deployment of these soldiers as a “cover” for returning to the United States over 200,000 additional American soldiers from the over 800 bases in over 39 countries they have stationed around the Globe bringing the level of these forces in America to over 1 million, a number the US Military believes will be able to contain the “explosion of violence” expected to roil these peoples when they learn their economy has been bankrupted.


These reports further state that at the same time Obama will be attempting to keep his Nation from violent disintegration, the tens of thousands of additional troops he will send to Afghanistan are to be ordered to Kandahar where the Americans and their NATO allies will begin their final attempt to secure their TAPI (Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan and India) pipeline, which without the Western Nations, due to their grave lack of alternative energy resources, and being cut off from these vast Central Asian supplies (which both Russia and China are seeking to insure), are warned will totally collapse.


Making the American’s (and by extension the West’s) situation even worse are new reports coming from the International Energy Agency stating that “under pressure” from the US government they have been “deliberately underplaying” a looming Global oil shortage for fear of triggering panic buying and raising the Americans fear over the end of oil supremacy because it would threaten their power over access to our World’s last remaining oil resources.


To the scariest “end game” maneuvers being made by Obama, in his attempt to protect Americas Global hegemony, is his record shattering move in plunging the United States $3.5 Trillion further into debt, and which raises the total amount owed by the United States, to its citizens and the World, to the unprecedented height of over $106 Trillion.


So alarming has Obama’s actions become (especially since they are being imitated by all of the Western powers) that the managing-director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Dominique Strauss-Kahn, warned this past week that the “stimulus actions” of the West (which in essence is nothing more than the printing of money with nothing to back it up) has now become a “threat to democracy” as millions of people are expected to erupt in violence against their governments over the theft of their money and their futures.


Most unfortunately for the American people though is that this IMF warning fell on “deaf ears” in the United States with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis President, James Bullard, saying this week that the US would continue its “stimulus actions” because they “would give more flexibility to US policymakers”, a most absurd statement especially when viewed in the light of the unprecedented debt payments currently looming over the American economy they have no ability whatsoever to pay.


To the ability of the West’s banking giants to save their Nation’s economies, even worse news came this week with the US ratings giant Standards & Poors issuing a warning that “every single bank in Japan, the US, Germany, Spain, and Italy included in S&P’s list of 45 Global lenders remain unsafe”, a warning which then lead to one of Europe’s largest banks, Société Générale, warning its clients to prepare for a “total Global Economic Collapse”.


To the fears of Obama over the United States erupting into civil war once the full extent of the rape and pillaging of these peoples by their banks and government becomes known to them, grim evidence now shows the likelihood of this occurring much sooner than later, especially in new poll figures showing that Obama’s approval rating among white Americans has now fallen to 39%. A number made more significant when one realizes that the white population of the United States comprises 74% of their estimated 398 million citizens, or put more ominously in these reports as “over 220 million American people armed to the teeth and ready to explode”.


And so fearful has the white population of the United States become that upon the election of Obama to the Presidency he was named as the “Gun Salesman of the Year” by the Outdoor Wire, the US’s largest daily electronic news service for the outdoor industry, who report “panic buying” of weapons and ammunition by those fearful of the destruction of their country at the hands of man they believe is not even an American citizen and had been foisted upon them by their elite classes seeking to enslave them.


Though the coming civil war in the United States is being virtually ignored by their propaganda media, the same cannot be said of Russia, where leading Russian political analyst, Professor Igor Panarin has long warned that the economic turmoil in the United States has confirmed his long-held view that the US is heading for collapse, and will divide into separate parts.


Professor Igor Panarin further stated in his warning that “the US Dollar is not secured by anything. The country’s foreign debt has grown like an avalanche, even though in the early 1980s there was no debt. By 1998, when I first made my prediction, it had exceeded $2 trillion. Now it is more than 11 trillion. This is a pyramid that can only collapse.”


What remains to be seen, and these reports do not speculate upon, is if the citizen-soldiers of the United States will fire upon and kill their fellow countrymen during the coming conflict, but if history is to be our guide clearly shows this will be the case as the once great American Nation continues its headlong plunge into the abyss of history. May God have mercy upon all of them.”

Author of article unknown?

Shortly thereafter, a news article from Canada Free Press indicates that top leaders of our US Military are considering a military coup d’ tat against the US President and his constitutional trampling socialist that are dragging the country towards socialism.

“The launching of a military coup, as a method to cleanse our Marxist-veering democracy was calmly discussed in a column by John L. Perry at Newsmax.com in late September, though the article was quickly taken down from the website after broad protests, and posted elsewhere. John Perry, a traditional democrat, did not use language that was particularly inflammatory, asserting only that senior military officers who have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution, not one to obey the Commander-in-Chief, might one day relieve him of real responsibility, as they determine that the military was being dangerously weakened and that many of our freedoms were being unconstitutionally usurped by the federal government.”

Here is the complete Newsmax article penned by John Perry on 9/30/09:

Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

"By John L. Perry – NewsMax


September 30, 2009 - There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic.


America isn't the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:


# Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States."


# Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized.


# They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President BarackObama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.


# They can see that the economy -- ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation -- is financially reliant on foreign lender governments.


# They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.


# They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America's troop strength is allowed to sag.


# They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.


# They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.


So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?


Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan's arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?


Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran's nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?


What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?


Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?


Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America's military leadership is lost in a fool's fog.


Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?


Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.


Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.


Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later."


In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass."

Each article if they were stand on their own (without the other) could be viewed as far fetched and even downright conspiratorial. But when you put both in context, it makes you think about the possibilities of reality given the state of the country’s financial system and the obvious disregard for the constitution that military members (officers and enlisted) are bound, by oath, to defend against both foreign and domestic.

Could it be possible that top brass are considering this? It is not unconceivable given the arrogance and total disregard that the Democratic leadership have historically have exhibited towards our military members and their missions. When men and women take that oath onto a battlefield, risking their life, it is something that few Americans understand unless they have taken this oath themselves. I am a former active duty Navy serviceman of 6 years (‘77-‘83) and still hold this oath paramount in spite of my 26 year separation from active duty.

The toxic teleprompter


The 2010 Congressional elections will be interesting!

I will just come out and say what is on my mind first then I will give the boring statistical information to follow, that way I will save you a nap. Obama has lost any shred of credibility he may have had to begin with before the election due to his lies, distortions and actions that are harming this country. As a result, when the massive tea party participants as well as the 8+ million Americans that have sent Congressional leaders their “pink slips” (at a personal cost of $29.95 to FedEx) flock to the voting booths to throw out the incumbent bums in 2010 Obama will be an ineffective and unwanted stumping voice in the run-up to the election. He and his teleprompter will be toxic to them. Here goes the boring stuff, proceed at your own peril.


In July 2008 polling data showed Congressional Approval ratings at a historic low of 14%.

Starting in January 2008 those who approved of the Job Congress was doing sat at 23% and by July it dropped to 14% (a -9% drop) while in January 2008 those who disapproved was sitting at 71% increased, by July to 75% (a +4% increase) just short of the record high of 78% in 1992.

These numbers were recorded during a Democrat majority with Bush in the White House and are sure to prove to a problem for Democrats as Congress historically takes the brunt of voter dissatisfaction as economic conditions worsen.

President Polling Data (January to present):

In January 2009 Obama was swept into office with an approval rating sitting at 70%+ and by August 2009 to 52-57% (depending on which poll you were reading). In December 2009 we find Obama at 49% (a -21%+ drop in approval over a 10 month period).

Current economic issues to watch:

The stock market is up, but it is a deceptive indicator to hang your hats on and here is why! Despite Obama’s stimulus “shovel ready job promises” the WSJ has reported that the nation’s main highway contractors are out of jobs without much on the horizon. Couple this with a stagnant job market that is still shedding vs. hiring the economic outlook is bleak, despite a Union and Education heavy vs. business community light “Obama Job Summit”.

Finally, when the retail sectors report their life saving “Christmas” sales as dismal the “perfect storm” of discontent will turn against anyone with a title of Congressman or Senator before their names in 2010.

The Obama TARP slush fund has been exposed in the “Healthcare Bill” house vote when Mary Landreau received $300 million for her critical vote. That is just a mere drop in the bucket compared to the hundreds of billions that is still available for Senate vote buying money. Eyes will be glued to the Senate debates and text of a Bill that will ultimately be approved as a result. We will see the extent that the White House will dole out to key Senate Democrats to secure a bill that is vital to Obama’s credibility (his Waterloo).

When Obama provided the surge in Afghanistan he pissed off his base, regardless of the cover Senator Kerry tried to provide with his Bush bashing flip flop version of the Tora Bora Bin Laden escape he leaked to the press one day before Obama’s announcement. The economic and troubling foreign and domestic policies that have come out of this non-exclusive, secretive and job killing Administration has resulted in the Independents running away faster than Jackie Joyner Kersey and then there are those anti-Democrat/Socialist Republicans that have not cooperated on iota on anything but the confirmation of Sotomayor.

Nope, nada, zip is what Obama will be able to provide incumbents that have risked everything they achieved in the way of personal political power. If Obama manages to find anyone that wants to have him endorse them on the campaign trail then it will only go to prove they are both devoid of reality, at least ours.