The Benghazi Spontaneus Protest

The NSC admits that our intelligence networks had "real-time" intel and video as the terrorist attack was unfolding.

Is it had to imagine that the picture to the left occurred during this "real time' video of our Ambassador being dragged out of the compound.  In fact the photo on the right was purported to be the Administration watching the Bin Laden raid "real time"! 

There has been much "conspiracy" theory about this very photo as some believe that "Obama" was airbrushed into the photo given his body size compared to everyone else in the photo.

The current investigation on Capital Hill is trying to determine what and when the Administration knew the truth.  Isn't it ironic that the killing of Bin Laden was Obama's reasoning that "Al Qaida", as an organization, was dead.  The war on terror is over. 

Hat tip to Human Events outlining the timeline:

"On Sept. 11, scores of men with automatic weapons and RPGs launched a night assault on the U.S. compound in Benghazi, killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and set the building ablaze. Using mortars, they launched a collateral attack on a safe house, killing two more Americans, as other U.S. agents fled to the airport.


On Sept. 14, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the attack came out of a spontaneous protest caused by an anti-Muslim video on YouTube.

On Sept. 16, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice told the entire nation the attack had not been premeditated or preplanned but emanated from a spontaneous protest of the nasty video.

On Sept. 25, Obama at the United Nations mentioned the video six times."

WH Press Secretary, Ambassador Rice, Hillary Clinton and Obama all told the same story.  Coordinated responses abound.

"If real-time intelligence and U.S. agents at the scene knew it was premeditated, preplanned terrorism by Sept. 12, who told Rice to deny specifically on Sept. 16 that the attack was premeditated or preplanned?


Indeed, why was Rice sent out at all? She is not in the chain of command. Why she accepted the assignment is obvious. She wants to be Hillary Clinton’s successor as secretary of state. But who put her up to this? Who pushed her out front to mislead us?

The CIA’s David Petraeus or Director of National Intelligence James Clapper should have been sent out to say what we knew, five days after the massacre. As Chris Stevens reported to the secretary of state and President Obama, why was Hillary or National Security Adviser Tom Donilon not sent out to explain what had happened to Stevens and the others?

Looking back, Carney and Rice appear to have been used by their superiors.

Carney would never have gone out to speculate on his own about what happened in Benghazi. His line on Sept. 14 had to have been fed to him by the White House chief of staff, Donilon, Obama or all of them.

As for Rice, someone contacted those five TV networks to put her on. And the party line she delivered — the opposite of the truth — had to have been fed to her, almost word for word — by Donilon or the chief of staff.

Could Donilon or Hillary have been in the dark about what Rice was going to say? Could they have still been in the dark about what had happened five days before in Benghazi, when Hillary’s own deputy Charlene Lamb had followed the terrorist attack in near real time?"

Is "Atlas Shrugg" ing?

This morning the business world woke to some surprising news.  The CEO and COO of Citigroup resigned abruptly, without reason, just walked away.  The news has all the pundits scratching their noggins.  Why?

One of the leading guesses is that the day after the bank posted a strong quarter that sent it's stock upwards 5% is because of executive compensation rules imposed by the State.  $1 is all the salary and compensation the CEO was receiving.

Sound familiar?  Just read Atlas Shrugged.  Who is John Galt?  Vickram Pandit may be John Galt. 

Want to see real results of Progressives policy?

Look no further than Detroit. 

Recently the Police Union warned that their fair city was much too dangerous to visit and to enter at your own risk.  So, get a good look at the video below for a tour of things to come.  Consider me the "ghost of Obama future":

Forward - part two

On Capital Hill hearings are convened to investigate the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens in Libya and the failure of security that led to the carnage.  Keep in mind that this failure occurred on September 11 and the terrorist attack was perpetrated by Al Qaida.  So, given the facts that another attack on that date by those who attacked us in 2001, is disturbing to most Americans on many levels.

In the MSM this morning the following interview occurred:

"Maryland Democrat Elijah Cummings, the ranking member on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told CBS's Bob Schieffer Sunday that the committee's hearings into the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Libya were "turning into a witch hunt." (see "witch hunt below).


One must take into consideration the background of this "senior Democrat".  First and foremost he is a card carrying member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus.  Second, he is also the one who claimed that members of the Tea Party spat on him when he and his fellow communist sympathisers were walking arm and arm up the steps of the Capital building with Nancy Pelosi carrying her gavel the day of the Obamacare vote.  Third, at the same rally -- "Recall that in March, 2010, when the Obamacare battle was raging, following a walk through a Tea Party rally outside the Capitol, black congressional leaders John Lewis and Emanuel Cleaver accused the Tea Party protesters there of spitting on them and calling them the “n-word.” Media outlets ran with it, but then Andrew Breitbart promised a $100,000 reward to the NAACP if anyone can show a video confirming the charge. The $100,000 was never paid.

Nanci Pelosi, John Lewis, Emanuel Cleaver as well as Elijah Cummings are all card carrying members of the "Congressional Progressive Caucus".  This walk through a tea party crowd in solidarity to socialist values is striking in it's audacity.  No longer are the Communist's fearing the stigma of association.  More importantly the communists are at all level's of our elected government all the way to the top.

Allen West made reference to the CPC as communist's and the usual slander occurred from the usual CPC members using the "Witch Hunt" analogy -- McCarthyism is synonymous with the term "Witch Hunt":

CPC Co-chairmen Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.) and Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) compared West’s remarks to those of former Sen. Joe McCarthy, who “divided Americans with name-calling and modern-day witch hunts that don’t advance policies to benefit people’s lives.” McCarthy was censured by the Senate for the tactics he used in his attempt to root out Soviet spies and sympathizers during the Cold War.


House Oversight and Government Reform Committee - Mission Statement
  Our solemn responsibility is to hold government accountable to taxpayers, because taxpayers have a right to know what they get from their government. We will work tirelessly, in partnership with citizen-watchdogs, to deliver the facts to the American people and bring genuine reform to the federal bureaucracy.   So explain how communist's are able to gain seats at the table of "oversight" of our own government? 

The lesson's of 9/11 are of no consequence to the communist and their fellow travellers in the hallowed halls of congress.  It doesn't fit with their vision of moving "Forward">>>>>>

Code words?

Forward



In the MSM recently we have seen liberal commentators, guest speakers, politicians and all of the usual suspect fellow travellers talking about the same theme -- "Republican Code Words".  They are consistently implying the when "Republicans & Conservatives" use terms like "socialists; communist, liberal, progressive and community organizers" it is code words for "blacks". 

This "mirroring" (calling someone something that you yourself are) is a common tactic to deflect reality and to mitigate the truth through intimidation.  Of course when Republicans and Conservatives use those particular words as nomenclature in describing Obama and his policies as well as all of those on the left who share Obama's vision, they are talking about all of them in terms that they are "socialists, communist, liberal, progressive and community organizers" that happen to be black, female, male, hispanic, etcs.

That said, I wish to solidify this belief that Obama and his fellow travellers are indeed what "Republicans and Conservatives" label them.

Before I get into that detail, I wish to remind the readers that:

1) Obama and the Democrats have not passed a single budget, as required by law.
2) Obama and the Democrats have not given speeches or even imbued their policies, or laws they have crafted over the last 4 years that promote individual freedoms (which America's heritage enshrined).

For instance, Obamacare.  Personal choice is replaced by the expanded Federal Government over the individual to make decisions on their behalf.  Michelle Obama and her takeover of student nutritional guidelines pushed into the cafeteria's.  I could go on and on, but you get the idea.  The only thing that they ardently defend in that arena is abortion.  Whereas it is a personal choice for the mother, the unborn and soon to be exterminated baby has no say.

Now, a look at some scary details that will undoubtedly label me as racist for merely suggesting the communist connections and code words the left is actually employing for their quick transformational changes that are already occurring.

In 2008, Obama's campaign slogal was "Hope & Change" and the effectiveness of this mantra is inspirational. 

Saul Alinsky:   In Rules for Radicals (his final work, published in 1971 one year before his death), he addressed the 1960s generationn of radicals, outlining his views on organizing for mass power. In the opening paragraph of the book Alinsky writes, "What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be.

If the above quote isn't enough to give the idea that when you apply it to current events of the left and what they are advocating today and realize it is straight from Alinsky then there is more to convince you.  For instance, did you know that Hillary Clinton's college thesis was on Saul Alinsky?

Then perhaps another quote taken from Alynski:

"On page 103 of Rules for Radicals,


The organizer’s job is to inseminate an invitation for himself, to agitate, introduce ideas, get people pregnant with hope and a desire for change and to identify you as the person most qualified for this purpose.

In 2008, Obama and the MSM inpregnated a large portion of America with his desire to "fundementally transform America" meme.  Of course, the population thought he meant transform Washington DC insider political games, partisanship and kicking out lobbyist.  What we got instead, well, you know.

In 2012, Obama's new campaign slogal is "Forward".  Vladimir Lenin founded the publication “Vpered” (the Russian word for “forward”) in 1905.


One of my favorite blogs that I follow is "Hack Wilson".  Awhile back he had an excellent article on this very subject which you can read here!

Code word?  Coincidence"   You decide in 3 weeks!  American needs you to organize against the Chief Community Organizer"!   Throw them out, all of them!  They do not represent America or her ideals and heritage......

November 7, 2012

Breathing a sigh of relief, and then?

So, you wake up on November 7th and learn that Obama has been defeated and come January Mitt Romney will be moving into 1600 Pensylvania Avenue, or will he?

I've been thinking about all of the things that we might be reading from the press on that day and started to get that chill down the back of my neck.

Landslide - Team Obama lawyers fan out across countryside to contest election they say was illegal as it suppressed the vote.

Riots - In Los Angeles, New York, Philedelphia as angry voters take to the streets in protest

New Black Panthers march on UN with leaders of the NAACP to demand immediate investigation into voter irregularities

Dow Jones has the biggest single day gain in history as investor's frenzy of buying and selling is expected to continue as the cloak of financial uncertainty is lifted

Chris Mathews has on air meltdown, rushed to the hospital

Cher seen boarding plane headed for Paris

Israel attacks Iranian nuclear sites in pre-dawn strike

General Motors announces halt to Volt line production

The duties of a Journalist

A journalist's responsibility


A journalist is responsible for his job towards people, he has to respect their dialogue with ombudsman. He has to create idoneus instruments (reader's guarantee, pages for readers, spaces for reply etc.), giving a wide diffusion to their activity.

A journalist only accepts suggestions and instructions from the editorial hierarchy of his newspaper, as long as the dispositions are not against the professional law, against the national Italian journalist's work contract (CNLG) and the Ethic Code (Carta dei Doveri).

A journalist cannot discriminate against people on grounds of race, religion, mental and physical conditions or political opinions.

Circumstances that are not extenuating, references that are not insulting or denigratory concerning people and their privacy are only accepted when they are relevant to the public interest.

A journalist respects the right of secrecy of every person and he may not publish news about someone's private life, unless they are transparent and relevant to the public interest, however, he must always make known his own identity and profession when he gathers such news.

The names of the relatives of people involved in such daily events cannot be published unless they are relevant public's interest; they can be neither made known in case of danger to people's safety, nor can they publish other elements, that can expose people's identity (photos, images).

The names of victims of sexual violence can be neither published, nor can a journalist give details that can lead to their identification unless it is required by the victims themselves for relevant general interest.

A journalist has to proceed with great caution when publishing names or elements that can lead to the identification of members of a legal team or of the police, when they ma provoke the risk of incolumnity for themselves or their families.

Now that you have read the above Journalist creed, apply it to the MSM.  Do they (MSM) create news with their bias?  Do they diligently dig for the facts when it comes to Obama and his background?  Are they independent "watchdogs" for the people against their Government?