Terminally ill terrorist disappears from Hospital!

Lockerbie bomber apparently well enough to “walk about”!


Something is “rotten in Denmark” as the man who was convicted to life in prison for the deaths of 270 souls was released from his prison “on humanitarian grounds, due to his terminal state.

“Following the release, doubts were expressed whether Megrahi was as ill as claimed by MacAskill in his statement to the Scottish Parliament. The guidance on compassionate release of a terminally ill prisoner under Scottish law specifies that death must be likely to occur "soon"; there is no fixed time limit but a life expectancy of three months is suggested as "appropriate". The Labour MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife and a Minister in the previous Labour administration, Dr Richard Simpson, accused the Scottish justice minister of failing to conduct sufficient checks before deciding to release Megrahi. Dr Simpson, a former member of the British Association of Urological Surgeons' prostate cancer working group who specialised in prostate disease research, expressed doubt that Megrahi would die within the next three months and claimed that Megrahi could live for eight months.”

Well surprise, surprise he has survived his terminal cancer past the three month stage as well as the eight month stage. It appears that “freedom” is the best medicine after all.

Not only is he well enough to keep on breathing in his terminal state, he has disappeared from the hospital in which he is being comforted in his impending death.

“Libyan officials could say nothing about the whereabouts of Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi, and his Scottish monitors could not contact him by telephone. They will try again to speak to him today but if they fail to reach him, the Scottish government could face a new crisis.”

It appears that perhaps he was depressed that his journey to collect his 72 virgins was taking so long that he decided on finding a few living ones in the meantime.  Then again, maybe he has simply been "misplaced" because after all it is a "State run hospital like the ones Democrats are trying to bring to America"?

Democrats have “astro-turf burn scars”

I bet they wish they were playing on “real turf” -- oops, they are!


John Kerry – Fundraising letter sent out on 12/15/09

““Think GOP obstruction is bad now?” Senator Kerry asks in a fundraising letter sent out Tuesday morning by the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. “Just imagine what Washington would look like if a bunch of new senators – inspired by Sarah Palin and the tea party crowd – took over.”

Note: First, GOP obstruction? Democrat socialists have supra-majorities and do not have any fear of obstruction what-so-ever. Second, they can imagine what Washington IS going to look like come 2010 and they are fearful though deny any fear openly in the MSM who have their collective backsides covered.

“Either we match the passion and activism of these new forces in the Republican Party or they’ll be choosing who’s sitting in the Senate, steering our country’s course,” Kerry writes. “If we don’t match them dollar-for-dollar, we will lose Senate seats in 2010."

Note: First, the passion and activism is not coming from the Republican Party, it’s coming from the “grassroots tea party movement” who have overtaken both Democrats and Republicans as the “dominant ideology in the US”. Second, Kerry seems to think that all they need is more money (I’m glad he is so ignorant of the seriousness of the Democrats situation in 2010).

“If you think this movement is more circus sideshow than actual threat, you’d be mistaken.”

Note: Finally the truth come out of his and the Democrats mouth.

Republicans such as Mark Kirk, who is running for Mr. Obama's former Senate seat in Illinois, are “contorting themselves to appeal to the new Sarah Palin Republicans,”

Note: Once again Kerry is misguided! Sarah Palin may have run on the 2008 Republican Presidential ticket but has since embraced the “tea party” crowd as evidenced by her endorsement of Doug Hoffman in the NY23rd race.

He also mentions GOP Senate candidate Rob Simmons in Connecticut, who “has been running around the state with a tea bag hanging from his rearview mirror.”

Such tactics, Kerry warns, “might seem silly. But they’re working.”

Note: I thought that the MSM, Democrats and Obama supporters all dismissed the “tea party” crowds as “right wing extremists, nazi’s, thugs and paid for by big insurance”.

History of MSM coverage of this non-grassroot movement:

April 15th, 2009 on ABC’s show “Good Morning America”, Dan Harris said:

"The White House says the president is unaware of the tea parties and will hold his own event today"

Quotes from Business and Media Institute article:

“In CNN’s case, the network also became the story when one of its reporters showed contempt for people at the Chicago Tea Party, calling the protests “anti-government” and “anti-CNN.” One night earlier, Anderson Cooper repeated the offensive sexual term “teabagging,” which had been the favorite anti-tea party slur of “liberal” MSNBC since April 9.

National broadcast or print media used the term “AstroTurf” at least 12 times since April 10 to attack the idea that the protests were a grassroots movement of conservatives. Left-wing bloggers at BuzzFlash used that term to label the tea party movement as early as March 24.”

“Of course on April 15, some in the media were still doing their best to downplay the thousands of protesters rallying across the country. The New York Times buried its tea party follow up on April 16 at the bottom of page A14. But a protest of Afghan women in Kabul secured the below-the-fold front page spot.

NBC’s Chuck Todd wrote off the protests for “Today” viewers April 15 saying, “There’s been some grassroots conservatives who have organized so called ‘tea parties’” around the country. “But I tell you, the idea hasn’t really caught on.”

Perhaps Todd should have been attending a tea party himself, like the one in Atlanta that was estimated to have 15,000 people. According to the San Francisco Chronicle a Sacramento rally drew about 5,000, and Associated Press reported that 1,000-2,000 attended a D.C. rally. According to CNN.com “tens of thousands of people spent part of April 15” at tea party demonstrations.”

“Both the Times and MSNBC covered the tea parties with mockery, skepticism and in the case of the cable network – dirty sex jokes."

Between Santelli’s outburst Feb. 19 and April 14, the Times mentioned tea parties six times (several mentions were in columns) and disparaged or undermined the protests in five of those instances.

The Times went after Santelli on March 3 claiming he was “on the defensive.” That article by Brian Stetler described the CNBC’s reporter’s commentary saying it “appeared spontaneous to viewers.”



At least Stetler acknowledged that since the rant “dozens of ‘tea party’ protests have taken place in cities across the country, and some conservative groups are planning a Tax Day Tea Party for April 15.” That was more information than the networks provided.

But it was Times’ columnists Paul Krugman, Frank Rich and Lawrence Downes who provided the main attacks. Downes mocked a Northport, N.Y. tea party on April 7 as “a day for brandishing signs, shouting imprecations, and donning silly clothing.” Rich claimed the Santelli “bonfire fizzled” and Krugman called them “AstroTurf (fake grass roots) events.”



Krugman tied the tea party events directly to the GOP in his April 13 column “Tea Parties Forever.” The tea parties, according to Krugman, “have been the subject of considerable mockery, and rightly so.”



Questioning the motivation and sincerity, Krugman wrote that “it turns out that the tea parties don’t represent a spontaneous outpouring of public sentiment. They’re AstroTurf (fake grass roots) events, manufactured by the usual suspects.”



MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow and David Shuster stooped even lower than the Times by repeatedly calling tea party protesters the offensive term “teabaggers.” One MSNBC guest cited the Urbandictionary.com definition for viewers unfamiliar with the term.



On April 13, Shuster discussed the tax day protests in a soliloquy that contained about a dozen separate oral sex puns. “But in our fourth story tonight: It’s going to be teabagging day for the right-wing and they’re going nuts for it. Thousands of them whipped out the festivities early this past weekend, and while the parties are officially toothless, the teabaggers are full-throated about their goals,” Shuster said in part.



But even Shuster’s filthy monologue was tame compared to Maddow’s April 9 exchange with Air America radio contributor (and former Wonkette) Ana Marie Cox. The duo used the word “teabag” at least 51 times in a in a 13-minute long segment of bad “teabag” puns.



Both Shuster and Cox were lost in juvenile criticism and ignored the reason there is discontent from the conservative base.”





So, now Kerry and the Democrat Senatorial Campaign are sending out fundraising letters that acknowledge the dangers of the movement against them. The only thing is, they think that it is coming from the Republicans which it is not. It is coming from conservative individuals who are not aligned with big business lobby groups or insurance companies. Both Republican and Democrats should be worried, very, very worried in the next 10 months because they are all dead “politically”, they just don’t realize it.

Rick Santelli started the phenomina on Febuary 19th, 2009 and in 10 months time has eclipsed the "two party" monopoly that the Democrats and Republicans have held for over 200+ years.  What the left and their allies have ignored (in hopes it would just go away) has blossomed into a political class of Americans that do not know the word "political party" and are following their conservative principles that dominate the landscape.  They are mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters of all colors, shapes and sizes.  They are Conservative Americans first and foremost who believe the Constitution to be a sacred document not a living breathing on to change or ignore at will.  The sleeping giant has truly awakened and is about to crush anyone or anything in their way to recapturing the greatness of this country that results in freedom from tyranny.

The terror triangle that John Brennan will try to cover-up!

Ft. Hood shooter’s “six degrees of separation” to Toronto 18” group


We were told immediately following the Ft. Hood terror attack to please, oh please, “don’t rush to judgment” (because the US Government hasn’t had time to cover it up).

At first, all we knew was “a few soldiers” shot and killed people on the base. Then we find out it was two and one had a Muslim name.

Next, we find out that it was only one (the Muslim sounding name) and that he had killed 12 fellow soldiers and was then killed by Base security.

During this time, DHS head Janet Napalitano was overseas in an Islamic Country and telling the world that we will not allow a backlash. Again, with the pleas for patience until the authorities perform their investigation. Oh, at this time eyewitnesses start to tell the press that Hassan yelled “Allah Akbar” (God is great) before and during his rampage.

Please, oh please, do not jump to any conclusions.

Next, we learn that Hassan has told fellow soldiers that it is the right of Muslims to fight the infidels and that Jihad is justified.

Please, oh please, do not jump to any conclusions.

Obama then announced that his “crack” Whitehouse Homeland Security guy (Brennan) is on the job and will hold a complete top to bottom review to learn the who, what, where and why’s to make damn certain this can never happen again (even though in 2004 Brennan had testified before the 9/11 Commission that all intelligence agencies are now communicating information because they now sit side by side under one roof to make damn certain this will never happen again).

Please, oh please, do not jump to any conclusions and by the way Congress please stand down because we have the situation under control and Brennan’s first preliminary report will be submitted no later than November 30, 2009 (it is now December 16).

Next we learn that the FBI had two separate investigations on Hassan for his multiple contacts with the Imam of the Mosque he attended (which coincidently was the same Mosque that three of the 9/11 high jackers attended at the same time as Hassan) which the FBI deemed OK because Hassan was just researching an article. One of the emails had Hassan tell the Imam "I cannot wait to join you in the after life".

Please, oh please, do not jump to any conclusions because now we learn that this Imam (that Hassan, according to two separate investigations was in contact with) that is wanted by the US Government for terror related behavior, also counseled three 9/11 terrorists is now linked to the two recently US convicted terrorists that were members of the Toronto 18.

Let’s here it one more time “Please, oh please, do not jump to any conclusions”!

According to the Justice Department (and echoed by Brennan's past 9/11 Commission testimony and statements in June 2009 to SCIC):

"FBI Atlanta Special Agent in Charge Greg Jones said, "The radicalization of U.S. citizens by jihadist recruiters abroad is a very real and growing concern that the FBI and the U.S. Government as a whole must deal with. The FBI is charged with preventing terrorist attacks before they occur and we are committed to this task. Individuals engaged in such activities as these two individuals cannot successfully argue that such activities are constitutionally protected."

Major Hassan (Ft. Hood shooter) was in email contact with the Radical Imam (same one that couselled the three 9/11 highjackers) and comment about the convictions of the two Toronto 18 terrorists convicted by saying "The radicalization of US Citizens (Hassan was a US Citizen) by jihadist recruiters (Imam that Hassan and the 2 recently convicted Toronto 18 members sought counsel with is a jihadist recruiter). 

So how is that "fix" that Brennan testified about at the 9/11 Commission that intelligence is now openly shared in one room, agents from all agencies sitting side by side to prevent future attacks like that on 9/11.  Did that information sharing fix stop Ft. Hood from happening?  I am sure that the man Obama tapped to do the investigation, who openly testified the problem fixed, will be an objective investigator when the information will show he was wrong then, as he is now.

But, hey -- Let's not jump to any conclusions, right?

One final thought on the FBI's determination that:

 "The FBI also said the investigation includes forensic examinations of Hasan's computers and any of his Internet activity in hopes of gaining insight into his motivation....


...agents and analysts reviewed unspecified communications between Hasan and the unidentified subject of the investigation, and determined that the content of those communications was consistent with research being conducted by Maj. Hasan in his position as a psychiatrist at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.

“Because the content of the communications was explainable by his research and nothing else derogatory was found, the JTTF concluded that Major Hasan was not involved in terrorist activities or terrorist planning,” the statement said. “Other communications that the FBI was aware of were similar to the ones reviewed by the JTTF.”

I find it amazing that a defendant in a "child porn" sting can say that the imaged on their computers were research for an article, or book which has been the case and in every instance were found guilty never-the-less.  Only when you are Muslim, killing Americans on American soil can you get away with that excuse.

Is it US or them?

Islamic terror intelligence capabilities at work?


Yesterday, I posted an article at “America’s Living Room” titled “Open Letter to Joint Chiefs of Staff”. Within moments I received a three “hits” to the article and I mean quickly. Too quickly, if you know what I mean! The first was located in Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan (IP 110.37.29.11) followed 15 seconds later located in Singapore, Singapore (IP 119.74.216.241) and finally again, in Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan (IP 58.27.159.153) 10 seconds later.

All three zeroed in to this specific article. This information was, to me, startling. I was not so alarmed that I was visited by three different Islamic States, but startled because of how quickly they “sniffed” out the obvious “key words” in my article title “Joint Chiefs of Staff”.

The Punjab province in Lahore is teaming with al Qaida hideouts and it is not unreasonable to think that the CIA may have a station there in their midst. On the other hand we know that terrorist utilize a wide array of electronics to communicate and ply their deadly craft of death so it is not unreasonable to also think that they have a sophisticated “sniffer type” software to monitor us.

The FBI had control of “Project Carnivore” until its purported abandonment due to civil liberty concerns and the subsequent availability of more sophisticated commercial software called NarusInsight.

The question I have in the “sniffer” action against “America’s Living Room” is, was US or them?

The unraveling of America’s two party system!

Why Rush Limbaugh is wrong.


Lately, on the Rush Limbaugh show (as well as other so-called conservative talk radio shows) there has been an attempt to dissuade “tea party” growth due to the danger that voting for any tea party candidates would hand Democrats another victory in 2010.

I say hogwash! The GOP is worried and rightly so. They are trying to convince us that “third parties” are spoilers at best.

In a recent Rasmussen generic poll comparing Democrat, Republican and Tea Party support it shows that the GOP has lost its dominance in power to the Tea Party movement. In response they are pushing the “third party” myth to scare voters into coming back to their ranks as the only viable means to defeat socialism.

Americans are sick and tired of Democrats and Republicans and this poll show this trend. The GOP is so much like the Democrats in political philosophy that these Americans are paying such close attention to individuals vs. political affiliation that both Democrats and Republicans are worried.

According to Rasmussen:

“Running under the Tea Party brand may be better in congressional races than being a Republican. In a three-way Generic Ballot test, the latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds Democrats attracting 36% of the vote. The Tea Party candidate picks up 23%, and Republicans finish third at 18%. Another 22% are undecided.


Among voters not affiliated with either major party, the Tea Party comes out on top. Thirty-three percent (33%) prefer the Tea Party candidate, and 30% are undecided. Twenty-five percent (25%) would vote for a Democrat, and just 12% prefer the GOP.


Among Republican voters, 39% say they’d vote for the GOP candidate, but 33% favor the Tea Party option.”

Limbaugh needs to check his pulse and compare it to reality. The reality is the GOP (which has lost its dominance) needs to say that “if you vote for GOP Republicans then they will be the spoiler”.

The reality, again, is that if you add the paltry 18% of GOP support to the tea party candidates, then you stand at 41%. The 25% undecided voters are certainly untrustworthy of the Democrats as they are flocking away from Obama and Democrats since they elected him.

The hope and change he pledged, which drew the independents to his side, now see what they voted for and sent him adrift and the Democrats with him.

Again, according to Rasmussen:

"The standard Generic Congressional Ballot shows Republicans holding a modest lead over Democrats. It appears that the policies of the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress are currently enough to unite both those who prefer Republicans and those who prefer the Tea Party route.


Data from the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll shows that just 55% of conservatives nationwide consider themselves Republicans. Recent polling shows that 73% of Republican voters believe their leaders in Washington are out of touch with the party base.


Republican voters are paying a lot more attention to the Tea Party movement than anyone else. Forty-three percent (43%) of GOP voters are following news about the movement Very Closely. Another 30% are following it somewhat closely. Just 12% of Democrats are following stories about the Tea Party movement Very Closely.

Seventy percent (70%) of Republican voters have a favorable opinion of the Tea Party movement while only seven percent (7%) offer an unfavorable view. Interestingly, 49% of Democrats have no opinion one way or the other. Among unaffiliated voters, 43% have a favorable opinion of the Tea Party efforts while 20% say the opposite.


Forty-one percent (41%) of all voters nationwide say Republicans and Democrats are so much alike that a new party is needed to represent the American people. Republicans are evenly divided on this question, while Democrats overwhelmingly disagree. However, among those not affiliated with either major party, 60% agree that a new party is needed, and only 25% disagree. Men are far more likely than women to believe a new party is needed.

As for the voting preference, the Tea Party bests the GOP among both men and women and in all age groups except those over 65."

The Tea Party candidates are the first choice among political conservatives. Among moderates, the Tea Party candidates are more popular than Republicans. However, nearly half of all moderate voters prefer a Democrat.”

The thing that worries the GOP the most is that those who are Conservative (vs. Republican) are the top ideological group in the country.

Gallup:

“Forty percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36% as moderate, and 20% as liberal.”

When you combine the “Conservative and Moderate” the picture is bleak for the GOP. Even if disregard the “Moderate” from “Conservative” you have the same %age of disparities with the Rasmussen polls.

Don’t get me wrong, I like Rush and believe that he is right on most issues that occur in the political spectrum but highly disagree with him on this front.

Regardless of his beliefs, I believe that Americans will go to the 2010 elections armed with their determination to vote for the “Doug Hoffmans” that represent the “people” most aligned with “Conservative vs. Republican” values. Hoffman would have won, if not for the disgusting antics and misguided support for the Socialist Scarafazza disguised in “Republican” clothing.

Update:  12/17

When this article went to press and posted another poll came out that proved this point with new findings.  The Tea Party philosophy has now eclipsed both the Democrat and Repubican parties.  In addition, so has the Independents.  You can read about it best, here:

politeaparty.blogspot.com/

An open letter to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the military community

First, in case you have forgotten the oath that you pledged upon receiving your “commission” as an office in the United States Military:


"I, _____ (Joint Chief and Military member), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

“You will bear true faith and allegiance to the same!” These are words that came from our founding fathers.

‘Thomas Jefferson and James Madison felt that if they could not guarantee all rights, at least they could guarantee those that would not allow the growth of tyranny.

Hence the freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech!

To preserve these rights, the second amendment was put into place. This constitution colors all actions in our country, affects all laws, and affects all practices. Though sometimes our nation may have problems relegating the balance between rights and powers, it is the sole document that guarantees our rights.

And it is this document that our congressmen, our president, and our military are sworn to uphold and protect against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and to swear true allegiance to the same, above all other oaths.

It has come time to look to you to uphold this sacred document in this time of growing tyranny that members of Congress, Judicial and Executive branches are trampling. I am confident that of all public servants (to the people of this country and the constitution) you are the ones who pay the ultimate sacrifice to that oath (with your very lives if necessary). You have shown great courage on battlefields afar and have bled to protect the fabric of this great nation and as such you place high value to these principles.

The American people are in great discontent by the usurpation of the Constitution and fear tyranny is at our very doorstep. You are, in effect, our last hope to confront and defend us from it. Your loyalty is not in question and we pray that you follow your heart and your reason to identify tyranny for what it is and defeat it, for us, you and future generations.

Those in the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government who have breached their own oaths need to be removed for their transgressions which is not too difficult a task given their own statements of contempt for the very Constitution they have falsely pledged to uphold. America has always stood for strength and freedom for the world to see and slowly, like a cancer eating away at her body we are in great peril of death.

Sirs & Madams, we hope and pray that you will not follow unlawful orders that turn your sights against your mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers and neighbors from whence you came. You have the moral, legal and constitutional duty to right our course.

Sincerely,


Veteran and Constitution Oath taker of the US

Why I detest the Obama Administration

Many who read my blog may wonder why (besides my conservative principles) I hammer away constantly at Barack Obama, Van Jones, John O. Brennan, Rahm Emanual, Valerie Jarrett and most other Socialist Democrats.


I am an ex-vet that has always worked hard in my life. I have always been suitably employed in many different fields (Workers Compensation Claims Examiner; Real Estate Banking, Retail Real Estate Executive; Retail Construction Manager & Retail Facilities Maintenance Management). I have a strong financial acumen and have worked high level pressure positions where I have thrived and earned a very decent living. That was until Obama decimated the economy and more pointedly, the retail sector.

I have been unemployed now for a long time (with a fully disabled wife) and have exhausted my unemployment benefits (which were nowhere near the salary I am accustomed to making) and I blame the anti-business, anti-capitalist policies for this. I have never, until recently had such a difficult time obtaining a job. Don’t get me wrong, I am a survivor and have made the most of my downtime in researching and exposing the people I have mentioned above. I thank them for that at least. The longer I am unemployed the more time I have to devote to exposing these policies and the people who are behind them for if I were employed, I would not be so focused in this task.

I will continue to spend this time in this fashion and will work diligently to bring about the information that the MSM or most other blogs do not mention. I love connecting dots and seeing where the trail leads, it is something I am very good at. So until I can do what I am also good at – working full time in gainful employment I will hammer away at those who are doing harm to this wonderful country we call America.

Sorry for the rant. Just wanted to get that off my chest…….