Don't tread on me

There have been recent controversy for those who display the flag "Don't tread on me" by a recent law enforcement seminar that will give officer's a "guideline" to recognize and identify "militia red flags" of individuals for scrutiny. The report was titled "The Modern Militia Movement Missouri MAIC Strategic Report"

Some of the "identifyers" to be utilized is scrutiny of those who have concern for the following issues of today and indicative of the potential for "militia" activity:

1) Ammunition accountability Act

2) Anticipation of the economic collapse of the US government

3) Possible Constitutional convention

4) North American Union

5) Obama's Universal Service Program

6) Radio Frequency Identification

additionally, if you fit the following ideological profile you will fit these"red flags":

1) Christian identity

2) White Nationalist (characterized as anti-immigration)

3) Sovereign Citizen (characterized as belief that US has shied away from Constitution)

4) Militant Abortion (characterized as anyone who is anti-abortion)

5) Tax resistor

6) Anti-immigration (characterized as anti-illegal immigration)

According to the guidelines in this report, this author is probably on the "red flag" listing.

I am Christian, anti-illegal immigration (for national security reasons as well as "rule of law").

I believe that the US Government has shied away (more like 180 degree turn) from the Constitution.

I am anti-Abortion (because of my Christian faith that believes that humans are created at conception vs. 3rd trimester of pregnancy or "first breath").

I am pro 2nd amendment and anti-ammunition accountability act

I am anti-North American Union

I am anti-Radio Frequency Identification

http://www.scribd.com/doc/13290698/The-Modern-Militia-MovementMissouri-MAIC-Strategic-Report-20Feb09-

But the reason for this articl today is to highlight the overt Constitutional infringements that our so-called elected representatives have been guilty of in spite of their "Oaths of Office" to defend the US Constitution. For those who are not familiary with these oaths, I will place them below:

Presidential Oath of Office:

Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight of the United States Constitution: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Senate Oath of Office:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

Obama Constitutional concerns:

1) In a 2001 radio interview Obama faults the US Constitution as not going far enough to redistribute wealth. He is currently rectifying this perceived injutice by the multitude of mass spending programs.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79225

2) In a 2008 video, Obama supports DC Gun Ban

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wu9jE1MnAE&eurl=http://www.nraila.org/obama/

3) Obama fights all attempts to release his "live birth certificate". On January 20, Obama took his oath of office and pledged to uphold constitution. Therefore, since he is intimately aware of his citizenship (as foreign) then he lied under oath. Of course this will have to wressled out of his hands in order to prove. The current cases that are pending will probably do so sometime in the future.

4) Obama did not read the "porkulous" stimulous bill that he rushed through the House and Senate and therefore is in violation of the US Constitution if there are constitutionally questionable language in it. Likewise the US House and Senate members that voted and failed to read it (as they Demcrats admitted) are also guilty. The biggest question now is have they still failed to read it (post legislation) as there has been ample time to do so since it's passage into law.

5) If Obama signs the retro-active AIG tax takeaway from the executive bonuses he will be doing so with the knowledge that it is unconstitutional to do so, after all he is a Harvard graduated lawyer.

It is no surprise that this country is going down the tubes of tyranny with the complicity of our so-called elected representatives. God help us all