Thursday, June 18, 2009

Carter proclaims Israeli's treat Palestinians like animals, News flash -- they are!

Jimmie the traitor has opened his vile mouth again when he travelled to Gaza to view the territories and to hold talks with Hamas when he stated that Israeli's treat the Palestinians like animals.
He went on to say that during the last flare up of fighting (which Hamas started by lobbing rockets at innocents), Israel intentionally targeted an American School with bombs from an F16.
The school was being used to shield and harbor terrorist activities! But hey, schools, mosques, ambulances, hospitals are off limits (which coincidently Hamas uses all to further their terror).
"I have to hold back tears when I see the deliberate destruction that has been wracked against your people," he said earlier at a destroyed American school, decrying the fact that the school was "deliberately destroyed by bombs from F16s made in my country."
"I feel partially responsible for this as must all Americans and Israelis." If the Palestinians want to be treated like humans than they need to act like humans. For instance, after 9/11 Al-Jazeera showed tens of thousands of happy and gleeful Palestinians that danced in joy at the 3,000 US deaths at the hands of terror. Women/mothers are proud and paraded and treated like royalty when they sacrifice a young child from their family in a suicide bombing against innocent civilians.
Yeah, thats human alright.

Something isn’t right in DC, Are the Federal Reserve and Treasury counterfeiting US Bonds?

There are a couple of things that have happened in the law enforcement and the Government Financial sectors that are curious.
Last week I posted a thread here:
The pair of Japanese nationals was arrested in Italy attempting to cross into Switzerland with $134.5 Billion dollars in US Bonds (249 issued in $500 million and 10 worth more than $1 Billion face value).
If these US Bonds are real then the 2 Japanese men alone would rank as the fourth largest creditor ahead of the UK ($128 Billion) and behind Russia ($138 Billion).
So, tell me why is it that the largest smuggling case in history gone unreported in the US mainstream media? The story broke here:
Furthermore, back in March 2009 “The Wall Street Journal” published an article that reported on the balance of the $700 TARP fund account was down to $134.5 Billion dollars (the exact amount of US Bonds these 2 Japanese men were smuggling into Switzerland) and Reuters also ran a story on the TARP fund balance. it coincident that the amount of remaining TARP fund balance and the “counterfeit Bonds” seized the same amount? Why has the US and Italian Press silent on the story?
On June 11th and just 3 days after the arrest our Treasury Secretary met with Japans Finance Minster and then on June 16th the Italian PM shows up at the White House. Yet for all the fanfare of the two “high profile meetings” between two countries that have been involved in this arrest there was no mention of the arrest as a topic of discussion or even to hold a press conference to re-assure the country that the SEC, FBI and Italian police are cooperating to get to the bottom of the largest counterfeit bond case in the worlds history?
The White House has also been silent?
The Obama Administration is, again, attempting to push through sweeping “financial reform” through the Senate in a rush that would give the Treasury Department unheard of powers that should bring pause to anyone who calls themselves American. With the head of Treasury (Turbo Tax Cheat Geitner) stonewalling any and all efforts to divulge to the public a full accounting of the bailout money (which they are required to do by law and have refused) and TARP funds, the thought of giving them even more power is disturbing.In addition, the “financial overhaul” is coming at a time when Congress now has enough co-signatures on a bill that would, for the first time in the 90+ history of the “Federal Reserve”, force a full disclosure audit of that agency.
Though I have not seen the details of Obama’s sweeping regulatory changes, it will be interesting to see if it has a “blocking” maneuver over the Ron Paul legislation for the audit of the Federal Reserve.
With everything being shoved through Congress by insistence of this socialist Congress, Senate and White House and the amount of money being printed and Bonds equaling UK’s debt investment total and the US dollar on the brink of collapse, it is hard not to think that there are those in our own government that are hastening the fall.
The quality of the forgeries were such that only a Government with the technology and printing presses could produce. The amounts of the Bonds are such a high amount that only Countries have them and that no individuals do. So what country printed these bonds and where were they going when they were apprehended?

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Democrats turn a “crisis into a catastrophe”, Biden declares “everybody guessed it wrong”

In an attempt to share the blame for the “catastrophe” that the democrats own lock-stock-and barrel Joe Biden admits they got it wrong when they predicted the jobs that were to be created (3.5 million) if the $878 billion economic stimulus bill wasn’t passed quickly.
It turns out that Biden NOW predicts only 600,000 jobs will be saved or created by the plan. First things first, while it is admirable that the Democrats finally want to share something with their opponents on the other side of the isle this bill’s failure isn’t one of them that we want or will accept.
As I recall it, in order to rush this bill into law our feckless and irresponsible elected ones failed to even read the damned thing.
“Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) predicted on Thursday that none of his Senate colleagues would "have the chance" to read the entire final version of the $790-billion stimulus bill before the bill comes up for a final vote in Congress.” Cns news 2/13/09“
The Democrats have thrown this at us very last-minute,” said Rep. Zach Wamp (R-Tenn.).
“That’s why the rule of thumb in the United States Congress should be, ‘When in doubt, vote no,’ because the devil is in the details and that’s why this stimulus is not worthy of support.” Cns news 2/13/09“
The bill is expected to land on President Obama’s desk no later than Monday, and the president is expected to sign it into law--whether the nation's lawmakers have read it or not.” Cns news 2/13/09
To be fair, most of the Republicans failed to read it, which is why they all voted no which is quite different than voting yes on a bill that can be enacted without knowing what is in it or even if it contains provisions that are “unconstitutional”.
Now for my next recollection, the final Senate vote for passage of this bill was 61 yeas and 36 nays which were all the Republicans.
The 61 yeas consisted of 58 Democrats and three Republicans (Susan Collins, Olympia Snow and Arlen Specter).
“With the nation falling deeper into recession, Obama used the first prime-time news conference of his presidency to warn that a failure to act “could turn a crisis into a catastrophe.”
He defended his plan against Republican criticism that it is loaded with pork-barrel spending and will not create jobs. “The plan is not perfect,” the president said, addressing the nation. “No plan is."
I can’t tell you for sure that everything in this plan will work exactly as we hope, but I can tell you with complete confidence that a failure to act will only deepen this crisis as well as the pain felt by millions of Americans.” Obama said 90 percent of the jobs created by the plan would be in the private sector, rebuilding crumbling roads, bridges and other aging infrastructure.” - Msmbc 2/9/09
So a little math recap here:
Joe Biden now declares that the $838 billion dollar economic stimulus bill will only net (or save) 600,000 jobs in 2009. The unemployed in May 2009 alone was 787,000 which by my math is a loss of -187,000 before we even get to the end of the May.
“Moments before the vote, the Congressional Budget Office issued a new estimate that put the cost at $838 billion, an increase from the $827 billion figure from last week. "This bill has the votes to pass. We know that," conceded Sen. John Thune, a Republican who has spoken daily in the Senate against the legislation.
Even so, in the hours before Monday's vote, he and other Republican opponents attacked it as too costly, and unlikely to have the desired effect on the economy. "This is a spending bill, not a stimulus bill," said Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Republican. All 36 votes in opposition were cast by Republicans.” – msmbc 2/9/09
With the defection (or as I call it, RINO’s declaring their Democrat roots) the MSM hailed the bill as “bi-partisan” (which meant 3 Republicans broke ranks and voted with the democrats – 3!).
For instance, a 2/7/09 “CNN headline” read:
This is not bipartisan," said Sen. John McCain, who lost the 2008 election to Obama. "If this legislation is passed, it'll be a very bad day for America."
"This is not some abstract debate. It is an urgent and growing crisis," President Obama said at a White House ceremony unveiling a new economic advisory board. "If we drag our feet and fail to act, this crisis will turn into a catastrophe."
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the administration was pleased with the progress. "On the day when we learned 3.6 million people have lost their jobs since this recession began, we are pleased the process is moving forward and we are closer to getting Americans a plan to create millions of jobs and get people back to work," Gibbs said.
Before the bill reached the Senate for their vote the House passed the bill with a vote of 244-188. The breakdown of the vote went something like this:244 Democrats voted yeah, with 11 Democrats voting against it! 177 Republicans voted Nay, 1 Republican not voting.
So when Biden and the Democrats fellow travelers in the MSM try to sell us on the fact that “everyone got it wrong” is cow flop. The only ones who voted for this “spending bill” vs. “economic stimulus bill” were Democrat/Socialists with 3 Republicans in name only voting with them. One of the three has since defected (Specter) back to the Democrats with leave the two Senators that hail from the State of Maine as the traitors to the American Public and their intended political parties.

Friday, June 12, 2009

Another example of the trampling of "free speech", Bucknell University requires permit to hand out bibles

The Conservative Club on campus at Bucknell University has their hands full with school administrators these days.
In a two month period, they have had 3 of their peaceful protest activities shut down completely. The latest being the administrators requiring a permit to hand out free bibles on campus."Bucknell promises free speech, but it delivers selective censorship," Kind of sounds like the County in San Diego requiring a permit for bible study in private homes.
On its face, it looks like "whats the big problem, obtain a permit and hand out bibles, right". Well back in March, the student group tried to hand out fake dollar bills with President Obama's face on the front and the sentence "Obama's stimulus plan makes your money as worthless as monopoly money" on the back. Mickanis (administrator) told the students they were "busted" and they needed a special permit for their "solicitation."
She told the students their offense was the equivalent of handing out Bibles -- thus the idea to do just that.Then in April, to protest "affirmative action and the reverse discrimination that the college doles out in favor of minorities over non-minorities the group held a "bake sale" which was also shut down because it needed one of those pesky permits.
The group then applied for a permit and it was shut down for reasons that the bake sale was discriminitory against minorities (because a donut was more expensive for one group than another -- again to make the political point of the affirmative action policy and its discriminatory effects."
The protests are thus intended to satirize and spark debate about affirmative action policies, not to raise revenue."

Obama is exporting Islamic Terror, Palau agrees to take Chinese Muslims

It appears that we the taxpayers are bribing the "Politicians of Palau" with roughly $19.92 million dollars per terrorist to have that small island tropical paradise take these terrorists.
It appears that the Obama Administration has dangled the $220 million "aid package" to that nation contingent upon receipt.
Whatever political gain the Administration thought it could gain by stating we had finally found another country to "voluntarily" take these criminals will be rendered moot. The effects of this hostage negotiations (money for terrorists) is already having an effect across the globe and not the effect Obama wanted.
The first effect is from the groundswell of opposition (now that the Palau public knows that their leader has agreed to import terror to the small predominately Christian nation) of fear for individual safety and the effects that this decision will have on the one commodity that they rely on -- tourism!
Secondly, China is very, very mad at the US for going against their demand NOT to send any of their nationals to a third party country.
So it appears that Obama is not just happy with decimating the US economy through arrogant policy decisions, he now will be responsible for the decline of a tropical tourist haven. Hey, maybe now that Christian nation can look to the muslim tourist trade and replace the cabanas and surf board shops with prayer rug vendors and skull cap retailers.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Donald Trump to Miss California, "You're fired!"

Surprise, suprise! It was learned that the outspoken Gay Marraige critic was fired from her duties as winner after Trump said that she violated her contract agreement on appearances?
I am sure the outspoken woman will illucidate us as to where she failed to go -- perhaps a code pink rally or someplace that would have been in direct conflict of her beliefs?
Time will tell......

New York Senate doors locked down after coup d' atat, Republicans oust Democratic Majority Leader

This is what is happening in New York. It is difficult to determine whether the move that Republicans pulled off where they moved 2 democrats to their ranks and overthrew the Senate Democrat majority (kinda of like Specter?). Democrats cried foul and locked the Senate doors which the Republicans said was illegal.Where will this end??

Will Tiller be accepted into heaven?, Can God absolve him of his 60,000 deaths

The funeral of Dr. Tiller the late term abortion doctor who self admittedly performed over 60,000 abortions was held today. The family struggled through the tough time of losing a loved one while others not so forgiving protested his life as evil. Those who protested were indeed a fringe religious group that also protests our fallen soldiers as homosexuals. The anti-abortion crowd stayed away in respect of the family.The question I wish to pose is this:Given the unspeakable devestation on human life at the hands of this man, is God benevolent enough to receive him in heaven or do you think there is a "special place in hell awaiting?"

Right Wing Extremist may get his wish, to Audit the Federal Reserve and Federal Reserve Banks

Ron Paul was cited as one of the main worries that the DHS "Right Wing Extremist" report divulged as those who follow him are deemed dangerous.
Ron Paul, for years has advocated that Congress audit the Federal Reserve (a private institution that has no government oversight) because of it's very nature of being a private company with powerful autonomous reach and the ability to sign treaties with other nations without any input or scrutiny from Congress.
With TARP, Bank Bailouts, Auto Bailouts and Americans distrustful of just where our money is going we finally may see light at the end of the tunnel.There are 435 members of Congress and Ron Paul has 213 co-sponsors lined up for this bill. He only needs to reach the magic number of 5 (to gain a procedural majority to assure the bill sees the light of day).
I for one will review the list of cosponsors and write to those who are not on it. The Federal Reserve system needs to go away and our old (95 years ago) "gold standard" needs to be re-asserted.

Monday, June 8, 2009

Liberal Corruption goes on trial, William “Cold Cash” Jefferson’s day in court

Back in 2005, when the democrats were telling any and all camera’s in close proximity about the “culture of corruption” the Republicans were mired in, one of their own was caught with $90,000 in his DC freezer.
I have been waiting with baited breath for this trial as the democrats managed to allow him to keep his seat in Congress after his arrest (after all you are innocent until proven guilty – unless you are a Conservative politician).
This case, as in most high profile cases have already been tried in the press. To solidify their case against Jefferson the FBI “raided his office in DC” and the open hostility from the Democrats began with charges of “political motivated” policing actions. It was the first time in our history that a “sitting Congressman’s” office was raided by law enforcement. “The 83-page affidavit, used to raid Jefferson's Capitol Hill office on Saturday night, portrays him as a money-hungry man who freely solicited hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes, discussed payoffs to African officials, had a history of involvement in numerous bribery schemes and used his family to hide his interest in high-tech business ventures he promoted in Cameroon, Ghana and Nigeria.” – Washington Post
Congressional leaders were outraged and challenged the legality of the raid to the press. The raid was deemed constitutional. What was interesting was that the outrage was actually coming from both sides of the isle. It is no wonder considering the sheer number of corrupt Congressional members taking influence payments and perks from Corporate Lobbyists to buy votes on bills and Senate seats.Jefferson’s attorney has indicated that he will attack the prosecutions star witness credibility as the defense has subpoenaed her medical and mental health records and will call into question her ability to remember.
The prosecution is not worried about their witnesses and their memories as they were wearing a wire during the sting.The biggest hurdle of all is the money. The foil wrapped cash that was confiscated from Jefferson two days after the sting is the money (marked) that they gave him for the bribe. The attorney for the defense will try to convince a jury that this is just a case of “influence peddling” vs. bribery but will have a hard time as once again the entire transaction was videotaped and recorded.As a final note, it was Jefferson who diverted National Guard assets that were being used to rescue civilians during Hurricane Katrina to remove personal belongings from his home. He has also been caught up in other controversies when he removed his “sponsorship” of blood money diamond legislation just before he took a trip to Africa on the dime of corrupt politicians in Africa who were exploiting the issue.In spite of all the negative and toxic publicity surrounding this corrupt man, he still managed to keep his Congressional seat until he lost his re-election bid.

Sunday, June 7, 2009

Tiller was targeted with violence in the past, What if he had a "concealed gun" permit?

I always look to this question when we hear about someone shot dead in a public place so I decided to check on the "conceal" laws in Witchita, KS to see if Tiller would have had the right to carry because the anti-gun crowd always high-jacks shootings to gain the political high ground.

This is what I found.

In 2007 for the first time in a long time Kansas passed legislation for citizens right to carry a concealed weapon. We do not know if Tiller or the two other men that were accosted by this crazed individual would have made the outcome any different had they had the opportunity to brandish their own weapons, or the very least if the crazed individual knew that the possibility of other armed citizens in close proximity would have deterred his actions.

Though Kansas passed this legislation the Kansas attorney general allowed for business owners to hang signs that prohibited concealed weapons in the private establishments. The law also forbids concealed weapons in the following areas within the state:

"schools, libraries, government buildings, courtrooms, bars, sporting events, or places of worship"

One thing we can conclude is that the crazed individual would have known, up front, that no-one would have been armed on this particular day in this particular "place of worship" thereby giving him a level of comfort from harm.

The 2007 legislation effectively disarms the ability of self defense in the places where you see the more violent massacres by creating "no gun zones" in cities that have the right to carry.

Obama’s Iron Curtain, He has spent Billions to erect it and close to $1 million dollars to defend it!

“Birthers”, you can’t live with them and you can’t shoot em and they certainly aren’t going away anytime soon.

Every single legal lawsuit, every single request to have Obama provide this “long form” could had been rectified and the matter put to rest that would have shown that the “birthers” were wrong or misguided or even politically motivated if Obama just release the document in question.

It begs the question, why go to the extent and legal costs, negative publicity and further fueling the controversy if Obama did not have anything to hide?

The answer is “he certainly has something to hide – the fact that he is not a US citizen by birth or naturalization therefore is not eligible to hold the office of President.

Even before the Usurper was swept into office with billions of dollars from foreign contributions, Soros cash and union money the so-called “birthers” have been demanding that Obama prove that he was actually born in the US vs. Kenya Africa (which would satisfy the US Constitutional requirements for those who wish to be POTUS). The Senate held hearings on John McCain’s eligibility to become POTUS because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone, on a US military Base but no such scrutiny after all of the questions surround Obama.

The MSM and Obama campaign officials have labeled the requesters as “kooks” and “crazies” for persisting in this demand since the Obama camp posted his “short form” certificate on its web site in an attempt to quiet them. So why is the persistent noise still coming about an issue that seemed to be satisfied by the transparent posting of this requested birth certificate by Obama really all about? Here is the answer:

In the year that Obama claims he was born in a Hawaiin hospital, by a physician (which the short form does not show where and by whom) and the State of Hawaii policy for the short form allowed births that took place in foreign countries to be registered in Hawaii. This is at the heart of the “birthers” demand because the short form provided by the Obama campaign only certifies that the State of Hawaii has a long form on record and does not certify that Obama was actually born in the State of Hawaii. came to the rescue of the Obama camp when it declared that they “spent time with the document recently and confirm it is the real McCoy in an attempt to authenticate it.

Problem: is funded primarily through the “Annenberg Foundation” (A Bill Ayers endeavor and Obama sat on the Board of Directors of Annenberg) thus making their impartiality impossible. In addition to the claim that “spent time recently with the document and posted 9 photographs of what it claimed were different aspects of Obama's "Certificate of Live Birth", all in less than optimal and idiosyncratic lighting conditions. All of them were taken over a less than seven minute period on March 12, 2008 from 10:40:18 to 10:47:02 at night.

According to Wikipedia:

“ is a nonpartisan, nonprofit website that describes itself as a "'consumer advocate' for voters that aims to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics.” It is a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania, and is funded primarily by the Annenberg Foundation.”

The 9 photos that maintains they spent time with were time stamped March 12, 2008 and was well before any questions were being raised about his Birth Certificate because at the time he was considered a “long shot” to beat Hillary in the distant Democratic Primaries and at such a late hour (normally when Sandy Burglar was doing his best casework).

So regardless of those protecting Obama from this disclosure the question of where Obama was truly born (Kenya or Hawaii) has not been satisfied by any definitive proof regardless of Factchecks corroboration.Questions surrounding the “copy” and whether it was forged, investigative reporting:

Of course we have to go to an overseas news site to get the information that the American Press won’t give us.Obama’s pledge of transparency doesn’t apply to this issue and certainly doesn’t apply to the Press:

Obama’s Press Secretary Robert Gibbs communicated that only one question be allowed regarding the “Birth Certificate request” by the pool of reporters (where the reporter pool has their questions rationed out according to their loyalty).

When the reporter for WND finally got his turn for a question, it was about the “Birth Certificate issue:

Gibbs was contentious with Kinsolving before he ever asked his question. Calling on WND's longtime correspondent, he said: "Lester, I'm a glutton for punishment."

Kinsolving said: "Thank you, thank you, very much. Just one question concerning what the president said in his speech on Thursday, and I quote, 'I ran for president promising transparency, and I meant what I said. This is why, whenever possible, we will make information available to the American people so they can make informed judgments and hold us accountable.' End of quote. Do you remember that statement?"

Gibbs: "I can confirm that he said that."

Kinsolving: "Good. In consideration of this very good promise of transparency, why can't the president respond to the petition to requests of 400,000 American citizens by releasing a certified copy of his long-form birth certificate listing hospital – (laughter) – 400,000. …"

Gibbs: "Are you looking for the President's birth certificate?"

Kinsolving: "Yes."

Gibbs: "It's on the Internet, Lester."

Kinsolving: "No, no, no -- the long form listing his hospital and physician." (Laughter.)

Gibbs: "Lester, this question in many ways continues to astound me. The state of Hawaii provided a copy with the seal of the President's birth. I know there are apparently at least 400,000 people – (laughter) – that continue to doubt the existence of and the certification by the state of Hawaii of the president's birth there, but it's on the Internet because we put it on the Internet for each of those 400,000 to download. I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we'll have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy."

And with that, Gibbs ended the briefing.

Before I get into the numerous lawsuits that have been filed in numerous State courts as well as the ones in Federal courts I want to point out how CBS is complicit in this silencing of the question surrounding Obama’s long form birth certificate. There is a grassroots effort to erect billboards around the country that say the following:


It does not mentioned Obama’s name (to get around the new campaign laws set to take effect in 2012 that pose restrictions on political advertising mentioning President Campaign names).

CBS owns the majority of billboards around the United States through its media subsidiary and have contacted and denied selling any “adspace” to the group for the following reason:

"misleading, offensive, or otherwise incompatible with individual community standards,"

Supreme Court Sabotage?

“A California attorney whose emergency submission to the U.S. Supreme Court on President Obama's eligibility was turned back without a hearing or comment now is submitting a motion for re-hearing alleging some of her documentation may have been withheld from the justices by a court clerk.

The motion for reconsideration alleges a court clerk "of his own volition and on his own authority refused to file of record, docket, and forward to the Chief Justice and Associate Justices petitioners' supplemental brief presented on January 15, 2009." Taitz explained in the motion that she submitted a brief Jan. 15 that reflected new developments in the case. She noted such filings "are allowed, when there is a new law or changed circumstance in the case." The change was the approval by Congress of the Electoral College vote in the presidential race. However, the clerk "refused to file this brief in the docket, stating that he will send it back with [an] explanation," the motion states. "Nothing was sent back and no explanation [was] provided.“But now Taitz is raising concerns about manipulation of her case at the Supreme Court.

She asserts docketing information about her case "was erased from the docket of the Supreme Court on January 21st, one day after the inauguration and two days before [the case was to be heard]." – wnd

Department of Justice Sabotage?

Below is a follow up to the original request to the US States Attorney inquiring the status of the Quo Waranto which, by law, he had 45 days to respond. On May 28, 2009 without answer Jeffrey A. Taylor resigned (or was he forced out).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------United States Attorney, Jeffrey A. Taylor

Judiciary Center Building

555 Fourth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20530

Ph (202)514-7566;

Fax (202)307-3569

May 5, 2009

Honorable United States Attorney Taylor

Re: Request for the United States to timely relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II to Test His Title to President

On March 29, 2009, the Relators below brought information in the nature of Quo Warranto that Barack Hussein Obama II is usurping the office of President. The information in the public record indicates that by Amendment XX, President Elect Barack Obama had failed to qualify under Article II, as not being a “natural born citizen” etc.

Like the Realtors, are you not bound by your Oath of Office to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic . . .”?

5 USC 3331. Our Founders demonstrated the supreme standard of “appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of [their] intentions.” Declaration of Independence – 1776.

Relators requested that, by your codified responsibilities as US Attorney, you institute a Quo Warranto proceeding against Obama under DC Code § 16-3502, and demand that Obama show clear title, proving, with clear and convincing evidence, that he had qualified as President elect, for the federal office of President.

The petition for redress of grievances securing the Constitution as preserved in Amendment 1 of the US Constitution, as codified in the security of Magna Carta section 61. By organic law of the District of Columbia, the common law including sections of the Magna Carta remain in force.

DC ST § 45-401. This security guaranteed prompt redress of grievances within forty days. Relators humbly request that you act on the information they related in the nature of Quo Warranto within this 40 days established in Common Law.

By their oath of office and and interest above other citizens and taxpayers, Relators submitted that they have standing.

The District of Columbia Code provides clear jurisdiction for Quo Warranto. Relators related this information in the form of draft motions to the United States District Court, in the District of Columbia. This quo warranto focuses on the foundational issue of enforcing and preserving our Constitution’s vital safeguards provided to preserve our Republic from tyranny.

We pray that you promptly provide redress and file this Quo Warranto.

Yours sincerelyOrly Taitz, Esq.,

Attorney for Relators

26302 La PazMission

Viejo CA 92691

Phone 949-683-5411


ALLEN C. JAMES, US Army, Active Duty, currently in Iraq

RAYMOND REFITT, Commander, Nuclear Submarine, US Navy,

RetHARRY RILEY, Colonel, US Army,

RetCHARLES E. MILLER, Lt. Col. US Air Force,

RetTIMOTHY W. KENNEY, Citadel Instructor, USMC veteran, Virginia Army National Guard

RALPH H. JENKINS, Cpt US Marine Corps

ERIC SWAFFORD, State Representative of Tennessee

LARRY RAPPAPORT , State Representative of New Hampshire

CYNTHIA DAVIS, State Representative of Missouri

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In addition to the “quo warranto” request to US Attorney taylor another was sent to the US Attorney General (Eric Holder).

If Holder refuses to act on the request (ostensibly because of a “conflict of interest” because he is an Obama appointee, then the matter falls back to the US Attorney Taylor.

But, wait – he can’t rule on the request because he has resigned which places the request in limbo and needs to be filed anew with the new US Attorney who will ultimately replace him.

See the circle of avoidance here?

Whitehouse Dialogue scrubbed “birther requests” from website

Per WND – “With more than 200 individual threads and thousands of comments on the eligibility issue alone, moderators of the White House website on "open government dialogue" have been working tirelessly to edit the dialogue about Barack Obama's elusive "long-form" birth certificate.

Many of the top-rated threads are from citizens calling on Obama to release his birth certificate. The postings in the "top rated" category have received the most "looks promising" votes from users. New threads on the topic of Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president are appearing by the minute. WND observed the "Making Data More Accessible" section for several hours as more suggestions appeared and at least 60 were subsequently deleted on the first page alone – all requests for the president to submit proof of citizenship.”

Surprise, surprise the “birth certificate” question did not make it to the next round of discussions.

Saturday, June 6, 2009

The number is now up to 5, another Gitmo inmate commits suicide

Usually when an Islamic Terrorist commits suicide it has a large group of innocents around him that bear the brunt of the deed. If there is one thing good that has come from those who would inflict maximum carnage in order to receive 72 virgins in the next life that are being held at Gitmo it would be that no-one else dies when they kill themselves.

Those who reside at our lavish hotel called Gitmo it is best to remember that most of them are busy sending others to their deaths and do not do so themselves (kind of like Charles Manson did with his family).

It also goes to show how stupid they are knowing that "Comrade Obama" is on their side and he is trying to get them released if it weren't for the stupid fact that everyone else in the world doesn't want it so.

ACLU have finally found resistance, High School Students defy lawsuit on Faith

Six months ago the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Santa Rosa County District which they forced, by way of consent decree that "essentially bans all Santa Rose County School District employees from engaging in prayer or religious activities."

It all started when Principal Frank Lay asked the athletic director to bless a meal at a school function. Then a teacher's husband (not a school board or school employee) offered a "prayer" at an awards ceremony. In came the ACLU guns blazing.As preparations were being made for the 2009 graduation, the ACLU demanded the school censor students from offering prayers or saying anything religious.

As a result, two student leaders traditionally allowed by the school to address their graduation were banned from doing so. As the ACLU does, they intimidated the school district and the school employees from such an attrocity but the students wanted no part of it. As soon as Lay asked everyone to be seated for the ceremony, the graduating seniors remained standing and recited the Lord's Prayer."

Many of the students also painted crosses on their graduation caps to make a statement of faith," the organization reported. "Neither students nor teachers shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate!"

The school was Pace High School and their mascot is the "Patriot" (same emblem that the NE Patriots sport as their logo).

Hats off to the young Patriots....

A strike against Sharia, Eastern District Court - Michigan rules against US

When the US Government decided in their infinate wisdom to "bail-out AIG" for a second time I wrote a scathing article because of 3 reasons.

1. We were socializing private sectors companies -- unamerican

2. We were allowing AIG to funnel the billions to "off-shore" subsidiaries -- foreign banks

3. That the US was now promoting Sharia law through 2 of the "subsidiaries" -- Sharia banking -- which was in direct violation of the Constitutions Establishment Clause (Separation of Church and State)!

I pointed out, by name, these subsidiaries and what they were doing to gain Muslim customers that Sharia law prohibited from profiting in "interest payments on the accounts".

Flash forward -- An individual (American Taxpayer) brought a lawsuit against the Federal Government based on this violation and the Judge, against the Governments request to dismiss the case on the grounds that the individual did not have standing (where have we heard that before -- Obama's birth certificate lawsuits) and that when the US Government bought the company they did not intend to hold one religion over another.

The US Government thankfully to us taxpayers are on shaky ground here. No doubt when this gets to the "discovery phase" of the trial the Government will move for "summary judgement" to say the Plaintiffs case is too weak to gain judgement, but they will have a mountain to climb in order to pull that manuever off, because --According to NRO --

"In this case, the United States government has a majority interest in AIG. AIG utilizes consolidated financing whereby all funds flow through a single port to support all of its activities, including Sharia-compliant financing. Pursuant to the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, the government has injected AIG with tens of billions of dollars, without restricting or tracking how this considerable sum of money is spent. At least two of AIG’s subsidiary companies practice Sharia-compliant financing, one of which was unveiled after the influx of government cash. After using the $40 billion from the government to pay down the $85 billion credit facility, the credit facility retained $60 billion in available credit, suggesting that AIG did not use all $40 billion consistent with its press release. Finally, after the government acquired a majority interest in AIG and contributed substantial funds to AIG for operational purposes, the government co-sponsored a forum entitled “Islamic Finance 101.”

The fact that our Treasury Department held a sanctioned forum on Islamic Finance 101 shows intent to infuse Muslim customers into a US banking system that Sharia Law forbids. The Government is complicit here.

Finally, an article was written about this forum titled:

What Is Sharia Finance? Don't Ask the Treasury!

It is a disturbing read but a must if you want to understand what our own government is doing to promote Islamic banking on our shores.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

What links "Tiller the Killer" to the "BTK Killer", Both attended the same Church

According to demcrats and liberal activists that label those who do not believe in Pro-Choice as "right wing extremist/terrorist" have seen the MSM point a collective finger of guilt at the "Pro-life movement" for his brutal demise.

Thats right, the MSM has said that Bill O'Reilly is guilty for whipping up the radical base of Pro-lifers until they murdered one of the lefts own when he ran repeated news stories about Tiller.

The finger pointing at the pro-life movement from the left is non-stop (just as the accusations they leveled at O'Reilly). The non stop drubbing makes it appear that the pro-life group has been actively engaged in violent jihad all along in order to stop a woman's right to choose.

But let us look at some facts:According to recent polls most Americans have indicated they are "Pro-Life" (the number is over 50% while 80% oppose late term abortions of the kind that Tiller specialized).

That is roughly 150 million people that the left call terrorists. It has been 36 years since a handful of black robed individuals foisted upon this country without the ability to vote on it a right to murder innocent human beings. In the same 36 year period there have only been 5 abortion doctors killed. In a country (US) where there are less than .05% Muslim, 19 muslims killed thousands of innocent Americans in 1 day (9/11).

Furthermore in this same 36 year span of time there have been 49 million innocents killed in the US and Dr. Tiller bragged that he performed 60,000 of those. The numbers say 49 million murdered to 5. Even one murder is tragic, but which stat would you consider to be a little more "radical".

I think that 150 million "pro-lifers" is a large number of terrorists don't you. They are a totally incompetent bunch of terrorist murderers if they can only manage to murder 5 people in 36 years! I think that the numbers tell us quite the opposite. That 150 million pro-lifers are decent humans that have absolutely no murder in their hearts and in fact are trying to stop it.

When Tiller's murder was first announced the first question that came to mind was "what church would accept such a man as a true man of faith". When I did a little digging into the "Liberal Lutheran Church" it came into view more clearly. In fact, if you look at what the ELCA doctrine on abortion it make sense why Tiller worshipped here:

It is a short read but the following statement explains how such a man of such horror can find religious refuge in this church:"A developing life in the womb does not have an absolute right to be born, nor does a pregnant woman have an absolute right to terminate a pregnancy. The concern for both the life of the woman and the developing life in her womb expresses a common commitment to life." The statement also adds:"The church recognizes that there can be sound reasons for ending a pregnancy through induced abortion."

These are the threat to a woman's physical life; when pregnancy has resulted from rape, incest or sexual violence; and fetal abnormalities incompatible with life."

If this is acceptable, how can the 60,000 abortions that this individual was responsible for even come close to the "sound reasons for ending a pregnancy"?

If so, Witchita is a very dangerous and dark place to live, let alone die in. How can anyone of sound mind think that this guy ended lives due to rape, incest or sexual violence or even fetal abnormalities. You can't and certainly nowhere near 60,000. This service Tiller performed was outside the church doctrine of their own accepted reasons for condoning the killing of human babies.

It also makes sense that the Church condones killing because Dennis Rader was the President of the Church for over 30 years an we know how he liked his victims -- bound, tortured and killed.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Obama tells Muslim World that America is not a “Christian Nation”, Then, Obama tells Muslim World “America is predominately Muslim”

Then - America not a Christian Nation

Now – America is predominantly Muslim

During the election campaign, Obama and his MSM allies were outraged with contempt for anyone who dared to describe the Muslim part of Obama as racist and xenophobic. Just the mere mention of Obama’s middle name by those who dared mention it was met with lightning quick scorn until even the GOP and McCain denounced it also.

In order to get to the bottom of his Muslim roots there were those who wanted to see and verify that Obama was indeed first American and qualified to be President and to settle his birth country origin.

Instead, Congress quickly held hearings to verify whether or not John McCain was qualified for the office of the President because he was born on a US military Base that controlled the Panama Canal yet there were no such scrutiny of Obama when the request to look into his birthright.

The NY Times were happy to report about the McCain eligibility but nary a peep about Obama.

There are those on the left (as well as the Whitehouse itself) that say this issue has been answered definitively when Obama release the short form of his birth certificate on his campaign website. They also point to the affidavit from the Governor of Hawaii that stated he verifies that there is a long form in its vault and that the short form is authentic copy with Hawaii State seal.

The issue, according to the Democrats, MSM and the White House is settled! Or is it?

We all know that the Democrats like to spend money irresponsibly and Obama is no different which could explain the extraordinary expense he is paying to answer and fight the release of his long form birth certificate that Hawaii say’s it has verified it is in possession of.

Why spend millions of dollars to fight something when all you have to do is release the document that can solve the lingering question once and for all? If Obama was so quick and free to release his “short form” without hesitation then there should be no reason to keep fighting the release of the longer version of the short form, right?

Wrong, if and when he is forced to reveal the document it will show that he was in fact born in Kenya and that both of his parents were not legal US residents at the time Obama appeared in the State of Hawaii to live with his mother.

It will also show that he is in fact, Muslim. We know that his father was Muslim and that while in Indonesia, Obama attended a Muslim religious school.Now that Obama has taken the prize of office, he no longer feels necessary to reassure the American Public of his American roots and is increasingly bragging about his Muslim heritage as his true faith.

Results of the latest "Gallup Poll", Why can't you find it in the MSM

91% of Republican oppose

68% of Independents oppose

53% of Democrats approve

internal data of poll:

Large majorities of men oppose

Large majorities of women oppose

Large majorities of whites oppose

Large majorities of non-whites oppose

People with graduate degrees oppose

People who did not finish high school oppose

conclusion: Pretty much everybody opposes it!

What is the poll and what is it that basically everyone (but the democrats and the WH) opposes?

Closing Guantanamo Bay detention facility.

The new Chevy "Obamamobile

GM (Government Motors) name inappropriate, It should be called "Fannie Motors"
An editorial from NRO about the above title of this thread is an apt description of Obama's adminstration running the new "hopefully leaner and greener" company.
The name Fannie Motors is because the model that is being utilized by those in the Government is the same model of the failed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac one.
Who ever said if you don't know history your doomed to repeat it. The aim of the governments fixation on running the company is predicated on two goals:
1) to provide health care, benefits, and high-wage employment to the United Auto Workers union, and
2) to build the little green cars that President Obama and the Democrats want them to make, and the American people do not want to buy (at least not from Detroit while Japan makes them better for less).
In exchange, the Big Three will continue to enjoy implicit and explicit taxpayer support.
The article say's it best "As long as the feds are telling Detroit what kind of cars to make, where to make them, and how to compensate their workers, Detroit will require taxpayer assistance, for the simple reason that the feds are terrible at running businesses. And if you believe otherwise, we’ve got a couple of defunct mortgage companies to sell you.

Monday, June 1, 2009

Cuba, Che and General Motors (aka Government motors) - "The New Obama Rebels wanted it all, and took it"

GOP donor owned dealerships forced to shutter
Two seemingly unrelated articles hit the news recently. The first is the investigation into the dealerships that the Government is forcing to close seem to be related to the amount of campaign contributions they gave to GOP candidates vs. Liberals.

The other is the $1 billion court case win of a “Cuban exile” living in America against the Government of Cuba.

First, the background on the man who won the lawsuit:

“According to the Miami Herald – “Villoldo's suit against the Castro brothers and Guevara was rooted in the Cuban government's confiscation of the elder Villoldo's business and property in the early days of the Cuban Revolution.

The elder Villoldo, also named Gustavo, came from a well-off Cuban family. He studied in the United States, became an attorney and attended the Wharton School of Business. He returned to Cuba, briefly practicing law before deciding to open a General Motors car dealership and distribution center.

Cuba's upwardly mobile society of the 1950s purchased their new cars at Villoldo Motor Co. in the center of Havana. Soon, Villoldo's dealership expanded. Just before the revolution, annual sales were nearly $15 million, Gustavo Villoldo testified at at the non-jury trial.
''My father was a very good businessman,'' he said. By the time Castro rolled into Havana on Jan. 8, 1959, Villoldo's personal fortune -- which he would have passed on to his sons -- included the dealership, a waterfront family compound, a home in Varadero near the Kennedy family and another home in Baracoa. There were also rental apartment buildings in Miramar and Havana, a farm and other property.

The new rebels wanted it all -- and took it.

Guevara, who had been named head of Cuba's Banco Nacional, immediately began dismantling all traces of capitalism and eyed Villoldo's General Motors distributorship.”
Now, the background on the controversy surrounding the decision for which dealerships are being forced to shutter:

By now you have heard about the claims that there is a disproportionate amount of GM (Chrysler) dealerships that are being forced to shutter their doors and the amounts of campaign contributions they gave to GOP candidates. Sounds like a conspiracy theory, but Zero Hedge has released a detailed report with visuals showing dealerships being shuttered in cities owned by GOP donors around dealerships owned by Liberal dealerships. In these instances, you can see that the closure of multiple GOP backed dealers are in direct competition to the Liberal owned ones and by virtue of the closures gives the Liberal owned dealerships unfettered market access by eliminating the closest GOP owned dealerships in the city. You really need to see it to understand:

Obama is taking a play from the “revolution handbook because this is just like when Castro and Che rumbled into Havana and took over the only GM dealership and all of the banks.

From Latino Nazi to “Historic Nomination” - Estada and Sotomayor - A tale of two Latino’s

Maybe it’s just me, but are they related by more than idiology???
Hey, it’s OK to label the Supreme Court pick of the Obama Administration a dangerous, nazi with a sexist and racist bent. Ok, the sexist and racist bent is added on because we can call her that because of her 2001 interview where she stated her superiority over men, white men specifically.

What’s more is she mocked the constitution when she bragged that from her perch on the 2nd Court of Appeals bench is where “policy” is made and implemented.

The reason we can say these terrible and divisive terms on another human being that happens to be Latina is because the very same liberal groups that praise this particular nominee went out of their way in 2001 to call another Latino nominee much the same as I listed above. I am only taking their words at their root meaning. Sounds rather harsh doesn’t it, then how can the liberal advocacy groups that now praise this Obama Supreme pick for the fact she is Latina just a few years ago called Estrada a “nazi” and dangerous because of his Latino heritage and is practicing catholic?

Oh, but wait, we can’t say anything like that because the White House spokesman has threatened us on May 27th (on C-SPAN) when Robert Gibbs “warned Sotomayor attackers to be careful!”

The Praise

The main stream media is awash with headlines describing the Usurper President’s nomination of Sotomayor in “Historic” terms.

Estrada judicial nomination and the Durbin memo’s

Before I get into the praise of the liberal advocacy groups as that deem Obama’s pick as “historic” I feel compelled to remind the readers that these same groups that are now fawning over Sotomayor were the same groups that called Bush’s pick of Estrada “dangerous Latino and being a Nazi.”

Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, said, "Describing Miguel Estrada as 'especially dangerous, because ... he is Latino,' as suggested in these memos, makes my skin crawl."

It is believed that one of the reason for the “Durbin memo’s was because the Democrats believed that it would give Bush points with Hispanic voters. But the memos to Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin mention liberal interest groups' desire to keep Estrada off the court because his Latino heritage made him "especially dangerous" as a potential future Supreme Court nominee.

The other aim of discrediting Estrada and utilizing the fillibuster against him was to delay putting a body on the bench while an affirmative action case was pending (University of Michigan case regarding the constitutionality of affirmative action in higher education).

According to the Washington Times:

“The memos, apparently written by aides to Sens. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), sketch the evolution between 2001 and early 2003 of plans to filibuster court nominees perceived as too conservative -- "nazis," in the words of one unidentified Democratic memo writer. At their most pointed, the documents assert that a leading civil rights lawyer urged senators to leave vacancies unfilled on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit while a particular case was pending.”

“The story sketched by the leaked memos starts in autumn 2001, not long after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Staff members, whose names have been blacked out, use the memos to update their senators on the views of leading liberal civil rights groups -- including the Alliance for Justice, People for the American Way, the NAACP, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights and several abortion rights groups.”

The liberal civil rights groups (or as the Democrats love to say “special interest groups” that buy votes from corrupt politicians) that were behind the tactics the democrats adopted from these memos were schizophrenic as they were attacking one Latina because of her heritage and attacking another Latino because of heritage.

For instance, ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE (advocacy group behind Durbin memo):
On Sotomayor
May 26, 2009, Washington, DC—We are thrilled with this choice. Sonia Sotomayor will be a strong voice to uphold the Constitution and the law to provide equal justice and protect personal freedoms for everyone in America, regardless of wealth, status, or popularity.
President Obama has nominated a highly qualified candidate with a compelling personal story and outstanding educational credentials. Furthermore, the president is making history by nominating the first Latina to the Supreme Court. Judge Sotomayor has more federal judicial experience than any justice nominated to the Supreme Court in the past 100 years.
Judges make a huge difference in our lives.

Courts protect our air and water, hold corporations accountable, ensure equal opportunity and fair pay, and safeguard our personal freedoms.

This nomination shows that President Obama is appointing judges who understand that the role of the courts is to give everyone a chance to be heard, to stand up for their rights, and get justice.
On Estrada
The filibuster is a legitimate tool for the Senate minority to prevent the administration and its allies in Congress from packing the courts. To be confirmed, a nominee has to have an excellent record in the law, show honesty and integrity, and have a demonstrated commitment to equal justice. The Senate has a responsibility to defeat any nominees falling short of these standards by any means necessary. Filibusters may also be appropriate when the administration or the Senate majority disregard established rules and procedures. As a substantive matter, Pickering and Owen have both already been defeated, if the Senate reconsiders their nominations, they should be defeated again.

Both of these statements came directly from their website. Notice how this liberal group strongly advocates the “filibuster” (which the democrats did for 2 years with Estrada).

On Sotomayor
The nomination of the first Latina to join the Supreme Court is a moment that our nation should celebrate,” Jealous said. “It brings us one step closer to the inclusive democracy that is the hallmark and promise of our great nation. Judge Sotomayor has the judicial track record, the intellectual fortitude, and the life experiences that will serve the Supreme Court and our nation well.”

Said Jealous: “It is our hope that the Senate will not politicize such a crucially important choice, but make its decision expeditiously based on her unimpeachable record as an outstanding prosecutor, litigator, and trial and appellate judge. This is a valuable opportunity to show a reasoned non-partisan dialogue around a decision that brings excellence to our highest Court and will only move our nation forward.”
On Estrada
So far the NAACP has opposed the nominations of Jeffrey Sutton, Miguel Estrada, Priscilla Owen, Carolyn Kuhl, Charles Pickering, Sr., William Pryor, John Roberts, Samuel Alito.


On Sotomayor:
“Today is a monumental day for Latinos. Finally, we see ourselves represented on the highest court in the land,” said Janet Murguía, NCLR President and CEO. “Judge Sotomayor’s story personifies the American Dream for so many Latinos in this country.”

“By nominating someone with the experience, background, and superb legal credentials of Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama has made an excellent choice for the entire country,” added Murguía. “The President wanted a justice who not only is a respected jurist, but also understands how the law affects the lives of everyday people. Judge Sotomayor embodies those qualities.”

“We commend President Obama for making this historic appointment and for recognizing that excellence and diversity are not mutually exclusive,” concluded Murguía.”

On Estrada:

“Washington, DC - The National Council of La Raza (NCLR), the nation’s largest Latino civil rights organization, today reiterated that it neither supports nor opposes the nomination of Miguel Estrada to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.”


"ACORN members across the country are inspired by President Obama's historic nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the pending vacancy on the United States Supreme Court. Judge Sotomayor brings a wealth of not only judicial experience, but experience in the real world as well. As a longtime practitioner of the law as private litigator, public prosecutor, and judge, Sonia Sotomayor has a profound understanding of how the law affects real families in real situations.
"Judge Sotomayor's incredible history of rising to the top of the legal profession from humble roots resonates deeply with ACORN members who work every day to open up opportunities for those in challenging circumstances.